Stupid and Biased, excellent qualifications for a reporter. The lessons of Memogate have definately not sunk in with these clowns

You know I'm half tempted to have the Republicans call for an investigation of the memo. It'd be nice to start grilling democrat aides and press memebers. Of course the rules being what they are,the Dems would grandstand and be the only things covered by the MSM.

No, no.

Let's not be hasty here.

They are biased.

It just so happens that they are also stupid.

IMHO, any career that depends on looks will automatically attract the geniuses among us ... especially tv, they have to still look good when the audience mutes the tv for a moment or two of sanity ...

Ace, I'm with you. I think they are mostly stupid. I have this picture of them receiveing the 'memo' and getting so excited that they forget everything they ever learned in journalism school. Like 'Memo, you are so f'n hot! I want to lick your margins!' kinda excited!

How about so stupid that they don't know they are biased?

How about so stupid that they don't know they are biased?

How about so stupid that they don't know they are biased?

Chuck, baby:

Drop and give me fifty. NOW!

A big ABC snowjob to be sure. Why do the biased hacks running the show at ABC continue to insist that we did not hear what was so clearly said? Are they calling me stupid? Fightin' words baby.

Lipstick: I did Chuck's 50 - and I liked it! May I do 50 more?

Phil,

You're my kind of man.

Do another 50 saying: "Kate Snow is my bitch" while you do them.

Then, at ease.

As the Terri Schiavo tragedy continues, we've learned that most Americans believe that these complex, deeply private end-of-life decisions should be made by families, not the government.

What we've also learned that is that one of the Americans who apparently feels that way is none other than Tom Delay. The Los Angeles Times reports that in 1988, Mr. Delay's own family chose to end life support for their 65 year old father, severely injured in a tragic accident:

"There was no point to even really talking about it," Maxine DeLay, the congressman's 81-year-old mother, recalled in an interview last week. "There was no way he (Charles) wanted to live like that. Tom knew, we all knew, his father wouldn't have wanted to live that way."

Doctors advised that he would "basically be a vegetable," said the congressman's aunt, JoAnne DeLay.

When the man's kidneys failed, the DeLay family decided against connecting him to a dialysis machine. "Extraordinary measures to prolong life were not initiated," said his medical report, citing "agreement with the family's wishes." His bedside chart carried the instruction: "Do Not Resuscitate."

On Dec. 14, 1988, the senior DeLay "expired with his family in attendance."

(Source: LA Times, 3/26/05)

In a further irony for the tort reform crusader Delay, his family filed a product liability lawsuit and later received a $250,000 settlement.

In 1988 and beyond, the Delay family suffered a terrible tragedy, one which should elicit only our sympathy, not our judgment. Surely all Americans can respect their pain, their preferences - and their privacy.

If Loretta had managed to compare apples to apples, she might have managed to make a point about **hypocrisy.**

But alas, no.

Cordially...

"We never said it was the Republicans; we said it was the GOP! Ha!" The way they're actually defending themselves doesn't appear to be much better than that.

1.) Senator Lautenberg (D-NJ) wrote a letter to Frist, asking Frist to investigate the memo's source. An unsigned memo on the Senate floor violates Senate rules. According to In the Agora website, First stood by his statement condemninig the memo but did not start an investigation.

Write to Frist and ask he start the investigation. That is, unless he has something to hide.

2.) 1 member of Powerline now thinks the GOP may have written the memo.

I just re-checked Power Line and can't find any of them thinking that the GOP wrote that memo.

The most I saw was one of them said that IF it was a Republican staffer, they ought to be fired for being stupid. And the context of that was a post that they were exploring and commenting on every possibility, unlikely or not.

Did I miss something?

I'm asking myself: How can it be that I've never ran through your site before? It's a great one! Soft voice over the net: http://www.pardonmyenglish.com/archives/2005/09/the_state_of_bi.html , through others who went there