Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« The Vicious Left: CafePress Offered "Kill Bush" Shirts | Main | LGF Has People Making "LGF Minion" Leather Biker Jackets, And I Can't Sell a $15 Schmatta »
April 13, 2005

Conservative-Kosher

My Nietzche quote has prompted a bit of completely-unexpected criticism. He said "God is dead" and God is the "deification of nothingness" and other stuff that surely does not go over well with the faithful.

I guess I just wanted to say this: I used to be a liberal. (Hey, look, if you want to get some play with the ladies in college you either be liberal as all get out or else you start as star cornerback for the football team... being liberal seemed easier to me. I mean, I could have been a star cornerback, if I felt like it.)

And one of the things that started turning me off of liberalism cold was this stupid Boycott of the Week program they enrolled me in against my wishes. Grapes, apples, Coors, Domino's... I just could not keep up with the wide range of products or entertainments I was expected to eschew just to demonstrate how socially conscious I was.

And a lot of times the people telling you to boycott couldn't even explain why you were supposed to boycott.

"Hey man, don't eat Snickers."

"But I love Snickers."

"Nope. Boycott Snickers. Didn't you hear?"

"Hear what, exactly?"

"Uhhhhh... well, like, something? You know? Like they don't pay their migrant workers enough to thresh and harvest the Snickers trees? Or, like, five cents of every nickle from a Snickers bar goes to fund the Death Squads in, um, Portugal?"

"What Portuguese Death Squads?"

"You know... all those Death Squads in Latin America. I don't know the facts, I'm just telling you what I know. And what I know is that Snickers is filled with the Devil's Nougat."

"You're kiddin' me, right? No more Snickers? What if I really want one?"

"Well.... There's always O Henry."

"Ohhhhhh God. I suppose. There's always O Henry."

At any rate, that sort of stupidity turned me off liberalism faster than my own rapidly-diminishing sex drive.

Conservatives have been better about avoiding this Boycott of the Week deal, and usually, when we do boycott, we have some pretty damn good reasons for boycotting.

As I noted in a post: HL Mencken was a misanthrope (can't blame him on that score, actually) but worse yet an anti-semite. And yet he writes like a dream, has good and vicious sense when writing about people who aren't Jewish, and provided me with a kick-ass quote that sums up my blogging philosophy (and looks good on a t-shirt, which, did I mention?, you can still buy for a limited time only).

Should I boycott Mencken because hew was anti-Jew, too?

And what if I wanted to read TS Eliott and Ezra Pound? I confess, this is a rather remote possibility; I didn't want to read them when I was required to read them by HS and college teachers ("The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock"? Give me a break. No sale, lady. Peddle it elsewhere, 'cause I ain't buyin'.).

But suppose I had a sudden desire to be bored out of my mind by ugly poetry?

Anyway, I guess the question I have is: how seriously do you try to keep conservative-kosher? Is it even possible in a culture dominated by liberals?


posted by Ace at 02:46 PM
Comments



Ace, please forgive my denseness (density?) but I don't understand the reference to kashruth (the laws regarding what's kosher and what's not). I presume you mean how does one stay true to conservative values while living amongst liberal influences.

Am I close?

Posted by: speedster1 on April 13, 2005 02:55 PM

I just mean that as observant Jews keep kosher -- avoiding certain things because of religious strictures -- some conservatives might keep "conservative-kosher" because their ideology or principles require, or at least suggest, it.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 02:58 PM

The culture is dominated by phonies, not liberals, really.

If you make money and you keep it and spend it pretty much all on yourself, you ain't any kind of liberal, sorry.
You are actually a good little fiscal conservative, no matter what you'd like to pretend or espouse.

And I think many conservatives expect pragmatism- or 'markets' - to eventually resolve all the stupid ideas in the world, without much grassroots cause-mongering.
Which is unfortunate.

Posted by: lauraw on April 13, 2005 03:05 PM

As Lord Peter Wimsey says in 'Murder Must Advertise':
"just because someone has a monomania doesn't mean they can't get their facts straight"

Posted by: ed in texas on April 13, 2005 03:10 PM

Ace,

Slow down, man. Take a breath. Relax. Have a drink. Eat something.

Come on, eat, eat - you're skin and bones!

Posted by: John from WuzzaDem on April 13, 2005 03:11 PM

But Ace, aren't you arguing for that which you turned away from in college? Do you really want to stop eating Snickers for a conservative cause when ya didn't like stopping if for a liberal cause? If that is what it takes to get you to start blogging liberal than I'm all for it.

Posted by: on April 13, 2005 03:11 PM

I can't believe that there anyone would seriously give you shit because Nietzche was a fervent atheist.

Oh wait - yes I can.

DON'T STRAY FROM THE RESERVATION, ACE. THAT WAY LIES MADNESS AND SHUNNING. PROFESS FAITH IN GOD OR BE TRAMPLED UNDER HIS FOOT.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on April 13, 2005 03:14 PM

Who cares is some whiners don't want you to quote Nietzche? You certainly shouldn't.

Posted by: Bob on April 13, 2005 03:18 PM

But Ace, aren't you arguing for that which you turned away from in college? Do you really want to stop eating Snickers for a conservative cause when ya didn't like stopping if for a liberal cause?

Ummmm.... no? I sorta thought I was arguing against that mindset entirely.

Do I really write that unclearly?

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 03:18 PM

With ya on this one ace.

Like the French wine thing. Now, I'm pretty far to the "right" whatever that means, and I was pretty upset with France's government's behavior in re the war. I also don't drink much wine. At all. Maybe a bottle a week at best.

But I'll be damned if I care where a wine came from if it's good and $6 a bottle.

For people who buy wine by the case, maybe it's important to express some political statment with your purchases.

For big ticket items I try to buy as domestic as possible so long as it's a good deal.

But really, a Snickers (for example)?

Who the fuck cares?

There's noting I but enough of to make me care about boycotting a certain manufacturer.

It reminds me of this one guy who lived in our neighborhood growing up in Michigan. He would walk around the neighborhood in a plain t-shirt and shorts (or blue parks and pants) with a sandwich bag pinned to the back of his clothes. The sign read "Boycott Lettuce" or "Boycott GM" or some such shit.

We called him Boycott GM as his name (not to his face).

And laughed.

Virgins, no offense, but the boycott thing is a really crank-y way of doing things. More than a little unhinged. And remeniscent of the Caesar Chavez inspired idiocy of the 70s, if you ask me.

I like you man, but it's going nowhere, and just making you look like a crank.


Posted by: hobgoblin on April 13, 2005 03:19 PM

Bob, I guess I don't care... much.

I find it more of a vaguely-interesting BS-session question than something I'm actually bothered by.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 03:19 PM

But I'll be damned if I care where a wine came from if it's good and $6 a bottle.

Nahhh, personally, I'm big on that.

Australian or Californian. No French. No German.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 03:20 PM

'Sides, Californian and Australian wines are, in fact, cheaper.

And better.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 03:21 PM

Have you ever noticed that when the subject turns to Jesus and stuff, Ol' Bill's never far behind? He'll pop up in the strangest places, runnin' down the Son of Man and his followers. I suspect the Web is a fine medium for him since we can't smell the FUCKING BRIMSTONE!

Plus he has a radio show with a Jew--how are we going to see them polish their horns if they're on the radio?

Clever, Scratchy, but not clever enough.

Posted by: spongeworthy on April 13, 2005 03:22 PM

Oh wait - yes I can.

Calling all bible-thumpers -- please follow me over to Wizbang.

Posted by: Michael on April 13, 2005 03:25 PM

Ditto on the French wine. We have been loving the Australian stuff.

Posted by: lauraw on April 13, 2005 03:26 PM

Hey Bill, you've got your own crankiness, too.

Being a "contrarian conservative" almost as a principle is a bit tiresome, too.

Now, I know you're not self-identified as "conservative", but if so, it helps to state that up front, so at least the true believers don't jump on you at a moment's deviation. You used to do that on your blog, stopped for a while, and then when the Schaivo thing came up, your new readership wasn't aware of where you were coming from. (IMAO)

As for Nietzche, a good libertarian (or free-thinking independent [read, "I'm not going to say what I espouse in a coherent system"]) like yourself should find as anathema Nietzche's rejection of logic and reason.

But hey, if it pisses off your new mortal enemies, the God-botherers, why not go with it?

Posted by: hobgoblin on April 13, 2005 03:27 PM

I like domestic Reislings (white) from the Pacific Northwest. Domestic wines are allowed to be stronger than the imports. Yea!

Posted by: rapidtransit on April 13, 2005 03:28 PM
Bob, I guess I don't care... much.

I find it more of a vaguely-interesting BS-session question than something I'm actually bothered by.

See, now that's where I get offended. You should be aiming a little higher than "vaguely interesting".

Especially after I bought your t-shirt, thus filling your pockets with crazy blog money...

Posted by: Bob on April 13, 2005 03:28 PM

Bill? Cranky?

Nawwwww! Say it ain't so.

Posted by: Michael on April 13, 2005 03:30 PM

No time to read the comments, but hope you weren't reacting to my "oh god, intervention needed" snark... I just think nihilism and altruism are for sniveling dolts. That's all. Back to work, just got swamped.

Posted by: fat kid on April 13, 2005 03:31 PM

Didn't you indicate you were considering a boycott of Cafe Press in your post just before this one?

Posted by: Hubris on April 13, 2005 03:32 PM

When I start buying more than one or two bottles a month, I might care. But I'll never give up my Spetlaese from the Rhineland, even then.

Besides the good wine/good price thing with Aussie and domestic (read OREGON) wines, why not buy a wine that's good and a good price (if the same as Aus/USA) no matter where it comes from. Chirac isn't getting a cut of the bottle (or he already has and now you're just hurting American wine merchants).

Posted by: hobgoblin on April 13, 2005 03:32 PM

Oh yeah, you're all on fucking notice.

Posted by: fat kid on April 13, 2005 03:32 PM

It's not so much feeling that I'm going to bankrupt someone, it's having the satisfaction of knowing that:
1. French wine.
2. Whoopie Goldberg
3. Chevy Chase
4. Michael Moore.
5. The list goes on.
Won't be getting any of MY money.

Posted by: Man of Substance on April 13, 2005 03:33 PM

But if a Jew is completed, does he still have to follow the Kosher laws?

Posted by: Iblis on April 13, 2005 03:33 PM

Yes, he did, and I've been wondering the same thing. My theory, expresse in the other thread, is that he's just trying to distract us from what we really want to discuss -- lesbians with cocoa butter.

Posted by: Michael on April 13, 2005 03:35 PM

I don't keep "conservative-kosher" very well at all, because I'm not conservative. I'm liberal.

And I'm using the term liberal to actually mean liberal, and not leftist. For example, in the middle east, I see George W. Bush leading great advances in women's rights, gay rights, and the treatment of minorities. So I voted for Bush because he promotes liberal causes.

All the same, although I'm not remotely "conservative kosher" or "right-wing PC" (RWPC!), I do get a bit touchy about widespread anti-Christian bias. I'm pretty much agnostic, but it bothers me to see. I don't mind blasphemous humor (love it, in fact), but I hate stereotypes about Christians.

Posted by: SJKevin on April 13, 2005 03:37 PM

Sorry, forgot the quote in previous post:

Didn't you indicate you were considering a boycott of Cafe Press in your post just before this one?


Yes, he did, and I've been wondering the same thing. My theory, expresse in the other thread, is that he's just trying to distract us from what we really want to discuss -- lesbians with cocoa butter.

Posted by: michael on April 13, 2005 03:37 PM

Oops, almost forgot. Do I keep conservative/kosher?

Not very. Fiscally, I'm 100%, but socially I'm way more libertarian. I take a lot of heat from my more religious friends for my live-and-let-live attitude toward porn and marijuana. I just figure there are bigger fish to fry. Like economics.

Posted by: RapidTransit on April 13, 2005 03:39 PM

Would anybody who seriously tries to keep "conservative kosher" even be reading this site?

That hilarious remix of "Hello" was probably the nastiest thing I have heard in my entire life...

Posted by: SJKevin on April 13, 2005 03:48 PM

Didn't you indicate you were considering a boycott of Cafe Press in your post just before this one?

Ah. I see now.

Yes I did. But dude-- seriously. They were peddling a t-shirt that endorsed the political assassination of a fucking president.

I didn't say that ALL boycotts were unjustified. I specifically said the right, I think, as done a better job of boycotting only for good reasons.

Like, that the French are vicious anti-semitic anti-American jagoffs and their economy should be crippled posthaste.

I just don't like the idea that any time Alec Baldwin says something stupid (about once a month) I should boycott his movies.

Although I do boycott them. Not because of his ideology (which he's entitled to, I think), but because 1, his movies have sucked since Red October and 2, no one puts him in movies anymore, pretty much.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 03:51 PM

Ace-- O/T, but cool story of some U.S. ass-kicking in Iraq.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A48017-2005Apr12?language=printer

I know how much you like this sort of stuff.

Hell, I know how much *I* like this sort of stuff.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on April 13, 2005 03:53 PM

That hilarious remix of "Hello" was probably the nastiest thing I have heard in my entire life...

On behalf of Allah, I thank you, and take credit for my good taste in posting it.


Yes, he did, and I've been wondering the same thing. My theory, expresse in the other thread, is that he's just trying to distract us from what we really want to discuss -- lesbians with cocoa butter.

I am reeling it in on the sex-talk for a while. I go over the line periodically, and then I pull back from it for a while. Until I get into the mood again.

So, fewer f-bombs, less strong sexual content. At least for a while.

Although I will continue to have some of that stuff. But I'm just trying to get a PG-13 rating now, because R ratings make it harder to sell tickets.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 03:54 PM

Bill,

I think there's a way to disagree politely with religious/traditionalist/moralist conservatives without being snide about it.

I've got a pretty bawdy site and while I have driven away a lot of religious conservatives with my cussin' and dirty-talk I've still managed to retain some of them.

I just don't see the need to demonize people who have strong religious convictions. Yeah, I disagree with them on some things. So what? I disagree with some of my best friends on all sorts of things (like, say, the proposition that they should loan me large sums of cash to support the Ace of Spades LifeStyle (TM) ), and yet there's no need to be angry about it.

Again:

I am all about the love.

It's time for you to give up some of that anger and try to be a little more, what's the word?, faggy.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 03:57 PM

Hey Bill, you've got your own crankiness, too.

Being a "contrarian conservative" almost as a principle is a bit tiresome, too.

Right, but I'm not. I'm just freely pointing out the stupidity of those on the right, now that I no longer care about focusing my ire on the left, now that the binary decision of an election is over. Unchecked, cliched conservative bs will be the seppaku of the right.

Now, I know you're not self-identified as "conservative",

Damn straight.

but if so, it helps to state that up front,

What, like a permanent banner? Perhaps a forehead tattoo?

so at least the true believers don't jump on you at a moment's deviation.

The true believers can blow me.

You used to do that on your blog, stopped for a while, and then when the Schaivo thing came up, your new readership wasn't aware of where you were coming from. (IMAO)

Right, well, adding disclaimers about "what type of label I am" tends to get tiresome, as opposed to independently conducting my analysis and then rendering my honest opinion.

I mean, I know that you're not being a dick, and I don't intend to be one either, but do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?

This whole identification thing can take on silly proportions. And in my mind, true conservatives wouldn't be cheering Congress to get involved in the life of one woman, attempting to thwart state courts, no matter what the case. After all, how much "injustice" is combatted by similiarly intrusive means by the left?

Means aside, are their goals inherently evil? Nah.

So, considering the fact that I viewed my position on the Schiavo matter as the true conservative position, there is also confusion about what the confusing labels even mean.

So confusing.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on April 13, 2005 03:59 PM

Hey, how old are you, anyway? Because when I went to college (Columbia U., class of 1972) the way to get a cool date was to be a member of the counter-counter-culture (i.e., a conservative).

Posted by: dulce on April 13, 2005 04:04 PM

Two points:

1. Hey, look, if you want to get some play with the ladies in college you either be liberal as all get out or else you start as star cornerback for the football team

I was stridently right-wing in college (in Europe!), and I got mad play from the ladies. Sometimes, they would call me a Nazi during sex.

But I didn't do that for a living. I was just so f'ing crazy.


2. Please stop referring to "nickles." The element and the unit of currency are spelled the same way: nickel. Damn it.

Oh, and more f-bombs, please.

Posted by: Pompous on April 13, 2005 04:06 PM

Hey, how old are you, anyway?

According to my AOL profile, I am 22 years of age.

I am also, it says, into rock-climbing, long walks on the beach at sunset, and inserting methamphetamine capsules in my ass.

Because when I went to college (Columbia U., class of 1972) the way to get a cool date was to be a member of the counter-counter-culture (i.e., a conservative).

As they say: It was always better in the old days.

I came of age during the Era of AIDS. Lucky me.

Posted by: ace on April 13, 2005 04:19 PM

Well, as a Conservative Jew who keeps kosher, um... I don't actually have an opinion on the matter.


Posted by: Eric J on April 13, 2005 04:20 PM

I used to be a liberal. (Hey, look, if you want to get some play with the ladies in college you either be liberal as all get out or else you start

I was a Liberal too, for the same reason, the trouble is: it worked well. Either Abbie Hoffman or Jerry Rubin confessed many years later that he became a radical to get pussy - as did old dogfaced Willliam Kuntsler (even with his name) and surely old sourpuss Kerry did too, though nothing could help much in his case, ... well Terezza did marry him, there's proof positive! But because you found the Left's boycotting tactics a pain in college is no reason to be down on the right boycotting.

The difference between the Left boycotting and the right boycotting is that the right has not sucessfully done so in forty years. The last time I know of when the right actually scored a victory was in the mid-sixties and I had to read about it recently in a book. I can't remember a sucessful boycott by the right in my lifetime. The Left has been so sucessful for so long that all they must do is to threaten a boycott, and people businesses roll over immediately! Most people in this country are being jerked around by the tail that has been wagging the dog for generations: the small cabal of activist judges, academe and the media. And what, exactly, is their power to intimidate based upon? It is based upon fear, fear of protestors, fear of bad publicity, but most of all: fear of economic retaliation, (like being blacklisted as a "hate-site" for posting Moslem jokes). Most people are cowed by the thought of losing their jobs as it is, the dread of some Liberal Pressure Group going after them or their employer is terrifying and so they roll over to the Left's demands right away. As long as this situation exists the balance of power between Conservatives and Liberals will remain the same as it is today. The Ward Chamberlains and the NY TIMES will still be there, unless the right learns to boycott. One well publisized sucessful boycott by the right would alter the political landscape totally. When people discovered how much power they really have and how easy it is to do, they'd take back the power. Power to the People!

THE RIGHT MUST BOYCOTT!!!

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on April 13, 2005 04:34 PM

Conservative kosher, huh?

Well, I tend not to drink French wines, but not because I dislike the French - I'm just cheap. Plus, I think French wines have too much tannin.

I thought the whole "freedom fries" thing was stupid.

I kinda like the Dixie Chicks.

I don't shop at Wal-Mart, but it's only because I used to work there and know they are evil.

I'm a religious conservative, but I don't mind the filthy cussin' on Ace's site. I'm convinced the Dusty girls ad is going to get me in trouble at work, though. I'm the only guy in my office.

I hate being put in a box with Dobson and Robertson, which explains my extraordinary pissiness at Andrew Sullivan and Oliver Willis.

That's about it, I guess.

Posted by: Slublog on April 13, 2005 04:51 PM

I was stridently right-wing in college (in Europe!), and I got mad play from the ladies. Sometimes, they would call me a Nazi during sex.

"No one has ever had a fantasy about being tied to a bed and sexually ravished by someone dressed as a liberal." -- P.J. O'Rourke

Posted by: Stumbo on April 13, 2005 05:00 PM

Bill

Re labels:

"I mean, I know that you're not being a dick, and I don't intend to be one either, but do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?"

Thank you for recognizing my sincerity, adn yes I do realize it's a foolish thing.

But this is the internets we're talking about, where the ridiculous (kos) gets 100,000 hits per day (or whatever).

I mean, either you accept that folks online expect a certain something from their favorite sites and modify their expectations accordingly, or you get flamed and bitch about it when no one gives a damn.

I'm just postulating that the former is more reasonable than the latter, and make you look less crank-y.

I think you're wrong on some things, but our differences of opinion don't offend me.

Your religion baiting does offend me, though, and stereotypes a wide swath of religious Americans and internet users. It's bigotry plain and simple. I would hope you take sicere criticism to heart, and though I'm not perfect or even all that mellow, I am just an anonymous poster. You're a personally identified content provider.

And the "true conservative" position to Randy Andy S was John Kerry in the election. See how perspective can warp things?


Posted by: hobgoblin on April 13, 2005 05:00 PM

I'm not too keen on the Dusty ads either. I read a fair amount of right-leaning blogs while at work, and (ironically enough) many of them tend to have ads with scantily-clad women. Nothing against scantily-clad women, per se, but I'd prefer not to have to worry about how it looks if somebody passes by my cube and sees me intently studying a web site featuring some girl in a bikini.

If I didn't read blogs at work, I wouldn't care. But since I do, the racy advertising is something that I can live with but would prefer not to have to.

Posted by: SJKevin on April 13, 2005 05:01 PM

I second Slublog on all those positions. I think it's fine and important to organize the occasional conservative boycott--I mean it's just necessary: if you're a private actor and you know that you can piss off the right with impunity, whereas you'll get no end of crap from the left for the tiniest infraction (or none at all, eg Nestle), you're going to tack left. That's why we're losing the culture war. We're unable to impose economic discipline in quite the same lockstep fashion. And that's OK.

You want a good example of a right wing boycott? Smith and Wesson. They pussed out on settling with the Clinton DOJ and their name is still mud. It will take them years to regain the goodwill of gun owners who had plenty of alternatives of fine American firearms who would actually protect their customers' rights.

Here's the difference, though: If it's possible, we need to be a little bit latitudinarian about the boycott thing so we don't do what happened to Ace. Don't go off like a Teamster on a scab if you see someone open a bottle of Montrachet. Drink up with them. If a guy has a new Smith and Wesson, shoot it. Don't politicize this stuff relentlessly and don't demonize people for these personal choices.

At the same time, make the case publicly on blogs and outlets like NRO, Fox, etc. I respect people's right to disagree with me on, say, paying a little extra for American or Taiwanese manufacture over Chicom slave-dreck. But just like I'm not going to be an effective evangelist for my religion (Christianity, I highly recommend it, e-mail me for details!) by insulting people and telling them they're going to HELL RIGHT NOW UNLESS I DUNK YOU IN THIS WATER YOU HEATHEN WRETCH I have to be satisfied with making the case with some humility and hoping a few people will agree with me--just maybe enough to make a difference.

Posted by: See-Dubya on April 13, 2005 05:19 PM

I don't mind the racy ads. They're a sublte indicator that Ace isn't a tool of the PC crowd.
Besides they provide stimulating content. Its win-win in my book.
I mean whats a right leaning blog without the objectivication of women, gay bashing/closet desiring, D&D geekiness, war porn, and high school sex jokes. Oh... NRO.

Posted by: Iblis on April 13, 2005 05:22 PM

I think a point that needs to be made is that in order to actually boycott Cafe Press, one would have had to shop there in the first place. I've never bought anything from them.

I prefer Amazon.

And for the record, I'm not against the idea of boycotts. Sometimes they're necessary in order to remind retailers or manufacturers who makes them rich - taking the customer for granted or doing things just to piss them off should be bad business.

Posted by: Slublog on April 13, 2005 05:30 PM

By them, of course, I mean "us," the customer.

You know, for a guy who makes his living putting pen to paper (pixel to screen?) I really write some cruddy sentences at times.

Posted by: Slublog on April 13, 2005 05:35 PM

If I didn't buy products created by people who I disagree with politically, my record and book collection would be rather small. No thanks.

You raise a good point about Menken, and I think some posters are being rather selective with their outrage. They don't like Nietzsche because he was an athiest, but they have no problem with our Founding Fathers, for example, most of whom were slave-owners. Hell, Michael Moore hasn't even done anything that bad! Of course, he's also contributed nothing as worthwhile as the Founding Fathers either, so...

Anyway, my point is that lots of folks who do a great amount of worthwhile things had some pretty shitty things, too. One can enjoy the good things without necessarily embracing the bad.

In most cases (e.g., books, music, food), politically-motivated boycotts are stupid.

Posted by: Mike on April 13, 2005 05:49 PM

Hell, Michael Moore hasn't even done anything that bad!

I respectfully disagree.

Posted by: Slublog on April 13, 2005 05:54 PM

Well, that link didn't work. try this one instead.

Posted by: Slublog on April 13, 2005 05:55 PM

Nietzsche thought Jews "[a] people of genius" were the strongest and purest race in Europe [Beyond Good and Evil,]
supported their further integration, and recommended kicking anti-semites,
"these latest speculators in idealism" out of Germany
[Genealogy of Morals] (this was at a time of rising soc***ist anti-semitism in Germany.) Nietzsche was strongly
opposed to nationalism as well as racial
conflict (Marx and Engels both supported racial conflict and were German nationalists in the
worst sense of the word.) Nietzsche criticized Judaism in as far as it had created
Christianity - Nietzsche was virulently anti-Christian, but was not entirely
negative about Judaism.
Rejection of logic? He rated the
scientist as the highest of the higher types of men. Rejection of reason - what does
that mean? reason need not be rational - hence soc***ism! He at times
recommended paying more attention to instinct than spirit, but that is far from
rejecting logic. As for
Nietzsche being depressing - Zarathustra depressing WTF?! More at the link..


Nietzsche the Nazi?


Posted by: Lazar on April 13, 2005 06:17 PM

Boycott can be effective and I see no problem with them as long as you don't let it control your life. Making snarky anti-Christian jabs and religion-bashing is not cool. Quoting Nietzsche does not consititute this.

Posted by: johnny on April 13, 2005 06:24 PM

I actually like boycotts as a means of protest: they don't involve passage of yet more legislation, enforcement is necessarily voluntary, and if businesses feel they're unfairly targeted, at least theoretically they can respond. ("Buy Our Product: Dipshits Won't!" is an ad line that would tempt me, anyway.)

OTOH, sit-ins and protest marches were effective before the left trivialized them with incessant, meaningless repetition. I got pretty tired of hearing my lefty friends tell me that everything I ate or drank made me some sort of globalization whore, and I'm old and surly enough these days that if the right tries the same tactic, I'll just laugh at them.

Posted by: utron on April 13, 2005 06:39 PM

Nietzsche: not a leftist; also spelled with an 's'.

Me: boycotting Spain.

Posted by: someone on April 13, 2005 06:48 PM

BTW this was a really funny riff. "Portuguese Death Squads" indeedy. I'm going to go have a Snickers.

Posted by: See-Dubya on April 13, 2005 07:01 PM

Your religion baiting does offend me, though, and stereotypes a wide swath of religious Americans and internet users. It's bigotry plain and simple.

Sorry Bill, he's right. I enjoy your blog and check it every day. But, he's right.

Posted by: Michael on April 13, 2005 07:39 PM

Let's see, in this house:

No CNN, ever! I even tell the motels and hotels I patronize to switch to Foxnews.

I used to drink Gray Goose for my vodka. No more. It's from France. Now my vodka's strictly Polish. And red wines from Chile, Australia and Northern California are better than the frog-juice anyway.

And if it wasn't for the Sopranos and Six Feet Under, I'd cancel HBO tomorrow. Too much Bill Maher. Too much pro-left propaganda on most their shows.

I have always bought American cars, even though Hondas run forever if you take care of them. That's pretty much keeping kosher for the USA auto industry.

Posted by: Log Cabin on April 14, 2005 12:23 AM

I've discussed before on Ace's site the fact that I don't drink any Gallo wines--including E&J Brandy--because they are Nancy Pelosi's biggest supporters. For cooking brandy I use Christian Brothers instead. There are a lot of Gallo wines and it's kind of hard to avoid them, but I think it's important.

Posted by: See-Dubya on April 14, 2005 01:29 AM

Ah, Mencken was writing at the turn of the century. Jew bigotry was like complaining about people who refuse to pull their pants up and proceed every sentence with "Like".

Mencken was also a rabid anti-Christian hyper-materialist. Don't care, I love the bastard anyway. Now, if he had secretly killed a man and feasted on his lightly roasted man-cutlets, and then proceeded to use his long bones to construct an ottoman of pain--well, then we'd have to rethink our fanboi nature.

Posted by: rho on April 14, 2005 11:02 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Is Kentucky's long nightmare over? Maine's resident Nazi might be out, NATO making progress, or is it a fake, Le Pen in France might have a shot, Democrats are simply pinch-faced scolds who hate America, but is our youth going to revitalize the country...and more!
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Birthright Citizenship? The Democratic Socialists of the Democrat Party are ascendant, the President's misstep about gas prices, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
It happened one summer, it happened one time
It happened forever, for a short time
A place for a moment, an end to dream
Forever I loved you, forever it seemed
One summer never ends, one summer never began
It keeps me standing still, it takes all my will
An Update about Grammie Winger:
She is doing poorly...she is in the hospital and is having a tough go of it. She would love to hear from you folks, so anyone who would like to contact her is welcome to her address! Please contact Bluebell at moroncookbook@gmail.com for her contact info. (I expect her local post office to be furious with us!)
[CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD commiserate about the NYC primaries and whether the contagion will spread, J.D. Vance is becoming a cypher, Texas Antifa gets a wake-up call, and more!
Trump will present the trophy for the World Cup, and lunatic cultists will not be happy
pRiDe Month's shameful record so far
Department of Energy Announces American Nuclear Supply Chain Loans
$17.5B is a good start. Now add two zeroes to that number! [CBD]
Recent Comments
gnats local 678: "new thread if no one mentioned it ..."

StefanH: ""This vibes to me like a play from Bernie Sanders ..."

Ian S.: "[i]Andrew Gillum got pulled over in Alabama with t ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "8 I would love to see the third place finisher vau ..."

Nazdar: "Nood. ..."

18-1: "[i]Jackson, who appeared with Platner and Sanders ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "Who wouldn't want to be known as the candidate han ..."

Washington Nearsider: Gotterdammerung : "Jackson, who appeared with Platner and Sanders at ..."

Bulg: "Que? Posted by: man at July 07, 2026 02:13 PM ( ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "People are acting like Platner has no choice. H ..."

Thomas Paine: "I would love to see the third place finisher vault ..."

Piper: "So what you are saying is a narcissist psychopath ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives