| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Trump Cancels $1.3 Billion in Medicaid Payments to Fraud and Piracy Ridden State of California
The Morning Rant: Thune Needs To Go! Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 5/ 14/26 Daily Tech News 14 May 2026 Wednesday Night ONT - May 13, 2026 [TRex] Golden Cafe Massive Report Details the Apocalyptic Evil of the October 7 Massacre -- as the NYT Hides That Reporting to Push Absurd Hamas Propaganda About Israel Training Dogs to Rape Palestinian Terrorist Prisoners Murkowski, Collins, and Paul Defect to the Democrats, As Usual, to Demand Trump Surrender to Iran Hollywood: Shit or Garbage? Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« I know that a senator from Massachusetts has family in France. |
Main
| Muslim Leaders Warn Extremist-Crackdown Will Produce Terrorist Martyrs »
August 24, 2005
APBB (All Points Blogging Bulletin): Thugs Beat The Hell Out Of Soldiers Returned From War, Seattle-Tacoma AreaBeat them unconscious, then began stomping their out-cold heads into the pavement. Oh, and they groped a couple of women just before that, too.
posted by Ace at 10:53 PM
CommentsWhat the hell is wrong with people today??? When did we become so brutal? It makes me sick. SICK! Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on August 24, 2005 10:59 PM
"John Walsh 'em"? I was thinking more along the lines of a moderate Harry Callahaning Posted by: Alex_fs on August 24, 2005 11:05 PM
If by "John Walsh" you mean kill them, then, yeah, I'm with you. I'm surprise the Seattle cops are even looking for the criminals. It's about the most anti-military place I've ever been. True story: My honor guard unit was coming back from a funeral in northern Washington. We stopped at a bar and grill for lunch, and we were refused service. They said our military ID's weren't good enough, neither were our home state driver's licenses, and they didn't want our kind in there anyway. That was in Seattle. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 24, 2005 11:10 PM
Thugs? I think you're mistaken, ace. These are peace activists. Posted by: tony on August 24, 2005 11:14 PM
They didn't look intelligent enough to even comprehend the meaning of "peace activist"... they looked to me like a bunch of stupid, worthless fuckwads who should be summarily executed and done with. IMHO, of course. Posted by: Dave S on August 24, 2005 11:35 PM
What Cedarford said! Posted by: Lipstick on August 24, 2005 11:41 PM
oh shit, I'm going to agree with Cedarford about something. I feel dirty. Lipstick, tell me about your feet again Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 24, 2005 11:49 PM
Give them tight pussy, free food, loose shoes, a warm place to shit and a chance to beat or kill people and the animals are happy. Sounds like a political philosophy to me. Posted by: tony on August 24, 2005 11:53 PM
Right on, Cedarford. Exactly right. Ugh, I don't feel well. Posted by: Log Cabin on August 24, 2005 11:57 PM
spatter some ape brains Ape brains??? Ape BRAINS??? Oh man, I'm on the floor... I'm just f'ing DYING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: Dogstar on August 24, 2005 11:58 PM
Cedarford's post deleted for not-even-close-to-subtle racism. Jesus, please try to exercise some amount of discretion in the comments. Posted by: ace on August 25, 2005 12:07 AM
One word : ArmaGlide™ Posted by: The real Tony on August 25, 2005 12:08 AM
now, now Can't we all just get along? I'm sure there is some reasonable explantion for this whole thing. Perhaps the young boys had too many twinkies and maybe there mothers abused them when they were young. We must understand that violence only happens when you've done something to provoke it. There are no evil people in this world, only misunderstood people. Posted by: Nancy Pelosi on August 25, 2005 12:08 AM
Nancy, Good call - the TwinkieDefense™ worked for me. Posted by: Dan White on August 25, 2005 12:13 AM
I officially retract my almost agreement, having just comprehended the racist overtones. I'm slow. I rode the little bus. Apologies. Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 25, 2005 12:16 AM
Local news says the two guys you have highlighted with arrows were accosting and groping some females when the guys that ended up in the hospital tried to help the females. Posted by: Al on August 25, 2005 12:17 AM
I am shocked to see these nice young peaceful democrats fists attacked by the imperialist jaws of these violent soldiers. Obviously a case of voter intimidation and a violation of the voting rights act of 1965. Why these fine young democrats fists were attcked so violently by the soldiers jaws that the nasty nazi soldiers jaws were boken. I hope the fists heal up soon. Posted by: howard dean on August 25, 2005 12:38 AM
First I’d catch them, then I’d open up that special can of whop-ass I’ve been saving. After that, I’d throw them in jail and throw away the fu**ing key. Time to get medieval. The moonies have some new heroes to look up to. Maybe these thugs will make a trip down to Crawford. Posted by: Lumpy on August 25, 2005 12:51 AM
Hey, Real Tony, I thought I trademarked that! Note that this post comes right on the heels of Cedarford's noctural emission in the previous thread about "inner city animal barbarians." I question the timing. And while I'm questioning timing, I note that Ace recently resurrected his legendary "duck" post, and right afterwards Kos comes out saying he has a double-secret plan -- which he cannot reveal at this time -- for doing down the DLC. Ace, I've warned you before about being careful with your powers . . . Posted by: quiggs on August 25, 2005 01:24 AM
I'm in the Sea-Tac area and have heard NOTHING about this. Not now or when it first occured. Now...had the perps been white and the G.I's black, it would be national news for weeks. Tell me it wouldn't...go on, I dare ya. Posted by: Mumblix Grumph on August 25, 2005 01:46 AM
There's three more black men destined [back] to prison. This is just the sort of pointless violence Bill Cosby keeps trying to get the black community to address...yet it continues to fall on deaf ears. What a waste. Posted by: The Ugly American on August 25, 2005 02:01 AM
Kos reminds me of the lead replicant in Blade Runner...a toy that doesn't realize that it is broken. Poor deluded Kos doesn't realize that its his KosBats™ that are "radioactive" to the electorate. I'm betting that he winds up with, in baseball terms, the Golden Sombrero™ Posted by: The real Tony on August 25, 2005 02:06 AM
Because the soldiers race isn't mentioned, how much you wanna bet they were white dudes... Posted by: fat kid on August 25, 2005 03:10 AM
Who gives a rat's behind what race either party is? Would you feel better if the GIs were black? And--for those of you who don't know-- yes, I'm black, an AF retiree, a conservative and, yes, I hope this a-hole gets his butt kicked by a bunch of Marines before he gets his butt kicked in prison. And sometimes misbehavior *is* about race--or rather, culture. This isn't. There should be more people who can tell the difference. Posted by: Juliette on August 25, 2005 03:28 AM
Who video tapes this kind of stuff????!!!! It's bad enough something like this happens, but to have not one, but two people filming it rather than calling the cops, or God forbid, coming to their defense, actually boggles me. Holy shit... this is wrong on so many levels. Posted by: monica on August 25, 2005 04:22 AM
I'm old enough to remember (as a small child) the Kitty Genovese incident. It was one of those things that sticks with a kid for the rest of their life. I go out of my way to avoid confrontation, but there are times when it is necessary to just wade in screaming like a banshee and back it up with your body if need be. Most malefactors seem to back down when you look frothing, crazed, and truly ready to cancel their ticket if they don't. Posted by: Tony on August 25, 2005 04:43 AM
Juliette said, "Who gives a rat's behind what race either party is? Would you feel better if the GIs were black?" The answer to the first question is, "People who have to be watchful and estimate their danger when abroad in a city care about every fact that might help them do so." The answer to the second question is, "If by 'you,' you mean readers of other races, and by 'better' you mean 'a little less fearful that a lot of black men despise them for their race,' then the answer is, 'Yes.'" Nor will I take any sh*t from you for suspecting there could be a racial dimension to this. When that sort of black man looks at a white man, I suspect he thinks, "White, therefore peaceably raised, not as aggressive, and not a street brawler. White, therefore afraid of being called racist if he fights a black guy. Easy mark. Let's totally f*ck him up in front of his girlfriend." I've just poured my argument out over you exactly as if you were white and male, Juliette. I hope you weren't expecting anything better than equal treatment, because equal is the best you're going to get from me. Posted by: Jacarutu on August 25, 2005 05:12 AM
This isn't. There should be more people who can tell the difference. Not being clairvoyant, I'm going to have to wait till the investigation is complete to draw any conclusions in this regard. I know what I saw, and it was disturbing. I don't know what was NOT shown on the clip. I don't know what was said INSIDE the club. Posted by: Tony on August 25, 2005 05:59 AM
The story that Kitty Genovese was killed while her cold, callous, uncaring neighbors looked on is not quite true. Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 25, 2005 06:16 AM
Monica:Who video tapes this kind of stuff????!!!! Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 25, 2005 06:20 AM
The story that Kitty Genovese was killed while her cold, callous, uncaring neighbors looked on is not quite true. Yet she is dead, and anyone could have intervened. Apologies for murderers and people who did nothing are in themselves a sad commentary. Posted by: Tony on August 25, 2005 07:50 AM
Not that it makes the crime any less horrific, but the article it links to doesn't suggest that the soldiers were beaten because they were soldiers. Al said: "Local news says the two guys you have highlighted with arrows were accosting and groping some females when the guys that ended up in the hospital tried to help the females." The soldiers got a beating because, apparently, they helped out a couple of women who chucked a hot dog at one of the thugs. Posted by: Dave D on August 25, 2005 08:15 AM
Tony, did you even read what I linked to? The Genovese case has been used to condemn the supposed "indifference" of the American people to suffering, when it turns out there was -- of course -- more nuance and stuff to the case. But it's handy for propagandists, and willing absorbers of propaganda. In the meantime an entire neighborhood of people was tarnished. But who cares about them, right? Only dead people matter. Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 25, 2005 08:41 AM
I'm not American, but i suspect Seattle is one of those places with "though" gun laws, right? Call me Harry Callahan, but had that happened in Texas someone would have pulled over in his car and let loose a few "caps", as they say, in these animals asses. Posted by: madne0 on August 25, 2005 08:49 AM
This assault actually happened on July 31. Although I naturally sympathize with the soldiers, there is nothing so far that indicates that the men were in uniform or that their attackers knew they were Iraq veterans. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/237930_fight25.html Unfortunately, Pioneer Square has a history of pretty nasty violence. In 2001, a Mardi Gras celebration turned into a full-blown riot, and a 20-year-old man, Kristopher Kime, was killed. He had stopped to help a woman who was being attacked. Someone broke a bottle over his head, and then a group of thugs descended on him, stomping in his skull. More than 70 other people were hurt. Police arrested more than 40 people, thanks mainly to videotapes of the scene. Most of the violence was black on white. The whole thing triggered this wave of hand-wringing in Seattle over racial issues. Posted by: Scott on August 25, 2005 08:54 AM
"This assault actually happened on July 31. Although I naturally sympathize with the soldiers, there is nothing so far that indicates that the men were in uniform or that their attackers knew they were Iraq veterans." Is there a point in there somewhere? Posted by: Ken on August 25, 2005 09:34 AM
A couple of thoughts: 1. The fact that the victims were veterans doesn't make the thugs any more evil, because their actions already maxed out their accounts just on face value alone. It does, however, make the victims' plight more tragic. 2. As for the commenter who argued that the people who videotaped this event should have been wading in to the fray instead, do you know who the videotapers were? Do you know how able-bodied? If it was someone whose intervention could have altered the outcome, I'd agree with you. But by keeping calm and videotaping it, these people have given the police a damned good chance to ID the perps and hopefully bring them to justice. Posted by: Brian B on August 25, 2005 09:45 AM
Holy shit, this post is like a Rorschach blot. How the hell is this supposed to be a racial issue? Posted by: Hubris on August 25, 2005 09:48 AM
Well, it is most certainly a crime inspired by (black on white) racism. But it most certainly shouldn't matter to the law, either. Posted by: lauraw on August 25, 2005 10:03 AM
Every goddamn thing that happens in this country is first cast through the lens of race, Hubris. Last night, I was flipping through the channels, and some program on PBS was powerstroking a story from segregation days. It showed a room full of white guys hassling a black kid, who looked like he'd been beat up. (I'm assuming this was a true story.) Nobody has ever questioned the usefullness of these things. Incessant and continuous drumbeating on what happened in the past, reminding a segment of our citizenry that they were once horribly discriminated against, and reminding the other segments that their racial forfathers were the ones who did it. I've never seen anybody put that together with the black-on-white violence like we see here. On some level, it's hard to blame them. If I were constantly reminded that my Irish ancestors were shafted by the Brits, I might have been just a bit more "understanding" of the IRA shits. After all, those Brits deserve a bit of what they did to "my people". If I never hear "we must learn from the past" again, it will be too soon. We never learn anything. The past sucks. Leave it there. Posted by: rho on August 25, 2005 10:10 AM
Years ago I was involved in a similar 5 on 2 incident but fortunately was not knocked out and was able to extricate myself with the least amount of damage as was possible. I made note to myself afterwards to not open my mouth unless the odds were a little more even. I am still working on that. Posted by: Dman on August 25, 2005 10:14 AM
There is no call for this these no good punks should be cuaght and have their arms cut off or at least be given a good caning like what they did to that youth in singapore a few years back and screw the whinning liberal jackasses Posted by: screaming eagle on August 25, 2005 10:21 AM
Hubris - you are correct. This isn't a racial issue though it's being made out to be. Criminal dumbfucks are criminal dumbfucks, no matter the color of their skin. I watched the video and still can't determine the race of the victims - not that it matters. lauraw - do you have more info? Did you all see that asshole stealing the victim's shoes toward the end of the video? Nice. Posted by: compos mentis on August 25, 2005 10:30 AM
Criminal dumbfucks are criminal dumbfucks, no matter the color of their skin. Exactly. The same horrible shit could easily have gone down outside a rural bar in my home state of West Virginia. Hillbilly-on-hillbilly crime. Posted by: Hubris on August 25, 2005 10:36 AM
Juliette, I agree with you. All that matters is that this was an act of aggressive violence. The race of the perpetrators or victims is irrelevant to the fact and magnitude of the moral and legal transgression involved here. Aggressive violence of this sort is intolerable. It should not be brushed aside, minimized, excused or downplayed. If someone had been on the scene with an appropriate weapon and had killed these thugs as an act of defense, I would vote to give him a medal. Good riddance. Posted by: Phinn on August 25, 2005 10:53 AM
that's disturbing. Hopefully they catch these guys and send em to jail. And hopefully there's some vets in jail to take care of em. I wouldn't wanna be a black guy in a jail cell with a bunch of vets if I had just beaten some soldiers returning from Iraq. They would surely deserve whatever is thrust onto them, or into. Whatever. Posted by: tyler on August 25, 2005 11:02 AM
Ken, the point is that some are playing the story up as "These assholes beat up a couple of soldiers!", as if their identity as soldiers had a crucial bearing on how the incident unfolded. As Brian B. said just after you, it makes the victims' plight more tragic, but doesn't necessarily tell us any more about the perpetrators. I disagree with Brian, however, in saying that the thugs "maxed out" their evil-doers account. I think there would be an added dimension of moral depravity if the thugs knew the guys had put their lives on the line in Iraq and yet still sought to inflict serious bodily harm. It's the difference between, were these guys targetted because they were soldiers, or were they a couple of guys who got in a fight and just happened to be soldiers? Posted by: Scott on August 25, 2005 11:45 AM
No compos, I don't have any more info. than you do. I admit to having biased ideas about urban black youths from having lived in a certain neighborhood. There are very racist and ignorant ones among them that will target white women for racist sexual assaults, and white men for racist ass whippings. And the ass whippings are more fun if the guy's wife or girlfriend is watching helplessly. This scenario, with the hotdog thrown at them as the spark, would be just too delicious for the guys that I remember to pass up. I'm sorry if that's not PC; I want to re-emphasize that I am talking about a specific social set of racist thugs, just like there's a small subset of poor whites who are racist thugs. I'd be surprised if the victims were black, really. Sorry! Posted by: lauraw on August 25, 2005 12:10 PM
I can't believe I live in the US. It might take a while, but these guys will get theirs...watch...they better watch their six! Posted by: patd95 on August 25, 2005 12:47 PM
Relevant portion from the PI article: A group of people were in line to enter Larry's Nightclub on First Avenue South when a man groped one of the women in the group. Her friend, another woman, confronted the man, and he groped her as well. Ok, here's what's buggin me. Two military men fresh from the theater of war, size things up, see they're outnumbered, outgunned, and decide the best thing is a withdraw from the hot-zone with a face saving argument - a retreat to a safe area protecting themselves and their embedded non-coms. But no. The chick. She decides she's gonna toss a hot dog, knowing full well that whatever happens, it ain't her that's gonna pay. Once again, a women writes a check knowing she won't have to cover. I guarantee you, as that dog flipped through the air, the men thought, "Well, I'm gonna get my ass kicked." And the women thought, "Well, the men are gonna get their asses kicked." And so it was. Once again, nature makes a mockery of the notion of equal treatment of the sexes. Men have the right to get their asses kicked; women have the right to see to it that their men get their asses kicked. Women, if you really loved us like you say you do, you'd stop doing stupid shit will obviously end up with us getting our asses kicked trying to protect you from the consequences of those actions. Please, just think a little. Posted by: Ray Midge on August 25, 2005 01:12 PM
Bill Clinton's midnight basketball program would have prevented this. Posted by: The Warden on August 25, 2005 01:33 PM
This kind of reminds me of something that happened nearby a couple years ago. Two cars full of women were looking for a parking spot at a shopping center. Then. One of the women threw an orange peel at a woman in the other car. That was it. The women flew out of their cars and attacked each other. Posted by: lauraw on August 25, 2005 01:41 PM
Tony, did you even read what I linked to? Every word. I guess I just have a non-nuanced view of this sort of thing. Excuse me for having a moral upbringing in a rural area where people who live near each other actually help each other out in times of need. Posted by: on August 25, 2005 02:26 PM
Tony, Beware of the hasty generalization. Sometimes those city slickers help each other out too. There were some good examples around 9/11/01. Posted by: Hubris on August 25, 2005 02:37 PM
I'm surprised there aren't carloads from Fort Lewis (20 miles south) out looking to settle this score right now. Posted by: SGT Dan on August 25, 2005 06:04 PM
Bill Clinton's midnight basketball program would have prevented this.
Posted by: The Ugly American on August 25, 2005 06:36 PM
Ace deleted my past post, but it was the same thing as the Seattle news media did to avoid the "offensive details and racial hate crimes" of the sexual assault on the 2 women and the brutal beatings of their boyfriends by inner city thugs. Just as off mark is Roy Midge, who blames the women for reacting in a way that "precipitated the fight" after 3 buffed up ghetto thugs grabbed their breasts and asses. "One of them threw the hot dog that started the fight!!! "( after having her breast grabbed and being called a white bitch 'ho) Yes, women getting their asses and breasts grabbed by total strangers, violent criminals, in public - then acting adversely are the "root cause" of "misunderstandings" such as this. Posted by: Cedarford on August 25, 2005 09:20 PM
Jacarutu : Nor will I take any sh*t from you for suspecting there could be a racial dimension to this. You will take whatever I dish out or you can ignore it. It's your choice. Whether you like it or not, however, is not my problem. Now as to your argument... When that sort of black man looks at a white man, I suspect he thinks, "White, therefore peaceably raised, not as aggressive, and not a street brawler. But, like the rest of us, you only guessing, and with only your apparent prejudices rather than your logic. When that sort of "man" looks at anyone, "straight" (meant in the law-abiding sense) or not, he's looking for weakness. That's how predators operate, regardless of color or culture. I've just poured my argument out over you exactly as if you were white and male, Juliette. I hope you weren't expecting anything better than equal treatment, because equal is the best you're going to get from me. Well it's so comforting to know that you bring the identical quality of argument for all and sundry. You are hereby granted a ghetto pass, good for slipping by every sort of black man unmolested. Don't bother thanking me. Posted by: Juliette on August 26, 2005 12:27 AM
Juliette said, "But, like the rest of us, you only guessing...." First of all, it's "you are only guessing." Secondly, I'm not just guessing; you merely guessed that I was guessing. I've heard the rhetoric of the "skinny white boy" all my life; I've heard all about the "pasty-faced," the "vanilla," the "whitebread." I know that being studious is "acting white." I've been reminded many times that "white men can't jump." I know about their "little dicks." If your point is that I can't read minds, then go make your argument to someone who thinks that I can. If your point is that I'm merely conjuring my opinion out of thin air when I suppose that black attackers especially despise their white victims, then the insults I've heard all my life refute you. Posted by: Jacarutu on August 26, 2005 02:31 AM
Jacarutu: We (white folk) hear quite a bit about how we have no appreciation for the suffering of, and invisible discrimination towards, minorities. Most of that seems like people playing the victim card, but when Juliette speaks on race, I listen. She is reasonable, rationale, and qualified. I wouldn't pick or perpetuate a fight with her, because she's on the side of the good guys (i.e., those who truly wish for equality and peace among races). Please consider a less confrontational attitude. Posted by: Geoff on August 26, 2005 02:42 AM
Aaahhh - look at the effect of 4 Bass Ale's. I clearly meant "rational" vice "rationale." I'll bet an odd number of beers will do the trick . . . Posted by: geoff on August 26, 2005 02:44 AM
Ah, you're missing a very important dimension to the incident. Of course, the fact that these soldiers were veterans of the Iraq War is crucial. Even if (especially if) they were out of uniform or not easily identified as such. Don't you perceive that the barrage of vicious anti-war speech created a cliimate of hate such that soldiers - or those who might seem like soldiers to the ignor- pardon me, easily-inflamed masses would trigger this sort of violent attack? Posted by: Carbonel on August 26, 2005 05:43 AM
Jacarutu: That's no way to treat a lady, and one should always enter a discussion with respect for other participants. As to your arguments, they seem to be: 1) the race of the participants is important because it is a datum used in identifying dangerous elements in society; and 2) some blacks hate whites and find them particularly easy prey. 1) is inarguable since you are using the to form your personal worldview. I think that it's a worldview that is unsupported by crime statistics and by the experiences of others, but if that's the kind of information you think you need to have to survive on the streets, then by all means file it away. 2) is also inarguable. It is almost certainly true that some percentage of blacks hate whites and would seize an opportunity to attack them based on purely racial motives. The question is: how big is that percentage? Is it really significant? Again, crime statistics suggest that it is not. Neither of these "arguments" is worth much, and certainly not worth being rude or disrespectful to a veteran, a lady, and an active supporter of conservative causes. Posted by: Geoff on August 26, 2005 08:47 AM
In the post of August 25, 2005 09:20 PM, Cedarford criticized Ray Midge for his critique of the woman who supposedly threw a hotdog at one of the men who groped her. Speaking ironically, he said, "Yes, women getting their asses and breasts grabbed by total strangers, violent criminals, in public - then acting adversely are the 'root cause' of 'misunderstandings' such as this." But Midge never tried to minimize the attack as being the result of a misunderstanding. Nor do I see any sign that he was trying to excuse the attackers. He claims that some women carelessly stir up violent men because they themselves don't contemplate having to fight. I wonder if Cedarford would like to go back and address the point that Ray Midge actually made, rather than knock down arguments that no one is trying to uphold. Posted by: Jacarutu on August 26, 2005 09:14 AM
In his reply of 8:47 a.m., Geoff conceded two of my points as being inarguable. Then he vaguely claimed the authority of "statistics" in order to minimize the significance of my points, yet he didn't cite any statistic or any source for a statistic. Of course, I admit that neither his concessions nor the lack of backup for the authority of the claimed statistics does anythng to prove my points. Posted by: Jacarutu on August 26, 2005 09:39 AM
Jacarutu: I can see that when you "reason without respect" you mean without respect for reason. Posted by: geoff on August 26, 2005 09:57 AM
About the race thing-- I was watching the video as they played it over and over again on Hannity & Colmes last night. I could SWEAR that a close up of one of the victims showed clearly that he was a black man. Looked to me like both the victims were other black men. I doubt race was a motivator in this crime. And, those guys doing the assault don't exactly look to me like a bunch of hippy protester morons. They look more like gangbanger morons. [My own prejudices kick in]. It looks to me like the person shooting the video may possibly have been a participant, or at least a friend of the attackers. I noticed that there was another guy also filming with a camcorder as someone else noted above, and he looks to me like an active participant filming this atrocity with glee. I also noticed another guy taking cell phone camera pictures while one of the attackers pose an unconscious victim. This whole film clip reminds me of the war in Iraq in a different way-- those guys did to the victims what a mob of terrorist sympathisers would do to captured Americans in a place like Fallujah [remember the bridge incident?] or in Somalia. I'm not saying these guys knew they were soldiers, I think they probably did not know. But it gives me chills to think that the same atmosphere of mayhem and terror that gripped a place like Fallujah exists in some of our own cities. And the laws in these places are set up so that if you obey the law, you usually can't even carry a piece to defend yourself. If only the victims had been armed! We must get a handle on this situation fast. Does anyone know if the victims survived the attack? That was the main thing I missed that I wanted to know when I saw the clip last night. Posted by: Mark_D on August 26, 2005 11:47 AM
Jacarutu : Picking nits about typos is unworthy of a decent debate. Are you perfect? Me neither. If your point is that I'm merely conjuring my opinion out of thin air when I suppose that black attackers especially despise their white victims, then the insults I've heard all my life refute you. If you pay attention to such things--as I'm guessing you do--you'll notice that black criminals' primary victims are also black. So, for example, whether a black murder victim (of a black murderer) is depised less than a white victim doesn't make the former any less dead. (You can probably guess that I'm against hate-crime legislation.) Also, were you insulted or were you physically attacked? (Your comment doesn't make that clear.) Heck, I've been insulted plenty of times--by you right here, as a matter of fact. Big whoop. Physical attacks, however, are a different matter. Posted by: Juliette on August 26, 2005 11:45 PM
Some niggas.. not all niggas.... are complete scum. Posted by: Repinsemertx on September 5, 2005 06:08 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust. Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD] Recent Comments
heya:
""320 The fun part is - we KNEW all this was true i ..."
It's me donna : "113 Thune is Cocaine Glitch McConnell sans the "ch ..." Dark Lihuixtzichatl: "Thune is Cocaine Glitch McConnell sans the "charis ..." Lady in Black[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "Thune has been on the government teats since 1985 ..." Yudhishthira's Dice: "And how do you keep them out of the new party? Wha ..." JROD: "Nevada State Treasurer from Nevada. Jeff Carter. ..." Polliwog the 'Ette: "Politicians never understand that. Nor do too many ..." Eromero: "The gOpe plan is to turn the country back over to ..." Mr. Lebowski: "Thune has been on the government teats since 1985 ..." L - No nic, another fine day: "Aye. 👍 In South Dakota state politics, ..." Jukin the Deplorable and Totally Unserious: "The real question is: How does a Republican maj ..." ShainS -- Paris Hilton is harder to get into than the D.C. Hilton [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "Frederica Wilson and [b]the 500 hats[/b]. Poste ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|