Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Quagmire: Paris | Main | California Voter? Here's A Guide To The Ballot Initiatives »
November 03, 2005

The Reason For The Dems' Revolting?

Yes, they've always been revolting. Now they're just acting up and need a time-out.

A very interesting thing was reported by Mort Kondracke on Brit Hume yesterday. It's very interesting indeed, but I'm not sure I completely understand what the heck he was trying to say.

Apparently the Dems don't like the way "Phase II" of the intelligence investigation is going -- Intelligence staffers drew up a list of quotes from Bush Administration officials and Republican and Democratic politicians making the case for war, and evaluated each as to what intelligence they were based on.

The tricksy bit? None of the quotes carried an attribution to a particular person. So, Mort said, if you made a big deal about a quote, you might find out that it was made by a Democrat-- or even by yourself.

I'm not sure I buy that-- I imagine that anyone on the Hill can run a Lexis/Nexus search and discover who said what. I imagine the real objection is that the Democrats don't like their own "twistings of intelligence" listed right beside Bush's, and traced back to the same intelligence sources.

But... interesting, anyway, even if maybe I'm misunderstanding it, and even if Mort Kondracke is misunderstanding it too.

Here are a lot of the quotes the Dems don't really want investigated.

Including, of course:

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.

- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

And, even better:

The intelligence which the president shared with us was in line with what we saw in the White House…

-- - Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2003

Thanks to JoeInDC44 for pointing out that last one.

How dare you distort the intelligence and make specious connections between Saddam and Al Qaeda, Madame Senatrix.


posted by Ace at 12:32 PM
Comments



I can't understand why Democrats are clamoring for hearings and select committees when their previous blatherings are captured on tape and can be played back to them to refute their current antipodal positions.

Posted by: tefta on November 3, 2005 01:10 PM

I don't think you are misunderstanding anything and there is probably not as big a difference between what you and Mort are saying as you think.

Without the names, Democrats really can't express any opinion or determination about whether or not any of those statements are misleading, for obvious reasons. You are saying that they don't like that it is being pointed out that they made just as many statements about Hussein and WMD. You also point out that they could just take the list and look up the quotes, then only find fault with the ones they know Bush made and that is an excellent point. I think the big problem they have, though, is that so many of the statements are almost identical. It would just make them look incredibly stupid (I know, that hasn't stopped them before) to determine one statement was fine, while another, almost identical one, was not.

So I think you and Mort are both right. In the context of a closed hearing, with the luxury of a staff with a little bit of time and computer access, they could identify the Democrat statements. If there are 50+ statements though that are from Democrats, the Senators are going to have a really hard time keeping those statements straight when they go on their chat show appearances -- especially when so many of the statements are surely almost word for word identical.

Posted by: Lorie Byrd on November 3, 2005 01:11 PM

Hi, just come back from the fetid swamps of the worst.stunt.ever comments. I bring news of the imaginary:

It seems that Phase II is the new Fitzmas Doom Scenario (FDS). Right now, its at level 2. There seems to be some confusion on the part of the looney tunes as to whats the bigger deal, the next 2 years of the Fitzgerald investigation (where Libby will "flip" and expose Cheney) or whether Phase II will be the next FDS for Bush.

I would recommend extreme incredulity once they try to infect this part of the blog. We don't want to have to listen to the rantings of a level IA FDS.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 3, 2005 01:15 PM

Again, this is the administrations fault, as well as the
Republican leadership in congress. This crap, Bush Lied, People died, should have been put to bed two years ago. All intelligence come from two sources, the CIA and the DOD. It's not like the President and the Republicans get to see the intel and then tell the
Democrats what's what. Everyone gets to see the same intel. In fact the Senators on the Intelligence Commity probably get to see intel before the POTUS does. It's like we are living in an Orwellian world where the future is known, it's the past that changes!

Posted by: Radical Centrist on November 3, 2005 01:22 PM

Hey! I posted that list of quotations well before deepdown inTexas did. In fact, I've been posting that list at several internet sites the last few days since the Dems' stunt. However, I found them at

http://www.jrwhipple.com/war/wmd.html

If someone is going to steal the work product that I stole from someone else, I ought to at least get some credit. An added plus is that the link above provides links to the news reports including the quotations.

Pass the list on and let's make their inclusion in Phase II unnecessary.

Posted by: The Raven on November 3, 2005 01:44 PM

Also check out this link:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/FF24Ag01.html

EVERYONE BELIEVED SADDAM HAD WMD DAMNIT!!!!

Posted by: Radical Centrist on November 3, 2005 01:47 PM

did i do that?

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 3, 2005 01:48 PM

What does she mean "we saw inthe White House?"

Was Bill in the habbit of sharing top secret intelligence - that he seemed to have little interest in - with the little woman? I mean his wife?

If she gets elected does she plan on sharing classified intelligence with her fillandering perjurer of a husband?

Posted by: Stephen Macklin on November 3, 2005 01:52 PM

Trackback not working.

Its funny how today they all act like recipients of retroactive infallibility. And guilty of the same crime Bush is, I'd like to see how they spin that.

Posted by: Stan on November 3, 2005 02:19 PM

Frankly what the demacrats are trying with bushes judicial nominations is revolting the whole demacratic party is revolting

Posted by: spurwing plover on November 3, 2005 03:17 PM

I can't understand why Democrats are clamoring for hearings and select committees when their previous blatherings are captured on tape and can be played back to them to refute their current antipodal positions.

Posted by: tefta on November 3, 2005 04:26 PM

Thanks for the link, Ace. I was wondering why my traffic spiked. The thing I can figure out is how anyone thinks that the Dem leadership is credible on anything anymore.

Posted by: Greg on November 3, 2005 08:57 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Recent Comments
Harry Vandenburg : "Posted by: JackStraw at May 15, 2026 09:49 PM (viF ..."

Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd: "I think the Philly tallies for Obama-Romney were r ..."

Cosda: "Could Pennsylvania gerrymander Philly to NJ and ta ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: "top pretending this is a north south thing. It's n ..."

Puddleglum at work: "[i]152 I was just reading about SCOTUS turning dow ..."

Case: "Just be happy for now the South is keeping us from ..."

IrishEi ?!: "I'm talking more New England and NY/NJ/DE/RI. PA ..."

JackStraw : ">>The NE are liberal blue states. That's undeniabl ..."

Harry Vandenburg : ">>The NE are liberal blue states. That's undeniabl ..."

Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd: "Stop pretending this is a north south thing. It's ..."

Common Tater: "Where big city populations overwhelm rural areas D ..."

Mr Aspirin Factory: "Holy shit. Horde mind meld. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives