Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« "Moderate" British Imam: Let's Keep An Open Mind; How Do We Know Four Dead Muslim Suspects Were Bombers Rather Than Victims? | Main | Air America Update: Theft From Children Going Swimmingly; Ratings, Not So Much »
July 27, 2005

Quote of the Day

From The New Criterion's blog. A British simp criticizes Blair for not seeking to "understand" the reasons for terror, but rather "merely" condemning it. David Clark continues:

No one doubts that the bombers are in the grip of an evil ideology. The question, unanswered in the acres of newsprint devoted to rubbishing the suggestion that terrorism is a political phenomenon, is why this ideology has grown in its appeal to young Muslims. To put it in the simplistic Manichean terms favoured by some, why is there more evil around than there used to be? On this there is nothing but silence.

The New Criterion answers:

Why is there more evil around, Mr. Clark? Maybe because evil has finally figured out that it doesn't need to hide in the shadows--it can walk around in broad daylight and still we'll find a way not to see it.

Remember when "defining deviancy down" only meant calling out-of-wedlock births fine and dandy?

Ah, the good old days.


posted by Ace at 10:01 PM
Comments



Respect is due, Don Goomba. Excellent post.

Posted by: DiscerningTexan on July 28, 2005 12:18 AM

Sorry Ace, forgot where I was posting my comment--I was over at Nickie's before I clicked here: nevertheless, all mistaken identity aside, thanks for the great post.

Posted by: DiscerningTexan on July 28, 2005 12:20 AM

There's not "more evil" today, its just that modern transportation technology has given it more mobility than was possible before.

Posted by: tony on July 28, 2005 12:39 AM

" is why this ideology has grown in its appeal to young Muslims. "

The very fact that we don't see too many 60 year old suicide bombers leads me to believe that the naivety that is abundant in the young through a lack of worldly experience is being exploited when combined with brainwashing.

Tell a horny young man who can't get laid he can get 72 virgins and be a 'somebody' and they'll be lining up around the block. This is especially the case when they do nothing but implant the idea that their life is going to be crap thanks to the Great Satan.

Which reminds me, why is nobody asking about the increase in gang violence, and how it has grown in appeal to young people?

Rebelliousness? In the 80's we all grew long hair, now they either get involved in gang violence or strap a bomb on their back.

Tsch, kids nowaday..
/old man

Posted by: Ring on July 28, 2005 03:13 AM

Ring,

Could it be that nobody is asking about the increase in youth violence because youth violence has actually decreased?


Here is my take in the context of video game censorship by Sen. Clinton.

Posted by: Sinner on July 28, 2005 08:27 AM

Leftism = Slave Morality

Posted by: on July 28, 2005 08:40 AM

In re: terrorism, we can worry about the "why" some other day; right now it's more important to focus on the "who" and the "where".

Posted by: DWC on July 28, 2005 10:20 AM

Why is there more evil around, Mr. Clark? Maybe because evil has finally figured out that it doesn't need to hide in the shadows--it can walk around in broad daylight and still we'll find a way not to see it.

We've had so many repugnant laws and so many bad policies shoved down our throats by Liberals and been so frustated for so long about it all that we've become passive and apathetic. Liberals have taught us to be quiet in the face of grave injustice, even when it gets right in our face. They've taught us to fear the powerful and the rich and not speak out about it. Their arrogance, their condesencion and their continual dishonesty no longer insult us anymore. They've taught us that instead of ourselves they are our primary caregivers and we're better off turning our will and our lives over to the care of the Nanny state. They have forcibly intruded into our lives in all sorts of ways, and we no longer fight back anymore. It was at this critical point, when we all stopped fighting back that Atlas Shrugged and the Liberal Poison really took effect. The roots of apathy and cynisicm run deep now, tended by decades of Liberal rule. If all the Liberals just put their heads in the sand and were chewed up by the rabid dog of Islam that would be fine, but they're taking too many with them. Hopefully, those who are still left with strength and courage will prevail.

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 28, 2005 10:29 AM

This damn evil has been running around since at least 1948 and romanticized and embraced by appeasors since 1972. It is not a new phenomonen.

Posted by: Dman on July 28, 2005 10:45 AM

Trying to understand the reasons for terror before doing something about it is like being a passenger on the Titanic and saying, "I'm not getting in the lifeboat until I understand why the ship is sinking."

Posted by: Jim on July 28, 2005 10:56 AM

Brought to you by the same people who can't confirm global warming is happening, or if it is, if we can do anything about it, yet still insist we must destroy the world economy RIGHT NOW to combat it. Somehow. We think.

Posted by: lauraw on July 28, 2005 11:06 AM

One of the sad losses of our times is the loss of the ability to shame, or to be ashamed. The bad guys have always been with us. Now, they can be with us and be "understood".

Whether one likes it or not, black is still black, white is still white, bad is still bad and good is still good, no matter how relativist apologists try to tell us otherwise.

Posted by: Carlos on July 28, 2005 12:09 PM

Carlos

One of the sad losses of our times is the loss of the ability to shame, or to be ashamed. The bad guys have always been with us. Now, they can be with us and be "understood"... Whether one likes it or not, bad is still bad and good is still good ...

Pope John Paul II used to describe it as "the death of conscience" and its quite true. We've been so lulled (or rather bullied) into "tolerance" by so many years of Liberal demonizing against anyone who disagrees with them that we instinctively shrug, instead of raising hell when we should, like people used to do. If I had to point to one figure in the US who is more responsible than anyone else for it, it is Bill Clinton. His continual race and gender baiting, his demonizing of everyone who disagreed with him, his treasonus actions in giving the W-88 warhead, missle technology and fabrication equipment to the Chicoms for bribes, his starting that idiotic war in Kosvo (when the Christians had ejected 90% of the trouble making Moslems, he brought them all back and created a permanent siege between them) to draw attention from the above, and his "accidental" bombing of the Chinese embassy to confuse the world about it, were just a few of the many, many things he did to kill our consience. Watergate had the catharitic effect of showing us that even the most powerful man in the country was not above the law. Bill showed us the opposite: that the rich and powerful really are above the law now and we can't fight them, so just lay down and try not to think about it all. We shall be paying for his crimes, his cowardice and his treachery for a long time to come.

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 28, 2005 12:40 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Update: My ballpark estimate for a reasonable cost for a wildlife overpass (suitably padded to sate the thirst of Democrat grifters) was $15 million. Turns out, that was a good estimate. That's how much it cost Denver to build one.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the obvious incompatibility of Islam with free societies, John Bolton is a disloyal sleaze, The SAVE Act is in the muck of Senate RINOs, the crappy quality of anti-American propaganda, and more!
Some people liked Candace Owens because she was a black woman who told hard truths about BLM and black criminality. But this was always a grift. She started out as a race hustler for a grift, then hustled race the other way to grift conservatives, and now she's back to being a race-hustler for the left again. Specifically, she is now claiming that people pointing out that she is legitimately low-IQ and can't pronounce half the words her AI-generated teleprompter script points out to her is racist and just Ben Shapiro's way of saying the n-word without quite saying it. You see, you can only say that black people are smart, and if you see a dumb one that doesn't know how to pronounce simple words while she poses as an investigatory journalist, you have to pretend she's actually smart or you're a racist. Weird, that doesn't sound very conservative, let alone "#Based," to me. To prove how much she hates racism, she then says that Ben Shapiro's Jew ancestors were masters of the slave trade.
The Oscars: A celebration of thanking. Dave Barry nails it! [CBD]
Ami Kozak: Every single Tucker Carlson episode consists of him claiming he didn't say the things he said in the last episode
Also: this is the manipulation Tucker does that i hate the most. It's so cowardly. All he does is smear people (and Jews, generally), and then claim "I have nothing against [the person or group I just smeared.]" He'll even claim "I love [x], actually." Just again and again and again. It's all a lie, of course. A year ago he smeared Jews but added how beautiful he thought Israel was, and then two weeks ago, he said Israel is ugly as dog-shit and nothing beautiful has been built there "since 1948."
Just got this email from Dracula: "I love Van Helsing, actually, he's one of my personal heroes, if I'm being honest. I will claw the heart out of his belly and bathe in his blood before the children of Babylon, but I have nothing but respect for Van Helsing, actually. Love is the answer. Except for the followers of the Christ whom I am commanded to turn into my dark army of Satan. And I totally don't worship Satan, I just think we should listen to both sides. Hugs and kisses, may Van Helsing burn in the blood-red fires of hell throughout eternity, even though I consider him a close and dear friend, Vlad called Dracul."
New CPAC Treasured Guest Speaker drops
He was hard to book, given all of his current commitments, but CPAC landed the man of the hour!
Recent Comments
Farmer Bob: "I guess I’m just retarded, but why not just ..."

It's me donna: "I'd like to punch that simpering ,whiny, little b* ..."

San Franpsycho: "Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil (Green ..."

Thanatopsis: "Hola ..."

Stateless: "249 Meanwhile gas here is $5.89 a gallon.. ..."

SSBN 656 (G): "258 WTF did the troll just say ? Posted by: It's ..."

San Franpsycho: "I'm not, [i]not[/i] enjoying watching the British ..."

29Victor: "We were watching a practicalengineering video last ..."

Oldcat: "WTF did the troll just say ? Posted by: It's me d ..."

nurse ratched: "Nude quickies ..."

nurse ratched: "Trifecta yeet? ..."

nurse ratched: "Yeeting yeets who yeet. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives