Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« I know that a senator from Massachusetts has family in France. | Main | Muslim Leaders Warn Extremist-Crackdown Will Produce Terrorist Martyrs »
August 24, 2005

APBB (All Points Blogging Bulletin): Thugs Beat The Hell Out Of Soldiers Returned From War, Seattle-Tacoma Area

Beat them unconscious, then began stomping their out-cold heads into the pavement.

Oh, and they groped a couple of women just before that, too.

Let's John Walsh 'em.


posted by Ace at 10:53 PM
Comments



What the hell is wrong with people today??? When did we become so brutal? It makes me sick. SICK!

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on August 24, 2005 10:59 PM

"John Walsh 'em"? I was thinking more along the lines of a moderate Harry Callahaning

Posted by: Alex_fs on August 24, 2005 11:05 PM

If by "John Walsh" you mean kill them, then, yeah, I'm with you. I'm surprise the Seattle cops are even looking for the criminals. It's about the most anti-military place I've ever been.

True story: My honor guard unit was coming back from a funeral in northern Washington. We stopped at a bar and grill for lunch, and we were refused service. They said our military ID's weren't good enough, neither were our home state driver's licenses, and they didn't want our kind in there anyway. That was in Seattle.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 24, 2005 11:10 PM

Thugs? I think you're mistaken, ace. These are peace activists.

Posted by: tony on August 24, 2005 11:14 PM

They didn't look intelligent enough to even comprehend the meaning of "peace activist"... they looked to me like a bunch of stupid, worthless fuckwads who should be summarily executed and done with.

IMHO, of course.

Posted by: Dave S on August 24, 2005 11:35 PM

What Cedarford said!

Posted by: Lipstick on August 24, 2005 11:41 PM

oh shit, I'm going to agree with Cedarford about something.

I feel dirty.

Lipstick, tell me about your feet again

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 24, 2005 11:49 PM

Give them tight pussy, free food, loose shoes, a warm place to shit and a chance to beat or kill people and the animals are happy.

Sounds like a political philosophy to me.

Posted by: tony on August 24, 2005 11:53 PM

Right on, Cedarford. Exactly right.

Ugh, I don't feel well.

Posted by: Log Cabin on August 24, 2005 11:57 PM

spatter some ape brains

Ape brains???

Ape BRAINS???

Oh man, I'm on the floor...

I'm just f'ing DYING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Dogstar on August 24, 2005 11:58 PM

Cedarford's post deleted for not-even-close-to-subtle racism.

Jesus, please try to exercise some amount of discretion in the comments.

Posted by: ace on August 25, 2005 12:07 AM

One word : ArmaGlide™

Posted by: The real Tony on August 25, 2005 12:08 AM

now, now Can't we all just get along? I'm sure there is some reasonable explantion for this whole thing. Perhaps the young boys had too many twinkies and maybe there mothers abused them when they were young. We must understand that violence only happens when you've done something to provoke it. There are no evil people in this world, only misunderstood people.

Posted by: Nancy Pelosi on August 25, 2005 12:08 AM

Nancy,

Good call - the TwinkieDefense™ worked for me.

Posted by: Dan White on August 25, 2005 12:13 AM

I officially retract my almost agreement, having just comprehended the racist overtones.

I'm slow. I rode the little bus.

Apologies.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 25, 2005 12:16 AM

Local news says the two guys you have highlighted with arrows were accosting and groping some females when the guys that ended up in the hospital tried to help the females.

Posted by: Al on August 25, 2005 12:17 AM

I am shocked to see these nice young peaceful democrats fists attacked by the imperialist jaws of these violent soldiers. Obviously a case of voter intimidation and a violation of the voting rights act of 1965. Why these fine young democrats fists were attcked so violently by the soldiers jaws that the nasty nazi soldiers jaws were boken. I hope the fists heal up soon.

Posted by: howard dean on August 25, 2005 12:38 AM

First I’d catch them, then I’d open up that special can of whop-ass I’ve been saving. After that, I’d throw them in jail and throw away the fu**ing key.

Time to get medieval.

The moonies have some new heroes to look up to. Maybe these thugs will make a trip down to Crawford.

Posted by: Lumpy on August 25, 2005 12:51 AM

Hey, Real Tony, I thought I trademarked that!

Note that this post comes right on the heels of Cedarford's noctural emission in the previous thread about "inner city animal barbarians." I question the timing.

And while I'm questioning timing, I note that Ace recently resurrected his legendary "duck" post, and right afterwards Kos comes out saying he has a double-secret plan -- which he cannot reveal at this time -- for doing down the DLC.

Ace, I've warned you before about being careful with your powers . . .

Posted by: quiggs on August 25, 2005 01:24 AM

I'm in the Sea-Tac area and have heard NOTHING about this. Not now or when it first occured.

Now...had the perps been white and the G.I's black, it would be national news for weeks.

Tell me it wouldn't...go on, I dare ya.

Posted by: Mumblix Grumph on August 25, 2005 01:46 AM

There's three more black men destined [back] to prison.

This is just the sort of pointless violence Bill Cosby keeps trying to get the black community to address...yet it continues to fall on deaf ears.

What a waste.

Posted by: The Ugly American on August 25, 2005 02:01 AM

Kos reminds me of the lead replicant in Blade Runner...a toy that doesn't realize that it is broken.

Poor deluded Kos doesn't realize that its his KosBats™ that are "radioactive" to the electorate.

I'm betting that he winds up with, in baseball terms, the Golden Sombrero™

Posted by: The real Tony on August 25, 2005 02:06 AM

Because the soldiers race isn't mentioned, how much you wanna bet they were white dudes...

Posted by: fat kid on August 25, 2005 03:10 AM

Who gives a rat's behind what race either party is? Would you feel better if the GIs were black?

And--for those of you who don't know-- yes, I'm black, an AF retiree, a conservative and, yes, I hope this a-hole gets his butt kicked by a bunch of Marines before he gets his butt kicked in prison. And sometimes misbehavior *is* about race--or rather, culture.

This isn't. There should be more people who can tell the difference.

Posted by: Juliette on August 25, 2005 03:28 AM

Who video tapes this kind of stuff????!!!!

It's bad enough something like this happens, but to have not one, but two people filming it rather than calling the cops, or God forbid, coming to their defense, actually boggles me.

Holy shit... this is wrong on so many levels.

Posted by: monica on August 25, 2005 04:22 AM

I'm old enough to remember (as a small child) the Kitty Genovese incident.

It was one of those things that sticks with a kid for the rest of their life.

I go out of my way to avoid confrontation, but there are times when it is necessary to just wade in screaming like a banshee and back it up with your body if need be. Most malefactors seem to back down when you look frothing, crazed, and truly ready to cancel their ticket if they don't.

Posted by: Tony on August 25, 2005 04:43 AM

Juliette said, "Who gives a rat's behind what race either party is? Would you feel better if the GIs were black?"

The answer to the first question is, "People who have to be watchful and estimate their danger when abroad in a city care about every fact that might help them do so."

The answer to the second question is, "If by 'you,' you mean readers of other races, and by 'better' you mean 'a little less fearful that a lot of black men despise them for their race,' then the answer is, 'Yes.'"

Nor will I take any sh*t from you for suspecting there could be a racial dimension to this. When that sort of black man looks at a white man, I suspect he thinks, "White, therefore peaceably raised, not as aggressive, and not a street brawler. White, therefore afraid of being called racist if he fights a black guy. Easy mark. Let's totally f*ck him up in front of his girlfriend."

I've just poured my argument out over you exactly as if you were white and male, Juliette. I hope you weren't expecting anything better than equal treatment, because equal is the best you're going to get from me.

Posted by: Jacarutu on August 25, 2005 05:12 AM

This isn't. There should be more people who can tell the difference.

Not being clairvoyant, I'm going to have to wait till the investigation is complete to draw any conclusions in this regard.

I know what I saw, and it was disturbing.

I don't know what was NOT shown on the clip.

I don't know what was said INSIDE the club.

Posted by: Tony on August 25, 2005 05:59 AM

The story that Kitty Genovese was killed while her cold, callous, uncaring neighbors looked on is not quite true.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 25, 2005 06:16 AM

Monica:Who video tapes this kind of stuff????!!!!
Pioneer Square is a touristy area in Seattle. Having a video camera down there, even at night, isn't too unusual.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 25, 2005 06:20 AM

The story that Kitty Genovese was killed while her cold, callous, uncaring neighbors looked on is not quite true.

Yet she is dead, and anyone could have intervened. Apologies for murderers and people who did nothing are in themselves a sad commentary.

Posted by: Tony on August 25, 2005 07:50 AM

Not that it makes the crime any less horrific, but the article it links to doesn't suggest that the soldiers were beaten because they were soldiers.

Al said: "Local news says the two guys you have highlighted with arrows were accosting and groping some females when the guys that ended up in the hospital tried to help the females."

The soldiers got a beating because, apparently, they helped out a couple of women who chucked a hot dog at one of the thugs.

Posted by: Dave D on August 25, 2005 08:15 AM

Tony, did you even read what I linked to? The Genovese case has been used to condemn the supposed "indifference" of the American people to suffering, when it turns out there was -- of course -- more nuance and stuff to the case. But it's handy for propagandists, and willing absorbers of propaganda. In the meantime an entire neighborhood of people was tarnished. But who cares about them, right? Only dead people matter.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 25, 2005 08:41 AM

I'm not American, but i suspect Seattle is one of those places with "though" gun laws, right? Call me Harry Callahan, but had that happened in Texas someone would have pulled over in his car and let loose a few "caps", as they say, in these animals asses.

Posted by: madne0 on August 25, 2005 08:49 AM

This assault actually happened on July 31. Although I naturally sympathize with the soldiers, there is nothing so far that indicates that the men were in uniform or that their attackers knew they were Iraq veterans.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/237930_fight25.html

Unfortunately, Pioneer Square has a history of pretty nasty violence. In 2001, a Mardi Gras celebration turned into a full-blown riot, and a 20-year-old man, Kristopher Kime, was killed. He had stopped to help a woman who was being attacked. Someone broke a bottle over his head, and then a group of thugs descended on him, stomping in his skull. More than 70 other people were hurt. Police arrested more than 40 people, thanks mainly to videotapes of the scene. Most of the violence was black on white. The whole thing triggered this wave of hand-wringing in Seattle over racial issues.

Posted by: Scott on August 25, 2005 08:54 AM

"This assault actually happened on July 31. Although I naturally sympathize with the soldiers, there is nothing so far that indicates that the men were in uniform or that their attackers knew they were Iraq veterans."

Is there a point in there somewhere?

Posted by: Ken on August 25, 2005 09:34 AM

A couple of thoughts:

1. The fact that the victims were veterans doesn't make the thugs any more evil, because their actions already maxed out their accounts just on face value alone. It does, however, make the victims' plight more tragic.

2. As for the commenter who argued that the people who videotaped this event should have been wading in to the fray instead, do you know who the videotapers were? Do you know how able-bodied? If it was someone whose intervention could have altered the outcome, I'd agree with you. But by keeping calm and videotaping it, these people have given the police a damned good chance to ID the perps and hopefully bring them to justice.

Posted by: Brian B on August 25, 2005 09:45 AM

Holy shit, this post is like a Rorschach blot. How the hell is this supposed to be a racial issue?

Posted by: Hubris on August 25, 2005 09:48 AM

Well, it is most certainly a crime inspired by (black on white) racism.

But it most certainly shouldn't matter to the law, either.

Posted by: lauraw on August 25, 2005 10:03 AM

Every goddamn thing that happens in this country is first cast through the lens of race, Hubris.

Last night, I was flipping through the channels, and some program on PBS was powerstroking a story from segregation days. It showed a room full of white guys hassling a black kid, who looked like he'd been beat up. (I'm assuming this was a true story.)

Nobody has ever questioned the usefullness of these things. Incessant and continuous drumbeating on what happened in the past, reminding a segment of our citizenry that they were once horribly discriminated against, and reminding the other segments that their racial forfathers were the ones who did it.

I've never seen anybody put that together with the black-on-white violence like we see here. On some level, it's hard to blame them. If I were constantly reminded that my Irish ancestors were shafted by the Brits, I might have been just a bit more "understanding" of the IRA shits. After all, those Brits deserve a bit of what they did to "my people".

If I never hear "we must learn from the past" again, it will be too soon. We never learn anything. The past sucks. Leave it there.

Posted by: rho on August 25, 2005 10:10 AM

Years ago I was involved in a similar 5 on 2 incident but fortunately was not knocked out and was able to extricate myself with the least amount of damage as was possible. I made note to myself afterwards to not open my mouth unless the odds were a little more even. I am still working on that.

Posted by: Dman on August 25, 2005 10:14 AM

There is no call for this these no good punks should be cuaght and have their arms cut off or at least be given a good caning like what they did to that youth in singapore a few years back and screw the whinning liberal jackasses

Posted by: screaming eagle on August 25, 2005 10:21 AM

Hubris - you are correct. This isn't a racial issue though it's being made out to be. Criminal dumbfucks are criminal dumbfucks, no matter the color of their skin.

I watched the video and still can't determine the race of the victims - not that it matters. lauraw - do you have more info?

Did you all see that asshole stealing the victim's shoes toward the end of the video? Nice.

Posted by: compos mentis on August 25, 2005 10:30 AM

Criminal dumbfucks are criminal dumbfucks, no matter the color of their skin.

Exactly. The same horrible shit could easily have gone down outside a rural bar in my home state of West Virginia. Hillbilly-on-hillbilly crime.

Posted by: Hubris on August 25, 2005 10:36 AM

Juliette, I agree with you.

All that matters is that this was an act of aggressive violence. The race of the perpetrators or victims is irrelevant to the fact and magnitude of the moral and legal transgression involved here. Aggressive violence of this sort is intolerable. It should not be brushed aside, minimized, excused or downplayed. If someone had been on the scene with an appropriate weapon and had killed these thugs as an act of defense, I would vote to give him a medal. Good riddance.

Posted by: Phinn on August 25, 2005 10:53 AM

that's disturbing. Hopefully they catch these guys and send em to jail. And hopefully there's some vets in jail to take care of em. I wouldn't wanna be a black guy in a jail cell with a bunch of vets if I had just beaten some soldiers returning from Iraq.

They would surely deserve whatever is thrust onto them, or into. Whatever.

Posted by: tyler on August 25, 2005 11:02 AM

Ken, the point is that some are playing the story up as "These assholes beat up a couple of soldiers!", as if their identity as soldiers had a crucial bearing on how the incident unfolded.

As Brian B. said just after you, it makes the victims' plight more tragic, but doesn't necessarily tell us any more about the perpetrators.

I disagree with Brian, however, in saying that the thugs "maxed out" their evil-doers account. I think there would be an added dimension of moral depravity if the thugs knew the guys had put their lives on the line in Iraq and yet still sought to inflict serious bodily harm.

It's the difference between, were these guys targetted because they were soldiers, or were they a couple of guys who got in a fight and just happened to be soldiers?

Posted by: Scott on August 25, 2005 11:45 AM

No compos, I don't have any more info. than you do.

I admit to having biased ideas about urban black youths from having lived in a certain neighborhood.

There are very racist and ignorant ones among them that will target white women for racist sexual assaults, and white men for racist ass whippings. And the ass whippings are more fun if the guy's wife or girlfriend is watching helplessly.

This scenario, with the hotdog thrown at them as the spark, would be just too delicious for the guys that I remember to pass up.

I'm sorry if that's not PC; I want to re-emphasize that I am talking about a specific social set of racist thugs, just like there's a small subset of poor whites who are racist thugs.

I'd be surprised if the victims were black, really. Sorry!

Posted by: lauraw on August 25, 2005 12:10 PM

I can't believe I live in the US. It might take a while, but these guys will get theirs...watch...they better watch their six!

Posted by: patd95 on August 25, 2005 12:47 PM

Relevant portion from the PI article:

A group of people were in line to enter Larry's Nightclub on First Avenue South when a man groped one of the women in the group. Her friend, another woman, confronted the man, and he groped her as well.

The second woman's husband stepped in, and an argument began. At that point, Whitcomb said, the group decided to leave without going to the club and walked away. But one of the women grabbed a hotdog and threw it at the man who had groped her.

Ok, here's what's buggin me. Two military men fresh from the theater of war, size things up, see they're outnumbered, outgunned, and decide the best thing is a withdraw from the hot-zone with a face saving argument - a retreat to a safe area protecting themselves and their embedded non-coms.

But no. The chick. She decides she's gonna toss a hot dog, knowing full well that whatever happens, it ain't her that's gonna pay. Once again, a women writes a check knowing she won't have to cover.

I guarantee you, as that dog flipped through the air, the men thought, "Well, I'm gonna get my ass kicked." And the women thought, "Well, the men are gonna get their asses kicked." And so it was.

Once again, nature makes a mockery of the notion of equal treatment of the sexes. Men have the right to get their asses kicked; women have the right to see to it that their men get their asses kicked.

Women, if you really loved us like you say you do, you'd stop doing stupid shit will obviously end up with us getting our asses kicked trying to protect you from the consequences of those actions. Please, just think a little.

Posted by: Ray Midge on August 25, 2005 01:12 PM

Bill Clinton's midnight basketball program would have prevented this.

Posted by: The Warden on August 25, 2005 01:33 PM

This kind of reminds me of something that happened nearby a couple years ago.

Two cars full of women were looking for a parking spot at a shopping center.
One spot became a bone of contention between them and the women argued with each other from their respective cars. It got heated.

Then.

One of the women threw an orange peel at a woman in the other car. That was it. The women flew out of their cars and attacked each other.
It became an all-out brawl that drew police to the scene.

Posted by: lauraw on August 25, 2005 01:41 PM

Tony, did you even read what I linked to?

Every word.

I guess I just have a non-nuanced view of this sort of thing. Excuse me for having a moral upbringing in a rural area where people who live near each other actually help each other out in times of need.

Posted by: on August 25, 2005 02:26 PM

Tony,

Beware of the hasty generalization.

Sometimes those city slickers help each other out too. There were some good examples around 9/11/01.

Posted by: Hubris on August 25, 2005 02:37 PM

I'm surprised there aren't carloads from Fort Lewis (20 miles south) out looking to settle this score right now.

Posted by: SGT Dan on August 25, 2005 06:04 PM

Bill Clinton's midnight basketball program would have prevented this.


LOL!!!!!!

Posted by: The Ugly American on August 25, 2005 06:36 PM

Ace deleted my past post, but it was the same thing as the Seattle news media did to avoid the "offensive details and racial hate crimes" of the sexual assault on the 2 women and the brutal beatings of their boyfriends by inner city thugs.

Just as off mark is Roy Midge, who blames the women for reacting in a way that "precipitated the fight" after 3 buffed up ghetto thugs grabbed their breasts and asses. "One of them threw the hot dog that started the fight!!! "( after having her breast grabbed and being called a white bitch 'ho)

Yes, women getting their asses and breasts grabbed by total strangers, violent criminals, in public - then acting adversely are the "root cause" of "misunderstandings" such as this.

Posted by: Cedarford on August 25, 2005 09:20 PM

Jacarutu :

Nor will I take any sh*t from you for suspecting there could be a racial dimension to this.

You will take whatever I dish out or you can ignore it. It's your choice. Whether you like it or not, however, is not my problem.

Now as to your argument...

When that sort of black man looks at a white man, I suspect he thinks, "White, therefore peaceably raised, not as aggressive, and not a street brawler.

But, like the rest of us, you only guessing, and with only your apparent prejudices rather than your logic. When that sort of "man" looks at anyone, "straight" (meant in the law-abiding sense) or not, he's looking for weakness. That's how predators operate, regardless of color or culture.

I've just poured my argument out over you exactly as if you were white and male, Juliette. I hope you weren't expecting anything better than equal treatment, because equal is the best you're going to get from me.

Well it's so comforting to know that you bring the identical quality of argument for all and sundry. You are hereby granted a ghetto pass, good for slipping by every sort of black man unmolested.

Don't bother thanking me.

Posted by: Juliette on August 26, 2005 12:27 AM

Juliette said, "But, like the rest of us, you only guessing...."

First of all, it's "you are only guessing." Secondly, I'm not just guessing; you merely guessed that I was guessing. I've heard the rhetoric of the "skinny white boy" all my life; I've heard all about the "pasty-faced," the "vanilla," the "whitebread." I know that being studious is "acting white." I've been reminded many times that "white men can't jump." I know about their "little dicks."

If your point is that I can't read minds, then go make your argument to someone who thinks that I can. If your point is that I'm merely conjuring my opinion out of thin air when I suppose that black attackers especially despise their white victims, then the insults I've heard all my life refute you.

Posted by: Jacarutu on August 26, 2005 02:31 AM

Jacarutu:

We (white folk) hear quite a bit about how we have no appreciation for the suffering of, and invisible discrimination towards, minorities. Most of that seems like people playing the victim card, but when Juliette speaks on race, I listen. She is reasonable, rationale, and qualified. I wouldn't pick or perpetuate a fight with her, because she's on the side of the good guys (i.e., those who truly wish for equality and peace among races).

Please consider a less confrontational attitude.

Posted by: Geoff on August 26, 2005 02:42 AM

Aaahhh - look at the effect of 4 Bass Ale's. I clearly meant "rational" vice "rationale." I'll bet an odd number of beers will do the trick . . .

Posted by: geoff on August 26, 2005 02:44 AM

Ah, you're missing a very important dimension to the incident. Of course, the fact that these soldiers were veterans of the Iraq War is crucial. Even if (especially if) they were out of uniform or not easily identified as such.

Don't you perceive that the barrage of vicious anti-war speech created a cliimate of hate such that soldiers - or those who might seem like soldiers to the ignor- pardon me, easily-inflamed masses would trigger this sort of violent attack?

Posted by: Carbonel on August 26, 2005 05:43 AM

Jacarutu:

That's no way to treat a lady, and one should always enter a discussion with respect for other participants.

As to your arguments, they seem to be: 1) the race of the participants is important because it is a datum used in identifying dangerous elements in society; and 2) some blacks hate whites and find them particularly easy prey.

1) is inarguable since you are using the to form your personal worldview. I think that it's a worldview that is unsupported by crime statistics and by the experiences of others, but if that's the kind of information you think you need to have to survive on the streets, then by all means file it away.

2) is also inarguable. It is almost certainly true that some percentage of blacks hate whites and would seize an opportunity to attack them based on purely racial motives. The question is: how big is that percentage? Is it really significant? Again, crime statistics suggest that it is not.

Neither of these "arguments" is worth much, and certainly not worth being rude or disrespectful to a veteran, a lady, and an active supporter of conservative causes.

Posted by: Geoff on August 26, 2005 08:47 AM

In the post of August 25, 2005 09:20 PM, Cedarford criticized Ray Midge for his critique of the woman who supposedly threw a hotdog at one of the men who groped her. Speaking ironically, he said, "Yes, women getting their asses and breasts grabbed by total strangers, violent criminals, in public - then acting adversely are the 'root cause' of 'misunderstandings' such as this." But Midge never tried to minimize the attack as being the result of a misunderstanding. Nor do I see any sign that he was trying to excuse the attackers. He claims that some women carelessly stir up violent men because they themselves don't contemplate having to fight. I wonder if Cedarford would like to go back and address the point that Ray Midge actually made, rather than knock down arguments that no one is trying to uphold.

Posted by: Jacarutu on August 26, 2005 09:14 AM

In his reply of 8:47 a.m., Geoff conceded two of my points as being inarguable. Then he vaguely claimed the authority of "statistics" in order to minimize the significance of my points, yet he didn't cite any statistic or any source for a statistic. Of course, I admit that neither his concessions nor the lack of backup for the authority of the claimed statistics does anythng to prove my points.

Posted by: Jacarutu on August 26, 2005 09:39 AM

Jacarutu:

I can see that when you "reason without respect" you mean without respect for reason.

Posted by: geoff on August 26, 2005 09:57 AM

About the race thing-- I was watching the video as they played it over and over again on Hannity & Colmes last night. I could SWEAR that a close up of one of the victims showed clearly that he was a black man. Looked to me like both the victims were other black men. I doubt race was a motivator in this crime. And, those guys doing the assault don't exactly look to me like a bunch of hippy protester morons. They look more like gangbanger morons. [My own prejudices kick in].

It looks to me like the person shooting the video may possibly have been a participant, or at least a friend of the attackers. I noticed that there was another guy also filming with a camcorder as someone else noted above, and he looks to me like an active participant filming this atrocity with glee. I also noticed another guy taking cell phone camera pictures while one of the attackers pose an unconscious victim.

This whole film clip reminds me of the war in Iraq in a different way-- those guys did to the victims what a mob of terrorist sympathisers would do to captured Americans in a place like Fallujah [remember the bridge incident?] or in Somalia.

I'm not saying these guys knew they were soldiers, I think they probably did not know. But it gives me chills to think that the same atmosphere of mayhem and terror that gripped a place like Fallujah exists in some of our own cities.

And the laws in these places are set up so that if you obey the law, you usually can't even carry a piece to defend yourself. If only the victims had been armed!

We must get a handle on this situation fast.

Does anyone know if the victims survived the attack? That was the main thing I missed that I wanted to know when I saw the clip last night.

Posted by: Mark_D on August 26, 2005 11:47 AM

Jacarutu :

Picking nits about typos is unworthy of a decent debate. Are you perfect? Me neither.

If your point is that I'm merely conjuring my opinion out of thin air when I suppose that black attackers especially despise their white victims, then the insults I've heard all my life refute you.

If you pay attention to such things--as I'm guessing you do--you'll notice that black criminals' primary victims are also black. So, for example, whether a black murder victim (of a black murderer) is depised less than a white victim doesn't make the former any less dead. (You can probably guess that I'm against hate-crime legislation.)

Also, were you insulted or were you physically attacked? (Your comment doesn't make that clear.) Heck, I've been insulted plenty of times--by you right here, as a matter of fact. Big whoop. Physical attacks, however, are a different matter.

Posted by: Juliette on August 26, 2005 11:45 PM

Some niggas.. not all niggas.... are complete scum.

Posted by: Repinsemertx on September 5, 2005 06:08 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Recent Comments
zombie Chuck Yeager : ""The Woke Stuff" Artemis (DEI) - II First bl ..."

Axeman: "So 12 of them stormed the Capital again? Becau ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "I was gonna say Geriatric ward Posted by: It's me ..."

tubal: "Come to the HQ to discuss ailments. And geopolitic ..."

The Eater of Socks[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]Me and the socks are going to have a battle to ..."

whig: "245 whig your back situation wow hang in the ..."

MAGA_Ken: "Is people "parading" in the "People House" now a v ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]Sounds like a Hospital ward around here Posted ..."

Duke Lowell: "There was a gent of a particular station, The cre ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "O suspect if you could record the Horde collective ..."

tubal: "All the girls, sorry, women will vote in favor of ..."

Kathysaysso: "Rubio is en fuego these days. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives