Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Scandalblogging | Main | Shock: Norwegian UN Official Wants the US to Raise Its Taxes »
December 28, 2004

Name That Decade

The generally-useless Tim Noah at the amateur leftist webzine Slate has a piece that's almost worth reading. Except a, it's fluff, and b, it's well-covered ground.

What the hell are we supposed to call this decade? Noah's topical hook for re-writing this piece for the six-thousandth time is that we are days away from the decade's midpoint, and yet no one's figured out what to call these years. And I guess he has a point there-- you'd have figured that, by now, we'd have all collectively settled for a shorthand nickname for these years begining with a zero.

The eighties, the nineties, and then the... what?

The "oh's" has been suggested, and the antique "aughts."

Look, if no one else is going to step up to the plate, please, allow me. We are currently living in the nils. It's short and it doesn't roll too badly off the tongue and it even sounds a little bit cool.

We're in the nils, and then we'll be in the teens.

Until someone comes up with something better, I say we just all agree on "the nils" and be done with it already.


posted by Ace at 03:57 AM
Comments



Hundreds.

Posted by: Kazmin on December 28, 2004 04:15 AM

The "problem" hasn't been resolved because the only ones who really care are at the music division of TimeLife. "Kickin' It Aught-Style" just doesn't have that smooth marketing buzz appropriate for late night/early morning television commercials.

If we're really, really careful this problem will go away in, say, five years.

Posted by: too many steves on December 28, 2004 06:00 AM

OTOH, if you want something that rolls badly off the tongue, try "the Eyes Without A Face's", pronounced with the same cadence as "the '80's" or "the '90's". Let me demonstrate:


Eyes With A Face: 00
>
-__-

Eyes Without A Face: 00

Eyes Without A Face's: 00's

The other cool thing about this little artifice is that it's the answer to a great trivia question: What is the only worthwhile thing Billy Idol has ever done in his life?

Posted by: Tongueboy on December 28, 2004 09:38 AM

Ahhhh, my little Impressionist demonstation didn't work. And I made all the spaces and everything. Time to get a preview function. And, no, I don't want to hear any whining about "cost" and "money". Effin' Amerikkkan greedmaster.

Posted by: Tongueboy on December 28, 2004 09:41 AM

How about the "double aughts?"

Nah, too wordy.

I don't like "nil" because it seems vaguely depressing - nihilistic.

How about the "mils?" It's just as short as nil but it recognizes the beginning of the millenium. It works well with particular years, mil one, mil 5 and the like. Mil-oh for 2000?

Posted by: Stephen Gordon on December 28, 2004 10:12 AM

I like "nulls".

Btw, isn't it now "amateur leftist webzine mouthpiece of WaPo"?

Posted by: someone on December 28, 2004 11:40 AM

How about 'the Zeroes'?

Posted by: lyle on December 28, 2004 11:58 AM

Most of us over-achieving types live in the "oughts" . Sigh.

Let's just call these years what they are:

the Pre-teen years.

Every bit as scary and clueless as the world seems right now.

Posted by: Joan of Argghh! on December 28, 2004 12:30 PM

We are in the 10s naturally. Next will be in the teens. "Nils" just doesn't cut it! Nice try though.

Posted by: calex59 on December 28, 2004 01:03 PM

It's the "aughties" (pronounced same as 'ought'ies)

I grew up hearing about how so-and-so did such-and-such back in "aught-seven", now it's our time. Besides if things get out of hand, we can refer to it retrospectively as the "naughty aughties"

Posted by: Stephen Cobbs on December 28, 2004 01:24 PM

The common usage will probably be 'the oh's.'
Ask people what year this is and they'll say 'oh-four.'

Posted by: lauraw on December 28, 2004 01:51 PM

Joan of Argghh! beat me to it. I think "the pre-teens" is perfect because it takes good consideration of the next decade, and because if this hasn't been a decade characterized by self-centered temper tantrums and a fundamental lack of respect for reality, I don't know what could possibly qualify.

Posted by: Sobek on December 28, 2004 02:06 PM

What was it called last century? This isn't the first time it's come up ya know!

Posted by: annie on December 28, 2004 03:29 PM

I'm partial to "the double naughts", in honor of Jethro Bodine. As in, "Uncle Jed, I'ma gonna be a double-naught spy!"

Posted by: iowahawk on December 28, 2004 06:04 PM

Maybe we should just accept the fact that this decade doesn't get a name. People can refer to it, Voldemort-style, as The Decade That Must Not Be Named, or You-Know-When. Or, for short, "the Y'know's."

Posted by: Bob Hawkins on December 29, 2004 11:02 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Commissar of plenty and festive little hats : "Dinosaur Face Mr Senegal sends greetings. ..."

Art Rondelet of Malmsey: "I saw that top picture and my 29 y.o. brain starte ..."

Commissar of plenty and festive little hats : "Woof woof ..."

Skip: "PET NOOD IS UP ..."

Skip: "Happy Caturday everyone ..."

Skip: "Ground isn't warming up very fast in esst either ..."

Lirio100: "Bletilla doesn't spread very fast either, and the ..."

Harry Vandenburg: "Mars' atmo is so thin that its possible that the n ..."

MkY : "Since no one else is chiming in, I will again. It ..."

BeckoningChasm: "@19 THank you! Knowledge is good! ..."

Harry Vandenburg: "DaVinci also didn't come up with the Vitruvian Man ..."

MkY : "Oh...my serviceberry fruit all froze... 4th year i ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives