Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Bush: Teach "Theory of Intelligent Design" Side By Side With Evolution | Main | Hackett Loses In Ohio; Kosmonauts Declare Victory »
August 02, 2005

Cathy Seipp Bans Poster/Stalker Until She Gets Paid $50 Idiot Tax

Why didn't I think of that?

But why would people pay to get an annoying poster un-banned? Seems to make more sense to ban someone only if everyone kicks in to the kitty.

At least it makes more sense from my selfish perspecive.

So, let's say I would ban some annoying poster -- I'm not thinking of anyone in particular, honest (fingers crossed) -- if I were paid a certain amount of money.

How much would the banning of this unnamed unknown annoyance be worth, collectively?

Hmmmm... Gotta say somewhere in the $5-10,000 neighborhood.


posted by Ace at 11:50 PM
Comments



I will not contribute one penny for banning Michael Meyer. :)

Posted by: max on August 3, 2005 12:12 AM

Cedar$ord?
Von Kreedork?

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on August 3, 2005 12:19 AM


I gotta say, if I had nearly the problem she had with serial assholes commenting like that, I would 1) post more often (to tick them off), and 2) impose the exact same tax.

That is an extraordinarily tidy way of dealing with problematic people.

Posted by: CollegePundit on August 3, 2005 12:20 AM

My goodness what should I do. I am a person who comes to your site not to troll but to see what the another side is saying. I take your advice(abuse)and go from there, I am not the kind of person that hates either side because of an affilation, rather I want true discussion of the facts( not the true facts as the pres says whatever true facts are). So hey if you are going to paid to get someone (me) off your site, where is my 10%, I do enliven your base, it is only a capitalist thing to do.

Posted by: jeff on August 3, 2005 01:04 AM

jeff, shut up and pay up.

Posted by: ted on August 3, 2005 01:45 AM

I haven't had a troll in ages. Cedarfnord showed up once, and I had some Chomskyite reducing the property value another time, but that's about it.

Posted by: Pixy Misa on August 3, 2005 02:15 AM

If you ban Cedarford, who's gonna pony up the dough to let him back in? I mean, after all, the Jews control all the money.

On second thought, maybe some nice, forgiving jewish girl will persuade her rich, black NBA star boyfriend to part with a few shekels.

Posted by: Sean M. on August 3, 2005 03:03 AM

Don't flatter yourself, Jeff. Your comments are not worthy of banning.

Hell, your comments are not usually worth reading.

Posted by: Rocketeer on August 3, 2005 08:21 AM

He means me. I'm sure of it.

I'm sure of it since I'm the only poster here with the means to reinstate myself, since the rest of you sit around watching Molly Ringwald film festivals and whacking off to unicorn/Cthulu dungeon sex fantasies instead of working.

Well, if I'm on my way out, I'm going out flaming:

Yo, Ace! The t-shirts were fucking ugly. And, um...bite me.

Posted by: spongeworthy on August 3, 2005 08:40 AM

Sean M. wrote:
On second thought, maybe some nice, forgiving jewish girl will persuade her rich, black NBA star boyfriend to part with a few shekels.

I can't speak for all of us, but this is one Jewish girl who's not into that whole forgiveness thing.

Now the NBA star, on the other hand... how big of a star are we talking about here? ;)

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on August 3, 2005 08:41 AM

You're breaking my heart, ace, I'm not that bad. The new meds should kick in any day now anyway.

Posted by: dulce on August 3, 2005 08:47 AM

I'm thinking Cathy should spend the money on a new photo. I have seen her look LOTS better.

Am I the only one in the blogosphere NOT asking for money?

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on August 3, 2005 09:32 AM

Ace, just because Dave always calls you out on posting old stuff doesn't mean you have to ban the guy. Afterall he is one of your regular guest posters and he did buy one of the "limited edition" Ace of Spades T-shirts didn't he? Buying one of the 12 shirts has to count for something, right?

Posted by: Aaron on August 3, 2005 09:44 AM

Yeah! What Aaron said! I bought a shirt!

Honest... I ran out of gas. I, I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake. A terrible flood. Locusts.

IT WASN'T MY FAULT, I SWEAR TO GOD!!!

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on August 3, 2005 09:52 AM

Sure am glad I'm one of the good kids. Most the rest of ya'll have said some pretty mean things to Ace in the past. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if he banned the lot of ya. 'Twould serve yuns right ya little devils!

Posted by: compos mentis on August 3, 2005 10:14 AM

Given the general tone of conversation on these comments, particularly the virulent ad hominem attacks on Ace, is there anyone here who isn't a troll to a greater or lesser extent and therefore likely to be fined?

Eager to hear the sound of crickets, Ace?

Posted by: Pompous on August 3, 2005 10:18 AM

I think you're missing the point, Ace. She banned him, confident in the fact that nobody would pay enough to re-instate him. And it was kind of a little sociology experiment.

Sparkle, I couldn't agree more about Cathy's pic. The thing that cracks me up is that there's actually a credit for the picture.

Posted by: CraigC on August 3, 2005 10:52 AM

Just want to make clear here that I, the inimitable Jeff B., am not this "jeff" who posted above.

That guy's a pussy. And er...I'm not.

But anyway, I'm a certified RWDB, not some pansy-ass member of "the other side." Please - I may be an effeminate, whiny manchild, but I have some self-respect.

Posted by: Jeff B. on August 3, 2005 11:09 AM

I would pay $1.25 for a short (45 seconds should suffice if past performance is any indication of future results) video clip of Megan, RWS and bbeck engaged in hot, 3-way, prison sex.

Posted by: RedBeer on August 3, 2005 11:12 AM

How many flying monkey references would it take to get someone banned?

Posted by: lauraw on August 3, 2005 11:13 AM

45 seconds ?! I blew it just reading your post!

Posted by: Newbomb Turk on August 3, 2005 11:24 AM

Didn't BrewFan or some other fan of the C-creature suggest this a while back? I seem to remember him asking how much crazy blog money it would take to purge your site.

Hmmm... Payday is Friday, two days from now. If we're talking about the guy I'm thinking (whose name will never cross my fingertips), I'll kick in.

Posted by: utron on August 3, 2005 11:51 AM

RedBeer, I don't know about bbeck, but you can forget Sparkle. I think you'd have a better shot with Sondra.

Posted by: CraigC on August 3, 2005 12:12 PM

utron,

That was me. Check out Ace's site meter. If all the lurkers threw $5.00 in Ace's tip jar I think we could buy ourselves a 'banning'. Bwahahaha!

Posted by: BrewFan on August 3, 2005 01:19 PM

Megan, RWS and bbeck engaged in hot, 3-way, prison sex.

Megan's probably cool with that, Sparkle, not. And be careful, bbeck will likely shoot your parts off then have her husband drop a bomb on your remains.

:)

Posted by: Lipstick on August 3, 2005 01:21 PM

What if we've , like, given that amount in the past (not that that bastard Ace, ever acknowledged my contribution with even a thank you email!!).... Does that give me a free "Get out of Troll Jail" card?

Posted by: JFH on August 3, 2005 01:59 PM

I don't WHY ya'll have the impression that I am a prude of some sort!!!!

But does it have to be in prison??? I am a Carlton Ritz kinda girl ya know.

I'm kidding of course. Prison is fine.

NOT.

Ok, seriously. Does it make me a prude to say that my idea of hot sex does not involve women??

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on August 3, 2005 02:09 PM

Ok, seriously. Does it make me a prude to say that my idea of hot sex does not involve women??

this is a trick question, I just know it...

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 3, 2005 02:17 PM

Sue Dohnim - I can't speak for all of us, but this is one Jewish girl who's not into that whole forgiveness thing.

Now the NBA star, on the other hand... how big of a star are we talking about here? ;)

I don't think celebrity level of the NBA star matters too much to a Jewish girl interested in exciting dalliances until the nebbish they eventually intend to marry is better set up in his dental practice.

Every NBA star is sort of a "Magic Johnson" to a Jewish groupie.

Many have money, too! That they spinkle on they Ho's and bitches..

Then there is a chance your illegitimate daughter will have Julius Erving's athletic genes and become a tennis star.

As for banning, if ACE could find several wealthy Zionists (Don't go for 5-10K ACE, that's just an amount a tiny state legislator would get bribed to look the other way as a Zionist Casino-meister lobbyist works his charm). You're worth more than that bowl of lentils pittance. But for 45-50K, , it could be a win-win for lots of people. Less Zionist money available for bribing politicians to spring more taxpayer money for the one foreign country that must never be criticized. Less chance American troops will be killed or maimed in further ME wars meant to safeguard one country....not "US".

You'd win, the taxpayers would win, the troops would win.

Then you could put up a "Friend of Israel" flag instead of the US flag or the current UK flag - as many bloggers have already done.....effectively announcing whose "pocket" you're in - and stand by for all that crazy Zionist money to roll in. There are many Zionist-Americans who have been bankrolling the Settlement land grabs and water thefts... now that money can't be spent like it used to be, and in so much as is actually tempermentally possible - may be burning a hole on those wallets...begging to be spent on a worthy blogger.

Posted by: Cedarford on August 3, 2005 02:28 PM

It doesn't make you a prude, just less interesting from the perspective of most men.

Not me, of course, I'm all about a woman's mind.

Posted by: TheDude on August 3, 2005 02:28 PM

What?! All female bloggers/commenters aren't closet bisexuals/lesbians?!... Dang, I blame that blogger "we're not supposed to name" for that impression.

Posted by: JFH on August 3, 2005 02:32 PM

RWS - simply by typing the words hot sex, prudery is out of the question. What's in the question is, "What is your idea of hot sex?" : )

Posted by: compos mentis on August 3, 2005 02:47 PM

I don't think I can write that on a public board.

But trust me. I got it covered.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on August 3, 2005 02:52 PM

Dang, do I now owe money since I (despite better judment) read this thread?

Posted by: SkyWatch on August 3, 2005 03:00 PM

If you whisper "Jew!" three times while gazing at a picture of Fran Drescher he appears as if by magic.

And bestows upon you the prize; precious, pure distilled drops of C-tard essence.

But don't get any on you.
It reeks.

Posted by: lauraw on August 3, 2005 03:01 PM

I am hearby notifing Ace that he owes me 1$ for every time someone reads any word that I have written in the comments section of his site.

Not real sure how I will collect it but .....ummm..

Posted by: SkyWatch on August 3, 2005 03:06 PM

Lauraw, I don't think I'm going to try that experiment. However, when reading C's comments, I find that it helps a lot to imagine C with the voice of Fran Drescher.

Posted by: utron on August 3, 2005 03:12 PM

Lipstick:

If you are correct that RWS is not really up for hot 3-way girl-on-girl prison sex, I just thought I'd point out that, y'know, we know have an open position to fill . . .

Posted by: Michael on August 3, 2005 03:13 PM

Cedarford

That was the weirdest post in the history of the web.

F*ck you very much,

Fugazi

Posted by: fugazi on August 3, 2005 03:54 PM

He's consciously evolved into a parody of himself, which I admire.

Sparkle strikes me as the kind of babe who does the normal stuff real well. Still, I'd hate to be the guy who couldn't get the job done and have her go off on me like she does Bill Ardolino.

Posted by: spongeworthy on August 3, 2005 04:07 PM

Fugazi - Fuck you back with a 6-pointed Star of David crammed up your ass.

Lauraw - An NBA star with a "Magic Johnson" would happily use Fran Dreschler, and laugh when she came back as a nasally baying bitch in heat begging for more.

Posted by: Cedarford on August 3, 2005 04:21 PM

Ugh. The guy really is disgusting.

Posted by: lauraw on August 3, 2005 04:31 PM

"He's consciously evolved"

That's the other thread, where we've decided he's a transitional form.

Posted by: BrewFan on August 3, 2005 04:40 PM

Is it just a coincidence or do you guys realize that Fran Drescher is actually dating a black former NBA player.

Posted by: Dman on August 3, 2005 04:41 PM

It reeks

It smells like a turd, covered in burnt hair.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 3, 2005 06:14 PM

Wow. I hereby resign as Cedarford's self-appointed apologist.

CF, normally I can find some humor in your comments, but you went way over the top today.

Posted by: Michael on August 3, 2005 06:21 PM

Ban me, I'm too cheap to pay you the fifty bucks ;)

Posted by: SGT Dan on August 3, 2005 06:37 PM

Michael -

I hate to say 'I told you so' &c....

Posted by: Jeff B. on August 3, 2005 07:22 PM

Jeff B:

I hate to admit it, but you did tell me so. Gawd, I feel so cheap, so used.

Posted by: Michael on August 3, 2005 09:19 PM

Don't play passive-aggressive, Michael.

Playing that game takes brains.

I used to like you and wanted to hug you - until your homoerotic nature was revealed. God, I feel so soiled by what you have written in the past!!

Posted by: Cedarford on August 3, 2005 10:38 PM

"I used to like you and wanted to hug you - until your homoerotic nature was revealed."

OK, Cedarford, now you're back to being really amusing.

Posted by: Michael on August 4, 2005 03:31 AM

Seedy's existence is proof that:

1. There is no God.

2. Darwin was wrong; things too stupid to live can survive and procreate.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on August 4, 2005 08:54 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Maori men in NZ do a haka war display for Charlie Kirk
You vicious bastards shot the wrong man. You have set the world on fire. This will be your apocalypse.
Nick Freitas responds to the Left's intentional lies that they are always the victim and the Right is always the oppressor. He refuses to play their game anymore. This is a must view. [dri]
I wonder if he was fearless. I wonder if he was scared. I wonder if he just did it anyway?
-- Mike Rowe
Low-T High-Calorie Potato Brian Stelter: "Matthew Dowd is no longer an MSNBC political analyst, according to a network source."
Matt Dowd, former Disney Groomer Corporation Political Director and John McCain advisor (of course), is the one who blamed Charlie Kirk's shooting on the real assassin, Charlie Kirk, claiming that Charlie's "hateful words lead to hateful actions."
Trump speaks about the "heinous assassination" of Charlie Kirk, notes the left relentlessly demonized him until they radicalized an assassin to kill him
"For years, the radical left has compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to NAZlS... this type of language is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the terrorism we're seeing in our country today.
And it must stop RIGHT NOW!"
Argentinian PM Javier Millei: "The left is always, at all times and places, a violent phenomenon full of hatred."
I disregard their hate. It's the violence that we object to. And we will begin objecting to it with force.
Update: Kash Patel says the person of interest has been interrogated and then released. Wrong guy, I guess.
But as the hours pass without a real suspect, and with the FBI apparently interrogating uninvolved people, I begin to fear the assassin has escaped. I mean, they don't seem to be following a breadcrumb trail, they seem genuinely baffled.
Karol Sheinin: I can confirm the person of interest questioned by the FBI is Zachariah Ahmed Qureshi.
If this is the guy -- apparently he also interned at Heritage.
Update: Source says he's been released? Wrong guy?
Fat-F*ck Pritzker blames Trump's rhetoric for the ramp up of political violence! May he rot in hell! [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Jim Lakely of Heartland.org joins us to discuss the blockbuster polls they have released over the last week. Americans 19-39 seem to be embracing socialism, overt redistributionist policies, destruction of our rights, and international control of our country! But there is hope on the horizon!
Broward County Officials Accused of Adding Over 100,000 Ineligible Voters to the Rolls It is too soon to know how it happened, but...Republicans are watching! And that is how it is done. [CBD]
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump from firing Federal Reserve Gov Lisa Cook With absolutely nonsensical reasoning, but you already knew that. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 2A ban for trannies? Venezuela attack is Congress dropping the ball, RFK Jr...Maniac or disrupter? Heartland.org poll is a sad commentary on American education, and more!
James Varney: Reflecting on Hurricane Katrina twenty years later, and the partisan uses Democrats found for it
There was fear aplenty. But the truth is, a lot of the panic Americans saw on television was performative. The throngs of people along Convention Center Boulevard sat patiently in the broiling weather, five or six deep in folding chairs on the sidewalk, waiting for something, someone, to arrive. Then, a television crew or photographer would show up, and people would pour into the street, falling on their knees, screaming and gesticulating to the camera. It was an awful situation, obviously, but when the camera wasn't on them, it was remarkable how patient and orderly everyone was.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: the most repetitive but catchy earworm of the eighties?
Sometimes, I find you doubt my love for you but I don't mind
Why should I mind? Why should I mind?

It's hard to quote the song while avoiding quoting from the endlessly-repeated chorus.
Wait, my mistake, his other hit from 1985 was the most repetitive new wave hit of the 80s.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
I'm gonna get high, man, I'm gonna get loose/
Need me a triple shot of that juice
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 600,000 Chinese spies given visas? Scotland relies on 14-year-old girls for their defense, tariffs work! mortgage fraud is the new thing, and more!
Recent Comments
Anna Puma: "I am going to meander away. Ciao amica. ..."

rhomboid: "And I think there are videos of the Prinz Eugen, c ..."

Kindltot: "[i]I wonder if it comes in Lorica Segmentata. Pos ..."

bear with asymmetrical balls: "220 I am actually afraid to carry right now. Be ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Romeo13!, I will pray to St Joseph and St Monica ..."

Dr. Claw: "92 ' >>>83 ace you haven't eaten for a week, or m ..."

Kindltot: "[i]"I don't eat." "You don't eat?!" "No, but it ..."

MkY: "Firesign Theater I think from Don't Crush That D ..."

Tonypete: "Regarding wayward children - I put a very small no ..."

496: "Debbie Harry was the most photographed person in t ..."

Anna Puma: "On YouTube you can find footage that was taken abo ..."

Mainah: "Romeo, We have a 40 something daughter who is a ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives