Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« First Adult-Rated Smurf Cartoon | Main | Three Bombs At Georgia Tech Part a "Terrorist Act" »
October 09, 2005

If It Worked For the Nazis and Soviets, Why Not PETA?

New PETA campaign hopes to turn children against their carnivorous parents.

Featuring a gory comic called Your Daddy Kills Animals!

Best bit: In an effort to convince people that fish are intelligent, PETA asserts that fish use tools.

Fish.

Using tools.

Like you saw in the acclaimed documentary Finding Nemo.

We all know from Blade Runner that having an insufficient empathy for animals is the sign of sociopathy and/or being an android. But it's also a mental disorder to be this concerned about animals. It shows some kind of defect in human emotional development. I know when I was a kid I found people boring and preferred cartoons and movies about animals. I think these PETA folks are in the same infantile state of development.

Consider all this insane energy that could be used helping people. Children starving. People dying of diseases eradicated in the westernized world for lack of immunization. Children used as prostitutes. Women abducted into prostitution. People being blown up by unmarked landmines. War. Famine. Pestillence. Human death.

Instead these people spend their time trying to save flounder.

There's a fundamental mental defect there. The empathy that should be directed towards human beings is instead directed almost exclusively towards dumb (yes, dumb) animals. I can't help but think that that stage of emotional development, when four year olds stop caring exclusively about puppies and kittens and ponies and unicorns and start caring about people, just sort of passed the PETA folk by.


Thanks to Alicia.


posted by Ace at 11:36 PM
Comments



My question would be that if fish are using tools, what would they be using them for? Maybe to catch and eat other fish?

Posted by: Tony B on October 9, 2005 11:42 PM

WHAT DO YOU MEAN I'M NOT HELPING?!?

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 9, 2005 11:49 PM

Oh, one other thing:

Don't kid yourself, PETA. If that fish ever got the chance, it'd kill you and everyone you care about.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 9, 2005 11:51 PM
Posted by: SWLiP on October 10, 2005 12:02 AM

Something about this campaign makes me want to go out and kill small indefensible animals just to spite them. Hell I think I'll just run out in front of my house and stamp on all those friggin slugs eating my expensive porch plants. Ammerikkka Fuck Ya!

Kaos

Posted by: kaos on October 10, 2005 12:34 AM

You know, it's sad, but I guess it is important that these kids learn, at an early age, that PETA is a pack of vicious monsters. What better way for them to find out than when they ask daddy about his fishing trips and hopefully end up going along for the next one to join in the FISH KILLING fun?

How the hell do they pass these things out, anyway?

Posted by: Sortelli on October 10, 2005 01:06 AM

The defect is self-loathing directed at others. It's like a double defect. A real nasty one too!

Posted by: Philip on October 10, 2005 01:17 AM

From what I've seen and experienced, the whole point of being a liberal is petulant, adolescent immaturity.

Posted by: Nathan (Chief Muser) on October 10, 2005 01:28 AM

I'm a life member of PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals). Maybe I can adapt to eating human flesh if it comes from one of the otherclass of PETA members. Na, too much of a chance it'll make you as stupid as they are.

Posted by: Scrapiron on October 10, 2005 01:54 AM

"...Many people have never stopped to think about it, but fish are smart, interesting
animals with their own unique personalities, just like the dogs and cats we share
our homes with..."
http://www.fishinghurts.com/

Sir,

The above is from PETA's "Fishing Hurts" website. It is seems to be geared
toward the adolescent activist/troublemaker. It has all kinds of fun facts about
fish toxicity and lobsters having an inherent fear of boiling water, bibs and melted
butter. Seems like a great resource for precocious kids to get facts to harangue
their parents and to produce anti-Rovian tracts for their Bush Administration Environmental
Holocaust class.

It has a link to a site called "PETAkids", which is oriented towards to
pre-pubescent activist/troublemaker. This second site has some real gems. Their
screeds are in quotes. My nuanced responses follow.

http://www.petakids.com/fish-corner.html


"Fishing is no fun for fish!"
Uh... okay.

"Write a story from the perspective of a fish. Tell how things look from the
fish's point of view. What things are important to the fish? What is he or she thinking?"
What is important to fishes? Other than advanced calculus, rotisserie baseball and
ballroom dancing, the only things that come to mind are eating (ironically, other
fishes) and reproduction. What is the fish thinking? "Eat (ironically, other
fishes), spawn, die". This turned out to be one of life's easier homework assignments.

"If your school fair has contests that give free goldfish as prizes, organize
a group of students to complain to the principal. Explain that a frightened, lonely
goldfish is no prize, and suggest stuffed animal toys or other non-animal prizes
instead."
I remember once reading that goldfish are so stupid that they make one lap around
the bowl and then they are in virgin territory for the next lap. My goldfish never
displayed a great intellect, then he ate himself to death when my kid brother fed
him half a bottle of fish food on Thanksgiving.

"Don't buy tropical fish! Fish belong in open waters, and they are frustrated
and unhappy when kept in tanks."
Frustrated? Unhappy? Evidentally they are capable of the same level of racionation
which engendered frustration and unhappiness in me over the Miers nomination. I
find this strangely disturbing (maybe that's the "strangeness" that Al
Gore was talking about when he went off his meds the other day).

"Send PETA your old unwanted fishing gear for use in educational displays and
anti-fishing demonstrations"
Now this is downright subversive. You know they want you (if you are an impressionable
kid who is horrified by your species pogram of the fish race) to go to the garage
while your dad isn't home and mail all his tackle to PETA. I cannot even begin to
fanthom the beating I would have received had I attempted this. Fish feel pain?
That would be nothing compared to the pain I would feel when Pops realized that
I gave away several hundred dollars worth of rods and reels to anti-fishing activists.

"If your town is holding a fishing tournament or other fishing event, hold
a demonstration, it's easy, and it only takes a few people. Make some signs with
slogans like "Hooks Hurt" and "Fishing Is No Fun for Fish" and
stand outside the event. Pass out leaflets (order them from PETA) and tell people
the fish's side of the story."
The fish's side of the story? "Lake Donne is a large body of water, 12 square
mile of teeming marine biodiversity, where fish are allowed to roam free and chase
their dreams. But there is a dark underside to this idyllic setting. Creatures here
live by simple creeds, such as "the big ones eat the little ones" and
"only the strong survive". Harsh realities in the food chain. It was a
hazy August day. Me and my partner got a report of smaller fish schooling over at
the submerged tree. We decided to check it out. On the way over, I noticed movement
to my flank. I saw something shiny. It was moving erratically, a sure sign of weakness,
fraility, vulnerability. It was slightly smaller than my head. I decided to eat
it. I'm a fish. This is my story". Cue Dragnet theme. How about the human's
side of this story? Asshole protesters aren't born. They are indoctrinated and formed.

"Some fish hide their babies in their mouths. At the first sign of danger,
they'll open their mouths and let their babies swim inside!"
Most fish eat their babies, because fish are cannibalistic, voracious killers and
don't have a real strong sense of paternity. In general, fish are pretty much just
fish-eating machines.

"Fish use their mouths for many things that people do with their hands: collecting
food, building homes, and taking care of their babies."
...and the number one thing that fishes do with their mouths? Eat other fishes.

"Fish have very sharp vision. They can also smell, touch, feel, and taste,
just like us. Plus, they can sense light, chemicals, vibrations, and electricity."
...senses which have evolved in fishes as they are extremely predatorial and these
traits help them capture, kill and consume other fishes.

I seem to see some common threads emerging here. Fish on fish violence. Cannibalism.
Infaticide. Unsatiable hunger. Fish are cruel, efficient predators with few moral
values and no sense of humor when it comes to what they do best: eat other fishes.

PETA was attempting to make me feel sorry for fish. It didn't work. The more I think
about it, the scarier they are. It also had another effect. All this talk of eating
gets me thinking that I'm hungry. I might have to run down to Red Lobster.

Courage.

rcl

Posted by: rcl on October 10, 2005 01:55 AM

I really think that they should set up an adopt-a-fish program. It would get us in touch with our scaly friends, and also allow for children to see first hand just how cute and cuddly fish are, and why we should NOT massacre the lot of them.

I would be first in line. Starting with a nice Alaskan Salmon, a couple of nice trout, maybe some big ol' cute tuna.

In fact, I'll up the ante. Give me the fish eggs. I'll care for them from day one.

Mmmmm. Fish eggs.

Posted by: JL Mould on October 10, 2005 03:51 AM

Fish.

Using tools.

"Tools" is the correct word to use here only not in the context that PETA thinks.

Posted by: Steve L. on October 10, 2005 08:04 AM

...and with no fish doctors around to take care of them, many slowly die!

What happened to those genius fish using tools? What are they using those tools for if not to help the other helpless fish? Perhaps PETA ought to spend some time trying to teach fish how to help each other. I am looking forward to the next comic in the series, "Why that lobster makes squealing sounds when your evil Mommy drops him in the boiling water"...

Posted by: Stacy Sofia on October 10, 2005 08:43 AM

Luckily the folks at PETA are so damn nuts that they have been remarkably effective at marginalizing themselves.

I believe it was Nietzsche who offered insight into the minds of such people when he argued that this supposed concern for the welfare of animals was nothing more than sublimated hatred for human beings.

Posted by: Jason on October 10, 2005 09:16 AM

me: dad, can we go fishing today?

dad: ok, but go put on a tie.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on October 10, 2005 09:43 AM

Thanks to Alicia.

Who is this Alicia and why are blaming her for peta's actions?

Posted by: Scott R on October 10, 2005 10:02 AM

When I hear about fish using tools, the first thing it makes me think is, "FISH ARE THREATENING MY POSITION IN THE FOOD CHAIN!!"

It makes me think we need tighter fish-controls, to ensure that the fishy bastards don't self-organize and mount a massive anti-human campaign.

It makes me think of a large-scale war (no pun intended), kind of like Starship Troopers, only with fish.

Something tells me that's not what their PR campaign was designed to accomplish.

Posted by: Phinn on October 10, 2005 10:06 AM

Quote lifted from People for the Ethical Treatment of Carnivores website:

"Some animal rights groups say that fishing is cruel."

Keep in mind some of these same people say that Linda McCartney was more than marginally talented.

Some activists say that fishing is cruel because fish can feel pain in a similar way to human beings. However, please remember that fish only have sequential, real-time memory of about ten or twelve seconds. A fish’s brain is, after all, the size of a sperm sample.

Because of this short memory, a fish would be traumatized by biting into a barbed hook… for about twelve seconds. After that, it would go back to its fish buddies and say, "Hey guys, if you see a worm just floating in the water, just be careful, because… hey! Free worm! I got dibs!" Nobody’s forcing the fish to eat the hook, okay? Any animal not introspective enough to question why an earthworm is floating in the middle of a lake deserves to be puréed into scrod.

Posted by: scott on October 10, 2005 10:12 AM

PETA is basically a scam. They proved it when they were caught brutally killing those kittens and puppies they were supposedly taking to a "no kill" shelter.

Basically, they extort money from corporations and rich, dumb liberals. All the real work gets done by dumb liberal volunteers. Then, their leaders get to fly around all over the world, attend lavish conferences, engage in street theater, and get interviewed on TV while drawing a generous salary. It beats real work, I guess.

I'm not too worried about it. My own kids (one of whom has his own blog, FYI) ridicule vegans, and even kid's programming like Nick's Drake and Josh have protrayed animal rights whackos as whackos.

Posted by: V the K on October 10, 2005 10:17 AM

I think most of the PETA jerks, when they get old, will probably be living alone in dilapidated houses or trailers with 87 ill-nourished cats.

Posted by: OregonMuse on October 10, 2005 10:20 AM

me: dad, can we go fishing today?
dad: ok, but go put on a tie.

Posted by: Dave in Texas

Laughing.

PETA hurts the cause by being so loony. It makes normal animal lovers look ridiculous when we get upset about French fishhooks through puppy snouts.

Posted by: on October 10, 2005 10:26 AM

me: dad, can we go fishing today?
dad: ok, but go put on a tie.

Posted by: Dave in Texas

Laughing.

PETA hurts the cause by being so loony. It makes normal animal lovers look ridiculous when we get upset about French fishhooks through puppy snouts.

Sorry about the post with no name.

Posted by: adolfo velasquez on October 10, 2005 10:27 AM


People who fly fish know that the fish's memory lasts only two minutes.

If you catch a fish and throw it back as most fly fishermen do, you can wait two minutes and catch the same fish again.

Posted by: Jake on October 10, 2005 11:00 AM

Basically, they extort money from corporations and rich, dumb liberals. All the real work gets done by dumb liberal volunteers. Then, their leaders get to fly around all over the world, attend lavish conferences, engage in street theater, and get interviewed on TV while drawing a generous salary. It beats real work, I guess.

Are you talking about PETA or the Democratic Party?

Posted by: Phinn on October 10, 2005 11:35 AM

For some reason, I'm craving Long John Silvers...

Posted by: Lipstick on October 10, 2005 11:36 AM

Phinn --- Touche

Posted by: V the K on October 10, 2005 11:37 AM

"Like you saw in the acclaimed documentary Finding Nemo."/


for some odd reason that made me laugh hysterically.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on October 10, 2005 11:43 AM

The "Your Daddy Kills Animals" comic is a parody, right?

Peta doesn't really put that out, do they??????

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on October 10, 2005 11:45 AM

One of these days I'm taking my nephews lobster hunting in Florida.

Or the Bahamas.

But, I prefer them grilled--the lobsters, that is.

Posted by: CUS on October 10, 2005 11:49 AM

RWS, it's another in a series.

You should see the one with mommy skinnin a bunny.

I made a joke out of this referencing the tie on daddy while fishing (they wear ties all the time down here in Texas when fishing), but the cartoon with mommy is interesting too - she's wearing a dress, and an apron (pearls too, if I recall), basically June Cleaver with a cleaver you'll pardon the pun.

Do those kinds of stereotypes resonate with kids? I didn't know what to make of slasher daddy, he looks more my 75 year old dad than me.

except for the tie.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on October 10, 2005 11:52 AM

As has been pretty much said already,
if the fish are so G-D smart; they wouldn't
bite the hooks.
PETA should be doing important stuff like going after people showing lion and bear cage-match snuff films.

Posted by: harrison on October 10, 2005 12:03 PM

Until your daddy learns that it’s not “fun” to kill, keep your doggies and kitties away from him. He’s so hooked on killing defenseless animals that they could be next!

The Onion couldn't make a better parody - is PETA serious?!?!? I like animals, but "fish are smart?" Maybe fish are about as smart as PETA folks. Crazy.

Posted by: markytom on October 10, 2005 12:35 PM

Everytime I read something on PETA, I get this tremendous urge to barbecue as many animals as possible, inviting all my friends over.

If the wonderful folks at PETA (not really) keep talking about fish, I am going to lobby for fishing with dynamite, or grenades.

Maybe we could start a group. How about Carnivores in Action or BETA (barbecue everything that's alive).

Posted by: Rock on October 10, 2005 01:15 PM

V the K:

My own kids ridicule vegans
I note that you didn't say "PETA members", you said "vegans". Not very friendly, if you ask me.

Posted by: SJKevin on October 10, 2005 01:42 PM
Consider all this insane energy that could be used helping people.
Ace, you forgot to add: Don't they know there's a war on?!


Posted by: SJKevin on October 10, 2005 01:45 PM

We laugh at PETA, and they are immature, moralistic pricks, but they do worry me a bit, too. The other side of the coin of their "pro-animal" B.S. is that they are fundamentally antihuman. I don't doubt for a second that they aren't sitting around and fantasizing about some plague eliminating about 90% of the planet's population. How long until frustration caused by their (self)marginalization prompts them to take more direct action?

Prediction: over the next 10 years, there will be more property damage and casualties caused in the U.S. by environmental terrorism than my Al Qaeda.

Posted by: Ayes of Death David on October 10, 2005 02:08 PM

Since fish are so smart, maybe PETA can teach them not to eat those worms on a hook.

You know, cause "if you give a fish a fish, you feed him for a day, but if you teach a fish to fish you feed him for life."

...wait that doesn't sound right....

Posted by: Tim J. on October 10, 2005 02:23 PM

Well.... That settles it.

I know what I'm having for dinner tonight!

Posted by: Sharp as a Marble on October 10, 2005 02:34 PM

adolfo velasquez:

PETA hurts the cause by being so loony.
Yes, unfortunately. As a right-winger who wants to end cruelty to animals, I'm very annoyed by PETA. Of course, a lot of people want to completely dismiss their own ethical obligations by using PETA's lunacy as a strawman. (e.g. look at V the K's comment, which is basically saying "PETA is crazy, therefore I teach my kids to be mean to vegans".)

It makes normal animal lovers look ridiculous when we get upset about French fishhooks through puppy snouts.
The main thing I find ridiculous is that people care about cruelty to dogs but not about factory farming. But then, dogs are "cute".
Posted by: SJKevin on October 10, 2005 02:34 PM

Fish using tools doesn't seem that far fetched to me. After all, they seem to need bicycles pretty badly. Or at least that's what all the feminists I know keep telling me.

Posted by: Tim Higgins on October 10, 2005 03:01 PM

I was an vegetarian for 15 years. I never once felt comfortable telling someone else how they should eat.

The Left loves feeling morally superior to "the masses" even if requires delusional thinking (re: The Iraqi killers are "resistance fighters" along the lines of our founder fathers).

Many on the Left like to call the Right fascists, but take a look around. It is the Left who feels comfortable telling you how to eat, what to wear, what car to drive, etc.

Ace's recent post regarding conspiracy theorists was interesting. Basically, it referenced some research which stated that conspiracy theorists are middling intellects who need to believe in conspiracies. You see, they "know" something which the unwashed masses do not. I believe that these radical animal rights activists are the same. Nothing like throwing a pie in the face of a "heathen" to warm your own self-righteous heart.


I am reminded also of a quote by the Buddha (paraphrase):

A man is not defiled by what he puts in his mouth
Rather, man is defiled by what comes out of his mouth.

Posted by: TheShadow on October 10, 2005 03:56 PM

You see, they "know" something which the unwashed masses do not. I believe that these radical animal rights activists are the same.

You really meant washed masses didn't you?

Posted by: scott on October 10, 2005 04:49 PM

"I am reminded also of a quote by the Buddha (paraphrase):

A man is not defiled by what he puts in his mouth
Rather, man is defiled by what comes out of his mouth."

Pretty sure that was Jesus.

Posted by: Knemon on October 10, 2005 05:57 PM

Yup. Matthew 15:11.

Of course, Buddha could well have said something similar. More than a little overlap there.

Posted by: Knemon on October 10, 2005 06:01 PM

You are right. The quote above did come from Jesus, but the Buddha also said something similar. (Although, admittedly, I quoted the more "Jesus-like" saying).


I have a book which compares the teachings of Buddha and Jesus. It is amazing how similar their teachings are in many ways.

Anyway, the quote I referenced:



There is nothing outside a person that by going in can defile, but the things that come out are what defile.
Mark 7.15

Stealing, deceiving, adultery; this is defilement. Not the eating of meat.

Sutta Nipata 242


Posted by: TheShadow on October 10, 2005 06:09 PM

"I have a book which compares the teachings of Buddha and Jesus. It is amazing how similar their teachings are in many ways."

I'd like to read it - can you send me the title, or an Amazon link, or some such?

Posted by: Knemon on October 10, 2005 06:22 PM

the Book:

Jesus and Buddha
The Parallel Sayings

Edited by Marcus Borg
ISBN: 1-56975-121-8


It is an interesting little read, emphasis on little. The format consists of similar quotes from Jesus and Buddha displayed on opposing pages. Therefore, most pages have only a couple sentences on them. Still, I found it an enjoyable book.

Posted by: TheShadow on October 10, 2005 07:00 PM

Wasn't it the great philosopher Basho who said: A flute with no holes is not a flute, and a donut with no hole, is a danish.

Posted by: Lord Floppington on October 10, 2005 08:51 PM

to the PETA jerks FINDING NEMO is not a documentry its a work of fiction and you PETA jerks should have those dirty wretched comics shoved down your throats you are the enemies of traditional faminies PETA should be disbanded

Posted by: spurwing plover on October 10, 2005 09:08 PM

Shadow - thanks! I'm off to Amazon now ...

Lord Floppington, yes. And while we're breaking out the yux:

"To be is to do." - Plato
"To do is to be." - Sartre
"Do be do be do." - Sinatra

Posted by: Knemon on October 10, 2005 11:11 PM

Think it's been touched on but my new bumper sticker is going to be:
PETA proof fish use "TOOLS"

Posted by: Bill on October 10, 2005 11:48 PM
(e.g. look at V the K's comment, which is basically saying "PETA is crazy, therefore I teach my kids to be mean to vegans".)

You could do much worse. You could teach them to BE vegans.

Anti-meat diets should be scorned.

Posted by: Sortelli on October 11, 2005 12:18 AM

Do worry about peta, in England we have animal right dipsticke, they "liberate" mink farms, dig up peoples grandparents for ransom and make the gestapo look benevolent, theu do not need disbanding, lobotomies would be more help. Are there any other sorts of liberals other than the rich dumb sort?

Posted by: chris Edwards on October 11, 2005 05:35 AM

Calling PETA "tools" is insulting to tools everywhere. Tools are good! (all this tool talk makes me want to go read the latest Snap-On catalog...)

Posted by: Rorschach on October 11, 2005 11:47 AM

I must say, it is very gratifying to have so completely gotunder the skin of a fragile individual, but in truth, I never taught my kids to hate Vegans, only that, having grown up on a dairy farm, I knew first hand that that intellectual capacity of a cow was not much greater than that of a broccoli sprig. Everything else, they picked up from South Park, in particular, if you don't eat meat, you turn into a giant pussy.

Posted by: V the K on October 11, 2005 08:04 PM

Next time you meet a vegetarian ask them how they get their protein. Pay attention to the shoes they are wearing, and most importantly, try and get them to poke you in that cool leather jacket you're wearing. Then you can ask if they enjoyed fondling dead animal skin.

Posted by: David Earney on October 12, 2005 12:06 PM

It is amazing how many vegetarians of conscience argue with you while wearing leather belts and shoes.

Still, while I'm not a vegetarian, I'll side with those who think we have an obligation of stewardship toward animals. We are obliged to handle them, as best we can, in direct proportion to their ability to experience fear or pain. And so I, too, am irritated with PETA for bringing howling discredit on any attempt to examine the relationship between people and animals.

And I think PETA is far more anti people than they are pro animals. I don't think the pair arrested in NC euthanizing pets in the back of a van and dumping them in dumpsters is a fluke; PETA has a very poor track record of pet adoption.

Posted by: S. Weasel on October 12, 2005 12:43 PM

PETA is a new age freak cult i tell you their against the traditional american family and any parenst who catches a PETA jerk pushing this junk on their kids should be allowed to beat the snot out of the PETA jerk

Posted by: spurwing plover on October 15, 2005 09:17 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]------ Just go really fast and blow the horn a ..."

XTC: "52 As with everything else, that was a choice. The ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i] Sponge, wouldn't coming through FT Worth be ea ..."

Aetius451AD: "Navigating a big rig through Dallas on 635, 75 or ..."

Weasel: "Navigating a big rig through Dallas on 635, 75 or ..."

Stateless - He ain't heavy, he's my dog: "Posted by: epador at May 11, 2026 11:22 AM (TRnzq) ..."

SciVo[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "The war on labor expense is a war on household inc ..."

PaleRider: "My dad was an OTR truck driver. The commiecrats ..."

DanMan: "The labor issue struck me in 1982 when the Plyler ..."

Ben Had: "Sponge, wouldn't coming through FT Worth be easie ..."

Codfanglers: "If we offered fentanyl overdoses as a means of exe ..."

Stateless - He ain't heavy, he's my dog: "How does one keep the toppings in place achieving ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives