Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Howard Dean's Hospital Scandal | Main | Snopes: Reliably Liberal and Liberally Unreliable »
February 15, 2005

Tim Blair Beats Me To the Punch

How many government officials and business executives have lost their jobs due to the media reporting (occasionally selectively) on their malfeasance?

Quite a few, I think. And yet the media never shed tears about this; it's quite necessary, they assure us. They are the watchdogs, and sometimes watchdogs need to take a bite. And sometimes those bites costs people their jobs and even ruin careers.

I think that's more or less true, although I also think that "investigative journalists" tend to sweeten their stories for maximum impact-- making for a more dramatic story, with more clear malfeasance, than a straight reporting of the facts might show.

But now several journalists have lost their jobs due to their malfeasances being investigated and critiqued and publicized by bloggers and other alternative media sources.

And now we have David Gergen blubbering like a heartbroken eighth-grader about how tremendously unfair this is. Others suggest it might even be a danger to democracy itself.

I grow tired of the media suggesting, implicitly or explicitly, that it is the one institution (well, maybe apart from the UN) that requires no outside monitoring or criticism -- no checks and balances, no external reviews or investigations -- in the entire damn-bastard world.

Howell Raines, Dan Rather, and Eason Jordan all committed gross malfeasance during their tenures. Were they CEO's of failing companies, who had made poor decisions that cost their shareholders money and their employees jobs, the media would of course have little qualms about exposing them and driving them from office.

And yet the media whines about this. Yet another double-standard which, shockingly enough, inures to their advantage: We can ask questions and investigate and even harass whoever we think is doin' wrong; but don't anyone dare put the same sort of harsh spotlight on us.

If investigation is good -- if external review is good -- if bringing attention to gross malfeasance is generally a good thing when the media is doing the investigating, how on earth can they claim with a straight face that such investigations are a threat to our very way of democracy when they're the ones being investigated?

Tim Blair dissects a NYT piece whining about the scary new world of the watchmen themselves being watched.

The New York Times cries:

In September, conservative bloggers exposed flaws in a report by Dan Rather; he subsequently announced that on March 9 he would step down as anchor of the “CBS Evening News.” On Friday, after nearly two weeks of intensifying pressure on the Internet, Eason Jordan, the chief news executive at CNN, abruptly resigned after being besieged by the online community. Morever, last week liberal bloggers forced a sketchily credentialed White House reporter to quit his post.

To which Blair responds:

This story could have been written at any time in the past forty years. Simply change a few words and you’d have a piece about politicians/builders/executives/whoever “abruptly resigning” after “being besieged by the journalistic community.” Certain footwear now resides on an alternate pedal extremity, and journalists don’t like it.

As John McClane said: "Welcome to the party, pals."

Scrutiny is a good thing. Journalists tell us this everytime they collect one of their own scalps.

They cannot now claim that scrutiny is bad, at least when that scrutiny is fixed on their own errors and lapses.


posted by Ace at 11:54 AM
Comments



Ace,

I can load your site in Firefox, but not in IE. Another nail in the coffin of IE I guess.

Posted by: Gregs on February 15, 2005 11:55 AM

Hmmm ... I read my own site in IE. So I think that might just be some problem with your version of IE, or some conflict you have going on.

Posted by: ace on February 15, 2005 12:13 PM

It's as simple as this- The 'professional media' is a priesthood. Their powers are derived from a higher power. No one may preach the word or enter the sacred sanctuary before first undergoing training in J-School.

There may have been a time when J-School was necessary. But can I ask an impertinent question? What EXACTLY is taught in J-School that is so important as to be necessary to reporting?

Editing? Fact checking? Objectivity at all costs? If this is what is being 'taught', then it is clear to me that vast swaths of the current High Priests of the MSM were playing hacky-sack the day these lessons were taught.

Save the lectures on how 'professionally trained' journalists are the only ones who can be trusted with the scary power of writing about other people's lives. It's bullshit. A chimp can do it. And judging by some bylines, often does.

So what's really going on here? Stark-raving terror, that's what. Blogs didn't EXIST 5 years ago. They're everywhere now. They're storming the ramparts. They are watching the King's men. And occassionally, they commit regicide against particularly lazy, arrogant kings themselves.

This is NO DIFFERENT than corpulent, lazy UAW workers screaming bloody murder 20 years ago about how "ROBOTS WERE GOING TO BUILD UNSAFE CARS AND PEOPLE WILL DIE". That was all bullshit. The reality was, some fat bastard with no skills but a great Shop Rep and bankruptcy-inducing salary was on the chopping block, and he was going to do whatever he could to keep the robots from doing what he claimed was a "highly skilled job" but was in reality...well. something a brainless robot could do.

This is not to say bloggers are brainless. This is to say that, for years, journalists have claimed that their job is hard, and that it takes intellegence, guts, and a special membership in the club to execute. And that is being revealed, every day, to be a load of crap.

It's over. Entrenched positions cannot fight a defensive battle to win. And that's what the MSM high priests are doing. They refuse to embrace change, and so are destined to be run over by it. They're every bit as totally fucked as that beer-bellied lazy slob watching a robot arm being tested in the next plant over.


Posted by: AndrewF on February 15, 2005 12:27 PM

I might be wrong, but it sure sounded like "welcome to the potty" to me.

Posted by: skinbad on February 15, 2005 01:19 PM

Andrew Ferguson once referred to Gergen as "a goggle-eyed mellon head". Can't say that this contributes significantly to the discussion, but we need to make sure this nominal Republican and wretched opportunist stays out of politics, and Ferguson's delightful description, if spread around, might be just the extra touch needed to make Gergen permanently and irretrievably ludicrous.

Posted by: DWC on February 15, 2005 01:22 PM

From the New American Dictionary of Political Hypocrisy, 3rd ed.

scrutiny (SCREW-tin-ee) noun The act of looking closely at something
when done by Democrats: an essential component to successful democracy; a great public service
when done by Republicans: a partisan witch-hunt atrocity; "McCarthyism"

Posted by: TallDave on February 15, 2005 03:14 PM

From the New American Dictionary of Political Hypocrisy, 3rd ed.

scrutiny (SCREW-tin-ee) noun The act of looking closely at something
when done by Democrats: an essential component to successful democracy; a great public service
when done by Republicans: a vicious partisan witch-hunt atrocity; "McCarthyism"

Posted by: TallDave on February 15, 2005 03:16 PM

I believe the full comment should have been written like this ... "Were they CEO's of failing companies, who had made poor decisions that cost their shareholders money and their employees jobs, the media would of course have little qualms about exposing them and driving them from office. All the while shrieking about the sweetheart tax deals and comlicity within the Bush Administration.

That's right, nothing to see here. Move along.

Posted by: brian on February 15, 2005 03:19 PM

Nice take on the subject:

http://www.command-post.org/desk/archives/018915.html

Posted by: on February 15, 2005 05:02 PM

Spank me!

Posted by: S&M on February 16, 2005 04:20 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
FenelonSpoke: "As far as AI- what is "engagement noise"? ..."

FenelonSpoke: "I have a tech ( phone) Is there a reason I am get ..."

Additional Blond Agent: "Pixy's up! ..."

Additional Blond Agent: "Morgen. ..."

Skip: "Looks lik rd Canada is gettingvthe Camp of the Sai ..."

eleven: "Oh man...that dude doing the Jungle Gym with his k ..."

Debby Doberman Schultz: "Sweet dreams Horde, I am needing to sleep. ..."

Common Tater: "Yes, brakes are (well … should) always worke ..."

rhomboid: "Franpsycho, were you in the USSR for Victory Day? ..."

mikeski: "[i]No mikeski, we are not related going way, way b ..."

Debby Doberman Schultz: "Good night AOP. ..."

m: "222 WWELEVEN Posted by: Debby Doberman Schultz at ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives