Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Paging Dr. Johnny Fever! | Main | James Bond Haiku Contest »
October 14, 2005

Three From Excitable Andy

The Emotional One calls NRO's anti-Miers writers "bullies" and tells them they can "go pull a Cheney," i.e., fuck off.

Sullivan Miers.

Scrolling down, he quotes The Metaphysical Girl Madonna "defending" religion. At least a goofy new-age/Old Testament kaballa/yoga "Energy" worshipping religion, at least. He's very heartened by that.

Finally, he makes a good point. A psychologist has urged terming suicide-bombing "altruistic suicide." Altruistic! Killing dozens of innocent people!

There are a couple of things wrong with this. First of all, of course, the dipshit death-loving psychologist chooses a deliberately positive word -- "altruistic" -- to describe the mass murder of innocent strangers. His point, such as it is, is that this sort of suicide (actually, homicide with an extra victim) is distinct psychologically from run of the mill suicides. Well, no shit. Run of the mill suicides don't have a bodycount exceeding one.

But he feels that this is sufficiently different to need a new term. Rather than choosing a neutral terminology -- such as "ideology-driven suicide" or "belief-based suicide/homicide" -- he chooses the term "altruistic," which is probably the mindset of the killer, but since when do we strain to look at mental disorders from the point of view of the criminally insane? Shall we now call "psychopaths" what they think of themselves as, "The Gods Who Walk The Earth And Prove Their Divinity By Taking The Lives of Mortals"?

Yes, here's a reasonable situation for the Excitable One to get excited. It would be one thing if this cocksucker proposed a purely neutral, clinically-nonjudgmental terminology. Instead, he injects moral judgment into his new coinage -- a judgment of full-fledged moral approval.

Unbelievable.

Oh, and? By the way? This really isn't that different from normal suicide in terms of motivation. Suicides are usually caused by narcissism, a desire to be noticed, and a desire to escape a bad circumstance. Considering the fact that Palestinians now frequently employ retarded teenagers as suicide bombers, it would seem that many suicide bombings are just animated by the same craving of attention and sympathy and need to escape as regular suicides.

Except, of course, they choose to enlist other people involuntarily into their suicide.

Thanks to Allah.


posted by Ace at 09:04 PM
Comments



Heh.

You get so many links from Allah, I'm starting to think this is an Islamic web site.

I mean, ending every post with "Thanks to Allah," and all.

Just sayin'....

Posted by: Russell Wardlow on October 14, 2005 09:47 PM

Maybe he should end posts like that with "Praise be to Allah," instead.

Posted by: Sean M. on October 14, 2005 10:38 PM

I think both you and Sullivan are slightly off on this one.

Altruism is a term used in biology, psychology, and other sciences to describe behaviors detrimental to the individual but beneficial to the group. It actually is a clinical, morally neutral term used pretty often in study.

I think the psychologist is probably guilty of a lack of common sense here, not realizing how his scientific terminology was going to go over with a layman who views the word differently.

In science, especially when studying the animal kingdom, altruism is seen as neither good nor bad.

I do understand your point, though. They definitely could've thought it through more. If not them, then someone around them who's a little more in touch with the average citizen.

Posted by: Robbie on October 14, 2005 10:52 PM

Wasn't Sully against Miers just the other day? Ahh, the joys of complete spinelessness.

Posted by: someone on October 14, 2005 11:00 PM

Andrianna Sullington --- an endless font of material.

Posted by: V the K on October 14, 2005 11:08 PM

Genius Ace, Pure Genius--- Connecting Miers scotus nomination issues to the the war on terror. I knew you could do this kind of gestalt analysis because really the Miers scotus issues apply to all issues!!!!!!! It's amazing how applicable the Miers issues are to the entire universe. I bet you could figure out how to use the Miers issues to help analyze calculus problems. And thinking of the possible scientific breakthroughs is simply mind boggling. Don't you think that should patent this revolutionary Miers gestalt analysis system before anyone else notices and steals it?

Posted by: john on October 14, 2005 11:41 PM

So if a solider sees the bomber in time and shoots him would that be "altruistic suicide prevention?"

Posted by: Chuck on October 15, 2005 12:33 AM

Wow Robbie, you nmight be on to something here!
I think the psychologist is probably guilty of a lack of common sense here
Chuck, you must be spot on with this one!

Posted by: on October 15, 2005 01:45 AM

The term "suicide bombing" has always rubbed me the wrong way.

Attrocity-loving muslim terrorists who blow up themselves should be thought of only as simple mass murderers.

To me it the suicide is a curious sideshow. Their islamic religion teaches them that dying during "jihad" sends them straight to heaven. I don't care what their monstrously sick and evil beliefs are, they just butchered dozens of innocents, that is the issue.

When islamic terrorists tried to kill as many little schoolchildren as they could in Beslan, that was not "altruistic". As far as they are concerned, everyone who isn't a headchopping muslim like they are is fair game, the more of us they massacre the better.

Seriously wake up, these fuckers are far more of a threat to civilization than the Nazis ever were. Hundreds of schoolchildren dying in Beslan is nothing, wait until Iran gives these people nuclear weapons and our cities start going up.

Posted by: Village Idiot on October 15, 2005 03:17 AM

Sorry, Ace. Sully may love Miers but you and your sycophants are the ones who needs the Freak-Out Advisory these days.

Courtesy of Beldar: Fisking NRO's latest anti-Miers manifesto

Posted by: on October 15, 2005 04:10 AM

Can I get you and Beldar a flashlight?

It must be pretty dark in there with your heads stuck so far up Miers ass.

Posted by: on October 15, 2005 06:19 AM

Yep, exactly the type of answer I would expect from a sycophant.

Posted by: on October 15, 2005 09:38 AM

Ple*se make up a stupid fake name.
All we need is one more of you anonymous folks and nobody will know who is talking to who.

The filter wouldn't let me post before because the word 'p l e a s e' is now questionable content.

But that would make sense on this stupid moronblog.

Posted by: lauraw on October 15, 2005 10:00 AM

The funny part about the Beldar post is after he finishes name-calling and insulting people at NRO for voicing their criticisms, he ends it with a plea for civility.

Granted, it's the "Shut up and trust the president, you sexist, elitist morons" kind of civility those of us who question the Miers nom have come to expect from the other side.

Posted by: V the K on October 15, 2005 10:24 AM

Sullivan is for Miers?

That tears it. The Anti-Meir side has won me over completely. Invertebrate Andy is one queen I never want on my side in a fight.

Posted by: Log Cabin on October 15, 2005 11:20 AM

What name calling, V the K? I read through it, and didn't see anyone called any names. Well, he did name some of them (eg: "Ramesh Punnuru" -- that's a real name, by the way), and he did use the term "guys." Ouch!

Just for the record, I always thought "name calling" meant things like "You're an asshole!" etc. Has the definition of "name-calling" been changed too, to something like "disagrees with me"?

Posted by: Andrea Harris on October 15, 2005 11:23 AM

PS: that post was by a "George Turner," not Beldar, and I may have missed what you are all talking about, as Beldar editing something "too personal."

Posted by: Andrea Harris on October 15, 2005 11:25 AM

"As Beldar edited out" -- for Christ's sake, I'm going for a walk.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on October 15, 2005 11:27 AM

Perhaps in Andrea's world, calling your critic's arguments "panic and hysteria" and making comments like "Nothing short of electrodes running from the next Associate Justice's knickers to a car battery at NRO's offices will satisfy these guys" and " neither can one find much inside NRO to suggest that its editors' and most of its contributors' minds were ever receptive to contrary evidence or argument" to be the height of intellectual debate. To me, it's pretty much equivalent to name-calling.

Posted by: V the K on October 15, 2005 11:36 AM

Technically, the term should be Non-altruistic suicide. After all, those of us who have read the Selfish Gene know there is no altruism in nature, and the bomber is just removing those competing individuals with whom he shares no genetic or memetic kinship.

Posted by: matoko on October 15, 2005 11:56 AM

This is not hard:

Suicide = killing yourself

Homicide = killing someone else

Use accordingly, in combination if needed.

Not hard.

Posted by: tachyonshyggy on October 15, 2005 12:59 PM

Yeah, Robbie's right. They use the word "altruism" to explain why behaviors that, for example, get the individual animal killed might still confer an evolutionary advantage by benefiting the greater herd. Greater herd. I like the sound of that.

And I still say someone ought to jigger the software to blurt out the IP of anyone not bothering to fill in the name slot. I'm big on anonymity, down on random, unidentifiable voices cluttering up the conversation. Pleeeez use a fake name, even if it's a fake fake name used to protect your real fake name.

Posted by: S. Weasel on October 15, 2005 01:30 PM

What does "pull a Cheney" mean?

Posted by: Duhggee on October 15, 2005 04:14 PM

Yes, V the K, I already said what "in my world" constitutes "name-calling." Nothing that you quoted falls under that category by the way. But then, I guess I'm talking to a hysteric. Oops! I called you a name. Oh deal with it, you big sissy. Oops! I called you another. Was that a twinge of remorse I felt? Nah -- just some gas.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on October 15, 2005 08:03 PM

We already have a term - Murder-Suicide. Been used for years.
Chuck - The soldier in your scenario would have been, in this psycho-psychologist's terminology an "Altruistic/Non-altruistic suicide assistant".

Altruisitic as he saved others' lives; non-altruisitic as he prevented the sucider (whatever) from getting his 72 what-nots.)

Posted by: Mikey on October 16, 2005 11:43 AM

I think "pull a Cheney" refers to Dick's confrontation with Senator Pat Leahy, during which the Vice President invited the good Senator to perform an anatomically impossible maneuver upon his Senatorial self.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on October 16, 2005 02:24 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
pawn: ""Most of the old soviet leaders are very concerned ..."

Skip: "AW especially if they lose, or win and think they ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks: "Its going to be a rough year until the mid term el ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks: "Shall I compare thee to a blazing Molotov cocktail ..."

Rev. Wishbone: "My great uncle worked for NASA on the Apollo progr ..."

Skip: "Virginia Marxists freak over the Va Supreme Court ..."

Maj. Healey [/i]: "Alex Jones seeming less crazy every day. ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: InZona at May 09, 2026 12:32 PM (XiTQh) ..."

doug: "and jazz hands ..."

Piper: "I am surprised people are seeing the Fosse influen ..."

Skip: "Read recently foreigners do think everything here ..."

Ian S.: "[i]May be something to that. One of the phrases th ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives