| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Daily Tech News 27 June 2026
I Think That I Will Never See A Poem As Lovely As The ONT Fri-Yay! Cafe The Week in Woke Democrats Recruited Antifa As their Zombie Street Enforcers. Now the Antifa Zombies Are Running the Show. Elon Musk Posts Entire Film "Citizen Vigilante" As Evidence of Gavin Newsom's Corruption Grows, He Placates the Left By Announcing He'll Support a Communist Seizure of the Estates of His Rich Enemies Former Colorado DNA Analyst Pleads Guitly to Manipulating Evidence Denmark's Left-Wing Government Plans to Ban the Islamic Call to Prayer, Saying That Parts of Denmark Feel Like "a Suburb of Islamabad" DHS General Counsel: It's Closing Time. Haitians Don't Have to Go Home, But They Can't Stay Here Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Governess Blanco: Bush Begged Me For Mandatory Evacuation Of City |
Main
| When will the French stop being so damn French? »
September 06, 2005
NYT: Rove Orchestrated Nagin's and Blanco's IncompetenceWell, the NYT doesn't quite say that. Instead, it implies that Blanco and Nagin were blameless and the finding of fault with them is entirely "spin" by a White House obsessed with politics and disdainful of the value of human life. posted by Ace at 07:42 PM
Comments*cough* Its hard to say this, but I find myself pining for the *cough* *cough* integrity level of the Howell Raines era. Posted by: Tony on September 6, 2005 08:01 PM
I'm sick of hearing that these people are victims. Except for possibly the elderly and children, they should have left. Don't tell me they are poor. I've dealt with poor people for 20 years. They all have money for the things they really want. Being poor in the US is no where near like it is in other countries. If they had no where to go, they should have hopped a bus and gone nowhere. If it was a miss, they could have come back. If not, stayed in the town they were in and seek refuge there. I hear the Superdome was nothing but trash, feces and urine. Yes, I know there was no plumbing etc. , but still. If no one has the self-discipline to follow public health orders in an emergency and not shit where they eat and sleep, fuck them. If those who could walk didn't get up off their asses and go to the French Quarter and get food and water, fuck 'em. And if the response afterwards sucked, blame it on the criminals and the local officials. Again, except for the elderly and kids, I have lost all sympathy. Posted by: on September 6, 2005 08:03 PM
A great deal of this can be blamed on the relentless dependency culture promoted towards the poor. "If you want, it's because there isn't a government program to give it to you" is the worst thing to happen to self-reliance in this country. In any random grouping of 20 or more middle-class Americans is at least one or two ex-Boy Scouts who can rig a temporary latrine and arrange for safe water. The lower-classes end up requiring outside aid because they've never had to face a situation like this before and under pressure is not the time to learn about hygeine. In that entire Superdome, there probably wasn't a handful of real leaders. They were to a man trained throughout their lifetime to be followers. Posted by: rho on September 6, 2005 08:29 PM
Apparently, shifting the blame among political parties is only one thing, which is left right now for the politicians to debate. So, who is going outsmart and convince public in their truth? It is sad, but it shows again how unprepared local (not only) government to manage any natural disaster. It is shame that with yearly drills and prediction services government are not able to predict how deal in such situations. Any way, they are doing their job accusing and blaming each one. I read that Americans (70%) do not like poor people. Please, correct me if I am wrong. Posted by: Michel on September 6, 2005 09:30 PM
Tell you what, you show me where it says that, and I'll tell you if you're wrong. Personally, I don't know 70% of the people in America, so it'd be foolish to speak for them. I don't like or dislike poor people. It's a bigoted response to paint everyone with the same brush, just because they're poor. Looking at the response in donations in time and money for the Katrina victims, it certainly looks like a lot of people like the poor. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on September 6, 2005 09:57 PM
Michel, Americans don't dislike poor people. They dislike lazy people who refuse to work because they think they are entitled to be supported by someone else. Posted by: Andrea Harris on September 6, 2005 10:01 PM
Yeah! And don't confuse the rest of the US with New Orleans. Look how Texas was able to respond. You know, Texas, where that "cowboy" comes from? I hope you realize what a big laugh we get when we hear "he's a real cowboy" used as a slur. Posted by: on September 6, 2005 10:24 PM
I read that Americans (70%) do not like poor people. Please, correct me if I am wrong. Okay, you're wrong. Posted by: Slublog on September 6, 2005 10:25 PM
Have I missed something concerning the analysis about the Kitrina disaster? It seems to me that if I were in the path of a force 5 hurricane , living on land with an average elevation 6 feet below sea level, next to a dike holding out the sea, I think I wouldn't have to wait for some dumbass politician to tell me to get the hell out. Is there some law that the citizens of New Orleans aren't allowed to think for themselves, but have to wait until someone thinks for them? Maybe this sounds heartless--Hell maybe it is heartless, but don't people have to take some responsibility for their own safety? Posted by: john on September 6, 2005 10:29 PM
I read that Americans (70%) do not like poor people. I read that too. No wait, I didn't. Question what you read Michel. Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 6, 2005 10:30 PM
john, many of New Orleans' poorest residents were given very bad information, if any information at all. They were assured the Superdome would protect them from the storm, which it did... but no one warned them the conditions they'd endure for the next 5 days would be hellish. There was no food, no water, no facilities for human waste. Worse than that, they were told "get there on your own (feet)". It was shameful. The local and state officials waited for the federal government to rescue them, and they did, but it takes time to move those kinds of massive resources. Even mistakes were made at the federal level, but the responsibility for "what do I do"? lies with the locals. They abdicated that responsibility, and cried "look what the feds did to us" when it became apparent they were in over their heads. The poor, the old, the infirm, all depended on a lie. They can't be held responsible for that. Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 6, 2005 10:35 PM
It's a known fact that 90% of statistics cited by people were made up on the spot. Posted by: Enas Yorl on September 6, 2005 10:42 PM
Michel, I work in development and spend a lot of my time searching for grants. You'd be amazed at how many charitable foundations in the United States are dedicated to helping the poor. We're a generous country. Posted by: Slublog on September 6, 2005 10:43 PM
Dave: We disagree on the poor. Even the poor these days have a couple of televsision sets. They knew what was coming and a number of them should have remembered Camille. Poor does not mean dumb. People make many stupid choices but it is not based on being poor. And before someone tells me they were poor and had no where to go or a way to get there, bull. Posted by: on September 6, 2005 10:54 PM
What people fail to mention when they blame the local government is the fact that the local government saved many thousands of lives by immediately opening up the Superdome and Convention center. What other people fail to mention is this simple fact: http://gov.louisiana.gov/Disaster%20Relief%20Request.pdf Now. Whos to blame? I don't believe that the local government is completely free of any blame but I'd put at least 75% of the blame on incompetence in the Federal Level. Why? Because the people in FEMA obviously were not qualified. ON the 28th they asked for assistance: it did not come until the 2nd. People also fail to understand that the local police LIVE there and MANY lost their homes, couldn't contact their family, and ultimately never had *experience* with this. Bush also cut alot of money back that could have *at the very least* slowed the flooding which could have aloud more evacuation and prevented alot of this. Why don't you guys mention those facts too and consider those facts too? Posted by: AlanB on September 6, 2005 11:01 PM
Yeeearrrgh! That was an outstanding recitation! You're all doing a great job! Keep up the good work! Posted by: Howard Dean on September 6, 2005 11:06 PM
Dave in Texas: That is exactly my point. Why rely on government? Have we become such a welfare mentality nation that we no longer are capable of even imagining that we ought to have our own responsibilities? Have we, (you and I) become such blobs that we do whatever the government says? Having read hour after hour and day after day the whole political range of commentary I was struck by the common thread-THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO TAKE CARE OF US. The only argument between right and left is that they( either the Democrats in local and state government or the Republicans in the Federal Government)aren't doing a good enough job of taking care of us. Blame Bush or someone else, but never yourself. Why is self reliance never an option? I fear we've all slipped into a welfare mom mind set. Remocrats and Depublicans. Posted by: john on September 6, 2005 11:09 PM
anon, how does a 28 year old remember Camille? For that matter, a 38 year old? as to means, like money, for a place to stay, or a vehicle? I hope you won't take this the wrong way or anything, but you're an idiot. john, ask around, you won't find many people as conservative/libertarian leaning as me. All I pointed out was that to blame them is a waste of time. They have been conditioned and trained and lied to, that when the SHTF, your government will take care of you. It's not their fault they believed it, you get lied to all your damn life you believe the lie. Cops were supposed to be moving through neighborhoods yelling on loudspeakers "move! get out"! Never happened. It is absolutely fine as conservatives to question the left shrieking blame game, well into the 3rd quarter as ace has pointed out. But there are victims here. Let's not get stupid and blame the victims. Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 6, 2005 11:21 PM
Dave in Texas: Yeh you're right about blaming the victims. But all the same I fear that each of us is just a conservative socialist and that the lefties are really liberal socalists. Posted by: john on September 6, 2005 11:27 PM
I read that close to 100% of Americans hate the French. You can't correct me because I'm not wrong. Posted by: zetetic on September 6, 2005 11:29 PM
Thanks for clarification. Read that close to 100% of Americans hate the French. You can't correct me because I'm not wrong. I think people can not dislike people, just because of their nationality. Matter is in other. And I think you are wrong. Posted by: Michel on September 7, 2005 12:08 AM
zetetic is wrong, it's really only about 75%-80%. Now French-Canadians, that's probably 100%, but even the real Canadians hate those guys. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on September 7, 2005 12:14 AM
Hate is a strong word. Loathe is better Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 12:16 AM
anon, how does a 28 year old remember Camille? For that matter, a 38 year old? Gee, I don't know. Maybe, they heard their parents and relatives talking about it? Maybe, they heard it in school? Maybe, not everyone who remained in New Orleans is 38 years or younger????? as to means, like money, for a place to stay, or a vehicle? People we label poor in America don't necessarily lack any money. They do have money for a lot of things. They may have different priorities, and I would hope a cat 5 hurricane would be one of them. Who needs a place to stay? Just get the hell out. Everyone thought NO had dodged the bullet and they were going to be able to return, that is until the levee broke. Then they needed a place to stay and it wasn't going to be in NO, anyway. And, are you saying “poor people” are entirely immobile? News to me. Are you ever around poor people? Ever met one? Doesn't sound like it. I hope you won't take this the wrong way or anything, but you're an idiot. And you're an ignorant asshole. And do take it the wrong way. Posted by: on September 7, 2005 12:16 AM
Let me just throw this into the circle jerk. With the hurricane hitting at the end of the month, could it be that some of the "poor" were living on fumes waiting for the check to come on the 1st. Isn't that when welfare goes out? Maybe they (some, not all) had cars, but no gas. That still doesn't explain most of them away, but it might be a reason for some of them. Basically, people make stupid decisions every day, unfortunately for them, this decision was worse than most. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on September 7, 2005 12:21 AM
Gee, I don't know That's true. You don't. Funny, I was just thinking today about the 97 year old black woman in a wheelchair I saw getting loaded up today, and I was thinking "why didn't she get on her Rascal and scoot on up to Baton Rouge?
Now, you're making me argue lefty points, which gives me a bleeding headache, so get yourself right already. You're screaming "fuck the poor", which is stupid and hateful and makes the rest of us who are conservative yet still have compassion look bad. Well, if we don't argue with you that is. So, in conclusion, blow me, you pathetic piece of monkey shit.
Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 12:27 AM
Who needs a place to stay? Just get the hell out. I think the point Dave is trying to make is that many of them were not able to get out because they didn't have transportation. The city had a plan to deal with these people, but that plan was not implemented. What were they supposed to do? Walk out of New Orleans? With the size of that storm, that would have been tends of thousands of people trapped outside during a Cat 4 hurricane. Posted by: Slublog on September 7, 2005 12:30 AM
New Orleans is a pretty big place too. Even if they're healthy enough to walk that distance, it would still leave them out in the open when the storm hit. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on September 7, 2005 12:32 AM
Well hell, Slub, I didn't know I had to take it down to Barney Rubble for him. Dear anon, so sorry, I gave you credit for being able to tie your shoelaces and shit. My bad. Many people in New Orleans, poor, without vehicles or money, trusted a stupid piece of shit plan that said "carry 5 days of food and water with you to the Superdome, wait for the Feds, good luck". Course the 97 year old lady in the wheelchair couldn't do that, but heck the rest of em made it ok. Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 12:35 AM
Dave in TX: I don't bother responding to our anonymous friend anymore because he soils our side of the debate. Averse to research or considered thought, he seems to simply reel off a series of observations that are a complete caricature of the conservative position. When liberals call us "knuckledraggers," they undoubtedly have him in mind. Posted by: geoff on September 7, 2005 12:35 AM
Anon, don't feel bad about being piled-upon. This is how we treat all angry, fact-averse, lie-spewing anonymous troll morons. Anonymous people annoy us. Anonymous people who talk nonsense really annoy us. So don't take it personally. Posted by: Slublog on September 7, 2005 12:37 AM
I'm more amused, than annoyed. My guess is Mr. Anonymous is a lefty plant playing a caricature of what he's perceives conservatives to be. Sort of like the parodies of liberals we sometimes do, except that it's harder to spot parodies of liberals. At least this troll has put in a little more effort than most. Bravo, Mr. Anonymous, whoever you are. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on September 7, 2005 12:43 AM
We really should have some informal "rules" (read: warnings) for people who want to discuss things here. Like - don't be anonymous. It annoys us right off the bat and we'll be more likely to call you bad names. Stuff like that. Posted by: Slublog on September 7, 2005 12:45 AM
s'why you gotta waste time and confront em dbs Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 12:49 AM
I confronted one : David "acid casualty" Brooks. I blogged an email I sent to him. Posted by: PurpleAvenger on September 7, 2005 04:56 AM
the finding of fault with them is entirely "spin" by a White House Uh, the finding of fault I've done with Blanco and Nagin has largely been based on their own admissions. Well, that, and the shouting they've done at each other. Is Rove able to put words in people's mouths now? Has he evolved that capability as well? Because then someone ought to congratulate the boys in the lab for their outstanding work with the Rovebot 3000. Smokin'. Posted by: ilyka on September 7, 2005 05:16 AM
I suspect a certain proportion of able bodied people weren't willing to get out because they were afraid that their stuff would be looted by their own neighbors. And guess what? Posted by: Dulce on September 7, 2005 07:08 AM
Hey Fuckwad from Texas. You and Sloblog just can't seem to tolerate anyone who doesn't think 110% like you. Tough shit. And, ignore the fact that I clearly stated that it did not apply to those who were dependent, i.e., the elderly and children, TWICE. But, hey, if you didn't, you wouldn't have an excuse to be an asshole now would you? And don't give me this shit You're screaming "fuck the poor" – Those are your words, asshat, not mine. You are the one who equates poor with stupid, dumb fuck. And I didn't say walk out of town. You get yourself to a bus station, a train station, into your car and go before the day of the fucking hurricane. You have the nerve to call me a liberal? You and the others with their noses up your ass are the ones acting like liberals – viewing everyone different from you as unable to take care of themselves. Shitheads. (and thanks for letting me piss you off. that makes up for a lot) Posted by: on September 7, 2005 07:39 AM
I suspect a certain proportion of able bodied people weren't willing to get out because they were afraid that their stuff would be looted by their own neighbors. Stuff? What stuff? They're poooooooor! They have no stuff. According to Fuckwad from Texas and the boys with their noses up his ass, because they're poooooor, they're also incapable of traveling to the store to buy stuff. Posted by: on September 7, 2005 07:54 AM
Huh. Beats me why you wouldn't want to sign a name to those sentiments. Posted by: S. Weasel on September 7, 2005 08:24 AM
Except for possibly the elderly and children possibly? yeah, you makin the case now bro. Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 08:54 AM
Your welcome. The combination of sheer stupidity and assholery always pisses me off. Now you and the boys can go back to doing what you know best --diddling each other. So not only do you hate the poor. You're also homophobic? Tsk. Tsk. Posted by: Slublog on September 7, 2005 09:06 AM
"So, in conclusion, blow me, you pathetic piece of monkey shit." Dave, I am requesting permission to use this in the next flame war thread! No Name, Consider yourself blessed if you've never had a period of time in your life when you were experiencing financial difficulties. When my wife and I made the decision for her to quit work and stay home to raise our children there were many times when we had ZERO cash-on-hand and we certainly had no credit cards. You can't just hop in your car and drive as far as that half tank of gas will take you because *then what?*. So, long story short, the people who didn't evacuate are paying the price now so a little compassion on our part is what's needed. Your scorn is counterproductive and makes you look small and petty. Posted by: BrewFan on September 7, 2005 09:13 AM
The NY Times? Who even reads that yellow rag piece of crap anymore? Infested with communists during the cold war, which is verifiably proven, they have never recovered. We need a new paper of record and to constrain the Slimes to the rack with the National Enquirer. Posted by: Defense Guy on September 7, 2005 09:20 AM
AlanB wrote: http://gov.louisiana.gov/Disaster%20Relief%20Request.pdf Now. Whos to blame? I don't believe that the local government is completely free of any blame but I'd put at least 75% of the blame on incompetence in the Federal Level. Why? Because the people in FEMA obviously were not qualified. ON the 28th they asked for assistance: it did not come until the 2nd. Your source states that Governor Blanco only requested money and debris removal assistance. The line item marked on the last page as "Distribution of emergency supplies" is zero. The purpose of the document was to expedite federal disaster funding. Blanco was requesting that Bush declare her state a disaster area to accomplish this. Bush did declare a State of Emergency for Louisiana on the 27th. I don't think he can declare a place as a disaster area until the actual disaster occurs. Katrina made landfall on the 29th. The best he could do was what he did - declare a State of Emergency and promise the governor exactly what she requested.
I don't think police in NYC had any experience with jetliners crashing into skyscrapers. But they handled it anyway. Do you know why? Because it was their job. I don't remember the oath "to serve and protect" being amended with "unless something really, really bad happens."
You're exactly right, just look at how uncaring he was, talking about cutting the money: Anyone who cares about responsible budgeting and the health of America's rivers and wetlands should pay attention to a bill now before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. The bill would shovel $17 billion at the Army Corps of Engineers for flood control and other water-related projects -- this at a time when President Bush is asking for major cuts in Medicaid and other important domestic programs. Among these projects is a $2.7 billion boondoggle on the Mississippi River that has twice flunked inspection by the National Academy of Sciences. The Government Accountability Office and other watchdogs accuse the corps of routinely inflating the economic benefits of its projects. And environmentalists blame it for turning free-flowing rivers into lifeless canals and destroying millions of acres of wetlands -- usually in the name of flood control and navigation but mostly to satisfy Congress's appetite for pork. Oh wait, Bush didn't say that. It was the New York Times, the very same newspaper calling for Bush's head on a platter for each and every problem that arises. And by the way, it's Congress that controls federal funding for state projects, not the President. The President only has such control during emergencies. A years-long engineering project is not an emergency. Why don't you guys mention those facts too and consider those facts too? We did, but we like the truth better than some leftist bullet-point-list propaganda. The truth is more difficult to find and understand, mind you, but we feel its better than having our brains rot from blindly accepting whatever the MSM and its leftist enablers spew. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on September 7, 2005 09:23 AM
Sue, the guy's right, I'm an idiot. I just now got the play on words in your name. *sigh* 7 years of college down the drain Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 12:57 PM
It's okay, Dave, even Texans aren't perfect. ;) Posted by: Sue Dohnim on September 7, 2005 02:05 PM
I just now got the play on words in your name. It took me two weeks, so I reckon I'm a little quicker on the uptake. I kept squinting at it thinking, "something ain't right here. I wonder if it's one o' them acronym dooflunkies." Posted by: S. Weasel on September 7, 2005 02:28 PM
we may not be perfect, but sometimes we're lucky. that Mychal Massie article you mentioned yesterday? that wasn't my comment he quoted, that was Monty's. I made some crack about sushi. of course, I don't mind getting credit for his insight, and he got screwed, bonus Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 02:29 PM
"I just now got the play on words in your name." Oh boy. I'm not bright but I am honest. Dave, you're the *second to last* person to figure it out. Dang! Posted by: BrewFan on September 7, 2005 04:36 PM
Really Brew? Well, ok then. Feel free to use the riveting conclusion to my earlier post in the next flame war. Posted by: Dave in Texas on September 7, 2005 05:15 PM
You have the nerve to call me a liberal? You and the others with their noses up your ass are the ones acting like liberals – viewing everyone different from you as unable to take care of themselves. Shitheads. Oh yeah, definitly a closet liberal, right down to the homophobia and the hatred of poor people, even though you need their votes. It's okay Anonymous, we aren't judging you for being a liberal, just for being an idiot. Btw, ask your mom if I left my wallet on her nightstand, I've been looking for it. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on September 7, 2005 08:05 PM
Oh yeah, definitly a closet liberal, right down to the homophobia and the hatred of poor people Don't forget the jooooos - the Iraq war is all the joooooos fault. Cindy Sheehan has reliably informed me of this. Posted by: Tony on September 7, 2005 08:18 PM
I've said no such thing. Conservatives are liars. Posted by: Cindy Sheehan on September 7, 2005 08:20 PM
Feel free to use the riveting conclusion to my earlier post in the next flame war. Sweet! I'm not sure I can wait that long, though. Hey, has anybody seen cedarford around? I've got something to tell him.
Posted by: BrewFan on September 7, 2005 08:31 PM
Except for possibly the elderly and children Yeah, Fuckwad from Texas, I wd expect most able bodied people to aid the elderly and children to get out. You, on the other hand, would leave your own grandma behind. Posted by: on September 8, 2005 01:01 AM
So not only do you hate the poor. You're also homophobic? Tsk. Tsk. You're not poor. And, homophobic because I don't care to join you and the other circle jerks? Hardly. Posted by: on September 8, 2005 01:03 AM
Consider yourself blessed if you've never had a period of time in your life when you were experiencing financial difficulties. Consider yourself stupid since you do not know anything about me. When my wife and I made the decision for her to quit work and stay home to raise our children there were many times when we had ZERO cash-on-hand and we certainly had no credit cards. You can't just hop in your car and drive as far as that half tank of gas will take you because *then what?*. You take what money you have, borrow the rest, either fill the tank or buy a one way ticket to anywhere, and get as far away from the hurricane which is what 80% of the people did. That's what. So, long story short, the people who didn't evacuate are paying the price now so a little compassion on our part is what's needed. Your scorn is counterproductive and makes you look small and petty. Let's make it shorter: fuck you. Your solution is for people to have stayed there and died. And don't lecture me about compassion, I have taken someone in who I barely know, who lost everything, as has her family. You and the other circlejerks idea of compassion is shooting your fat mouths off and attacking people bc you're stupid and bored, you small, petty asshole. Posted by: on September 8, 2005 01:11 AM
Consider yourself stupid since you do not know anything about me. Who's fault is that? Why don't you grace us with your riveting tales of childhood deprivation and desperate deadening adult poverty and rejection. Ten-hut Ace denizens - we are about to be graced with a recitation by the next Charles Bukowski. Posted by: Purple Avenger on September 8, 2005 01:49 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
An Update about Grammie Winger:
She is doing poorly...she is in the hospital and is having a tough go of it. She would love to hear from you folks, so anyone who would like to contact her is welcome to her address! Please contact Bluebell at moroncookbook@gmail.com for her contact info. (I expect her local post office to be furious with us!) [CBD]
Trump will present the trophy for the World Cup, and lunatic cultists will not be happy
pRiDe Month's shameful record so far
Department of Energy Announces American Nuclear Supply Chain Loans
$17.5B is a good start. Now add two zeroes to that number! [CBD]
It's finally legal for kids to play pinball in South Carolina
It is the end times! [CBD] Paul Sperry
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Recent Comments
Skip:
"Only been cat napping, might as well get up ..."
m: ".. and fizz ..." jim (in Kalifornia): "407 onomatopoeic? Posted by: jim Yes Posted ..." Dark Lixtiquatal: "onomatopoeic? Posted by: jim Yes ..." jim (in Kalifornia): "404 Crap is such a funny word. It's just so onamot ..." m: "397 If you think using larf instead of laugh is a ..." Dark Lixtiquatal: "Crap is such a funny word. It's just so onamotic. ..." jim (in Kalifornia): "401 Good to see you jim, wish you had joined in ea ..." m: "Thanks, Skip! ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "Good to see you jim, wish you had joined in earlie ..." m: "400 ..." Skip: "Peeking in, too early to get up ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|