Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Bastards: New York Times Defiles Dead Hero By Selectively Editing His Last Letter | Main | New Yorkers Alarmed That City Smells Nice »
October 28, 2005

Early Thoughts On Libby Indictment, Fitzgerald

Although my first reaction was a knee-jerk semi-defense of Libby and semi-attack on Fitzgerald, here are some second thoughts. Still tenative, still half-formed:

1) Libby is charged with misrepresenting, multiple times, under oath, the source from which he got the Plame tip. According to Fitzgerald, he repeatedly claimed he just got it from reporters-- under oath. According to Fitzgerald, too, he got the information from government sources, and he thinks he can prove that.

If this is true, then this is genuine perjury, and he's not being charged for merely having a hazy memory.

2) Fitzgerald answered my question regarding why the long investigation without any charges for the underlying crime (if one existed). He says (by analogy and implication) that he could not tell if Libby satisfied the criminal intent requirements of the laws against divulging classified information. (He says he's convinced Plame's status was classified, even if not covert.) Thus, while he seems convinced that Libby committed the "bad acts" of the statute, he cannot ascertain if he had the "bad motive" (crimnal intent, intent to harm the national interest, etc.) so that's why he couldn't bring charges against him on these grounds.

This would in fact be a fact-intensive inquiry, and would justify interviewing the relevant witnesses. So, if we take this as true, then Fitzgerald did not act in a partisan or overzealous manner by conducting this long, long, long grand jury inquiry.

So, as of the moment -- and again, assuming Fitzgerald is being straight with us -- Fitzgerald acted responsibily and Libby did commit some very stupid criminal perjuries, for which he should resign and be prosecuted.

I hope he can reach a deal; I don't really want to see him behind bars for a lengthy jail sentence, but, again assuming that Fitzgerald is being straight with us, he did commit the crimes he's charged with and must leave the government.

The Berger Precedent: Why is it that Democrats are offered sweetheart deals for serious, proveable breaches of national security, and Republicans are threatened with thirty years in the clink for perjury?

The Warden notes Libby should be offered...

A plea bargain, $50,000 in fines and removal of his security clearance for 3 years, just like Berger got. I'm sure this will be ok with the lefties, as they seemed satisfied w/Berger's sentence.

Won't happen. It's a Republican. Democrats get very generous benefits of the doubts, Republicans get the slammer.


posted by Ace at 03:47 PM
Comments



Agreed. A plea bargain, $50,000 in fines and removal of his security clearance for 3 years, just like Berger got. I'm sure this will be ok with the lefties, as they seemed satisfied w/Berger's sentence.

Posted by: The Warden on October 28, 2005 03:53 PM

Now how 'bout posting that cropped shot of Bbeck in the Ace of Spades tee? I need to be stimulated, dammit!

Posted by: The Warden on October 28, 2005 03:56 PM

I can't believe someone beat me to the Berger slam. Damn...

Are there recordings or corroborative eyewitnesses, or is this just three separate he said/she said recollections?

Sounds like a whole lotta bullshit to me.

Job 1 was to figure out how the hell Plame could have been covered by the statute. I thought that was already disproved by several different tests.

Posted by: Dogstar on October 28, 2005 04:04 PM

assuming that Fitzgerald is being straight

Taking so much of the MSM and rogue CIA dreck at face value looks like BDS to me.

Posted by: boris on October 28, 2005 04:05 PM

As I said in an earlier post on this subject:

"So who would perjure? Not any administration official. Rove and Libby and friends were probably advised from the start to tell no lies and that there was no crime. As a lawyer, I would be sure to inform them of that (and of their fifth amendment rights).

So, unless there is a desire to publicly embarrass themselves, there should be no charges against admin officials."

Well, I was wrong on the big question, but like Libby, I got it on the follow up. I was right that someone would have to act in a foolish manner, and from the prosecutor's side, it does not seem like a he said-she said scenario, but a "thats my story and I am sticking to it" scenario.

He should have just sat there and done his impression of a potato. Stupid.

Posted by: joeindc44 on October 28, 2005 04:11 PM

So...

Why DID Scooter give Judith Miller permission to talk if he was intentionally breaking the law?

Posted by: bbeck on October 28, 2005 04:15 PM

I wonder what happened to that vile POS lefty troll who claimed a star was added to the CIA Wall of Honor due to the Plame disclosure. Come out, little troll, and read this.

Posted by: spongeworthy on October 28, 2005 04:16 PM

He should have just sat there and done his impression of a potato. Stupid.

I find it amazing that after 50 years of Dragnet, Perry Mason, and Law & Order, anyone ever says anything at all to a prosecutor. Even if you never commit a crime, they'll back you into one through a purjury charge.

As much as I hate to say it, Rehnquist was probably right about Miranda.

Posted by: The Black Republican on October 28, 2005 04:23 PM

Oh yeah, Tubino came out and said she was a NOC.

Of course, if she was such a big deal, she should not have gotten her husband a junket with the CIA. And then the husband should not have gone to the NYT's.

The enraging thing is that the prosecutor started out this press conference with a lot of throwaway lines about how classified Plame was, but leaves it to the end of the talker to say, well "thats not what I'm saying."

Either way, its over. 2 years and they got Scooter because he tried to float a story to the grand jury. Sorry, no security laws or anything material violated. Have a nice life.

Posted by: joeindc44 on October 28, 2005 04:24 PM

*If* Libby is found guilty, the Berger Standard sounds about right to me.

Alternatively, if the left wants to set a harsher standard of punishment, then let's apply it to the next NYT reporter who compromises national security; if the Left objects, we can just remind them where we got the idea.

Posted by: utron on October 28, 2005 04:43 PM

Speaking of the NYT's, what about the outing of the CIA's underground terror airline system? That was a big deal.

As long as we are talking big deals, hasn't the UN Oil for Supporting Saddam report been published today?

All this media attention on the Plame Myth.

Posted by: joeindc44 on October 28, 2005 04:46 PM

Oh, please! How many grand juries out there are going on for 2 years looking into BS like this? This is not the even handled application of justice.

Posted by: Joshua Chamberlain on October 28, 2005 05:16 PM

P.S. Libby didn't take the Fifth because if he did, W would have had to fire him. And everyone would have assumed he outed Plame.

Posted by: Joshua Chamberlain on October 28, 2005 05:21 PM

I felt all along the whole deal had a stale lifeless quality. I'm no conspiracy theorist. Never have been, and never will be. But I honestly believe the CIA has been outed on this one. Whatever little pony party the Dems want to throw for themselves.

The larger shame is the Dems are cheering what I see as a very dangerous turf battle. One that has not enhanced national security. One can only hope that the public scenes, hide some rather intense beeootch slapping, taking place backstage?

The Dems ...... live and on the air, unaware.

Posted by: Elmo on October 28, 2005 06:18 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD wonder about the Chaos that Trump is creating in the minds of the Iranian junta, Virginia redistricting is pure power grab, Ilhan Omar is many things ...and stupid too! Amazon censoring conservative thought again, and the UK...put a fork in it!
NYT Melts Down Over Texas Rangers Statue Outside... Texas Rangers' Stadium
"The Athletic posted a lengthy article about a statue outside Globe Life Field, presenting a virtue-signaling moral grievance as unbiased news coverage." [CBD]
Important Message from Recent Convert to Christianity and Yet Super-Serious Christian Tuq'r Qarlson: Actually Muslims love Jesus, it's Trump and his neocons who hate him
Tucker Carlson Network
@TCNetwork

The people in charge [Jews, of course -- ace] don't want you to know this, but Muslims love Jesus.

Islam reveres Him as a major prophet and messenger of the Lord, believes He performed miracles, and states that He will return to Earth to defeat the Antichrist. That's why Donald Trump's painting depicting himself as the Son of God offended the president of Iran. It was an attack on his religion as well as Christianity.

Trump's trolling tweet was ill-advised, but Tucker is just lying when he claims the Christianity-hating President of Iran was "offended" by this.
He's one step away from announcing his official conversion to Islam. He literally never stops praising Islam. Well, he suddenly became Christian two years ago, there's not much stopping him from converting again.
You can track Tuq'r's official conversion to Islam with this Bingo card.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk Orban losing, but is it the end of Hungary? The Irish start a brawl, but is it enough, Pope Leo wades into politics, Trump calls Iran's bluff and blockades Hormuz, Artemis II! Swallwell is scum, and more!
People say that the bearded man in the video of Fartwell molesting a hooker looks like Democrat Arizona Senator Rueben Gallego, said to be Swalwell's "best friend" and known to take vacations with him.
@KFILE 21m

Politico is reporting that multiple people have abruptly resigned from Eric Swalwell's gubernatorial campaign: "Members of senior leadership have departed the campaign, including Courtni Pugh, a strategic adviser who served as Swalwell's top liaison to organized labor groups."

So the campaign is collapsing due to the truth of the sexual harassment allegations.
That hissing sound you hear is the air going out of the Swalwell campaign. UPDATE: No it wasn't, it was just Swalwell one-cheek-sneaking out a fart on camera
Eric Swalwell more like Eric Farewell amirite
thanks to weft-cut loop.
This is the dumbest AI bullslop I've seen in a while: the CIA can use "quantum magnetometry" to track an individual man's heartbeat from twelve miles away
I wouldn't click on it, it's not interesting, it's just stupid clickslop. I just want to share my annoyance with you.
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
Recent Comments
RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]ahem: timestamps: Posted by: Disinformation ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "277 I don't care who is funding who or what their ..."

kurtz: "This Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterparte ..."

Astroturf everywhere!: "270 Blade copy/pasting first comment is kind of ge ..."

Boss Moss: "Stevia gone. Tea undrinkable. ..."

m: "270 Blade copy/pasting first comment is kind of ge ..."

Maj. Healey [/i]: "It's almost like Pam Bondi was a worthless Fox New ..."

ShainS [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "Blade copy/pasting first comment is kind of gettin ..."

Commissar of plenty and festive little hats : "Dull blade ..."

XTC: "270 Blade copy/pasting first comment is kind of ge ..."

Rev. Wishbone: "I don't care who is funding who or what their affi ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]Meep meep! Posted by: Roadrunner at April 22, ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives