Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Even Kosmonauts Sickened By Cindy Sheehan's Self-Absorbed Starfucking | Main | Hoist The Black Flag At 4PM ET »
September 27, 2005

Sentences Upheld For Parents Who Starved Baby On Vegan Nuts-and-Fruit Diet

Weird:

...the Swintons fed their daughter nothing more than nuts and fruit. In November 2001, Ice [the child; cool name, eh?] weighed 10 pounds when she should have weighed about 25. She had no teeth, underdeveloped and soft bones, and could not lift her own head. Ice is reportedly now healthy and living with relatives.

I have a question: Were these people so f'n' crazy they rejected the notion of even breastfeeding their child, as breastmilk would be an "animal product" and hence not fit for human consumption? From what I can see, that would appear to be the case.

How stupid do you have to be to decide, based on some kind of insane eating-disorder-cum-political ideology, that human milk is itself unfit for consumption by a human baby?



posted by Ace at 02:01 AM
Comments



This supports my theory that vegan diets lower IQ by 50 points.

In any case, I see no real "structural" social problem here. This is really just NATURAL SELECTION working as Arawn(my fav Druid god) intended it to -- MORONS will not produce viable offspring and thus be consigned to the ash-heap of evolution.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on September 27, 2005 02:53 AM

"How stupid do you have to be..."

Vegan. Probably Lefty. Say no more.

Posted by: rcl on September 27, 2005 02:53 AM

There is a very good chance that these people would have breastfed their baby if only, you know, the mother was physically substantial enough to provide milk to her own child.

My own wife was no waife after my daughter's birth but her milk never really came in. Maybe we didn't give it enough time... etc, etc.

But any mother so wrapped up in veganism that she inflicts it (yes, INFLICTS IT) upon her own babys is probably so see-through that she'd have trouble carrying a healthy 25lb baby. There is such a wide variety of baby formula on the market that I am sure these idiots could have found something to meet any of their special dietary requirements, unless anything "manufactured" goes against their sick rules.

This is just plain sick and pisses me off as a father.

Posted by: Joe Ego on September 27, 2005 03:00 AM

Regarding Purple's first comment, this has little to do with any sort of Darwinism. Veganism is purely intelectual. It is an idea that is passed on without regard to genetics. Maybe some people are more genetically predisposed to believe anything preached at them repeatedly? I don't know.

But you can't hold anything against that baby for the way its genetics relates to veganism. The parents are just plain stupid and they're going to jail for child abuse as the law demands.

The worst part of this whole thing is that Ice will likely end up back with his parents and brought up vegan after his body can survive the treatment, er diet.

"If God didn't want us to eat animals then why did He make them so tasty?"

Posted by: Joe Ego on September 27, 2005 03:06 AM

The parents are just plain stupid...

Stupid is clearly genetically influenced. Look at the Kennedy family.

Face it, the poor kid (who I have much empathy for since you don't choose your parents or genes) was doomed to be a hopeless retard with parents like that.

Bottom line: Clueless tards like this shouldn't shouldn't breed and nature, via various mechanisms, ensures the results will be unfavorable when they do.

Nature isn't "fair", never has been. If your parent(s) are freebasing skanks who feed you cockroaches and flat Genesee Lite, there's a pretty good chance you die in a tenement fire or starve because they locked you in a filthy apartment for 3 weeks with your other 5 siblings while they went off on a bender.

This IS Darwinism on a social scale, just like Socialism self-destructs on a somewhat larger national scale.

Natural selection isn't just biology or nature, its about "systems" in the broadest engineering, free market and social senses.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on September 27, 2005 03:53 AM

I'm just glad that one can be sentenced for being criminally stupid.

By the way, my husband is a strict vegetarian (not a vegan, but let's not get started on that debate) -- and he cooks the best steak for me. Also, it was his idea to feed lamb sausage to our toddler, because he thought she wasn't gaining enough weight. For =some= parents, their kids' physical well-being comes before promulgating their own particular lifestyle choices.

Posted by: meep on September 27, 2005 05:12 AM

Regarding Purple's first comment, this has little to do with any sort of Darwinism. Veganism is purely intelectual. It is an idea that is passed on without regard to genetics.

Ideas are subject to a certain Darwinian selection on their own. Universal celebacy, for example, never really lasts in a community.

Posted by: Robert Crawford on September 27, 2005 07:44 AM

If God didn't want us to eat meat, why do we have 'CANINE' teeth?

Posted by: Maggie on September 27, 2005 08:38 AM

I love the line in the story where the dad was given a reduced sentence because of his "reduced mental capacity."

If there was ever a more true statement, I have yet to read it.

Posted by: Mark on September 27, 2005 09:00 AM

So where was grandma and grandpa and aunts and uncles and every other friend, relative, and neighbor? The kid was premature but she only weighed 3 pounds at birth. There is no way they ever took their kid to the doctor for an exam, genetic testing, vaccines, etc. How easy would it have been for anyone to just drop a dime to children services to come check this kid out.

Posted by: on September 27, 2005 09:13 AM

1) These people were not vegans, they were fruitarians, and crazy ones at that. Understand the difference, commenters, please, before issuing knee-jerk rants.
2) Being a vegetarian (or a vegan, for that matter) does not deny you entrance to the conservative club.
3) For a conservative, religious understanding of the issue you could do worse than read Matthew Scully's _Dominion_. It might make you rethink that whole jokey "animals taste good" business.

Posted by: pandalume on September 27, 2005 09:14 AM

That should have read wasn't premature yet weighed three pounds.

Posted by: on September 27, 2005 09:15 AM

Fair enough, Pandalume.

I does seem to me that the vegan/vegetarian lifestyle is overwhelmingly a silly lefty thing. Please forgive anyone (including me, I'm guilty also) of assuming that a vegan/vegetarian might be a hippie airhead. Thanks, though, for pointing out that this isn't always the case.

Posted by: File Closer on September 27, 2005 09:27 AM

Sorry about my tone earlier. Many is the time that I've been told that eating soy and reading National Review were incompatible, nay contradictory, activities. Speaking of NR, check out Rod Dreher from a few years back: http://www.nationalreview.com/dreher/dreher071202.asp

Posted by: pandalume on September 27, 2005 09:43 AM

Oh Christ, if there is anything I do not want to see, it is a rehash of the whole Crunchy-con thing.

Please. God. No.

Posted by: Mark on September 27, 2005 09:57 AM

Just prove that the vegetarian diets so pushed by hollywood celeberties and PETA idiots just dont hack it they are indeed unhealthy so blow this out your ears PETA and PAMELA ANDERSON

Posted by: spurwing plover on September 27, 2005 10:02 AM

I love salads and some vegetables, but they are not food. They are what food eats.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

I'm actually pretty sympathetic to pandalume's arguments regarding lifestyle choices and political ideology. I've met some very conservative 'hippies' (I do live in Maine after all) and also met some very liberal suit-wearing bankers.

And "Dominion" is a fantastic book.

Posted by: Slublog on September 27, 2005 10:05 AM

I am absolutely mortified to say this, but I identify with the idiot vegan parents.

When my eldest son was born, we wanted to breastfeed so badly that even though my wife was not producing adequate amounts of milk, nevertheless we kept at it even though our boy was thin as a rail. We had read lots of material from the La Leche League and were convinced that we were bad parents if we didn't breastfeed. Finally, though, our doctor warned us that the situation was getting critical, which caused me to wake up and ask myself why I was sacrificing my son's health on the alter of someone else's ideology. So we switched to using formula from a bottle (gasp!) and our son immediately gained wait and health. This year he is a sophmore in college and eats like a horse.

So I know how it is to be blinded by ideology. I just thank God my foolishness was stopped before I did any real damage to our son.

Posted by: OregonMuse on September 27, 2005 10:19 AM

Slublog,

I'm an Oregonian, so I know plenty of conservative hippies, and even have a few hippy tendencies of my own.

If these people were fruitarians, that's an even deeper level of stupid. But for a vegetarian to starve a child like this would require that they be unaware of the myriad of soy-based formulas and other animal-free food options for babies that DON'T REQUIRE TREATING THEM LIKE CONCENTRATION CAMP INMATES!!!!!!!

I'm sorry, I have Absolutely NO sympathy for these schmucks whatsoever. I'm a new father, and even at this early stage in the job I get that the Lad's well being comes first. Period.

Posted by: Brian B on September 27, 2005 10:53 AM

Oregon, how long did you wait? We pretty much went through the same situation, but after about 9 days it was apparent that it just wasn't gonna happen, and we went to formula.

She's a college sophomore too, so we all pretty much got the same guilt crap.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 27, 2005 10:53 AM

That's what I don't like. Food choices as a political movement. Or, being so obsessed with food that you spend in ordinate amounts of time shopping for, planning, cooking, etc, in order to avoid certain foods. To me that is what the hard core vegans are doing.

Posted by: on September 27, 2005 10:56 AM

We were in the same boat when it came to breast feeding vs. formula. The Lad was a preemie, so he never got the hang of breast feeding. pretty early on we resolved ourselves to a combination of pumped breast milk and formula.

I'm not sure where in this fine state OregonMuse is, but here in Eugene (Berkeley North), breastfeeding's almost a religion. Thankfully, the lactation consultants at Sacred Heart Medical Center had enough brains and common sense to remember and remind us that the baby's health is the primary concern. They were a big help.

Posted by: Brian B on September 27, 2005 10:58 AM

Mark me down as a member of the vast vegetarian neo-con conspiracy. Moral vegetarianism is one of the few beliefs I eagerly absorbed as a callow impressionable undergraduate that has stood the test of time.

Vegetarianism and veganism are perfectly healthy diets, if you (a) pay a little more attention to what you eat and (b) not be a complete nutjob, like these people.

Crunchy-con...I like that term.

Posted by: Lapsed Leftist on September 27, 2005 11:02 AM

Two comments -generally speaking- babies don't need anything but breastmilk for (at least) a full year, so if these nimrods had at least done that, the baby would have been better off.

And -at times - women do not produce enough milk (or have enough fat in their milk) because they 1) did not eat enough while pregnant 2) are trying too hard to lose the weight afterwards. This is OBVIOUSLY not always the fact, I just want to throw it out there. Women are not meant to look like twiggy after birth, and if they do - they might fail at the breastfeeding thing. I imagine a vegan diet - practiced by someone of questionable intellect - might result in a woman not producing milk with enough fat in it.

Posted by: carin on September 27, 2005 11:12 AM

Vegan's , even the "hippies", come down petty hard on the Swinton's.
This vegan blogger actually got a call from Silva Swinton asking for assistance in her case. That was denied. The blogger, however, got Silva's side of the story directly, The blogger feels Silva was just ignorant and and wrong, but well-intentioned, and that educaton could have helped society and the Swintons more than prison.

Most of the commentors are not as generous.

The dad's mental defect is apparently an IQ so low he is classified as mentally retarded.

Posted by: SarahW on September 27, 2005 11:33 AM

On a different angle....

If [literal] retarded people are going to have children, and they do, where are the people that are making sure they are able to care for their children? i.e. A social worker? A doctor? A public health nurse? A relative? A friend? Anyone? Someone must've noticed the absence of a bottle or a boob in this child's mouth as well as absence of teeth and/or absence of weight at some point before he or she (Ice?) was a year old.

I'm sure it wasn't breaking news when the court mentioned the dad was mentally retarded. Most mentally retarded people have social workers in the first place because---hey!---they are at risk for not being able to take care of themselves without at least some degree of help from others.

The fact that nobody helped until the child was severely malnourished and nobody noticed sooner is a shitty commentary on society-at-large.

Posted by: Feisty on September 27, 2005 12:32 PM

Hey! I have a college sophomore too!

Anybody have a buck I can borrow for lunch?

Posted by: BrewFan on September 27, 2005 12:40 PM

Brian B:

I am in Eugene, too.

Dave in TX:

How long did I wait? Stop trying to embarrass me! I hate to say it was approx. 2-3 months. We had a lot of stuff happening about that same time, we had to go back east to attend to my wife's father's death and funeral and some other things. I wish it had only taken me 9 days to wise up. I've been mad at the La Leche League ever since. Good info on breastfeeding, no doubt about that, but it's not supposed to be a religion, is it? Sheesh.

Years later on some blog I was reading, one frustrated mother referred to the LLL as "the nipple nazis." That sounds about right.

Posted by: OregonMuse on September 27, 2005 12:43 PM

Oregon, sorry, didn't mean to come across as badgering you. We didn't wise up so much as got some good advice from our doc's nurse who commended us for giving it a shot, but said "this ain't happenin".

My wife was still guilt-ridden for months, particularly every time our daughter got the sniffles.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 27, 2005 12:53 PM

Oregon & Dave:

My wife went through the same thing with both our kids. She gave it a shot for about a month, and then we bottle-fed. Then, of course, she felt like she wasn't a 'real' mom.

I appreciate all the benefits of breast feeding, but the way it's pushed has turned into a moral obligation, rather than a sound nutitional practice.

Posted by: geoff on September 27, 2005 01:01 PM

"How stupid do you have to be..."

Very. Note that even one of the judges was stupid enough to dissent, saying they might just not have known their diet was having an effect. What parent could fail to note that a child was severely underweight and not growing, and not take it to a doctor - at least that last refuge, the emergency room?

But it could have been worse. Recently in Massachusetts a couple were found to have refused their child proper food or to see a doctor, and when the child died taking the body to a woodland and burying it. Why? Because a relative had a "vision" about how to feed the kid.

Posted by: John Anderson on September 27, 2005 01:05 PM

rather than a sound nutitional practice

errrr - something of a Freudian slip, I imagine.

Posted by: geoff on September 27, 2005 01:10 PM

OM,

"Nipple Nazi's" Heh. Quite right. You know what it's like here, then. When I read articles from the rest of the country about people having a cow because some woman breast fed in public, I chickle. Here, they'll give you the evil eye for feeding your child in public for any source OTHER THAN a boobie. My wife still deals with guilt that she couldn't breastfeed our son, and the insensitive comments from well-meaning "progressive" Eugene Neohippies don't help any. I've taken the same attitude in defending her that I suppose parents in other places have to take when defending breastfeeding: We're doing whatever it takes to care for our child, and if you don't like it, go pound sand.

Posted by: Brian B on September 27, 2005 01:13 PM

Dave, I knew you weren't trying to badger me, my mock exasperation did not come off well in text.

I know what your wife went through. We have photos of our son from during those "lean" months and I still get a twinge when I look at them and see how thin he was.

Posted by: OregonMuse on September 27, 2005 01:13 PM

That's chuckle, not chickle.

Posted by: Brian B on September 27, 2005 01:15 PM

What?

Posted by: chickle on September 27, 2005 01:31 PM

I don't know if this is true or not, but I remember hearing that the first liquid that comes from the mother is colostrum, which contains the antibodies and such. That's pretty important.
After that comes the milk, which is not so much.

Posted by: lauraw on September 27, 2005 01:41 PM

Brian:

Quite right. I finally got to the point where I could say, "gee, I know I'm a bad parent and all that for going to a bottle, but is the La Leche League going to be here to help out when my son's heath fails?" That's when I said screw 'em. What's the point, to have a healthy baby, or to have ideological purity?

And still my wife had to endure the "oh, you didn't do this right" or "you didn't do that right" second-guessing from the nipple nazis but by then their admonitions were falling on deaf ears. Like you said, they can pound sand.

And on another subject, didn't you used to work at Stream?

Posted by: OregonMuse on September 27, 2005 01:46 PM

OM,
*shudder* Promise me you will never speak of that place again.

Posted by: Brian B on September 27, 2005 02:34 PM

That's a heartbreaking story, but those folks are as much vegans as Fred Phelps is a Christian.

Posted by: Nels Nelson on September 27, 2005 03:44 PM

I've got a good story about this kind of Vegan stupidity.

See here, if you like.

Posted by: Grim on September 27, 2005 03:46 PM

What "good intentions" justify starving your child? Please describe them to me. More liberal crap.

Posted by: robert108 on September 27, 2005 05:15 PM

Okay, so what sort of Vegan diet would a baby thrive on?

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on September 27, 2005 06:59 PM

Okay, so what sort of Vegan diet would a baby thrive on?

As if those diapers didn't stink enough, sigh.

Posted by: on September 27, 2005 07:46 PM

In my experience, people who are vegetarian for "moral" reasons sure like to pretend that they're doing it for "healthy" reasons instead of acknowledging that they're trying to cheat their natural biology for the sake of ideology.

Posted by: Sortelli on September 27, 2005 07:48 PM

But it could have been worse. Recently in Massachusetts a couple were found to have refused their child proper food or to see a doctor, and when the child died taking the body to a woodland and burying it. Why? Because a relative had a "vision" about how to feed the kid.

You sure that didn't have something to do with a cult and sexual jealousy?

Posted by: on September 27, 2005 07:48 PM

bbeck, my daughter is now two-and-a-half and around the 95th percentile for her height. Her language, memory, and creativity seem advanced compared to other children her age. A typical day of food looks something like the following:

Breakfast: Cheerios w/ fortified rice milk.

Lunch: macaroni and fake cheese made from nutritional yeast; additional oil

Supper: udon soup (noodles) with tofu and mushrooms

Before Bed: soy yogurt w/ crushed multi-vitamin

Snacks: cashews, banana, blueberries, carrots, cookies

Drinks: water, vanilla/chocolate soy milk

Posted by: Nels Nelson on September 27, 2005 08:05 PM

Nels, I was asking about a baby.

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on September 28, 2005 12:09 AM

Sorry, bbeck, I misunderstood. Breast milk is vegan, plus there are soy-based formulas for those who prefer that route.

Posted by: Nels Nelson on September 28, 2005 01:32 AM

"they're trying to cheat their natural biology for the sake of ideology."

Pretty good thumbnail definition of marriage, though - actually, of society itself.

Posted by: Knemon on September 28, 2005 08:04 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_

NEW: Just heard something extraordinary from a former White House official who worked with former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in Trump45's NSC: "McMaster had weekly phone calls with George Soros. We have no idea why." Neither could be reached for comment.
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton dissect the Iran treaty but praise the great U.S. military, decry the deep state's influence on SAVE and FISA, talk marijuana and guns, mock the Northeast's racism, and Go Knicks!
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Recent Comments
polynikes: "The Hart family (the victims) are Black, by the wa ..."

Schumer is a piece of shit: ""Schumer is a piece of shit. Posted by: four se ..."

POS: "[i]Schumer is a piece of shit. Posted by: four se ..."

Amy Schumer: ">>> 113 Schumer is a piece of shit. Posted b ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "101 Oddly Abby Hoffman committed suicide soon afte ..."

four seasons: " Schumer is a piece of shit. ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " Another look at the Obama building: https:/ ..."

Duncanthrax: ""This is a horrible thing, the SAVE Act, one of th ..."

Blonde Morticia: " top result was 'Is Obama behind the group that p ..."

ChrisW: "So we can say "gay marriage doesn't exist." It do ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: "Slow thread... everybody must be downtown watching ..."

Black Orchid (j+aD2): "there are tons of reports of lefties messing with ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives