Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« There's Hope For Me Yet | Main | Dow Posts Triple-Digit Gains on Economic News »
November 17, 2004

PETA: Fish are People Too

Every one of their campaigns seems like it was conceived due to losing a bar bet:

NEW YORK - Touting tofu chowder and vegetarian sushi as alternatives, animal-rights activists have launched a novel campaign arguing that fish — contrary to stereotype — are intelligent, sensitive animals no more deserving of being eaten than a pet dog or cat.

Called the Fish Empathy Project, the campaign reflects a strategy shift by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals as it challenges a diet component widely viewed as nutritious and uncontroversial.

"No one would ever put a hook through a dog's or cat's mouth," said Bruce Friedrich, PETA's director of vegan outreach. "Once people start to understand that fish, although they come in different packaging, are just as intelligent, they'll stop eating them."

...

"Fish are so misunderstood because they're so far removed from our daily lives," said Karin Robertson, 24, the Empathy Project manager and daughter of an Indiana fisheries biologist. "They're such interesting, fascinating individuals, yet they're so incredibly abused."

...

Friedrich acknowledges the difficulty of changing long-held customs, but thinks his project is worthwhile. "We'd rather go too far than not far enough," he said.

I think that goes without saying.


posted by Ace at 08:50 AM
Comments



Are (were) they also concerned about Arafish?

Posted by: The Old Coot on November 17, 2004 09:21 AM

"They're such interesting, fascinating individuals..."

I agree. Last time I went fishing I had an interesting discussion with a charming rainbow trout fellow named Thomas who had some interesting comments on whether economic liberalization is a cause or effect of political liberalization.

That was, of course, before I grilled him up and served him with a side of aspargus and a lovely spring salad.

God, I miss him.

Posted by: Jason on November 17, 2004 09:49 AM

We're not "putting a hook through their mouth"... We're introducing the fish to the joys of "body piercing"- much like most of the PETA people I've seen.

PETA= Please Eat The Aquarium

Posted by: Jack Grey on November 17, 2004 09:55 AM

I think it's funny that they imply they haven't gone too far yet in that last sentence.

Giving pamphlets like "Your Mommy wants to kill your dog" to young kids - Understated

"Holocaust on Your Plate" - Perfectly acceptable

Pouring blood on unsuspecting women - Nothing bad about that.

Suggesting fish might have intelligence - Might be pushing it a little.

Posted by: Axolotl on November 17, 2004 10:05 AM

I'm "empathic" toward fish. I think they're great pets. I also like to fish and eat fish. Fish certianly have their place in the world. They also have their place in the food chain.

Living in an area where many earn the livings off the bounty of the sea (when it's not being killed off by overfishing, that is), I don't expect to see many PETA-philes in my neighborhood.

Posted by: John on November 17, 2004 10:16 AM

Wow,

Stupid. Jesus fed people fish, Peter was a fisherman. They've just declared themselves anti-Christian.

Hugh McBryde

Posted by: Prakk on November 17, 2004 10:29 AM

When fish stop eating fish, I'll stop eating fish.

OK, if they just stop eating their OWN YOUNG, I'll stop eating fish.

Muwahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Posted by: Just Don on November 17, 2004 10:29 AM

Damn. I was trying to economise but now I realise I have to eat sushi tonight. And beat a border collie with an extension cord.

I wonder what O-Dubyah thinks about PETA frowning on his favourite Mickey D's sandwich?

Posted by: David Gillies on November 17, 2004 10:45 AM

Some people keep fish as pets and in the case of Japanese Koi (which are friendly and long-lived), get very attached to them.

These same people have no problem with shooting a deer or yanking a trout from the water.

Eh. Whatever.

I will say that I think the Asian practice of serving fish that have been lightly grilled- but are still alive and moving- is rather disgusting.

Posted by: lauraw on November 17, 2004 11:03 AM

"They're such interesting, fascinating individuals, yet they're so incredibly abused."
Abused by who? For God's sake, Fish eat Fish! These must be the same people who insist that the Evil White Man did something peculiar in taking the land from the Indians after conquering them, something they had done to each other for thousands of years ever since they first arrived on the continent. Oh, now I get it, the fish who eat fish are Evil White Fish!

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on November 17, 2004 11:17 AM

Makes me want to go out in the back allyway with rod and reel and see if I can't land me some allycat for dinner.

I mean, after all, they're no different than fish, right?

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta on November 17, 2004 11:29 AM

Though I'm a meat-eater, I think ethically you can make a pretty good argument that in a wealthy society where plenty of non-meat alternatives are available, it's immoral to kill a nondangerous, conscious, self-aware being for no other reason than you like how it tastes. If PETA stuck to that argument (and didn't engage in stupid shock tactics like throwing blood on people or releasing a press release on 9/12 saying that a 9/11 occurs every hour for processed chickens), I'd be sympathetic. But when they start alleging that there is no difference between humans and fish, well now they're just insane. Seriously, PETA do SO MUCH more harm than good for the vegetarian cause.

Posted by: Mike on November 17, 2004 11:49 AM

Those PETA morons once tried to turn me into a "veggie oasis" burger...till they learned this cat has claws.

Posted by: Johnny "Fucking Unemployed" Coldcuts on November 17, 2004 11:50 AM

I was reading an article in our local Catholic paper by one of our bishops where he started out talking about his aquarium hobby (which we share) as the article progressed I discovered his point was that if you have a salt water tank (we do) you're evil because of the way the fish are harvested, not raised in fish farms. Who knew? The rest of this comment is too obvious to even write.

Posted by: Full Auto on November 17, 2004 11:54 AM

Why are these fascists trying to take away my right to choose?

My aquarium, myself and all that.

And Mike, I'm not trying to harsh on you, but htere is NO alternative to eating meat. Sure you can SURVIVE on tofurkey, but you can't LIVE on it.

Posted by: hobgoblin on November 17, 2004 11:55 AM

I love the line about fish being removed from the lives of people.

Show me a cattle rancher who doesn't eat steak and I'll take that claim a little more seriously.

Posted by: Sobek on November 17, 2004 12:10 PM

Next: PETA announces protest of Fear Factor. "Bugs are people, too," claims PETA rep.

Posted by: hobgoblin on November 17, 2004 12:22 PM

What Would Oliver Willis Say?

Posted by: fat kid on November 17, 2004 12:24 PM

"And Mike, I'm not trying to harsh on you, but htere is NO alternative to eating meat. Sure you can SURVIVE on tofurkey, but you can't LIVE on it."

You'd be surprised at the stuff you could live on for the sake of a vegetarian girlfriend. :)

Seriously, though, the quality of tofu fake-meat products has improved immeasurably over the past few years (check out Morning Star Chicken Wings or Boca Burgers, but avoid fast food veggie burgers like the plague). And grilled portobello mushrooms with soy or teriaki sauce tastes better and "meatier" than most steaks.

Posted by: on November 17, 2004 12:38 PM

And grilled portobello mushrooms with soy or teriaki sauce tastes better and "meatier" than most steaks.

Hoo-boy.

I bet veggie girlfriend has this schlepp believing sex feels so much better with a condom, too.

Posted by: Michael Ansana on November 17, 2004 12:42 PM

'grilled portobello mushrooms with soy or teriaki sauce tastes better and "meatier" than most steaks'

Dude, you seriously need to change butchers. I can assure you that a 10oz, 2" thick tenderloin, marinated in soy, red wine and garlic overnight and cooked to medium rare over a charcoal grill tastes meatier than any damn fungus known to man. Mushrooms are a side, not an entree. I remember the immortal words of the VodkaPundit: Quorn is not a meat substitute. A meat substitute is the baked potato I eat between mouthfuls of steak.

Posted by: David Gillies on November 17, 2004 01:10 PM

"Hoo-boy.

I bet veggie girlfriend has this schlepp believing sex feels so much better with a condom, too."

My reply/retort would be far too graphic to get past the filters. ;) Seriously though, it's mostly the spices and marianation that make steak taste so good. If you put those same ingredients on a portabella mushroom--which actually has a strong taste to begin with--it tastes awesome.

They still haven't made an acceptable substitute to bacon, though.

Posted by: Mike on November 17, 2004 01:12 PM

"Every one of their campaigns seems like it was conceived due to losing a bar bet"

Classic.

Posted by: physics geek on November 17, 2004 02:01 PM

I've had the pleasure of running into to some of the lovely rock throwing folks from PETA while flyfishing. From that encounter, I've a complete understanding of how these guys can see fish as intelligent. Everythings relative afterall ...right?
Stephen

Posted by: Stephen on November 17, 2004 02:11 PM

Stephen

I've had the pleasure of running into to some of the lovely rock throwing folks from PETA while flyfishing

YOu're joking right? If someone ever threw a rock at me, I'd toss a hook on that fly fishing rod and aim for a cheek/eye. Heh.

Posted by: fat kid on November 17, 2004 02:16 PM

Mike.

Mike.

Mike.

Take a nice 1 1/2 ribeye, salt and pepper only, grill it over flame to medium rare, and legitimately tell me that a fucking portobello is just as good.

Fungus might taste sweeter after that vegan pussior, but really dude, there's no substitute for both flavor AND nutrition of meat.

I've just never met any middle linebackers that are vegetarians, know what I'm saying?

But I hope that your girlfriend has a nice rack at least.

Posted by: hobgoblin on November 17, 2004 02:33 PM

Talk about far removed from reality, PETA takes the (fish)cake. I'm in the ocean 4-5 days a week getting my yahyahs out while surfing. I see pelicans diving and eating fish, dolphins chasing & eating fish, and seals catching and eating fish. I spend 8-10 hours a week in the water and I shouldn't eat fish? What about crushing the "life" out of thousands of soybeans to make their tofu?

Posted by: dano on November 17, 2004 05:05 PM

If PETA was truly serious about this campaign, they would use a real war hero such as the Incredible Mr. Limpet.

Posted by: Lennie on November 17, 2004 05:28 PM

I have a problem with overfishing, not eating fish. If it was left up to commercial fishermen, with no government regulation, they'd strip mine the ocean bottom until the last commercially viable species was exterminated.

And there are oceanic species that show ability to learn (groupers) and one that displays a full range of basic emotions and is judged smarter than the average chicken - octopi.

Not that I have any problem eating chickens or very rarely - octopus - since I eat pork and pigs are higher on the intelligence scale than cats or dogs.

I only want harvesting of wildlife to be done humanely and in an environmentally sustainable maner.

Posted by: Cedarford on November 17, 2004 06:40 PM
If it was left up to commercial fishermen, with no government regulation, they'd strip mine the ocean bottom until the last commercially viable species was exterminated.

Well, of course. Commercial fishermen want to put themselves out of a job, don't you know.

Posted by: zetetic on November 17, 2004 07:21 PM

No one thought the commercial fisherman would be as greedy and short-sighted as their wildlife harvesting forebears who wiped out the bison, passenger pidgeon, California sardine industry, or came close to wiping out the whooping crane, rhino, most whale populations, and tigers -

But they proved again and again they could care less about the long-term viability of species they harvested as long as they were free to collect maximum profits in the short-term.

Many commercial fishermen would have gladly taken the last netload of cod out of the Grand Banks - if not them, they reasoned some other boat with no one saying "NO! with the power to stop it " would have. And they could have switched to wiping out a new species once the cod were all scooped up.

The result was they damaged every major global fishery in the 2nd half of the 20th century. And many land ecospheres.

Now needed, emergency, heavy gov't regulation is controlling the commercial harvestors of wildlife and is slowly recovering some major fisheries and land wildlife species - save where killing species for profit with no regard to the future by the entrepreneurs continues in areas of weak governments(Caspian Sea, African bush meat trade).

Posted by: Cedarford on November 17, 2004 09:19 PM

Hey, I think plants are living things, they must have feelings too.
hey hey pass me some of that steak ... lol

Posted by: Bill on November 18, 2004 06:42 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
NaCly Dog: "Oldcat That is one point to pound in on. IST ..."

gKWVE : "#Justice4Kaya ..."

garrett: ">>It messes up the flavor and texture profile. ..."

Anna Puma: "Piper is riffing off 'being a beacon to the world' ..."

ShainS [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "[Just belatedly saw this from the prior thread:] ..."

garrett: ">>My daughter mentioned to me that she has never l ..."

Turn 2: ">>> Well traditionally it was all Judy Garland mov ..."

Harry Vandenburg: "Didn't California do the same thing with gay marri ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "Organically grown, smartass. No pesticides or crap ..."

Guy Mohawk: "I think a repost of Diablo girl is warranted. ..."

Auspex: " The long march through the institutions is over, ..."

Anna Puma: "Hakeem Jeffries, every time he opens his pie-hole ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives