Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Saint Cindy's "Sacrifice" | Main | Again: Brosnan Out As Bond, Supposedly »
August 17, 2005

Top Ten "Questions" Saint Cindy Sheehan Wants "Answered" By President Bush

10. Why did you kill my son?

9. You had something to do with Natalie Wood's drowning, too, didn't you?

8. Is this war being fought on behalf of the Jews?

7. If not all of the Jews, is this war being fought on behalf of Ben Gazzarra?

6. Who do you think is cuter-- Brian Williams or Matt Lauer? I've had the chance to meet both gentlemen and I have to say that Brian Williams is more "classically" handsome, but there's something about Matt Lauer that makes me think he'd be a real tiger in bed. Your thoughts?

5. A follow-up: Do you have Charlie Rose's home phone number?

4. Why did you lie to us about Saddam Hussein's WMD's?

3. Seriously-- is there even a man named "Saddam Hussein," or was that just another neo-con lie?

2. Knopff is overing me a $250,000 advance against 15% of royalties, but Doubleday is offering $300,000 against 10%. What would you do in this situation?

...and the Number One "Question" Saint Cindy Sheehan Wants "Answered" By President Bush...

1. Would you mind moving? You're blocking my camera.


posted by Ace at 02:49 PM
Comments



You know, Cindy, Paul Newman is half Jewish.

I'm sure there's something to be made of that.

Posted by: Phinn on August 17, 2005 02:51 PM

You know, Cindy, Paul Newman is half Jewish.

Well, that explains why I'm only half as comfortable with Butch Cassidy as I am with The Sundance Kid.

Posted by: Pseudarford on August 17, 2005 02:59 PM

What was the deal with Ben Gazzarra in Roadhouse? Not to be stereotypical or anything, but that guy looked as out of place in that world as I do in Harlem.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 17, 2005 03:03 PM

What do you think would happen if Cindy and Chucky Schumer were there and there was only one TV camera?

Posted by: CraigC on August 17, 2005 03:15 PM

What do you think would happen if Cindy and Chucky Schumer were there and there was only one TV camera?

Cold fusion.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 17, 2005 03:16 PM

#1 made it.

Posted by: Megan on August 17, 2005 03:17 PM
Posted by: on August 17, 2005 03:21 PM
9. You had something to do with Natalie Wood's drowning, too, didn't you?

Hold on, let's not dismiss Cindy Sheehan's question out of hand. Christopher Walken (2008 Stealth Candidate of the Republican Right) was on board the yacht the night Ms. Wood "accidentally drowned"... Coincidence or massive Karl Rove conspiracy? What did Natalie know?

Posted by: JFH on August 17, 2005 03:22 PM

That reminds me of a joke.

Q: What kind of wood doesn't float?

A: Yup.

Posted by: Dogstar on August 17, 2005 03:27 PM

Oh, no. I forgot about the upcoming books. They will have her photo on the cover looking "grieved." Any ideas for titles?

Posted by: on August 17, 2005 03:45 PM

More Natalie Wood jokes:

Why didn't Natalie take a shower on the boat?

She prefers to wash up on shore.

Ok, no more...sorry....had to tell it.

Don't you know it is all the JOOOOOS fault for everything. They sure do get around.

Posted by: WunderKraut on August 17, 2005 03:48 PM

,Any ideas for titles?

Speaking of titles, Jerome and Markos have titled their forthcoming book 'Donkey Fall' ....

... no, really - out of the nearly infinite number of ways you could combine letters into words and words into book titles, they've come up with 'Donkey Fall'

Well played, Karl ... well played, indeed.

Posted by: BumperStickerist on August 17, 2005 03:55 PM

Donkey Fuck.

Posted by: Phinn on August 17, 2005 04:00 PM

Donkey Hoetey

Posted by: Ayes of Death David on August 17, 2005 04:01 PM

Duh, some budy say Cindy Sheehan was a racist...duh...me write unwitty jokes...duh me do my mother in the can...

Posted by: DougAhole on August 17, 2005 04:07 PM

Possible Titles

"How I Brody Slapped Bush by St. Cindy"
"How a woman with a schnoz planes could land on stood up to the President"
"From mother to martyr, a liberal success story"
"How the JOOOOOS killed my son"
"Defiance in the Desert: A profile in sacrifice"
"Whoring for Babylon: Exploiting personal tragedy for political gain"

Posted by: Iblis on August 17, 2005 04:07 PM

FWIW, I agree with Andrea. (Shock and awe!) Cindy Sheehan is a mediawhore slut who deserves zero sympathy; only every single scrap of contempt any decent American can muster.

Later in the thread linked above I said:

"To hell with this evil bitch. Plenty of people have seen friends and family die since the Moslems declared war on us. We haven't all decided to commit treason against our country as a result. "

And that's all I'll ever have to say about Cindy.

Posted by: Megan on August 17, 2005 04:13 PM

I can't agree that she's committing treason.

That implies some sort of rational thought in her mental processes.

Posted by: cirby on August 17, 2005 05:03 PM

Harry Potter and the Neocon Rethuglican Zionist Conspiracy

Posted by: Sobek on August 17, 2005 06:02 PM

(Scratching head.) Megan, I don't see my name linked to anything on that forum. (Unless you mean another Andrea one I forgot to have killed; in that case ignore this comment.)

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 06:03 PM

Argh. The evil live preview showed the "strikeout" tag working on the phrase "one I forgot to have killed", but it doesn't show in the actual uploaded comment thus rendering my clever "there can be only one (Andrea)" joke an incoherent and possibly psychotic mess. Internet 40, Andrea love.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 06:05 PM

Greetings from Oceania

I can't tell if Cindy Sheehan's rants here are a parody or not, nor do I have the time or inclination to try to figure it out. They are sick, no doubt and she's doubtless turned off as many people to her cause as she ever had. She makes a beautiful poster child for the Left, if you're a conservative. I suspect she's had her Two Minutes Hate and is on her way to oblivion.

Posted by: Winston Smith on August 17, 2005 06:13 PM

"Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?"
  
-Sean Hannity, Fox News, 4/6/99

Posted by: Bill Batten on August 17, 2005 06:54 PM

As a liberal who has visited this site for my own education, I have to say that I'm shocked at the disgusting, hateful comments made regarding a woman who has given up a beloved son to this war. Have you all gone mad? Have you no decency? There are enough critics of Bush to find a target for sliming. Common decency should tell you that a woman who has lost a son gets a pass, no matter what you think of her opinions. I ask you all to take a deep breath and consider just what you are saying. We are a better society than this. We are all Americans. Please remember that Cindy Sheehan raised someone to become an alter boy, an honor student, an Eagle Scout and, finally, a Marine. You've got to admit that it takes a good Mother to do that. Try to harness your hysterical desire to protect Bush long enough to think about that.

Posted by: Bill Batten on August 17, 2005 07:03 PM

Yep, Hannity is (and always has been) an inconsistent idiot. Which proves what else, exactly?

I believe that type of argument is commonly called "tu quoque."

Posted by: Hubris on August 17, 2005 07:04 PM

"Why is Sean Hannity on the television? He's a yammering fool."

-- Andrea Harris, Ace of Spades HQ, 8/17/05

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 07:04 PM

Is it me or is Bill Batten the epitome of an old maid in britches?

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 07:05 PM

"Try to harness your hysterical desire to protect Bush long enough to think about that."

And so Cindy Sheehan, Michael Moore, MoveOn, et al can continue their hysterical criticism of President Bush. Why doesn't that sound like an equitable proposal?

Posted by: BrewFan on August 17, 2005 07:12 PM

Hey, I gave it a shot. Figured I could find one reasonable person anywhere, but what the hey. Andrea, just so you won't suffer under this particular illusion, I'm a combat veteran with 3 children who has been married for 29 years. As someone who has had to tell families their children have been killed, I would give a grieving Mother or Father a break no matter what they said or who said it for them. It's called common decency. Americans used to be rich with it. You people of course don't realize it but, you're just sick. As sick as I've ever seen in my 57 years. Well, I've had my education for the day and it's been enlightening. Thanks everybody!

Posted by: Bill Batten on August 17, 2005 07:57 PM

Did anyone see Anderson Cooper's 360 yesterday? He specifically asked her about this:

"My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. "

and she denied saying it. Anderson said he asked ABC about it, and they said they were scrambling to find the email from which she was quoted, but couldn't find it. So I did some digging, and found this..

The paragraph from which the quote is taken is about 2/3 down. I'm thinking I should email Anderson. Whadya all think? Legit?

Posted by: Lydia on August 17, 2005 07:58 PM

Bill,

Sorry, but the minute anyone, grieving parent or not, starts providing propaganda for Al-Jazeera to broadcast and the enemy to use as a recruiting tool, any pass they had to be immune from criticism gets revoked.

That unfortunate deranged woman is encouraging an increase in attacks, because when the enemy sees weakness they step up the pressure. She is making it harder for us to defeat the enemy, and ultimately helping to drag this war out longer than it would be if the nation collectively were to butch up and demonstrate some resolve -- and thus the end result will be more young men and women killed. I hope that one day she may realize this. But I doubt she will.

Until then, the audacious position of her and her backers -- the idea that she can say or do whatever she wants and cannot be criticized because of her victim status -- needs to be mocked and ridiculed as forcefully and mercilessly as possible.

Posted by: Alex on August 17, 2005 09:23 PM

Scenes I'd love to see; New York Post headline:

Mr. Cindy Sheehan: STFU AND COME HOME!

Posted by: on August 17, 2005 09:37 PM

Bill,
Are you saying that Gail Sheehan's grief is so great that she should never be criticized- not even by quoting her own words back to her- but noone who disagrees with her should ever say so even in private, because that's wrong?

Since when did Gail Sheehan's right to pimp her son's corpse override my right to call her on it?

Oh, and THANKS for supporting the troops by betraying their mission, dude. The ones I've heard from really appreciate it.

Posted by: DaveP. on August 17, 2005 09:40 PM

"Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?"

Because, you great blithering nit, they were killed by the enemy.

Posted by: Pixy Misa on August 17, 2005 09:44 PM

To Bill et al.,

No one is insulting Cindy Sheehan's motherhood, and no one is mocking her loss. But now she has become a liberal icon, using her motherhood and loss as some sort of gateway to the media. That is immoral, contra every decent impulse a mother should have, and dangerous for our troops.

In the normal course of affairs her unfortunate behavior would be tolerated, but since becoming an overnight celebrity and lightning rod for the moonbat left, she has moved her agenda onto the plane of public debate, and there motherhood is an insufficient cloak against criticism.

Posted by: Geoff on August 17, 2005 10:14 PM

Bill Batten: Gee, I guess if you're a combat vet, we all just need to shut the fuck up and behave now. I guess nobody else has ever killed somebody for America except for Bill B. For a 57 year old, you really should grow the fuck up. I'm a vet too, that doesn't give me more rights, or less rights, than the next citizen to have an opinion. Shit, I've been to dozens of military funerals, I don't remember ever meeting a parent that behaved liked this woman. Sheehan is an embarassment. The fact that her son turned out alright I gurantee was in spite of her, not because of her.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 17, 2005 10:33 PM

Please remember that Cindy Sheehan raised someone to become an alter boy, an honor student, an Eagle Scout and, finally, a Marine.

BTW dumbass, if you're going to show him some respect, at least figure out which fucking branch the man served in. He was in the Army, not the Marine Corps. Your "combat" must have been a long time ago if you don't know the damned difference.

Posted by: on August 17, 2005 10:37 PM
I'm a combat veteran with 3 children who has been married for 29 years.

Wow, you can serve in the military and be in "combat" and still be an asshole -- ( cough John Kerry cough) who knew.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on August 17, 2005 10:59 PM

I was trying to avoid the obvious comparison. Being compared to Kerry probably gives Bill a woody.

A very small woody.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 17, 2005 11:09 PM

I recently had to watch our very close friends have to bury their 23 year-old daughter, and have 80-something neighbors who still grieve for a daughter they lost 50 years ago, so I can (at least from a distance) appreciate the mourning Ms. Sheehan is enduring.

However, she's missing one critical element, IMO. Her son was an adult. He made an adult decision to enlist, and then re-enlist. As much as many parents love to remember their children as children, Casey was not a child. He made an adult decision on his career and accepted the dangers associated with that choice. President Bush didn't make Casey make that decision; he did it all by himself.

Posted by: azlibertarian on August 18, 2005 12:14 AM

Andrea puzzled: "(Scratching head.) Megan, I don't see my name linked to anything on that forum."

Sorry, I have my thing set up to display 50 posts per page, so the post linking to your site was on the same page for me. :) Default is 20 or thereabouts, I think, so it might've been on the next page for you. Here's the direct link to the relevant post.

Posted by: Megan on August 18, 2005 06:24 AM

Does anyone know if Casey Sheehan's re-elistment happened after the start of the Iraq war? It's a small point, but really, SH's argument (in as much as she has one) seems to be a bascially neo-isolationist (Buchanan-Dean fusion) one: that the US military should only be used as a purely defensive force, only responding to direct attacks on the US by folks with proper uniforms and TOCs, etc. It's a wackadoo argument, intellectually lazy and belied by history, but an argument nonetheless. Thus, Casey joined to do just that but was misused by the Pres and sent overseas to fight for the Jooos. However, if Casey re-upped after Spring 2003, then he did so knowing full well that he would be sent to kill innocent Iraqis on a quest to get Dick Cheney more oil.

Posted by: holdfast on August 18, 2005 11:38 AM

Holdfast:

All I found was that he re-upped in 2003, but even it was pre-invasion, he certainly would have known war was likely.

Posted by: Geoff on August 18, 2005 12:08 PM

I had to search hard for the info and I don't remember where I found it but I believe he re-enlisted in April 2003.

Posted by: on August 18, 2005 12:51 PM

The Corner seems to agree


Just shows what a ding-bat this woman really is. I mean, by then it was clear that the whole thing was nothing but a war for oil.

Posted by: holdfast on August 18, 2005 01:33 PM

You and all your blogo-brethren are such f*cking ingrates for dragging this woman through the mud just because she is protesting a friggin war. Give me a break.

Posted by: The Rock on August 19, 2005 10:03 AM

What exactly am I supposed to be thankful to her for? I'm thankful to her son for believing that there's something bigger than self that's worth fighting for. His mother on the other hand is a self-serving, delusional, anti-semetic cunt who's so covered in her own mud that we don't need to sling any.

Protest the war if you want. It's a free country, no thanks to people that help the enemy like your dear Cindy. Encouraging the enemy to fight is what keeps the fight alive.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on August 19, 2005 10:54 AM

No one is being cruel to Cindy Sheehan. She wants attention. She's getting it.

Posted by: Persnickety on August 19, 2005 11:14 AM

Wow, what a hate-fest! All a person needs to do, whether they're a greiving mother, a decorated vet, a butcher, a baker, a candle-stick maker, is oppose current administration policies and they'll get a load of the most despicable trash I've ever seen committed to print. Those currently in power can rest easy knowing there are legions of willing enablers and explainers who will jump into action, sluring anyone who dares pose a question or two. And, boy do those plutocrats need your help! We've got one poster boy who takes his name from a famous band of Nazi thugs who rampaged through neighborhoods smashing the windows of Jewish Houses and another the namesake of a person famous for subverting the American electoral process. And, I suppose these names are meaningful and illustrative of the posters' identities, hopes and asperations. So many things I find surprising on this board. It's surprising how many posters still cling to disproven allegations on who perpetrated the 9-11 attacks. It's surprising that so many of you even think you have to take up Bush's side and speak for him. It's surprising that so many of you have bought the specious argument that somehow insurgents in Iraq are encouraged by grieving Mothers stateside more than by the pure incompetence of our own leaders. And, so many of you don't seem to understand that in the military, we took an oath to protect the constitution, not the office of the presidency. To make critical comment on a purely political war, or any kind of war for that matter, is our duty as Americans. To challenge authority is in the best tradition of our country. To call some one a traitor for questioning the policies, decisions or even the legitimacy of any administration is profoundly unAmerican.

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:16 PM

"You can support the troops but not the president"
  
-Representative Tom Delay (R-TX)

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:20 PM

"You know, if I were a single man, I might ask that mummy out. That's a good-looking mummy"

- President William Jefferson Clinton

Posted by: Slublog on August 19, 2005 07:35 PM

"If we are going to commit American troops, we must be certain they have a clear mission, an achievable goal and an exit strategy."
  
-Karen Hughes, speaking on behalf of presidential candidate George W. Bush

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:41 PM

"This is President Clinton's war, and when he falls flat on his face, that's his problem."
  
-Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN)

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:43 PM


The Ballad of Jayne

Jayne, the man they call Jayne

He robbed from the rich
And he gave to the poor
Stood up to the man
And gave him what for
Our love for him now
Ain't hard to explain
The hero of Canton
The man they call Jayne

Our Jayne saw the mudders' backs breakin'
He saw the mudders' lament
And he saw the magistrate takin'
Every dollar and leavin' five cents
So he said "you can't do that to my people"
He said "you can't crush them under your heel"
So Jayne strapped on his hat
And in 5 seconds flat
Stole everythin' Boss Higgins had to steal

He robbed from the rich
And he gave to the poor
Stood up to the man
And gave him what for
Our love for him now
Ain't hard to explain
The hero of Canton
The man they call Jayne

Now here is what separates heroes
From common folk like you and I
The man they call Jayne
He turned 'round his plane
And let that money hit sky
He dropped it onto our houses
He dropped it into our yards
The man they called Jayne
He stole away our pain
And headed out for the stars

He robbed from the rich
And he gave to the poor
Stood up to the man
And gave him what for
Our love for him now
Ain't hard to explain
The hero of Canton
The man they call Jayne.

Posted by: Jayne Cobb on August 19, 2005 07:46 PM

"These international war criminals were led by Gen. Wesley Clark ...who clicked his shiny heels for the commander-in-grief, Bill Clinton."
  
-Michael Savage

Bush-enablers: should conservative commentator Michael Savage be criticized for being a traitor? After all, when he said this we had "boots on the ground."

"I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarifiedrules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our overextended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today"
  
-Representative Tom Delay (R-TX)

Bush-enablers: wasn't Tom Delay demoralizing the troops here? I didn't here any conservatives complaining about this at the time. What do you think? Does Tom Delay hate freedom? Does he hate America?

Posted by: Bill on August 19, 2005 07:48 PM

"I'm on the Senate Intelligence Committee, so you can trust me and believe me when I say we're running out of cruise missles. I can't tell you exactly how many we have left, for security reasons, but we're almost out of cruise missles."
  
-Senator Inhofe (R-OK )

Bush-enablers: When Republican Senator Inhofe said this in public, we had troops committed. Was he providing aid and comfort to the enemy? Was he demoralizing the troops. Come on, Bush-enablers, I didn't hear you complaining then. Maybe you can offer some complaints after the fact.

Posted by: on August 19, 2005 07:52 PM

Michael Savage is an idiot.

Bush-enablers: wasn't Tom Delay demoralizing the troops here? I didn't here any conservatives complaining about this at the time. What do you think? Does Tom Delay hate freedom? Does he hate America?

To answer your questions - yes, Tom DeLay was demoralizing the troops.

I'm not sure why conservatives didn't complain about it. To be honest, I can't even remember which campaign he was talking about.

Does Tom DeLay hate freedom and America?
Yes. And I hear he really despises them commies, too.

Posted by: Slublog on August 19, 2005 07:56 PM

Oh Bill, you're so full of yourself! I LOVE the way you defend Cindy Sheehan's right to her opinion while at the same time attacking all who disagree. It seems to me that Cindy wasn't as politically adamant in her views until AFTER her son gave his life. I repeat, GAVE his life. He was a grown man who made a grown man's decision. Period. And our, or at least my, opinion is based NOT on her as a grieving mother, but rather a terribly broken and misguided mother's willingness to parade her dead son's memory in such a negative light. Perhaps Casey would have preferred to be remembered more as a hero rather than as Saint Cindy's cause.

Posted by: carmen on August 21, 2005 05:24 PM

Carmen, they all "gave" their lives. The question is why? Some gave their lives under the mistaken opinion that they were fighting the people who attacked us on 9-11. Some gave their lives under the mistaken assumption that they were saving their loved ones back at home from weapons of mass destruction. But, I'd be willing to bet that if we went back a couple of years and asked young Americans if they would be willing to give their lives so that Iraq could have a new government, you'd see far fewer young people signing up. And, how about asking young people to die in order to set up an Iranian-style Islamic Republic? Would you be willing to die for that, Carmen?

Posted by: Bill on August 22, 2005 07:21 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
JTB: "82 ... "Tolkien himself rejected the idea that Bom ..."

Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd: "Modern readers want everything explained and sifte ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks, Damn It Feels Good to Be a Trumpster! [/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "Gunnison, Colorado, "successfully avoided the Span ..."

Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM): "[i] That and the Haitian rebellion, is where you ..."

13times: "I don't understand. I publish on Amazon and all my ..."

Miguel cervantes: "Being in an algerian dungeon give a lot of time to ..."

Weak Geek: ""Have Gun -- Will Travel" had an episode about a t ..."

whig: "114 Am I the only reader who never had a problem w ..."

werewife: "58 Which one? Posted by: lin-duh is offended at M ..."

Skip: "Just thought, I haven't been to a new book store ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]Alcibiades was the Bill Clinton of the era. Rem ..."

GrenadierX: "Interesting article. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives