Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Madonna Cleanses Chernobyl of Radiation Using Kabbalah Incantation, Then Pens Children's Book Called "Diedre and the Dildo Factory" | Main | Quote of the Day »
January 13, 2005

What Did the Anchor Know, and When Did He Know It?

RatherBiased asks a good question: When, exactly, did Dan Rather learn about Bill Burkett's rather colorful past?

He first maintained his source was "unimpeachable."

RatherBiased says that the script he had prepared for his September 10 defense of the story included that word. But then, strangely, Rather changed the script, to say the story had been confirmed "by what we consider solid sources." [Emphasis added.]

Why the change? And if Rather knew at all about Bill Burkett, how could he maintain he was even a "solid" source?

Another unanswered question. Jeepers, it sure would have been nice to have a blue-ribbon independent panel checking into these things, wouldn't it have?

Related: The American Thinker speculates (a bit unclearly, alas) as to who actually made the forgeries.

The Thinker puts some emphasis on possibly erroneously-interpreted passages from an online "Bush AWOL" piece resulting in the forgeries' error as to when Bush was required to take his physical.

Which is interesting. Because as I, err, "reported" here some time ago, the forger may have stated that Staudt was exerting pressure to "sugar coat" Bush's record -- despite the fact that he had been retired for more than a year at the time -- because he trusted the Boston Globe to get Staudt's retirement date correct, which it did not.

The Globe erroneously reported he retired much later than he actually did.

Ah, the perils of being an "Internet Detective," relying only on web-searches and on-line essays when "reassembling" someone's military files.


posted by Ace at 04:01 PM
Comments



Besides all the American Thinker points, as I've been trying to tell you Bill and Allah for months:

There is no such thing as an OETR!!!! And the only place I ever saw this acronym (or its "full name", Officer Effectiveness Training Report) is on Paul Lukasiak's glcq.com site!

The author MUST have used Lukasiak's site (if the author is not Lukasiak himself) as a basis for the forgeries.

Posted by: JFH on January 13, 2005 07:23 PM

It's a good tip, JFH. Let me tell you the truth: I didn't ignore you, and I didn't think you were necessarily wrong.

I just didn't want to start anything that could result in a libel suit, you know?

You had a hunch, and a good one, but I can't prove it, and so I've been wary of following up on that sort of tip which seems to point towards one person.

Posted by: ace on January 13, 2005 11:43 PM

"RatherBiased asks a good question: When, exactly, did Dan Rather learn about Bill Burkett's rather colorful past?"

Balls.

I'm just a lower-middle-class Texan with absolutely no direct contacts in the politics business, and I knew who Burkett was as soon as I saw the name.

Rather's supposed to be this high-powered clued-in newsman with hotlines to all the players. There is no, repeat no, chance that anybody like that -- most especially somebody with relatives in the Austin political scene -- didn't know who Burkett was.

He's either lying or senile.

Regards,
Ric Locke

Posted by: Ric Locke on January 14, 2005 12:22 AM

I thought the reference to "unimpeachable source" was to Conn, not Burkett.

Am I wrong on this?

My recollection, admittedly sketchy, is that CBS had some concerns about Burkett, which is why they were pressing him to say where he got the docs. That's when he lied and said he got them from Conn. My understanding is that this name satisfied them.

Posted by: Phil on January 14, 2005 12:07 PM

I don't think Lukasiak created the docs. I asked Paul, point-blank.

I can't say for sure, of course, but he strikes me as simply deluded, not malicious enough to forge documents.

Must my opinion, of course.

There's virtually no doubt that the forger read Lukasiak's site, though.

That's the only place I've found that mistakenly uses OETR. And Paul agrees it is his error.

Posted by: Phil on January 14, 2005 12:22 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Will Cuba fall without a fight? More Iran confusion, gun rights for felons isn't a crazy idea, wetbacks are voting! And are data centers of the devil? Nope!
Months ago, I reported that the final Zodiac cypher had been cracked and the name of the killer revealed. And the name of the killer turned out to be someone suspected in the unsolved Black Dahlia murder. The general tone of my mention of this was "serious you guys, this is real."
Well, it's not real. It's total bullshit.
Sorry about that. I did two things: 1, I bought into something, a conspiracy theory really, because it was new and exciting. And 2, I allowed a self-declared "expert" to snow me over with his "expert" claims about solving ciphers, an alleged expertise I could not challenge because I know practically nothing about codebreaking. I remember being similarly swindled by self-declared "experts" babbling about "chromatic aberrations." (Although I didn't really buy into that, but I found it "interesting" and I wasn't strongly skeptical about it. Hey they said they're "experts," they must know that they're talking about, right?)
I screwed up. It won't be the last time, I'm sure.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: In Wisconsin, the Dems steal an election from themselves, abortion is cheered in Massachusetts, Spain gets what it voted for, the economy is humming, and more!
Via Archimedes:
Selections from H.P. Lovecraft's Brief Tenure as a Whitman's Sampler Copywriter

Chocolate Cherry Cordial
You must not think me mad when I tell you what I found below the thin shell of chocolate used to disguise this bonbon's true face. Yes! Hidden beneath its rich exterior is a hideously moist cherry cordial! What deranged architect could have engineered this non-Euclidean aberration? I dare not speculate.

Caramel Chew
There is a dimension ruled by a blind caramel God-King who sits on a vast, cyclopean milk-chocolate throne while his mindless, gooey followers dance to the piping of crazed flutes. It is said that there are gateways in our world that lead to this caramel hell-planet. The delectable Caramel Chew may be one such portal.

More at this ineffable link
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
I haven't forgotten this one. I play it a couple of times a month. But I bet a lot of you forgot it:
Athletic (boogie down)
Hustle (turn back)
Feel pathetic (sugar town)
No muscle (soul hack)
I'm jumping (you move)
No dancer (beside me)
I'm thumping (you prove)
Don't get no answer
On "Professor" Arday:
He was their living lawn jockey, period. They won't say that 'cause they're sensitive and down with his struggle and all. He was there to appease and flatter their sense of being uplifters of the oppressed. In truth, he served as their living lawn jockey -- no more, no less, and unworthy of even a second thought on their part. Tokenism, pure and simple.
-- Krebs v Carnot
Ireland's 'Air Force One' lacks a key safety system for fog -- thanks to country's ban on Israeli products
Ireland's best emigrated 150 years ago. The current Ireland is a sad joke. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: More Iran bluster from Trump? Enough! Deportations hit a record, and that is a good thing for all, Todd Blanche's nomination is out of committee, the DSA is on the march, and more!
The Short Unhappy Life of a Russian Soldier: Why recruits die in 20-30 minutes
Interesting video. Some key parts: drones were responsible for 70-80% of all battlefield deaths in mid-2025, and I bet it's higher now. The Russian army is incredibly corrupt. Men get assigned to the most dangerous frontline units, the "Storm" units, unless they pay a superior $2,000 to be assigned to a different unit. Furthermore, there is often no real training for recruits -- commanders pocket the money that would have gone towards fuel and ammo costs incurred during training. Much "training" consists just of taking a single picture of soldiers doing something soldier-y, like fording a river, and publishing that as proof that the training was done. Even when it is done, training is only two weeks long.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the Berlin attack, Iran...Again! Sefton's mini Odyssey review, Data Republican's blockbuster reveal about the DNC, and more!
Recent Comments
gp: "nood ..."

gp: ""There is a Paraguayan movie about it on YouTube c ..."

Those 'other' AoSHQ commenters: "[i]Every tribe has a subgroup of crazy. The proble ..."

Chuck Martel: "Zimbabwe is a poster nation for Sam Kinnison's YOU ..."

SMH at God's mercy: "I will now do the obligatory "I know there are man ..."

Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM): " How about we b***** the little shit and then lif ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]Similarly, after having no power 18 hours a day ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]Zimbabwe is a poster nation for Sam Kinnison's ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "BTW, we don't have this vague "simple murder" char ..."

Cave Johnson: "I'm totally loving this standard that if a white p ..."

Black Orchid (j+aD2): "[I]231 The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily all ..."

Kindltot: "[i]Bolivia and Paraguay fought a war over oil in t ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives