Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« "Moderate" British Imam: Let's Keep An Open Mind; How Do We Know Four Dead Muslim Suspects Were Bombers Rather Than Victims? | Main | Air America Update: Theft From Children Going Swimmingly; Ratings, Not So Much »
July 27, 2005

Quote of the Day

From The New Criterion's blog. A British simp criticizes Blair for not seeking to "understand" the reasons for terror, but rather "merely" condemning it. David Clark continues:

No one doubts that the bombers are in the grip of an evil ideology. The question, unanswered in the acres of newsprint devoted to rubbishing the suggestion that terrorism is a political phenomenon, is why this ideology has grown in its appeal to young Muslims. To put it in the simplistic Manichean terms favoured by some, why is there more evil around than there used to be? On this there is nothing but silence.

The New Criterion answers:

Why is there more evil around, Mr. Clark? Maybe because evil has finally figured out that it doesn't need to hide in the shadows--it can walk around in broad daylight and still we'll find a way not to see it.

Remember when "defining deviancy down" only meant calling out-of-wedlock births fine and dandy?

Ah, the good old days.


posted by Ace at 10:01 PM
Comments



Respect is due, Don Goomba. Excellent post.

Posted by: DiscerningTexan on July 28, 2005 12:18 AM

Sorry Ace, forgot where I was posting my comment--I was over at Nickie's before I clicked here: nevertheless, all mistaken identity aside, thanks for the great post.

Posted by: DiscerningTexan on July 28, 2005 12:20 AM

There's not "more evil" today, its just that modern transportation technology has given it more mobility than was possible before.

Posted by: tony on July 28, 2005 12:39 AM

" is why this ideology has grown in its appeal to young Muslims. "

The very fact that we don't see too many 60 year old suicide bombers leads me to believe that the naivety that is abundant in the young through a lack of worldly experience is being exploited when combined with brainwashing.

Tell a horny young man who can't get laid he can get 72 virgins and be a 'somebody' and they'll be lining up around the block. This is especially the case when they do nothing but implant the idea that their life is going to be crap thanks to the Great Satan.

Which reminds me, why is nobody asking about the increase in gang violence, and how it has grown in appeal to young people?

Rebelliousness? In the 80's we all grew long hair, now they either get involved in gang violence or strap a bomb on their back.

Tsch, kids nowaday..
/old man

Posted by: Ring on July 28, 2005 03:13 AM

Ring,

Could it be that nobody is asking about the increase in youth violence because youth violence has actually decreased?


Here is my take in the context of video game censorship by Sen. Clinton.

Posted by: Sinner on July 28, 2005 08:27 AM

Leftism = Slave Morality

Posted by: on July 28, 2005 08:40 AM

In re: terrorism, we can worry about the "why" some other day; right now it's more important to focus on the "who" and the "where".

Posted by: DWC on July 28, 2005 10:20 AM

Why is there more evil around, Mr. Clark? Maybe because evil has finally figured out that it doesn't need to hide in the shadows--it can walk around in broad daylight and still we'll find a way not to see it.

We've had so many repugnant laws and so many bad policies shoved down our throats by Liberals and been so frustated for so long about it all that we've become passive and apathetic. Liberals have taught us to be quiet in the face of grave injustice, even when it gets right in our face. They've taught us to fear the powerful and the rich and not speak out about it. Their arrogance, their condesencion and their continual dishonesty no longer insult us anymore. They've taught us that instead of ourselves they are our primary caregivers and we're better off turning our will and our lives over to the care of the Nanny state. They have forcibly intruded into our lives in all sorts of ways, and we no longer fight back anymore. It was at this critical point, when we all stopped fighting back that Atlas Shrugged and the Liberal Poison really took effect. The roots of apathy and cynisicm run deep now, tended by decades of Liberal rule. If all the Liberals just put their heads in the sand and were chewed up by the rabid dog of Islam that would be fine, but they're taking too many with them. Hopefully, those who are still left with strength and courage will prevail.

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 28, 2005 10:29 AM

This damn evil has been running around since at least 1948 and romanticized and embraced by appeasors since 1972. It is not a new phenomonen.

Posted by: Dman on July 28, 2005 10:45 AM

Trying to understand the reasons for terror before doing something about it is like being a passenger on the Titanic and saying, "I'm not getting in the lifeboat until I understand why the ship is sinking."

Posted by: Jim on July 28, 2005 10:56 AM

Brought to you by the same people who can't confirm global warming is happening, or if it is, if we can do anything about it, yet still insist we must destroy the world economy RIGHT NOW to combat it. Somehow. We think.

Posted by: lauraw on July 28, 2005 11:06 AM

One of the sad losses of our times is the loss of the ability to shame, or to be ashamed. The bad guys have always been with us. Now, they can be with us and be "understood".

Whether one likes it or not, black is still black, white is still white, bad is still bad and good is still good, no matter how relativist apologists try to tell us otherwise.

Posted by: Carlos on July 28, 2005 12:09 PM

Carlos

One of the sad losses of our times is the loss of the ability to shame, or to be ashamed. The bad guys have always been with us. Now, they can be with us and be "understood"... Whether one likes it or not, bad is still bad and good is still good ...

Pope John Paul II used to describe it as "the death of conscience" and its quite true. We've been so lulled (or rather bullied) into "tolerance" by so many years of Liberal demonizing against anyone who disagrees with them that we instinctively shrug, instead of raising hell when we should, like people used to do. If I had to point to one figure in the US who is more responsible than anyone else for it, it is Bill Clinton. His continual race and gender baiting, his demonizing of everyone who disagreed with him, his treasonus actions in giving the W-88 warhead, missle technology and fabrication equipment to the Chicoms for bribes, his starting that idiotic war in Kosvo (when the Christians had ejected 90% of the trouble making Moslems, he brought them all back and created a permanent siege between them) to draw attention from the above, and his "accidental" bombing of the Chinese embassy to confuse the world about it, were just a few of the many, many things he did to kill our consience. Watergate had the catharitic effect of showing us that even the most powerful man in the country was not above the law. Bill showed us the opposite: that the rich and powerful really are above the law now and we can't fight them, so just lay down and try not to think about it all. We shall be paying for his crimes, his cowardice and his treachery for a long time to come.

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 28, 2005 12:40 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
I guess yesterday's Starship test flight was cancelled. They're counting down to another launch, NOW. Lift-off!
The "hip" gray corporate slop era of Cracker Barrel is put on hold (supposedly):
Bret Baier
@BretBaier

Cracker Barrel is going back to the old logo. Company statement: "We thank our guests for sharing your voices and love for Cracker Barrel. We said we would listen, and we have. Our new logo is going away and our "Old Timer" will remain. At Cracker Barrel, it’s always been - and always will be - about serving up delicious food, warm welcomes, and the kind of country hospitality that feels like family. As a proud American institution, our 70,000 hardworking employees look forward to welcoming you to our table soon."
Elric the Blade says he's no longer sure that Trump will have the right to appeal in the NY fraud case:
Yesterday, I thought that Trump had an appeal as of right on the fraud liability, based upon news reports that cited the second opinion as declining to find in favor of liability. That would give Trump at least 2 dissenting judges for an appeal as of right.
But now, after seeing the actual decisions, I'm not so sure. Sorry, guys. I've never seen or heard of what the second opinion did. They dissented, but ... decided not to dissent? I'm not sure what the effect is in terms of whether Trump has a right to appeal. I doubt anyone does.
I think even if Trump doesn't have a right of appeal, the Court of Appeals (NY's highest court) will take the case. But ... it's a liberal court so who knows how they'll rule. I have the docket number so I can track what gets appealed to the Court of Appeals. If Trump wants to appeal, I think he might file an appeal as of right and a petition for permission to appeal. His lawyers know this case much better than I, but even they might know what the effect of all the opinions are.
I don't think they'll take the appeal. Judges are lazy and cowardly and will duck any hot potato case they can. These judges are also liberal hacks, and do not want to deliver Trump a full victory.
FBI raids home of John Bolton, former Trump national security advisor "The probe is eyeing multiple instances of the use of classified documents in leaks to news media. NBC reported that the investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration, but did not go further before President Joe Biden left office in January." [CBD]
Money Wired to Mexico Hits a Decade Low as US Immigration Policies Take Hold
Now bump the fee to 10%, and mandate proof of legal residence for all money transfers out of the United States [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Boots on the ground in Ukraine? We're against it! Trump shines a light on voting, Miss Universe wearing a suicide vest? And more!
"As the discussion continued, Fox News host Charlie Hurt asked Trump directly to confirm there will be no U.S. troops involved in this potential security umbrella for Ukraine. "Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president," Trump replied."
Good! I hope I am wrong! [CBD]
Lost Seventies Mystery Click: The Darkest Song Ever Recorded?
I think Professor of Rock (on YouTube) claimed this song was so upsetting that people used to pull over to the side of the road when it came on the radio. It's about a fatal plane crash, but obviously it suggests a fatal car crash too, which could wig out a driver.
It's like one of those nasty 70s anti-war body horror movies. Not for the squeamish. I'm not even going to post the lyrics because they're upsetting too.
Compilation of Naked Gun intros
That theme gets me charged.
Compilation of all Police Squad! openings. They're all the same except for the last few seconds where they reveal the Special Guest Star and the title(s).
Pitch Meeting: Amazon's new, terrible War of the Worlds
I don't know why these tech monopolists spend so much money on ripoff/sequel/remake slop. I like popcorn entertainment but is it legally required to be terrible?
Lost 90s Mystery Click: College Radio Edition
Well you look fantastic in your cast-off casket
At least the thing still runs
This nine to five bullshit don't let you forget
Whose suicide you're on.

Also:
You wax poetic about things pathetic
As long as you look so cute
Believe these hills are starting to roll
Believe these stars are starting to shoot
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: In the last Episode of the season CBD and J.J. Sefton chat about Texas Gerrymandering, The Islamist who is about to be the mayor of NYC, Jim Acosta's ghoulish interview, Israel needs a new strategy for Gaza, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Garrett's Favorite Band Edition
Everybody wants you
Everybody wants your love
I'd just like to make you mine, all mine
Recent Comments
IS ROTH [/b][/s][/i]: "H'm. Not debold. ..."

QED Texan : "Th ..."

Zeera. I voted for ALL of this: "Scampy! TL;DR Yet ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "Oregon has a Troy? How humiliating for King Priam. ..."

IS ROTH [/b][/s][/i]: "bold move ..."

InspiredHistoryMike: "I was offline most of the day today, started check ..."

Matthew Kant Cipher: "Bold!! Howdy, ScampyDog! ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "ONT! ..."

IS ROTH: "argh, didn't post! ..."

Thanatopsis : "Hola ..."

OrangeEnt: "You could hide a body in those mountains up top. ..."

haffhowershower: "OH yeah ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives