Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Saint Cindy's "Sacrifice" | Main | Again: Brosnan Out As Bond, Supposedly »
August 17, 2005

Top Ten "Questions" Saint Cindy Sheehan Wants "Answered" By President Bush

10. Why did you kill my son?

9. You had something to do with Natalie Wood's drowning, too, didn't you?

8. Is this war being fought on behalf of the Jews?

7. If not all of the Jews, is this war being fought on behalf of Ben Gazzarra?

6. Who do you think is cuter-- Brian Williams or Matt Lauer? I've had the chance to meet both gentlemen and I have to say that Brian Williams is more "classically" handsome, but there's something about Matt Lauer that makes me think he'd be a real tiger in bed. Your thoughts?

5. A follow-up: Do you have Charlie Rose's home phone number?

4. Why did you lie to us about Saddam Hussein's WMD's?

3. Seriously-- is there even a man named "Saddam Hussein," or was that just another neo-con lie?

2. Knopff is overing me a $250,000 advance against 15% of royalties, but Doubleday is offering $300,000 against 10%. What would you do in this situation?

...and the Number One "Question" Saint Cindy Sheehan Wants "Answered" By President Bush...

1. Would you mind moving? You're blocking my camera.


posted by Ace at 02:49 PM
Comments



You know, Cindy, Paul Newman is half Jewish.

I'm sure there's something to be made of that.

Posted by: Phinn on August 17, 2005 02:51 PM

You know, Cindy, Paul Newman is half Jewish.

Well, that explains why I'm only half as comfortable with Butch Cassidy as I am with The Sundance Kid.

Posted by: Pseudarford on August 17, 2005 02:59 PM

What was the deal with Ben Gazzarra in Roadhouse? Not to be stereotypical or anything, but that guy looked as out of place in that world as I do in Harlem.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 17, 2005 03:03 PM

What do you think would happen if Cindy and Chucky Schumer were there and there was only one TV camera?

Posted by: CraigC on August 17, 2005 03:15 PM

What do you think would happen if Cindy and Chucky Schumer were there and there was only one TV camera?

Cold fusion.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 17, 2005 03:16 PM

#1 made it.

Posted by: Megan on August 17, 2005 03:17 PM
Posted by: on August 17, 2005 03:21 PM
9. You had something to do with Natalie Wood's drowning, too, didn't you?

Hold on, let's not dismiss Cindy Sheehan's question out of hand. Christopher Walken (2008 Stealth Candidate of the Republican Right) was on board the yacht the night Ms. Wood "accidentally drowned"... Coincidence or massive Karl Rove conspiracy? What did Natalie know?

Posted by: JFH on August 17, 2005 03:22 PM

That reminds me of a joke.

Q: What kind of wood doesn't float?

A: Yup.

Posted by: Dogstar on August 17, 2005 03:27 PM

Oh, no. I forgot about the upcoming books. They will have her photo on the cover looking "grieved." Any ideas for titles?

Posted by: on August 17, 2005 03:45 PM

More Natalie Wood jokes:

Why didn't Natalie take a shower on the boat?

She prefers to wash up on shore.

Ok, no more...sorry....had to tell it.

Don't you know it is all the JOOOOOS fault for everything. They sure do get around.

Posted by: WunderKraut on August 17, 2005 03:48 PM

,Any ideas for titles?

Speaking of titles, Jerome and Markos have titled their forthcoming book 'Donkey Fall' ....

... no, really - out of the nearly infinite number of ways you could combine letters into words and words into book titles, they've come up with 'Donkey Fall'

Well played, Karl ... well played, indeed.

Posted by: BumperStickerist on August 17, 2005 03:55 PM

Donkey Fuck.

Posted by: Phinn on August 17, 2005 04:00 PM

Donkey Hoetey

Posted by: Ayes of Death David on August 17, 2005 04:01 PM

Duh, some budy say Cindy Sheehan was a racist...duh...me write unwitty jokes...duh me do my mother in the can...

Posted by: DougAhole on August 17, 2005 04:07 PM

Possible Titles

"How I Brody Slapped Bush by St. Cindy"
"How a woman with a schnoz planes could land on stood up to the President"
"From mother to martyr, a liberal success story"
"How the JOOOOOS killed my son"
"Defiance in the Desert: A profile in sacrifice"
"Whoring for Babylon: Exploiting personal tragedy for political gain"

Posted by: Iblis on August 17, 2005 04:07 PM

FWIW, I agree with Andrea. (Shock and awe!) Cindy Sheehan is a mediawhore slut who deserves zero sympathy; only every single scrap of contempt any decent American can muster.

Later in the thread linked above I said:

"To hell with this evil bitch. Plenty of people have seen friends and family die since the Moslems declared war on us. We haven't all decided to commit treason against our country as a result. "

And that's all I'll ever have to say about Cindy.

Posted by: Megan on August 17, 2005 04:13 PM

I can't agree that she's committing treason.

That implies some sort of rational thought in her mental processes.

Posted by: cirby on August 17, 2005 05:03 PM

Harry Potter and the Neocon Rethuglican Zionist Conspiracy

Posted by: Sobek on August 17, 2005 06:02 PM

(Scratching head.) Megan, I don't see my name linked to anything on that forum. (Unless you mean another Andrea one I forgot to have killed; in that case ignore this comment.)

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 06:03 PM

Argh. The evil live preview showed the "strikeout" tag working on the phrase "one I forgot to have killed", but it doesn't show in the actual uploaded comment thus rendering my clever "there can be only one (Andrea)" joke an incoherent and possibly psychotic mess. Internet 40, Andrea love.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 06:05 PM

Greetings from Oceania

I can't tell if Cindy Sheehan's rants here are a parody or not, nor do I have the time or inclination to try to figure it out. They are sick, no doubt and she's doubtless turned off as many people to her cause as she ever had. She makes a beautiful poster child for the Left, if you're a conservative. I suspect she's had her Two Minutes Hate and is on her way to oblivion.

Posted by: Winston Smith on August 17, 2005 06:13 PM

"Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?"
  
-Sean Hannity, Fox News, 4/6/99

Posted by: Bill Batten on August 17, 2005 06:54 PM

As a liberal who has visited this site for my own education, I have to say that I'm shocked at the disgusting, hateful comments made regarding a woman who has given up a beloved son to this war. Have you all gone mad? Have you no decency? There are enough critics of Bush to find a target for sliming. Common decency should tell you that a woman who has lost a son gets a pass, no matter what you think of her opinions. I ask you all to take a deep breath and consider just what you are saying. We are a better society than this. We are all Americans. Please remember that Cindy Sheehan raised someone to become an alter boy, an honor student, an Eagle Scout and, finally, a Marine. You've got to admit that it takes a good Mother to do that. Try to harness your hysterical desire to protect Bush long enough to think about that.

Posted by: Bill Batten on August 17, 2005 07:03 PM

Yep, Hannity is (and always has been) an inconsistent idiot. Which proves what else, exactly?

I believe that type of argument is commonly called "tu quoque."

Posted by: Hubris on August 17, 2005 07:04 PM

"Why is Sean Hannity on the television? He's a yammering fool."

-- Andrea Harris, Ace of Spades HQ, 8/17/05

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 07:04 PM

Is it me or is Bill Batten the epitome of an old maid in britches?

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 07:05 PM

"Try to harness your hysterical desire to protect Bush long enough to think about that."

And so Cindy Sheehan, Michael Moore, MoveOn, et al can continue their hysterical criticism of President Bush. Why doesn't that sound like an equitable proposal?

Posted by: BrewFan on August 17, 2005 07:12 PM

Hey, I gave it a shot. Figured I could find one reasonable person anywhere, but what the hey. Andrea, just so you won't suffer under this particular illusion, I'm a combat veteran with 3 children who has been married for 29 years. As someone who has had to tell families their children have been killed, I would give a grieving Mother or Father a break no matter what they said or who said it for them. It's called common decency. Americans used to be rich with it. You people of course don't realize it but, you're just sick. As sick as I've ever seen in my 57 years. Well, I've had my education for the day and it's been enlightening. Thanks everybody!

Posted by: Bill Batten on August 17, 2005 07:57 PM

Did anyone see Anderson Cooper's 360 yesterday? He specifically asked her about this:

"My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. "

and she denied saying it. Anderson said he asked ABC about it, and they said they were scrambling to find the email from which she was quoted, but couldn't find it. So I did some digging, and found this..

The paragraph from which the quote is taken is about 2/3 down. I'm thinking I should email Anderson. Whadya all think? Legit?

Posted by: Lydia on August 17, 2005 07:58 PM

Bill,

Sorry, but the minute anyone, grieving parent or not, starts providing propaganda for Al-Jazeera to broadcast and the enemy to use as a recruiting tool, any pass they had to be immune from criticism gets revoked.

That unfortunate deranged woman is encouraging an increase in attacks, because when the enemy sees weakness they step up the pressure. She is making it harder for us to defeat the enemy, and ultimately helping to drag this war out longer than it would be if the nation collectively were to butch up and demonstrate some resolve -- and thus the end result will be more young men and women killed. I hope that one day she may realize this. But I doubt she will.

Until then, the audacious position of her and her backers -- the idea that she can say or do whatever she wants and cannot be criticized because of her victim status -- needs to be mocked and ridiculed as forcefully and mercilessly as possible.

Posted by: Alex on August 17, 2005 09:23 PM

Scenes I'd love to see; New York Post headline:

Mr. Cindy Sheehan: STFU AND COME HOME!

Posted by: on August 17, 2005 09:37 PM

Bill,
Are you saying that Gail Sheehan's grief is so great that she should never be criticized- not even by quoting her own words back to her- but noone who disagrees with her should ever say so even in private, because that's wrong?

Since when did Gail Sheehan's right to pimp her son's corpse override my right to call her on it?

Oh, and THANKS for supporting the troops by betraying their mission, dude. The ones I've heard from really appreciate it.

Posted by: DaveP. on August 17, 2005 09:40 PM

"Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?"

Because, you great blithering nit, they were killed by the enemy.

Posted by: Pixy Misa on August 17, 2005 09:44 PM

To Bill et al.,

No one is insulting Cindy Sheehan's motherhood, and no one is mocking her loss. But now she has become a liberal icon, using her motherhood and loss as some sort of gateway to the media. That is immoral, contra every decent impulse a mother should have, and dangerous for our troops.

In the normal course of affairs her unfortunate behavior would be tolerated, but since becoming an overnight celebrity and lightning rod for the moonbat left, she has moved her agenda onto the plane of public debate, and there motherhood is an insufficient cloak against criticism.

Posted by: Geoff on August 17, 2005 10:14 PM

Bill Batten: Gee, I guess if you're a combat vet, we all just need to shut the fuck up and behave now. I guess nobody else has ever killed somebody for America except for Bill B. For a 57 year old, you really should grow the fuck up. I'm a vet too, that doesn't give me more rights, or less rights, than the next citizen to have an opinion. Shit, I've been to dozens of military funerals, I don't remember ever meeting a parent that behaved liked this woman. Sheehan is an embarassment. The fact that her son turned out alright I gurantee was in spite of her, not because of her.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 17, 2005 10:33 PM

Please remember that Cindy Sheehan raised someone to become an alter boy, an honor student, an Eagle Scout and, finally, a Marine.

BTW dumbass, if you're going to show him some respect, at least figure out which fucking branch the man served in. He was in the Army, not the Marine Corps. Your "combat" must have been a long time ago if you don't know the damned difference.

Posted by: on August 17, 2005 10:37 PM
I'm a combat veteran with 3 children who has been married for 29 years.

Wow, you can serve in the military and be in "combat" and still be an asshole -- ( cough John Kerry cough) who knew.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 10:59 PM

I was trying to avoid the obvious comparison. Being compared to Kerry probably gives Bill a woody.

A very small woody.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 17, 2005 11:09 PM

I recently had to watch our very close friends have to bury their 23 year-old daughter, and have 80-something neighbors who still grieve for a daughter they lost 50 years ago, so I can (at least from a distance) appreciate the mourning Ms. Sheehan is enduring.

However, she's missing one critical element, IMO. Her son was an adult. He made an adult decision to enlist, and then re-enlist. As much as many parents love to remember their children as children, Casey was not a child. He made an adult decision on his career and accepted the dangers associated with that choice. President Bush didn't make Casey make that decision; he did it all by himself.

Posted by: azlibertarian on August 18, 2005 12:14 AM

Andrea puzzled: "(Scratching head.) Megan, I don't see my name linked to anything on that forum."

Sorry, I have my thing set up to display 50 posts per page, so the post linking to your site was on the same page for me. :) Default is 20 or thereabouts, I think, so it might've been on the next page for you. Here's the direct link to the relevant post.

Posted by: Megan on August 18, 2005 06:24 AM

Does anyone know if Casey Sheehan's re-elistment happened after the start of the Iraq war? It's a small point, but really, SH's argument (in as much as she has one) seems to be a bascially neo-isolationist (Buchanan-Dean fusion) one: that the US military should only be used as a purely defensive force, only responding to direct attacks on the US by folks with proper uniforms and TOCs, etc. It's a wackadoo argument, intellectually lazy and belied by history, but an argument nonetheless. Thus, Casey joined to do just that but was misused by the Pres and sent overseas to fight for the Jooos. However, if Casey re-upped after Spring 2003, then he did so knowing full well that he would be sent to kill innocent Iraqis on a quest to get Dick Cheney more oil.

Posted by: holdfast on August 18, 2005 11:38 AM

Holdfast:

All I found was that he re-upped in 2003, but even it was pre-invasion, he certainly would have known war was likely.

Posted by: Geoff on August 18, 2005 12:08 PM

I had to search hard for the info and I don't remember where I found it but I believe he re-enlisted in April 2003.

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 12:51 PM

The Corner seems to agree


Just shows what a ding-bat this woman really is. I mean, by then it was clear that the whole thing was nothing but a war for oil.

Posted by: holdfast on August 18, 2005 01:33 PM

You and all your blogo-brethren are such f*cking ingrates for dragging this woman through the mud just because she is protesting a friggin war. Give me a break.

Posted by: The Rock on August 19, 2005 10:03 AM

What exactly am I supposed to be thankful to her for? I'm thankful to her son for believing that there's something bigger than self that's worth fighting for. His mother on the other hand is a self-serving, delusional, anti-semetic cunt who's so covered in her own mud that we don't need to sling any.

Protest the war if you want. It's a free country, no thanks to people that help the enemy like your dear Cindy. Encouraging the enemy to fight is what keeps the fight alive.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 19, 2005 10:54 AM

No one is being cruel to Cindy Sheehan. She wants attention. She's getting it.

Posted by: Persnickety on August 19, 2005 11:14 AM

Wow, what a hate-fest! All a person needs to do, whether they're a greiving mother, a decorated vet, a butcher, a baker, a candle-stick maker, is oppose current administration policies and they'll get a load of the most despicable trash I've ever seen committed to print. Those currently in power can rest easy knowing there are legions of willing enablers and explainers who will jump into action, sluring anyone who dares pose a question or two. And, boy do those plutocrats need your help! We've got one poster boy who takes his name from a famous band of Nazi thugs who rampaged through neighborhoods smashing the windows of Jewish Houses and another the namesake of a person famous for subverting the American electoral process. And, I suppose these names are meaningful and illustrative of the posters' identities, hopes and asperations. So many things I find surprising on this board. It's surprising how many posters still cling to disproven allegations on who perpetrated the 9-11 attacks. It's surprising that so many of you even think you have to take up Bush's side and speak for him. It's surprising that so many of you have bought the specious argument that somehow insurgents in Iraq are encouraged by grieving Mothers stateside more than by the pure incompetence of our own leaders. And, so many of you don't seem to understand that in the military, we took an oath to protect the constitution, not the office of the presidency. To make critical comment on a purely political war, or any kind of war for that matter, is our duty as Americans. To challenge authority is in the best tradition of our country. To call some one a traitor for questioning the policies, decisions or even the legitimacy of any administration is profoundly unAmerican.

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:16 PM

"You can support the troops but not the president"
  
-Representative Tom Delay (R-TX)

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:20 PM

"You know, if I were a single man, I might ask that mummy out. That's a good-looking mummy"

- President William Jefferson Clinton

Posted by: Slublog on August 19, 2005 07:35 PM

"If we are going to commit American troops, we must be certain they have a clear mission, an achievable goal and an exit strategy."
  
-Karen Hughes, speaking on behalf of presidential candidate George W. Bush

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:41 PM

"This is President Clinton's war, and when he falls flat on his face, that's his problem."
  
-Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN)

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:43 PM


The Ballad of Jayne

Jayne, the man they call Jayne

He robbed from the rich
And he gave to the poor
Stood up to the man
And gave him what for
Our love for him now
Ain't hard to explain
The hero of Canton
The man they call Jayne

Our Jayne saw the mudders' backs breakin'
He saw the mudders' lament
And he saw the magistrate takin'
Every dollar and leavin' five cents
So he said "you can't do that to my people"
He said "you can't crush them under your heel"
So Jayne strapped on his hat
And in 5 seconds flat
Stole everythin' Boss Higgins had to steal

He robbed from the rich
And he gave to the poor
Stood up to the man
And gave him what for
Our love for him now
Ain't hard to explain
The hero of Canton
The man they call Jayne

Now here is what separates heroes
From common folk like you and I
The man they call Jayne
He turned 'round his plane
And let that money hit sky
He dropped it onto our houses
He dropped it into our yards
The man they called Jayne
He stole away our pain
And headed out for the stars

He robbed from the rich
And he gave to the poor
Stood up to the man
And gave him what for
Our love for him now
Ain't hard to explain
The hero of Canton
The man they call Jayne.

Posted by: Jayne Cobb on August 19, 2005 07:46 PM

"These international war criminals were led by Gen. Wesley Clark ...who clicked his shiny heels for the commander-in-grief, Bill Clinton."
  
-Michael Savage

Bush-enablers: should conservative commentator Michael Savage be criticized for being a traitor? After all, when he said this we had "boots on the ground."

"I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarifiedrules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our overextended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today"
  
-Representative Tom Delay (R-TX)

Bush-enablers: wasn't Tom Delay demoralizing the troops here? I didn't here any conservatives complaining about this at the time. What do you think? Does Tom Delay hate freedom? Does he hate America?

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:48 PM

"I'm on the Senate Intelligence Committee, so you can trust me and believe me when I say we're running out of cruise missles. I can't tell you exactly how many we have left, for security reasons, but we're almost out of cruise missles."
  
-Senator Inhofe (R-OK )

Bush-enablers: When Republican Senator Inhofe said this in public, we had troops committed. Was he providing aid and comfort to the enemy? Was he demoralizing the troops. Come on, Bush-enablers, I didn't hear you complaining then. Maybe you can offer some complaints after the fact.

Posted by: on August 19, 2005 07:52 PM

Michael Savage is an idiot.

Bush-enablers: wasn't Tom Delay demoralizing the troops here? I didn't here any conservatives complaining about this at the time. What do you think? Does Tom Delay hate freedom? Does he hate America?

To answer your questions - yes, Tom DeLay was demoralizing the troops.

I'm not sure why conservatives didn't complain about it. To be honest, I can't even remember which campaign he was talking about.

Does Tom DeLay hate freedom and America?
Yes. And I hear he really despises them commies, too.

Posted by: Slublog on August 19, 2005 07:56 PM

Oh Bill, you're so full of yourself! I LOVE the way you defend Cindy Sheehan's right to her opinion while at the same time attacking all who disagree. It seems to me that Cindy wasn't as politically adamant in her views until AFTER her son gave his life. I repeat, GAVE his life. He was a grown man who made a grown man's decision. Period. And our, or at least my, opinion is based NOT on her as a grieving mother, but rather a terribly broken and misguided mother's willingness to parade her dead son's memory in such a negative light. Perhaps Casey would have preferred to be remembered more as a hero rather than as Saint Cindy's cause.

Posted by: carmen on August 21, 2005 05:24 PM

Carmen, they all "gave" their lives. The question is why? Some gave their lives under the mistaken opinion that they were fighting the people who attacked us on 9-11. Some gave their lives under the mistaken assumption that they were saving their loved ones back at home from weapons of mass destruction. But, I'd be willing to bet that if we went back a couple of years and asked young Americans if they would be willing to give their lives so that Iraq could have a new government, you'd see far fewer young people signing up. And, how about asking young people to die in order to set up an Iranian-style Islamic Republic? Would you be willing to die for that, Carmen?

Posted by: Bill on August 22, 2005 07:21 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
NR Pax: "Morning, everyone! ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " Dutch (The Beeg Boy) bloated in 2013, the evenin ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "I think that was 3 years ago now ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Doggeh got blot & torsion a couple of years ago wh ..."

olddog in mo: "Morning, 'rons and 'ettes. ..."

Rufus T. Firefly : "Good morning everyone. Finally got some rain here ..."

NR Pax: "[i]74 Pixy, what was that article the other day ab ..."

Florida Peasant: "I'll have to go back and give Warren Zevon a close ..."

Don Black: "[i] ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Looks like it's gonna be a bad day for Keir Starme ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Pixy, what was that article the other day about Ch ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]One of my mother's cats, "Li'l Bit," We had ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives