Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Keith Olbermann Was Right | Main | The Tsunami »
December 29, 2004

Tomorrow, Ace of Spades HQ Turns One Year Old

Yeahp. Almost one year.

But before I start the festivities, let me say thank you once again to all of you who check in here. It's really very flattering, and I appreicate all of my readers. And of course my commenters and tipsters, without whom this site would have pretty much shut down entirely after Rathergate.

And of course the other bloggers who link me.

(And the donors, too! Let's not forget them!)

It's been a fun year. Man, it really did go quickly. One year ago, I decided that I really couldn't stomach Oliver Willis getting attention while I got none, and that I really had to get me a piece of that crazy blog-money. One year later, I'm at least tied with Willis in terms of traffic and links -- ummm, not really something to brag about, I know -- but I still really haven't seen much of that crazy blog-money.

Still-- it's been a blast. From time to time I've pretty much gotten sick of this blog -- "That can't be true," you're all saying, "because every day there's just such a torrent of brilliance streaming out of your keyboard!" -- but most of the time it's been a lot of fun.

It was especially fun climbing up that Ecosystem thing. As I've said before, every time I moved up into a new category it was like levelling up in Dungeons & Dragons, and time to pick out my new +3 flaming longsword of truth. I'm in now what you might call a stall -- sort of stuck at 10th to 12th level, you know, when it gets harder to earn expeirience points -- but still it was wonderful that so many of you voted for me for Wizbang's Best Blog poll. I didn't level-up with that, but it was like drawing the King of Diamonds from The Deck of Many Things and getting a kick-ass warhorse who responds to my psychic commands.

Right now I'm sort of looking over some of my past stuff, to see if I can find some forgotten material that was kind of funny but that no one really saw or remembers.

Like this piece, for example. It's a long and not particularly inspired rant against Whoopie Goldberg -- more funny than true -- but it contained this put-down, which made me chuckle:

I would say that watching Whoopie on Comic Relief was much akin to suffering through the Yoko Ono songs on a John Lennon album, except that I wouldn't want to malign the dead by comparing Lennon to Billy Crystal and Robin "I'm 'improvising' all this shit I've been doing for 30 years" Williams.

So the analogy doesn't really hold. Let's hypothesize that Yoko Ono put a lot of her screechingly painful songs on Foghat albums. Okay, then: Watching Whoopie Goldberg on Comic Relief was much like having to listen to Yoko Ono songs as the price for hearing all that amazing Foghat.

Anyway, once again thanks for making this site possible. When I'm at my keyboard, I feel like a little internet Evita Perone, especially because I'm generally wearing a dress and holding the hand of a distinguished Hispanic man wearing sunglasses.

And Still Kinda Funny: Inspired by AoS reader contributions, Ace's Dreadful Debate Drinking Game.


posted by Ace at 01:17 AM
Comments



Let me be the first to congratulate you, Ace!

Posted by: see-dubya on December 29, 2004 01:50 AM

Let me be the second. And to also realize that I've been visiting you for months and realized that I hadn't blogrolled you yet...what a dick I am.

Not like you need it, but still....

Keep up the good work. Oh, and more D&D.

Posted by: Christopher Cross on December 29, 2004 01:57 AM

Ace--like Vorpal to Willis.

Posted by: see-dubya on December 29, 2004 03:32 AM

Just keep up the funny and your blog money will grow.

Posted by: Moonbat One on December 29, 2004 05:08 AM

Umm. Does this mean we have to re-up our PayPal subscriptions? I paid twice so I figured that'd be good for a couple of years of funny at least.

Seriously, blog when you like it. When you're doing it out of obligation it's like you're whoring (and it shows...). Drift in and out as the funny leads you.

Posted by: Ron C on December 29, 2004 05:29 AM
I'm in now what you might call a stall -- sort of stuck at 10th to 12th level
Well, you know, Glenn Reynolds doesn't run a Monty Haul campaign.
Posted by: someone on December 29, 2004 07:00 AM

Heya Ace,just two or three more years and your blog's age will equal that of the public which truly appreciates your type of humor!

Posted by: Milty on December 29, 2004 07:40 AM

"[I]t was like drawing the King of Diamonds from The Deck of Many Things and getting a kick-ass warhorse who responds to my psychic commands."

This is why I come here. You put things in terms I understand at a visceral level.

Posted by: Kerry on December 29, 2004 08:16 AM

Congrats.

Unrelated: I just sold a screenplay!

Posted by: Bill from INDC on December 29, 2004 08:39 AM

Congrats Ace. In just one year you have made Ace Of Spades recipient of "my favorite blog" award.
How's that for a crappy prize?

Posted by: madne0 on December 29, 2004 08:40 AM

ACE Die after Rathergate? Did Mr. Blue die before Mr. Orange? Congratulations on a very successful year, you're becoming an institution. After awhile you'll get fat and old and lazy (well, fatter and older and lazier) and you'll start lying (well, you'll start lying more) and you'll insist you're right when you know damn well you're wrong (well, you'll insist you're right when you damn well know you're wrong even more) and you'll ... wait a minute, you HAVE become an institution!

ALL PRAISES TO ALLAH, THE HARD OF HEARING!

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on December 29, 2004 08:50 AM

Congratulations Ace!

Please don't pull an Allah on us and drop out of sight. Stick around a long time, have bad days, take time off, but keep on doin' what you do. Great stuff.

Posted by: Gordon on December 29, 2004 09:50 AM

I don't rember how I first stumbled in here, but the Mencken quote made me bookmark the site and the sarky prose kept me coming back.

Off topic: Congrats Bill, always said you were a good writer. And Ace, time to update your Allah link (he's back at blogspot now).

Posted by: TallDave on December 29, 2004 10:16 AM

Yeah...yeah...that's great and all, but could you add me to your friggin' blogroll already? Share the potential to make some crazy blog money to the rest of us! Share the LOVE!

Uh, sorry about that. My inner socialist got loose for a second.

Congratulations, Ace. If I could, I'd buy you a beer to celebrate. I guess we'll just have to wait until the Annual Meeting of Right Wing Bloggers. When is Rove going to send out those invitations already?

Posted by: Slubgob on December 29, 2004 10:24 AM

False alarm on the screenplay, I was just fucking with Ace. He's got jealousy issues. And he's trying to sell a screenplay.

Congrats on one year, Ace.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on December 29, 2004 10:40 AM

Bill, you are an evil bastard. Funny, though.

That counts for something.

Posted by: Slubgob on December 29, 2004 10:44 AM

Rightie troll posts rarely come with reason or factual support. Usually rightie troll posts are nothing but gratuitous insult.

If you spend time cruising both sides of the blogosphere, IMO there is a marked difference in overall tone between right and left. But generally, leftie bloggers post about current events and explain (with reason and factual support) what the blogger likes or does not like about said events. And generally, rightie bloggers just spew out hate.

The bald truth is that to be a Bush supporter means that you are (a) ignorant of what's going on; (b) suffering massive cognitive dissonance; or (c) are a soulless sociopathic bastard.

Read more here:
http://www.mahablog.com/2004.12.19_arch.html#1103813337996

Posted by: on December 29, 2004 10:51 AM

Okay, Anonymous Wussy Boy, I'll take the bait. Not because your comments are especially insightful (they're not), but because I'm suffering from writer's block at work and need something to do.

It wasn't right-wing bloggers that made the following statement:

I feel nothing over the death of merceneries. They aren’t in Iraq because of orders, or because they are there trying to help the people make Iraq a better place. They are there to wage war for profit. Screw them.
That was from The Daily Kos, a blogger from the left.

If you were more than a traffic-seeking troll who posts insipid nonsense masquerating as "speaking truth to power," you would know that bloggers on the right deal with policy and politics all the time.

Viewed through the warped little lens of liberalism, though, any disagreement with Dem orthdoxy is considered "hate speech." Rather than deal with the arguments we make against your ideology, you call us names and project your own issues onto those you despise.

Go back to the fever swamps, troll, and let the adults talk.

Posted by: Slubgob on December 29, 2004 11:04 AM

Thus spake the castrato:

"Usually rightie troll posts are nothing but gratuitous insult [sic]"

"to be a Bush supporter means that you are (a) ignorant of what's going on; (b) suffering massive cognitive dissonance; or (c) are a soulless sociopathic bastard."

I hope you won't think this gratuitous, but... Go fuck yourself.

Posted by: zetetic on December 29, 2004 11:11 AM

Yeah, die you fucking Leftie turd! I don't need no facts and information, I got Rush to tell me what to think! Mega Dittos

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on December 29, 2004 11:53 AM

Sheesh, a year and the quality of the trolls is still pitiful.

How long are they going to bang that 'cognitive dissonance' drum anyway?

A couple communist professors write an essay containing that phrase, and all the little trolls parrot it endlessly (though I doubt that too many of them understand it).

Posted by: lauraw on December 29, 2004 11:54 AM

And while I'm at it, just what the hell is wrong with being a soulless sociopathic bastard, anyway? Fellow SSBs, unite!

Posted by: Slubgob on December 29, 2004 12:15 PM

Yep, apparently soulless sociopathic bastards outnumber Kerry voters by about 4 million.

Who knew? *shrugs*

Posted by: lauraw on December 29, 2004 12:42 PM

True. Think there are enough of us to form a special interest group with Ace as our Fearless Leader?

Posted by: Slubgob on December 29, 2004 12:52 PM

Wussy-Liberal-Weenie writes in that same tired, pseudo-academic style where the use of a phrase like cognitive dissonance passes for something meaningful and insightful when neither are present. Weenie still believes that a little academic-sounding jargon combined with a lot of words imparts analysis, depth, and meaning, when they do no such thing unless there is analysis, depth and meaning. When wading through all tiresome Liberal pedantry, one quickly finds false assumptions, a complete inability to weight and seperate major facts and major issues from minor facts and minor issues, uncredible sources, and conclusions that can't be drawn from the arguments presented but are based upon the speakers wishes were true and outright lying. In short, a lack of critical thinking ability exists in all Liberals. Yet they continue to blow because it appeals to the one bodily function they do excel at besides passing Liberal Gas: Feelings. Their words are mere justifications for their "feelings" which keeps them untrustworthy, treacherous, amoral children.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on December 29, 2004 01:05 PM

I'd say we are already the largest special interest group the world has ever seen, and we already elected him.

Posted by: lauraw on December 29, 2004 01:06 PM

Do you think the lefties are ever ashamed of their ethical bankruptcy? Example above; some lame-ass troll makes a visit to a blog that holds no common cause with theirs simply to drop a turd in the hopes it will drum up some traffic for them!

Posted by: BrewFan on December 29, 2004 01:13 PM

BrewFan-

No, I don't. The post-Clinton Left no longer has the capacity for shame.

Posted by: zetetic on December 29, 2004 01:21 PM

When a troll craps on the rug, you don't ask why, or wonder about its morals. You just swack it with a rolled up newspaper and get on with your day.

Posted by: lauraw on December 29, 2004 01:41 PM

Criminy. I've just been in the mind of a moron. Has anyone actually visited the blog referenced in the troll post above? Here is an example of the type of writing:

But if you keep reading, it becomes clear that what really bit his royal butt is the fact that our most recent actual President, Bill Clinton, talked about the tsunami disaster during a BBC interview and had the nerve to offer an opinion about it -- apparently, that it was real awful -- while His Brattiness in Texas was blowing it off. And the the Court of Bush II was royally pissed.
No hate-spewing there! Or how about this gem:
President Bush has shamed our nation by pledging only $15 million for disaster aid. His upcoming coronation is expected to cost more than twice that. So, as want and disease and famine and grief spread over much of the earth, the Boy King will be whooping it up in grandly austentatious style. A statesman, a person with any class at all, would be scaling back the pomp and re-directing some of the inauguration money to Asia.
Nope, no hate. Just a reasoned discussion of the issues.

The absolute best part of visiting the blog? A graphic on the right of the page proclaims it a "troll-free zone." Heh.

Posted by: Slubgob on December 29, 2004 01:52 PM

Here's something pathetic - the MahaBlogger has left the exact same message at Wizbang.

Of course, I don't know what's actually more pathetic - what I just mentioned or that I'm bored enough to spend that much time in blog comments.

Posted by: Slubgob on December 29, 2004 02:44 PM

Still "kinda" funny? Try again: Year's top 50 humor posts, all categories, all blogs.

Posted by: quiggs on December 29, 2004 03:07 PM

lauraw: What a great post! Just swack the troll with a rolled up newspaper and get on with your day. Good idea, I tried it at first but fell into the Troll Resentment Trap, guess I'll have to work the Twelve Steps of Troll Recovery over again.

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on December 29, 2004 03:26 PM

Happy anniversary! Keep up the good work!
rich g

Posted by: rich glasgow on December 31, 2004 08:30 PM

Happy New Year Ace

Posted by: Bob S on January 1, 2005 02:40 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
Recent Comments
Anonosaurus Wrecks, Damn It Feels Good to Be a Trumpster! [/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "Well, that's not very nice. Trump Calls for Boy ..."

JM in Illinois : " >>This country is about to have the most importan ..."

Diogenes : "Wakes up Scratches Looks around Dang. Good m ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]YES! Thanks for the assist. *fistbump* P ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant[/b][/i][/s][/u]: "@150/r hennigantx: "[i]Great beaver story[/i]" ..."

LinusVanPelt : "Posted by: red speck at April 03, 2026 10:49 AM (V ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks, Damn It Feels Good to Be a Trumpster! [/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "Great beaver story https://x.com/DoctorLemma/st ..."

vivi: "174- true. They really are the Evil Party. They a ..."

It's me donna: "So they shot down one of our planes and are search ..."

Lizzy [/i]: ">>Texas isn't gone, yet. GOOD! What I am readi ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "This seems to indicate that this Trump fellow coul ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i] You're thinking of The Fat Electrician's "Ban ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives