Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Two "Mohammed Attas? | Main | There's Hope For You Mutants Yet: Geeks, Freaks, & Gaywads The Hot Hunks In Japan »
August 19, 2005

Cindy Sheehan Wins A Convert!

For the GOP. A longtime liberal suddenly discovers Cindy Sheehan's shenanigans have pushed him to the right.

Thanks to Rick.


posted by Ace at 01:07 PM
Comments



Oh man, I can tell that the comments are going to be pure gold. Putting on a fresh pot of coffee now.

I love partisan bickering. :)

Posted by: Megan on August 19, 2005 01:14 PM

The good little democrat in me tied the little noose around his neck and jumped off the stool. He just couldn’t take it anymore.

Oh man, that is a priceless line. I am glad he sees the light. Being a strong Right Winger, I have been having doubts myself about the war, but he is right, we are there, we HAVE to see it through.

I hate seeing our men and women blown to bits, but the war they are fighting is helping the war on terror. I know that some will say we have hurt our cause because more terrorists are being recruited. Yes, to be sure that is happening, BUT more terrorists are being killed now then if we had never invaded.

I keep holding my breath for the Iraqi people to get so fed up and begin kicking terrorist ass.

Posted by: WunderKraut on August 19, 2005 01:19 PM

Bit late, isn't he? Even if Sheehan manages to reclaim her ditch, it seems unlikely she'll be able to reclaim the media momentum.

Nothing like pissing off your own side just when it probably won't do you any good with the other side, either.

Posted by: S. Weasel on August 19, 2005 01:25 PM

Easy on the coffee, Megan.

You know what happened last time.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 19, 2005 01:59 PM

I know that some will say we have hurt our cause because more terrorists are being recruited.

Remember, you can't recruit the unwilling. If a person is wired to become a terrorist, it's gonna happen. Iraq may have been the proximate cause for many of these goons, but to me, that argues that we're just flushing 'em out now and killing them in one spot, rather than having to do it later all over the place.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 19, 2005 02:02 PM

"Easy on the coffee, Megan. You know what happened last time."

:0

Keep Laura out of the thread!

Posted by: Megan on August 19, 2005 02:05 PM

Tease.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 19, 2005 02:07 PM

...wait, we're not talking about the time she made me spray my monitor?

Posted by: Megan on August 19, 2005 02:12 PM

One of the commenters over there posted this link documenting Iraq's sponsorship of terrorism. It's a must-read.

Posted by: The Warden on August 19, 2005 02:13 PM

WunderKraut wrote:
I keep holding my breath for the Iraqi people to get so fed up and begin kicking terrorist ass.

You can come up for air now.

Posted by: on August 19, 2005 02:25 PM

Cool Beans about the Iraqis fighting back.

I think that Rocketeer may have misunderstood my comment about the war causing terrorist recruiting to go up. You have to read the next sentence where I say that is not so bad because we get to kill more of them. I think that is one of the bigger reasons for fighting. It takes the fight over there and keeps it away from our civilians. Besides our boys have cool weapons!

Posted by: WunderKraut on August 19, 2005 02:35 PM

the poll question "do you approve of the way President Bush is conducting the war"? misses a whole lot of people who support the war but don't think Bush is doing enough.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 19, 2005 02:37 PM

Eesh, just got done with that thread. Do the moonbats ever have anything other than "ENLIST ENLIST ENLIST?" Someone should post this link on Scott's site... maybe he could make it part of the banner or something, I don't know.

Posted by: Megan on August 19, 2005 02:38 PM

WunderKraut,

I am not trying to be obnoxious here, but I have a question: Were all these people who are being "pushed" into becoming terrorists by our presence in Iraq just sitting around arranging flowers before? I just don't buy it.

I can't see someone saying, "well I was going to attend college and find a nice girl to settle down with and have a family, but since Bush invaded Iraq, I'm going to go blow myself to pieces and take some infidels with me."

It streches the bounds of credibility a little, don't you think?

Posted by: Log Cabin on August 19, 2005 02:46 PM

No, WunderKraut, I think you misunderstand our intentions in fighting this war.

If we (the U.S.) didn't have to kill one person to effectively eliminate the threat of Islamofascism, we would have never gone to war.

Look at what we tolerate here in our own borders. The Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and most any other type of hate group you can think of. Even though some people would think it would be fun to kill every single one of these hatemongers, we don't do it.

Why? Because it's wrong to kill people just for thinking a certain way, even if that way is hateful. Only their actions count. The hateful groups mentioned above aren't currently a credible threat to us, because we keep them under surveillance and punish them severely if they ever do pose a threat.

If the Muslim terrorist groups were big-talking but ineffective hate groups, we could and would co-exist with them. But they're not. And so we won't.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on August 19, 2005 02:55 PM

Log,

Running an Islamic florist is SERIOUS BUSINESS...

Posted by: on August 19, 2005 02:56 PM

Oddly enough I sort of agree with WK.

LCR asked: "Were all these people who are being "pushed" into becoming terrorists by our presence in Iraq just sitting around arranging flowers before?"

Nah - probably going to "Death to the Great Satan" rallies and burning the US flag. But possibly a fair-sized segment of them wasn't terribly motivated to do much beyond set flame to cloth and shout "derka derka mohammed jihad."

"I can't see someone saying, "well I was going to attend college"

"- to memorize the Koran and learn how to call for infidel killing more loudly than the other guys -"

"and find a nice girl to settle down with"

"- to beat, whip, rape, and possibly mutilate and/or murder if she were raped by anyone else, or if she spoke to or looked at anyone else for that matter -"

"and have a family"

"- though most baby girls would, of course, be buried alive because the family would be dishonored and the mother would be whipped again, regardless of whether or not she already had been that day -"

"but since Bush invaded Iraq, I'm going to go blow myself to pieces and take some infidels with me."

"- or at least give it my best shot, which means there's a high probability of a United States Marine shooting me in the head before I can do any damage at all, because I'm a dumb Islamoretard shithead."

Hey, this works out all right. :)

Posted by: Megan on August 19, 2005 02:58 PM

I'm sorry if I was harsh, WunderKraut. Sometimes we get sneaky trolls in here who make "straw men" out of conservative positions by exaggerating them.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on August 19, 2005 03:06 PM

...y'know Sue, on the basis of that, you'd think Ace would've banned me long ago.

[pre-emptively firing a leftover nuke at the peanut gallery]

Posted by: Megan on August 19, 2005 03:11 PM

I am no Lefty troll. Go see my site for my posts on Israel today.

I have always believed in our cause. You guys are right in saying that the war probably just gave them an excuse to blow themselves up, but probably they would have done so anyway. That is why I said some people.

Fighting this war is the right thing to do. It is the right thing for the Iraqi people and it is the right thing for the War on Terror. If we leave before we are done, then we are back to where we were before 9/11 when our enemy thought we were weak.

I hate that I gave the impression that I think the war is wrong. Again, my comment was meant say that even if more terrorists are recruited, that at least we get to kill them! Without the war they would have still joined the terrorists and would be lurking in the shadows. At least we have a venue to kill them before they get here.

Posted by: WunderKraut on August 19, 2005 03:29 PM

I hate that I gave the impression that I think the war is wrong.

No, sweetie, you came out so gung ho on it that I figured you were making fun of us.

After I visited your website, I saw you were sincere and I apologized.

:)

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on August 19, 2005 03:39 PM

Sue,

Ok, great :-) Sometimes I write a comment and after reading it and seeing how others took it, I wish I could take it back or revise it.

I got a little defensive, sorry. Long day and week, plus I have this terrible patch of poison ivy on my right arm....no seriously....it is bad....My surveyors tell me to put gas or bleach on it.....

Stay tuned to see if WunderKraut lives through the weekend.

Posted by: WunderKraut on August 19, 2005 03:43 PM

WunderKraut, now I owe you clarification and a bit of an apology - I wasn't actually disagreeing with you, just trying to reinforce what you were saying. It's just that so often, I hear war opponents claim, directly or indirectly, that our actions are making terrorists out of folks that, absent a US presence, would be kite-flying puppy-huggers brimming with kumbayah. It ain't true, you know it, I know you know it, and I was just trying to clarify that further.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 19, 2005 04:06 PM

"My surveyors tell me to put gas or bleach on it"

Proceed with caution! There's probably a good reason they're surveyors and not doctors :)

Posted by: BrewFan on August 19, 2005 04:06 PM

P.S. - On the poison ivy, get some plug tobacco from the drugstore, put a chunk in a washcloth, wet it, mash it, and rub the affected area down with it every couple of hours. It works, I swear.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 19, 2005 04:08 PM

P.P.S. - I'm not even a surveyor, much less a doctor, so factor that into your decision as to whether or not to follow my advice.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 19, 2005 04:11 PM

Duly noted :-)

Posted by: WunderKraut on August 19, 2005 04:12 PM

"the poll question "do you approve of the way President Bush is conducting the war"? misses a whole lot of people who support the war but don't think Bush is doing enough."

This is true - it completely ignores the "kill'em all and let god sort'em out" somewhere to the right of Ghengis Kahn crowd".

Posted by: on August 19, 2005 04:16 PM

WK, I'm pretty allergic to the stuff (have reacted to smoke from firewood that had poison ivy growing on it)..

Go see your doc or a PA and let him prescribe prednisone - or a similar oral steroid. Knocks it back fast.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 19, 2005 04:40 PM
it’s time for all of America to stand together, put on the big boy pants, and get through the next few years.

That's golden.

Posted by: Master of None on August 19, 2005 04:45 PM

Go out and cut some jewelweed and press the juice from the stem. Apply to poison ivy rash.

Stings a bit at first but it does help dry it out.

Posted by: lauraw on August 19, 2005 04:55 PM

Oh, shoot. I saw the title and assumed the article was about Republican senator Chuck Hagel saying Bush should've met with the woman and posted accordingly.

Wow. First time I've ever said anything stupid on the internet.

Posted by: S. Weasel on August 19, 2005 05:17 PM

What's jewelweed? Does it grow in the cracks in the parking lot at Zales?

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 19, 2005 05:30 PM

I thought "jewelweed" was just a fancy-pants word for pot.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 19, 2005 05:32 PM

This was the best line I've seen in addressing the chickenhawk issue. From a commenter on Scott Randolph's post. Actually it's in a post above the linked one.

I’m troubled by what I read on some of the above posts. People saying things like “shut up and enlist if you love this war” etc, etc. Those people are stupid. To equate supporting something as being legitimate only if you’re doing that something is not a standard anybody needs to live up to. Support abortion or gay rights? Ever had an abortion/are you gay? No? Then shut up, get an abortion/a boyfriend you hypocrite. Sounds stupid, doesn’t it. Because it is.”

Me: Do you support Gay Rights?
He: Yes I do. Strongly.
Me: (unzipping my pants) Then try this.
He: I support gay rights-I don't do gay sex.
Me: AHAAA-a Chickencocksucker.

Posted by: tom scott on August 19, 2005 06:09 PM

Tom Scott, I reserve the right to steal that "chickencocksucker" argument on numerous future occasions. Nicely done.

Posted by: utron on August 19, 2005 06:33 PM

Wunder,

No misunderstanding by me. I am totally picking up on where you are coming from. I think your support for TGWOT and for Isreal's self-defense are great.

I just have a real hard time believing our pre-emptive war is causing terrorism, that's all. Good work on your blog, BTW.

Posted by: Log Cabin on August 19, 2005 09:09 PM

Cindy Sheehan is not a strategy. Once again the Dems confuse attacking Bush with presenting an alternate strategy. When I see her on TV, all I can think is that I have absolutely nothing in common with this woman.

Posted by: insider on August 20, 2005 01:40 AM

Once again the Dems confuse attacking Bush with presenting an alternate strategy

Shhhh... we don't want them to realize this.

Posted by: tony on August 20, 2005 02:21 AM

oooooooh, lookee. bloggy mcblogblog decided to change his mind. what a remarkable sea change, that. pull up the tent stakes, folks. no, on second thought, leave the tent stakes, the porta-potties, the fallen soldier memorials, etc. -- the larry northern volunteer militia will be by shortly to clean up.

volunteers can apply below.

Posted by: dave. on August 20, 2005 04:28 AM

Worthy of note: Matt "moonbat" Lauer gets slamdunked.

http://newsbusters.org/media/TodaySoldier.wmv

Posted by: on August 20, 2005 05:02 AM

That is an awesome video. LOL
Wish it were longer.

Posted by: lauraw on August 20, 2005 11:46 AM

I have yet to see any moonbat cry "Clinton lied. Soldiers died." for any of his nefarious military excursions when trying to get attention turned away from Monica, the stained dress and nasty cigar. Not that it's surprising to see a double standard from the leftists. All stripes of moonbat/leftist/socialist/communist/moderate/stupid people cling to the two-standard reference of morality.

Posted by: Carlos on August 20, 2005 05:35 PM

carlos, when ya got nothing, ya drag clinton into it. well, clinton -- the best republican president ever -- is hanging out with 41, trading wisecracks about 43.

if ya wanna compare sucky past presidents to 43, start with nixon, then hoover, coolidge and truman.

then go wash your twat. i can smell ya from here.

Posted by: dave. on August 21, 2005 12:07 AM

dave.:

You are a quality troll -- please keep visiting. I personally agree that Clinton was one of the better Republican presidents.

Posted by: Michael on August 21, 2005 07:03 PM

I mean, Slick Willy earned my respect when he took on the unions and got NAFTA passed. Let's be honest, that took guts.

You, dave., can also earn my respect if you drop to your knees and give me a Monica.

Posted by: Michael on August 21, 2005 07:16 PM

Clinton earned my respect when he did Monica in the oval office and then peacefully brazened it out after getting caught. Teddy would have just taken her for a ride... ;->

The wussy euro politicians would have resigned when faced with a scandal of that sort.

He's a lecherous adultering scoundrel of course, but is a scoundrel who understood exactly what the public was willing to tolerate and took it right to the ragged edge.

Posted by: Tony on August 22, 2005 08:32 PM

Cindy Sheehan is dishonoring her son Casey in several ways. One way she dishonors him is by omitting what his own views on the Iraq war was and synthesizing her own personal views with his. I find it strange that she says her son was against the war in Iraq, but yet Casey Sheehen reenlisted in the army of his own volition, that just doesn’t comport with Cindy Sheehan’s statements. This is a 100 % volunteer military, there is no conscription and that begs the question as to why Casey Sheehan reenlisted in a war he opposed, if that is even true. If perhaps Casey Sheehan disagreed with certain aspects of the war in Iraq e.g..he felt maybe we needed more troops in Iraq, or more armor on humvee’s or better food for the troops etc., then that should be explained by Cindy Sheehan without the partisan hyperbole. A person can complain about particular conditions in Iraq without opposing the entire war in Iraq you know. During another interview on national television Cindy Sheehan stated that her son was killed by friendly fire, when she was pressed about that statement she then said ” well I have speculative evidence that he was killed by friendly fire.” It’s amazing that anyone could use the words speculative and evidence in the same sentence side by side and keep a straight face. Evidence substantiates an allegation, speculation is just the opposite it requires no evidence at all,to use “speculative evidence” together is a perfect example of an oxymoron. The real truth of Casey Sheehan’s death is he was killed by hostile fire in Sadr City, this was the consistent report of his death since day one, medical reports and the reports from fellow soldiers who were present at his death confirm the same fact. Casey Sheehan was a real hero of the first order, when a convoy of soldiers from his unit was attacked in Sadr City he volunteered to join a rescue force to get them out, even after his commanding Sergeant told him he didn’t have to go because he was a mechanic and not an infantryman. Casey was reported telling his officer ” I go where my chief goes.” Thats not a man who didn’t believe in his cause or his duty, thats a hero. Casey Sheehan’s family has released this statement and I quote ” We do not agree with the political motivations and publicity tactics of Cindy Sheehan. She now appears to be promoting her own personal agenda and notoriety at the the expense of her son’s good name and reputation.”

Posted by: William Leatherwood on August 22, 2005 10:12 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
Recent Comments
whig: "YES, here is why... when you get busted for did ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " A man can become a woman. Make it make sens ..."

sniffybigtoe: " Obama's library looks like a Nazi anti-aircraft ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Nood. Virginia reaction stream. ..."

garrett: ">>RAGBRAI, the annual bike ride across Iowa, goes ..."

Seems Legit: "Never, ever, ever underestimate the degree of ment ..."

John McCain: "This is a good opportunity for me to reach across ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "The Chicago way Posted by: Steve_in_SoCal at May ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: "Only Jan 6 grannies go to jail for "inciting" viol ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks, Fat, Dumb, and Happy[/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "I've seen photos of her. That lawyer needs glasses ..."

mikeski's Cereal Box Replies: "[i]I am enough. Posted by: fd's Cereal Box Affirm ..."

Steve_in_SoCal: "I seeem to recall there are also massive issues wi ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives