Ace of Spades HQ

« Homo Cola -- When An Iced Toddy Just Isn't Gay Enough | Main | BREAKING: Sheep Are Dumb »

July 11, 2005

Faster And Worse Than I Predicted: The BBC Edits Out Word "Terrorist" From Original Print Reports About Bombings!

A few days ago I precognitively bloviated:

Next week, when similar murderers blow up bombs in Iraq, Israel, Indonesia, or Indiana, [what the BBC termed "terrorists" after the bombings will] be "militants" or "bearded scimitar-wielding warrior-poets" again. Trust that.

But it's worse. They've actually edited the word "terrorist" from their website archives:

The BBC has re-edited some of its coverage of the London Underground and bus bombings to avoid labelling the perpetrators as "terrorists", it was disclosed yesterday. Early reporting of the attacks on the BBC's website spoke of terrorists but the same coverage was changed to describe the attackers simply as "bombers".
The BBC's guidelines state that its credibility is undermined by the "careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgments".

Consequently, "the word 'terrorist' itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding" and its use should be "avoided", the guidelines say.

Rod Liddle, a former editor of the Today programme, has accused the BBC of "institutionalised political correctness" in its coverage of British Muslims.

A BBC spokesman said last night: "The word terrorist is not banned from the BBC."

But of course not. It still applies to the Americans and Israelis.

posted by Ace at 11:09 PM

Comments

Ace,

Britain is lost.

Really.

For all of the stoicism and "We are not afraid" outrage, the ruling elite of their government, press, academies, and society appear hell-bent on surrender.

So be it.

I'll miss Newcastle Ale though.

Posted by: MeTooThen on July 11, 2005 11:19 PM

Sometimes, it's best to just go with your first impressions.

These. People. Have. No. Fucking. Clue.

Posted by: Russ from Winterset on July 11, 2005 11:22 PM

Someone should hack into their websites and substitute the word muslim for bombers.

Posted by: on July 11, 2005 11:37 PM

You know, one man's "terrorist" who kills and maims innocent people on their way to work with explosives is another man's "freedom fighter" who is fighting for the freedom to basically enslave women, kill Jews, and collapse stome walls (ironic, no?) on gays.

Let's not put up "a barrier rather than an aid to understanding."

Let's let the healing begin, people.

Posted by: Sean M. on July 11, 2005 11:38 PM

How come no one ever bombs these twats?

Posted by: Iblis on July 12, 2005 12:24 AM

They already seem to have a significant "barrier to understanding" that people want to freaking kill them. More barriers would be counterproductive donchaknow.

Posted by: Claire on July 12, 2005 12:31 AM

Consequently, "the word 'journalist' itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding" and its use should be "avoided", the guidelines say.

I thought the sentence read better this way.

Posted by: Steve L. on July 12, 2005 08:19 AM

A BBC spokesman said last night: "The word (redacted) is not banned from the BBC."

Posted by: Dave in Texas on July 12, 2005 08:47 AM

Hey Ace, I bet if you asked Allah real nicely he'd lend you that old pair of photos he always used to use in situations like this, where the guy standing next to Stalin is airbrushed out in the second photo. I really miss that.

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on July 12, 2005 09:07 AM

Maybe I'm too cynical here, but would the BBC or the NY Times have a problem calling an abortion clinic bomber a terrorist? Someone should do a Lexis-Nexis search on that.

Posted by: JeffK on July 12, 2005 09:13 AM

George Orwell's famous phrases are proven true again and we are seeing them in action:

Doublethink - The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. ... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies—all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.

Duckspeak - Can be either good or bad, depending on who is speaking, and if what they are saying is in following with the ideals of Big Brother. To be speaking rubbish and lies (bad), or to be speaking rubbish and lies for the good of "The Party" (good).

Newspeak - Is closely based on English but has a greatly reduced and simplified vocabulary and grammar. This suited the totalitarian regime of the Party, whose aim was to make subversive thought ("thoughtcrime") and speech impossible. And to to sever humanity from its language (that is, Oldspeak) and thus its history and past. From there the government, by way of Newspeak, could control how people think and act.

Liberalism is a mental disorder and must be totally defeated.

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 12, 2005 10:45 AM

The idea that they sympathize with the terrorists to some extent doesn't really explain this kind of shit. Being Liberals, they are by definition cowards and are afraid of the consequences if they really take on the terrorists. So they've now begun to self censor the truth in their clumsy covert fashion. I wonder if the terrorists overtly try to silence? It wouldn't take much to flip them, they're three quarters of the way there already.

Posted by: COWARDLY LIBERALS on July 12, 2005 11:07 AM

The day the BBC has to report the use of their own planes against the Brits and there are thousands of dead bodies lying in the streets maybe that will be the day they start calling them what they really are.

Never forget.

Posted by: lometa on July 12, 2005 12:00 PM

Looks like JeffK is right:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=abortion+bombing+terror

Posted by: 12" Saturday Night on July 12, 2005 12:44 PM

OTOH, the AP today finally found an occasion where it's OK to call them "terrorists": when they escape from US detention in Afghanistan.

Posted by: quiggs on July 12, 2005 01:18 PM

Doubtless George Orwell is unhappy for his country while Liberals give new meaning to his ideas.

Posted by: s&m on July 12, 2005 05:51 PM

How come no one ever bombs these twats?

Iblis

Because they are far more useful to Islam where they are. It's the Rusty Shackleford's and the Robert Spencer's and guys like Allah in the House they'd like to stop.

Posted by: 72 VIRGINS on July 12, 2005 05:57 PM

I'll miss Guinness stout.

Posted by: Doomed and knew it... on July 12, 2005 07:17 PM

Amazon.com Widgets

Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]

Top Headlines

Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?

Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.

TJM explores the movies of David Lean, director of Lawrence of Arabia

Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.

Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove

Chris
@chriswithans

"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"

Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining

TJM wonders about world building in stories, mostly The Hunger Games

"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.

Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over

"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)

No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.

Now they've lost 84%.

Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.

Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...

The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.

Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.

(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.

Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party

STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.

Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.

Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"

Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]

Tucker Carlson is pretty sure Trump is a wizard