Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Name That Decade | Main | Economists: US Job Creation "Strong" »
December 28, 2004

Shock: Norwegian UN Official Wants the US to Raise Its Taxes

This is just that Drudge-linked piece about our contribution to Asian disaster relief being "stingy," but I liked this bit:

But U.N. Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Jan Egeland suggested that the United States and other Western nations were being "stingy" with relief funds, saying there would be more available if taxes were raised. "It is beyond me why are we so stingy, really," the Norwegian-born U.N. official told reporters. "Christmastime should remind many Western countries at least, [of] how rich we have become."

"There are several donors who are less generous than before in a growing world economy," he said, adding that politicians in the United States and Europe "believe that they are really burdening the taxpayers too much, and the taxpayers want to give less. It's not true. They want to give more."

And here's what he looks like:

Bear in mind, he's whining about the "stinginess" of the US aid package and the need for us to pay more in taxes while the UN is covering up the greatest theft/embezzlement in human history.

Europe, the UN, and especially the fucking Scandavian socialist tax-weinies have to pour themselves and nice big tall cold glass of shut-the-fuck-up juice and just chill out for four years.

I don't give a damn about European internal politics. Why are Europeans so goddamned interested in ours?

I think it's for the same reason that I, as a conservative, used to hate Sweden.

Sweden was always offered as a utopia where socialism worked. As such, it was always a potent, or at least useful, point to raise against conservatives preaching lower taxes and such.

The US now occupies that same position among European leftists-- as a place of (moderately) free-market capitalism that seems to work a hell of a lot better than their systems. As such, it's a frequent embarassment to them, and they collectively wish the US would just get with the tax-'em-'till-they-bleed program so they wouldn't have our economy shoved in their faces everytime they want to do something economically retarded.


posted by Ace at 04:04 AM
Comments



Scandanavians gove more foreign aid per capita than any other country. Yet Americans are some of the most reliably generous people in the world. We just don't rely on the government to handle our charity; we do it through private and religious organizations.

Why should I be taxed to support the UN's ridiculous, irrelevant sanctimony, when I can voluntarily send a contribution to a private charity that will do the job efficiently and honestly, and competes in a market to earn my donations rather than appropriating them through a corrupt self-appointed monopoly? Hell, if I wanted to spend money on ridiculous, irrelevant sanctimony I'll just give my money to the Episcopal Church.


Posted by: See Dubya on December 28, 2004 04:43 AM

You know, I really think we ought to listen to Jan. I'm not suggesting that taxes should be raised, but maybe we are being too stingy. Maybe we should donate the entire amount of the federal budget that's earmarked for the UN in general to disaster relief efforts.

And while we're at it, we could evict the UN from its digs in NYC and sell the property to someone who could develop it as "affordable housing." And the cash from the development deal could also go to disaster relief! That would make the libs happy, no? After all, low-income families from NY could find a place to live, and the General Assembly hall would make one Hell of a rec room. The downtrodden in places like Sri Lanka get help out of the deal. Meanwhile, all the diplomats could fuck off to Sweden or Switzerland, where, let's face it, they really belong.

Hey, everybody wins!

Posted by: Sean M. on December 28, 2004 05:11 AM

To a European seeking to flog the United States -- and that's essentially any Eurocrat who gets within shouting distance of a microphone, these days -- any stick is good enough. But underneath the rhetoric is always the same core motivation: envy.

Their people want what we have, but the ruling classes want to keep the people down and their States' coffers bulging. (There's a reason "Oil For Food" is a European scandal rather than an American one, eh?) So they can't afford to admit their real reason for despising us: compared to them, we're unbelievably free, unbelievably rich, and very secure.

"I'd rather be a junkie in a New York City jail than King, Queen, and Jack of all you Europeans." -- P. J. O'Rourke

Posted by: Francis W. Porretto on December 28, 2004 06:26 AM

Ace, See-Dubya:

Damn you! Early blog catches the worm, I guess.

Who wakes up at 4? Or, better yet, who doesn't go to sleep until 4?

Anyways. . . I posted the same thoughts as See-Dub over at my site. Why tax when you can donate?

Oops, that's right, private donations require something called "take home pay," which last time I checked, you don't get with a 10% unemployment rate.

Of course, when I first read the headline, I thought it read "U.S. official slams U.N. as 'stingy' over aid to Iraq."

Alas, one can hope. . .

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 28, 2004 09:23 AM

Guys, ol Jan is just another poli-whore who needs the spotlight for his 15 minutes of fame. Our genorosity speaks for itself and assholes like Jan represent the very worst opportunists out there. Don't stoop to his level.

Posted by: Neal on December 28, 2004 09:24 AM

Jan thinks the American people want to pay higher taxes? Oh yes, we are yearning for it!

Newsflash, Jan; socialism is a dirty word in most of the US. You fucking blind idiot.

Its bad enough when our own mindless ideologues claim to speak for the People. But you've got to have humongous brass ones if you think a Eurocommie such as yourself could ever correctly divine what Americans want. Not if you had 1000 guesses, you twit.

You shouldn't smoke so much hash, Jan. Its making you loopy, you nutty kid.

Posted by: lauraw on December 28, 2004 10:21 AM


Americans and our government give far more in aid as a percent of GDP than the Europeans do. We just don't use UN or European aid organizations to do so.

There is a good reason for that. The UN is the most corrupt institution in the world. Embezzlement is not the exception at the UN; it is a way of life.

Go to Geneva as I have and look at the palatial offices where these UN agency bureaucrats work. Look at all the limos parked outside. Go into the neighborhoods and look at the palatial homes they live in.

Jan Egeland's is griping because his Ferrari is two years old and he needs a new one.

Posted by: on December 28, 2004 10:48 AM

http://kerryhaters.blogspot.com/
this guy posted Mr. Stingy's phone and fax number.

Posted by: stingy on December 28, 2004 11:00 AM

I've got a better idea. Fire half the UN. Cut the other half's pay (to, say, $40K/yr max). Send the savings abroad for disaster relief.

They do, after all, "want to give more".

Posted by: someone on December 28, 2004 11:45 AM

or Jan could donate half Norway's oil fund

http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article927125.ece

Posted by: jim on December 28, 2004 11:53 AM

I come to work, pop up Ace, and discover he's on fucking FIRE!

Damn, Ace, tell us how you really feel.

That Swedish meatball can go puff on a turd if he thinks the American people wwant higher taxes.

Fuck him.

It's bad enought that he mouths off about our "gift." (Who complains about a gift but a true fucking ingrate?) But then he has the audacity to speak for ME? No, sir, you can go jump off a fjord.

Man, this asshole has me steamed too, Ace.

Posted by: hobgoblin on December 28, 2004 12:18 PM

and, yes, I see he's Norwegian, but I couldn't resist the "Swedish meatball."

Posted by: hobgoblin on December 28, 2004 12:20 PM

From Frontpage this morning;

"Americans make a minimum of $34 billion in private donations to assist the less fortunate overseas, the overwhelming majority from religious foundations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). "

As it should be.

When it comes to giving aid through direct donations of our tax cash, the government is like a bucket brigade fighting a fire, but all their buckets have holes.

To then pass whatever remains of that money through the thieving UN....well.

Again, Jan; kiss my grits.

Posted by: lauraw on December 28, 2004 12:26 PM

Shut-the-fuck-up-juice? That's great. Where can I get a tanker-truck-full for our own Liberals?

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on December 28, 2004 12:26 PM

I just wrote about the stupidity of Jan on my own site, then came to Ace and found his primal scream of rage at the UN. Beats the hell out of my post.

Maybe Jan should ask Kojo Annan to give some of his blood money to the people of Asia. Humanitarian aid has a funny way of disappearing into UN pockets. Maybe Jan is just pissed that his cut of $15 million won't be that much.

Posted by: Slubgob on December 28, 2004 12:53 PM

Wait, maybe Jan's right. Maybe we do want to pay more taxes. Let's try making taxes voluntary to see if revenue goes up.

Posted by: Van Helsing on December 28, 2004 01:02 PM

Van Helsing,
Our Republican governor got so sick and tired of people whining about no money for this special program or that. He held a press conference and announced a special "Pay extra taxes" fund. Anyone that felt they weren't paying enough in taxes was encouraged to send money to this fund. Three years later, there is about $1000 in it.

As for the U.N., screw them and the horse they rode in on.

Posted by: Steve L. on December 28, 2004 01:29 PM

72 Virgins, here ya go;

http://www.jordansplace.net/homepage/shutup.jpg

Makes a beautiful gift for lefty trolls.

Posted by: lauraw on December 28, 2004 01:45 PM

To call the UN's scandal the "the greatest theft/embezzlement in human history" is overdoing it a bit. Sure, it's absolutely huge, but it's small potatoes to the billions stolen by kleptocratic governments throughout the world, usually over decades. The UN was acting according to what many of its members consider "normal operating standards". Not that that excuses anything.

Let's try to keep some perspective here: the problem isn't just the UN, but with many of its members.


Posted by: jon on December 28, 2004 03:39 PM

Weren't the Vikings Norwegian?

I guess the modern descendents of Vikings are just pussies.

Posted by: George on December 28, 2004 03:55 PM

A detailed account of US foreign aid, public and private, from the Hudson Institute:

http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=3479

Posted by: David on December 28, 2004 04:03 PM

The only thing I hate more than America-hating UN pussies like Egeland is America-hating UN pussies who don't have the BALLS to stick to their asinine America-hating positions.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,11803670%255E1702,00.html

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 28, 2004 09:08 PM

He feels he has a right to comment on the US because HE LIVES HERE, where is UN income is tax free.

He needs to be sent home.

Posted by: Insert-Name-Here on December 29, 2004 10:13 AM

Yes, and his tax-free UN income is approximately 350K per year.
He is so convinced that people WANT to be taxed more; maybe he could start a trend and donate 40% of his income to the US Treasury. Show that he is willing to walk the walk, you know?

Posted by: lauraw on December 30, 2004 09:51 AM

United States fought a war to end taxes imposed upon us from another nation. Guess what, We Won! I have the right to donate my income as I see fit! Stay out of my bussiness.

Posted by: Ken on January 2, 2005 12:35 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
pawn: ""Most of the old soviet leaders are very concerned ..."

Skip: "AW especially if they lose, or win and think they ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks: "Its going to be a rough year until the mid term el ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks: "Shall I compare thee to a blazing Molotov cocktail ..."

Rev. Wishbone: "My great uncle worked for NASA on the Apollo progr ..."

Skip: "Virginia Marxists freak over the Va Supreme Court ..."

Maj. Healey [/i]: "Alex Jones seeming less crazy every day. ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: InZona at May 09, 2026 12:32 PM (XiTQh) ..."

doug: "and jazz hands ..."

Piper: "I am surprised people are seeing the Fosse influen ..."

Skip: "Read recently foreigners do think everything here ..."

Ian S.: "[i]May be something to that. One of the phrases th ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives