| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Barrel of Monkeys Cafe
Democrats Melt Down Over Virginia Supreme Court Ruling, with Socialist Democrat Influencer Hasan Piker Demanding Violent Revolution and the "Smart" Commentators of the Left Unable to Read a Simple Court Decision Quick Hits/The Week In Woke Combo Thread DOJ Will Denaturalize 12 Cultural Enrichment Officers Who Lied About Their War Crimes and Support for Terrorism Reform Gains Over 1,300 Seats as Labour Loses Nearly 1,200 US Launches Airstrikes Against Iranian Targets, Stops 70+ Iranian Oil Tankers from Evading the Blockade lol THE MORNING RANT: School Board and Down Ballot Races Are the Most Important Races You Can Vote in this Cycle Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 5/ 8/26 Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Giant Hornets: Nature's Little Zionist Imperialists |
Main
| Al Gore's "Current TV" Fiasco-In-Waiting »
July 14, 2005
College Professor Implicated In London BombingsThese murderous bastards are permitted to preach murder on campuses and recruit unformed-but-searching retarded little minds into the ranks of Al Qaeda. Does freedom of academic expression actually embrace conspiracy to commit murder? When the hell are we going to get serious about these things? How many more people have to die before something more than 40% of our country (and Europe, and the world) decide that enough is just goddamned enough? Your Patriotic Academy We'll expel students for posting flyers for Republican guest speakers, but we'll be damned before we cast out professors who agitate for actual mass-murder. You can't make an omlette without fragging a few officers or decapitating a few commuters. Meanwhile... In San Fransisco... City supervisors vote 8-3 to reject hosting historic WWII battleship USS Iowa as tourist attraction and floating museum. Uhhhh... I'm starting to think that Star Trek lied to me by claiming that San Francisco would wind up as the Federation's galactic headquarters. posted by Ace at 03:00 PM
CommentsI dunno. Star Fleet's saving grace was that it was into all sorts of exploratory sex, with like guys and green girls and stuff. To boldly go where no man has gone before. So it'd fit right in with San Fran's permissive atmosphere Posted by: Iblis on July 14, 2005 03:35 PM
You are wrong wingnut. The Federation was a socialist paradise. No redstaters allowed! Posted by: on July 14, 2005 03:37 PM
Worked in the Bay area for three years (while still living in Tx). SF left the planet about 26 years ago. And although I didn't like Willie Brown, there was a funny story going round on him... his home phone number was listed. A frustrated citizen called him in the wee hours of the morning bitching about a burned out street light. He said he'd take care of it. Tried going back to sleep, couldn't, got up and went to work. After everyone started coming to work, he called the public works director and said "whatever you do, get that light fixed and tell me when it's done". So it gets fixed. He goes home. Waits until the wee hours of the morning and calls the citizen back, saying "I just wanted to make sure we got that light fixed for you, is it on now"? Posted by: Dave in Texas on July 14, 2005 03:42 PM
It wasn't a lie. It merely omitted the fact that SF was chosen AFTER it had been paved over. Posted by: physics geek on July 14, 2005 03:44 PM
You are such an amazing hack. What a fucking stupid post. Are you fucking kidding? What is the point you are trying to make with this? Why don't you spit it out in less ambiguous terms? An Egyptian chemistry professor working on a visa at Leeds, who spent a single, fucking semester at an American University is a suspect in the London Bombings and that somehow leads you into a thinly veiled rant about American liberal academics. So tell me, Ace, is it time to censor or jail all the academics and artists, is it ace? If that's not what you are saying, exactly what is it? What are you advocating? What is your fucking plan for dealing with this grave threat to the red, white, and blue? I know this will bring out all your sycophants defending you with their best venom and bile. But you know what? It really is time for you too take a long hard look at what fascism is, how it is defined, and what its characteristics are and then look in the mirror. Or better yet, just spend a week reviewing your moron-blog.
Posted by: izzadem on July 14, 2005 03:47 PM
Hey stupid, I think he has been pretty clear that if you encourage violence, you should be locked up. Must be so hard to wrap your little brain around that. Posted by: The Dude on July 14, 2005 03:50 PM
One wonders if izzadem would classify his own comment as containing any venom and bile, or if that can only be attributed to opinions in which he disagrees. So tell us, oh keeper of the flame of enlightenment, how exactly can fascism be applied to a blog that so freely allows you to post a dissenting opinion? What's more it is quite brave to demand solutions and then offer up none of your own. Let me guess, you are currently employed or enrolled in a university and you classify yourself as either a liberal or left-leaning. Posted by: Defense Guy on July 14, 2005 03:54 PM
Oh, yeah, tell me exactly how this fucker was preaching murder on campuses when he was delivering lectures on fucking bio-chemistry? Cuz, that's probably how your moron-mind is working, "Let's round up all the academics who are preaching murder, and put them in Gitmo" You in charge, dip-shit, how to you propose to get serious about these things? What's your genius d&d inspired plan? Posted by: izzadem on July 14, 2005 03:55 PM
Oh, yeah, tell me exactly how this fucker was preaching murder on campuses when he was delivering lectures on fucking bio-chemistry? Gee, I don't know... meeting with students interested in Islamicism, recruiting them from Middle-Eastern Students' Leagues and such? Goodness gracious, I had no idea that professors simply vanished off the face of the earth when not standing in a lecture hall. Posted by: ace on July 14, 2005 03:57 PM
Dude, you stupid twat... were do you see that this jack-ass was encouraging voilence in any publicly recogonizable way? Or are you just making baseless assumptions? Posted by: izzadem on July 14, 2005 03:58 PM
Given that he built the bomb... yeah, I'm making some assumptions he recruited students and impressionable youths. Crazy assumption. You know another crazy assumption I made? That Muslims were responsible for this. Still waiting for "all the evidence" on that one, though. Posted by: ace on July 14, 2005 04:00 PM
As Norman Mailer pointed out, the Pax Americana of the future is solid evidence of this calamity brought to us by a horrific onslaught, known as Shock and Awe. This suggests that the appropriation of Arab resources represents the repudiation of international law in order to bring about the seizure of the Iraqi Oil Ministry. Clearly, the unstated purpose of this war represents the crushing of internal dissent in order to propagate the resurgence of White Supremacist ideologies. Let us never forget that the pro-Sharon neoconservative cabal brings forth the end of any possibility of social justice in a reactionary state. Posted by: profdem on July 14, 2005 04:02 PM
Ace, Whatever you do, don't question the courageous dissenter izzadem's patiotism, or his support for the troops. Lord knows, I certainly don't. Although, to be honest, I have no idea whose troops (or, conceivably "unlawful combatants") he may be supporting. But I'm sure he's with them 110%. Posted by: Jack M. on July 14, 2005 04:04 PM
A chemistry instructor at Leeds University has been implicated as the possible as the mastermind behind the 7/7 bombings, but the fact that the bomb-making materials were found in his apartment puts him squarely at the center of the conspiracy. I guess reading is not your strong suit izzadem. Don't worry there must be some sort of career path that has as it's central strengths the spouting off of inane and pointless accusations that are provably false. Politics maybe? Ace, any idea why your comment section refuses to remember me? Posted by: Defense Guy on July 14, 2005 04:04 PM
Izzadem, are you seriously suggesting that a guy who apparently assembled the bombs in his apartment and then fled to Egypt days before the attack should retain his teaching position because terrorism was more of an extracurricular hobby? That's a rhetorical question, BTW. Discussing the issue with you looks like a profoundly unrewarding experience. Posted by: utron on July 14, 2005 04:06 PM
Oh, and Iblis? All that interspecies sexual experimentation was only possible because of Starfleet's liberal, supportive attitude toward alternative lifestyles. Most Federation citizens were quite boring and conventional, and by that point in history they were all gay as clams. Posted by: utron on July 14, 2005 04:08 PM
profdem That explains the absolute resurgance of Klanners running around and the huge boost in sales of white sheets at the local WalMart. If these two are any indication of the brain power of the current crop of leftists then they should look forward to a very long losing streak in American politics. Posted by: Defense Guy on July 14, 2005 04:08 PM
Is profdem for real? Either way, he is cracking me up. Posted by: TheDude on July 14, 2005 04:09 PM
Izzadem, are you seriously suggesting that a guy who apparently assembled the bombs in his apartment and then fled to Egypt days before the attack should retain his teaching position because terrorism was more of an extracurricular hobby? That's a rhetorical question, BTW. Discussing the issue with you looks like a profoundly unrewarding experience. You're kidding right? Please tell me you're kidding. The creep is dead, for one thing, keeping his teaching position would be pretty fucking pointless, wouldn't it? There is no way this guy walked around campus with sandwich boards advocating bombing and killing civilians, and I'm certain it wasn't on his visa application. And besides, ace just used that ask a pathetic excuse to make some stupid point about how its time to get serious, presumably about the presence of traitorous liberals on our campuses. I want to know exactly what his plan is. And how he is going to implement without raising taxes. Posted by: izzadem on July 14, 2005 04:15 PM
El-Nashar is dead? Well shoot, somebody call the cops and tell them they can quit looking for him. whizzerdem, are you stoned or something? oh, my question is rhetorical too. I can't get interested in a conversation with you either. Posted by: on July 14, 2005 04:27 PM
Izzadem, in the first sentence of the linked article, it's stated that the guy is being sought by the police. You would have to read... wow, all the way to the fourth sentence before you learned they thought he had fled to Egypt. I know why you're so upset about this. You're a graduate liberal arts TA, aren't you? I can't think of any other field where reading comprehension skills like that would make you employable. And there's another one of those "rhetorical questions." Do you even know what that means? If not, I suggest you look it up. Assuming you can, of course. Posted by: utron on July 14, 2005 04:28 PM
Izzadem, you are a moron. The article (and Utron's comment) clearly states that the lecturer fled to Egypt prior to the bombings - why would he be dead? Ace's comment was that we need to stop the hate speech on our campuses. That would seem to be noncontroversial, given current campus speech codes. But at this point, no one in academia is even addressing the issue: there is no effort to create a no-tolerance environment for speech advocating violence against the West. As far as his plan, I think it is to encourage knee-jerk liberal apologists like yourself to STFU, while simultaneously encouraging bipartisan criticism of hate speech in mosques, universities, and youth centers. Just before he lowers taxes. Posted by: on July 14, 2005 04:30 PM
04:27 pm was me... sorry about the loose shit. Posted by: Dave in Texas on July 14, 2005 04:31 PM
izzadem, I think you're cute. For a quarter, I'll let you do my dog, i.e. if that wasn't you last night. Posted by: on July 14, 2005 04:31 PM
. . . and 04:30 was me (I'm compelled by forces beyond my control to press "Post" before I remember to type my name). Posted by: Geoff on July 14, 2005 04:34 PM
fyi, shade grown coffee is delicious - about 10 times better than regular. izzadem is accurately, but given the quality of his 'thinking', redundantly named. Posted by: max on July 14, 2005 04:53 PM
JESUS H. CHRIST! (there I said it!) What a bunch of divided squabbling assholes! If we don't like what guys like Ward Connerly are doing we should boycott the goods and services that support them. That really will stop them all cold, tenure, academic freedom or none. How much clearer can it be? And best of all we don't have to actually do something, we merely have to NOT buy the the goods and services that support them! We get to still keep our freedoms and stop the motherfuckers cold from this shit! The right must boycott! Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 14, 2005 04:59 PM
"As Norman Mailer pointed out, the Pax Americana of the future is solid evidence of this calamity brought to us by a horrific onslaught, known as Shock and Awe. This suggests that the appropriation of Arub resourcez representz the repudiashun uv internashunal law in ordure to breeng abowt thee seezure...seizzure...zeizzzure...zzz....zzzzzzzz..." Well, what do you expect? He's no Tom Clancy. Heck, he's no Dr. Seuss, either. Wake me when he's through. And then someone please wake HIM. Later, Posted by: bbeck on July 14, 2005 05:01 PM
Guess Izzadum doesn't know how to follow a link. Or read. One of the two. Hmm, I'd say he thought the red print was one of those Red Letter Bible deals but I doubt he's ever touched a Bible. At least not one that didn't burst into flames. Later, Posted by: bbeck on July 14, 2005 05:04 PM
Izzademon confirms the saying keep your mouth closed and only be thought a fool, open it up and remove all doubt. Posted by: Dman on July 14, 2005 05:05 PM
72 Virgins: I think you mean Ward Churchill, don't you? And how exactly do we boycott academia? Posted by: Geoff on July 14, 2005 05:05 PM
Utron, which is why Star Fleet is perfect in San Fran. I mean this is the organization that brought you form fitting mini-skirts for men. Its guys like izzadork that make me miss Cedaford. Posted by: Iblis on July 14, 2005 05:23 PM
I think Geoff is right on the Ward deal... Verklempt! Posted by: Uncle Jefe on July 14, 2005 05:30 PM
Ace, Wow. You might want to turn off that angry moonbat-troll Norman Ouch. As for San Francsisco, I meant to post on the cop who suffered head injury at the hands of so-called anarchists-read: dirty, unemployed, crank-using, angry runaways, losers, and beggars. No really. And I am being generous. For the last few years I have traveled there on business almost every month, and believe-U-Me, there's a lot of rage in the streets. The police are incredibly restrained. I have on many occasion seen them just grit their teeth, and remarkably not bust some dirtball's head in after he has urinated on the building, accosted passersby, and swung at the cops. The SFPD are to be complimented. As for Federation HQ? I think it does have something to do with the tight fitting clothes. Looking good in San Francisco is a must. Just sayin'. Posted by: on July 14, 2005 06:12 PM
Ace, In case you didn't already know. That was me n'stuff, you know, with the funny tractor beam schtick. That is all. Posted by: MeTooThen on July 14, 2005 06:14 PM
Yeah, why doesn't "remember info" work? Posted by: NathanB on July 14, 2005 06:30 PM
"I'd say he thought the red print was one of those Red Letter Bible deals" You're killing me! Posted by: Michael on July 14, 2005 08:01 PM
"Remember me" doesn't work on a single site on mu.nu (the domain I'm on). It's a glitch in the software we use affecting 100+ blogs. Posted by: ace on July 14, 2005 08:12 PM
This academic piece of shit was sentenced to life yesterday: Muslim Leader Gets Life for Inciting Jihad Ali Al Timimi: American born Jihad recruiter convicted of urging holy war And tomorrow is Lynne Stewart Day, hurray! p.s.: I like Ward Connerly. Posted by: on July 14, 2005 08:59 PM
"Remember me" doesn't work on a single site on mu.nu (the domain I'm on). It's a glitch in the software we use affecting 100+ blogs. That should be the first comment on every topic, so dumbasses like myself will stop trying to use it. Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on July 14, 2005 09:00 PM
Izzadem is from The Onion. Has to be. Or he's Jeff Larkin. Because that was Great! [I]s it time to censor or jail all the academics and artists, is it ace? If that's not what you are saying, exactly what is it? What are you advocating? What is your fucking plan for dealing with this grave threat to the red, white, and blue?Awesome! But, Ace, you were saying that, right? It wasn't really about universities firing death preaching murder fiends? Because that would be censorship. The only exception is when academic expression rises to the level of hate speech. (Spoken by a white person.) (Unless leftist.) You knew that, I'm sure. Everyone knows hate speech hurts people much worse than exploding.
Posted by: rdbrewer on July 14, 2005 09:21 PM
As Norman Mailer pointed out, the Pax Americana . . . Heh. That satirical appeal to authority. Classic. Great way to start off. ProfDem is from The Onion too, I'll bet. Prolly the same person as IzzaDem. . . . of the future is solid evidence of this calamity brought to us by a horrific onslaught, known as Shock and Awe. Oh, this is the best. And it's not even a sentence. Well, technically it is, but the prepositional phrases render it delightfully non-sensical. Absurd humor. My fav. It needs a that, or a them, or a second verb. Or something. Heh. And there's no explanation of the apparent time-travel-based rationale! It's just left hanging there. Hi-larious. Like some drunken professor rambling away at the keyboard. This suggests . . . What, the evidence from the future? . . . that the appropriation of Arab resources represents the repudiation of international law in order to bring about the seizure of the Iraqi Oil Ministry. So we could have cheap oil, cheap gasoline? Ha! I just love this. Clearly, the unstated purpose of this war represents the crushing of internal dissent in order to propagate the resurgence of White Supremacist ideologies. Let us never forget that the pro-Sharon neoconservative cabal brings forth the end of any possibility of social justice in a reactionary state. Larkin, that's the greatest pile of bullshit you've ever written. You da man. Posted by: rdbrewer on July 14, 2005 09:53 PM
Shhh, you'll inhibit him. Posted by: lauraw on July 14, 2005 10:03 PM
Should we start having a "Comments until Izzadem calls someone a twat" countdown on relevant posts. Ace could set an over/under and field bets. Of course, Izzadem couldn't place bets shimself, but it might be fun for the rest of us. Posted by: anon on July 15, 2005 11:06 AM
twat. Posted by: izzadem on July 15, 2005 11:22 AM
Hey, izzadope, they caught that dead guy in Cairo. How does a corpse flee the country, anyway? Maybe by the same magic they use to vote Democrat. Posted by: lauraw on July 15, 2005 12:27 PM
laurawrong, Yeah, I was mistaken about his being dead. I thought he was one of the 4 bombers. So Sorry. Really had nothing to do with what I was saying anyway. Posted by: izzadem on July 15, 2005 01:13 PM
VERKLEMPT Posted by: Uncle Jefe on July 15, 2005 03:58 PM
mneversene.com either on the fly or by means of the scrivner Posted by: torquemada's on July 22, 2005 06:03 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Democrat Congresswoman Sara Jacobs cites Me-Again Kelly, Cavernous Nostrils, Alex Jones and Tuq'r Qarlson as proof that concerns about Trump's mental health are "bipartisan"
As Bonchie from Red State says: Know the op when you see it.
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports. Recent Comments
NaCly Dog:
"Oldcat
That is one point to pound in on.
IST ..."
gKWVE : "#Justice4Kaya ..." garrett: ">>It messes up the flavor and texture profile. ..." Anna Puma: "Piper is riffing off 'being a beacon to the world' ..." ShainS [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "[Just belatedly saw this from the prior thread:] ..." garrett: ">>My daughter mentioned to me that she has never l ..." Turn 2: ">>> Well traditionally it was all Judy Garland mov ..." Harry Vandenburg: "Didn't California do the same thing with gay marri ..." "Perfessor" Squirrel: "Organically grown, smartass. No pesticides or crap ..." Guy Mohawk: "I think a repost of Diablo girl is warranted. ..." Auspex: " The long march through the institutions is over, ..." Anna Puma: "Hakeem Jeffries, every time he opens his pie-hole ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|