Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Golden Hour: California Finally Joins In Job Growth | Main | There's Hope For Me Yet »
November 16, 2004

Germany Considers Requiring Muslim Sermons to be Given in German

So the Germans can better monitor racist and inciteful diatribes, they say.

But don't forget the key word: Germans.

I don't know. Part of me thinks this may be almost justified. But another part of me thinks it's dangerous for a state to begin dictating the manner in which citizens may worship. And the biggest part of me gets scared whenever Germans start worrying themselves over a minority religion.

On the other hand, I wouldn't mind seeing France invaded again. Just for old times' sake.

The implications of the story are serious, but some of the details are actually kinda funny:

ISLAMIC preachers in Germany have been told that they may be ordered to deliver their sermons in German rather than in Arabic in an attempt to halt racist diatribes. The move reflects Berlin’s fears that a spark of ethnic and religious unrest could leap from the Netherlands to Germany, a country with more than three million Muslims.

Support for such a move is growing after a television channel used hidden cameras to film the imam of a Berlin mosque frequented by young Turks. He was heard telling worshippers that “Germans can only expect to rot in the fires of hell because they are non-believers”.

I will say right now that I don't mind that Muslims condemn non-believers to Hell-- so do most religions. And the Germans really oughtn't be that pissy over this, because, well, most of them probably are going to hell anyway.

The Germans, he said, would only support Turkish entry to the European Union if the Turks ripped down the minarets and bulldozed the mosques. Moreover, Germans smelt badly: “These nonbelievers, these Europeans, they do not even shave under their armpits, so that sweat gathers in their hair and makes them stink.”

Anyone want to bet that this is what really incensed the Germans? No one likes be told their race literally stinks. And the Germans are, let's face it, kind of an arrogant people.

The sermon, translated from Arabic and broadcast on German state television, stopped well short of a call to violence. But it was strong and hostile enough to shock ordinary Germans and the political class who argue that European Muslims are being poisoned by the rhetoric they hear in the mosques.

Remember, these are the people who accused America of "overreacting" after 2700 people were immolated on 9-11. But tell them they smell a bit, and they're ready for a nice pogrom.

There are serious reasons to fix a wary eye on militant Muslims. Here's one of them:

...

Bassam Tibi, Germany’s leading expert on Islamic affairs, advised the Government to find a proper balance between controlling mosques and integrating foreigners. “If we don’t do more to integrate foreigners then Germany will face the civil war-like conditions that are emerging in Holland,” the professor said.

But while they consider taking the rather scary step of imposing restrictions on how a minority may worship -- these are the Germans, mind you -- they're simultaneously appeasing like crazy:

...

German television last week withdrew the controversial film Submission, which has been blamed for inciting the fatal attack on the Dutch film director Theo van Gogh. The decision seems to have come from the Dutch production company rather than the German networks. “We don’t want to pour even more oil on the fire,” Alexandra Keddemann, spokeswoman for the producers, said.

...

German television chiefs were shocked when they sent their reporters out to question German Muslim responses to the killing of Mr van Gogh.

Young Turks questioned at a Cologne street market immediately supported the attack. “If you insult Islam, you have to pay,” was a typical response.

Young Muslims in Germany support murder in the cause of avenging an insult to their religion. But the Germans only get animated when someone tells them they could afford to shower a little more frequently.

Is this a serious response to real problems? Or has Europe simply become a continent of silly teenagers?


posted by Ace at 11:38 PM
Comments



Ahh, its just so that the Germans can help the Islamofascists be the best fascists they can be!

Posted by: Iblis on November 17, 2004 12:32 AM

Darn right it's "dangerous for a state to begin dictating the manner in which citizens may worship" because it suggests the locals think long-term threats to Germany (and Europe) can be resolved with gestures. When Bassam Tibi said "If we don’t do more to integrate foreigners then Germany will face the civil war-like conditions" he was echoing the french general who said a while back "In 10 years we'll be fighting in the streets of France."

Most recently, Europe's "silly teenagers" came up with a placebo agreement with Iran that will serve to guarantee the mullah's build a bomb. Among the Euro's shortsighted goals was to forestall stronger U.S. action, but they're buying themselves a passel of trouble. If they think they've got problems with a homegrown terrorist factory now, just wait 'til the latter is protected by Iran's nuclear umbrella. Remember "better red than dead?" There's an updated version of that jackboot ready to stomp in Europe's demilitarized face forever, and it awaits their forthcoming surrender.

Posted by: Lastango on November 17, 2004 12:33 AM

One other teensy detail. We’ve now got one more good reason to draw down our Germany-based troops on the double-quick, and they’ve got one more really, really good reason to wish they hadn’t spent the last two years teeth-kicking the only ally they’ve got that's ready, willing and able to project meaningful force.

If they do call on us they can use the same phone# Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero reached when he phoned to offer congratulations on Bush’s reelection.

Posted by: Lastango on November 17, 2004 01:09 AM

Wait just a friggin' minute here. This whole article, Ace, is comparing apples and oranges. First of all, Christians don't preach hatred and intollerance, as does Islam. Ducking behind the cover of religious oppression by the Germans, says nothing to the overall problem. The problem isn't one of imposing an edict on Islam, it's a problem that more countries, this one included, aren't doing more to monitor the Islamic cult. Yes, cult. Islam is a cult of believers in a religion contrived by a false prophet. Germany, in this case is right to weed out the radicals; something we're too weak-kneed to do.

Posted by: Ron on November 17, 2004 01:37 AM

Sooner or later the cowardly Europeans are going to wake up to the fact that we are already well into World War III. Hopefully sooner rather then later. But until they tire of being knocked around by demented religious fanatics, the US will just have to soldier on. Sometimes, as in this story, you can really hear the rusty wheels of comprehension turning over in their fuzzy utopian little heads. (This is what happens when you don't take responsibility for your own defense - pathetic!)

Posted by: Philip on November 17, 2004 02:26 AM

Um, Ron, I'm assuming from your comment that you're a Christian. I may be wrong, and if I am, I'm sure you'll correct me. That said, when you write something like this:

Christians don't preach hatred and intollerance, as does Islam.

You might want to reconsider writing the following just a few sentences later:

Islam is a cult of believers in a religion contrived by a false prophet.

I know, I know...that may be your opinion, and you're entitled to it. It's just that you sound a little, well, intolerant when you basically claim that the followers of one of the world's largest religions believe in a load of crap.

Posted by: Sean M. on November 17, 2004 04:29 AM

one of Martin Luther's many reforms was to translate the Bible and the Christian liturgy from the language of the priests (Latin) into the language of the people (German in his case)

This split the church but in the end (centuries later...) the Catholic church adopted this particular reform.

Many commentators have called for the many strands of Islam to collectively undergo a reformation similar to what Christianity has undergone. But I don't think this is quite what they had in mind....

Posted by: Bill on November 17, 2004 06:52 AM

Sean M.,

If Ron is belongs to any religion but Islam, or is an atheist, then by definition he believes Islam is bunk. Respecting other religions is all well and good, and one can say that there are good points to Islam, but unless you are a Muslim you believe they are wrong.

I don't tell people of other religions this to their face because it isn't polite, and I appreciate the fact that they don't tell me my faith in the Great Pumpkin is wackiness. However, not saying something because it is "intolerant" sticks in my craw.

Posted by: Alex on November 17, 2004 06:57 AM

I guess the "freedom of worship" point of view would be that they can say what they want, how they want, in church/mosque or whatever. I'm rather against trying to tell someone to do their services in a certain language. (hey Jews, none of that Hebrew stuff... Catholics, knock off the Latin)

Having said that, are the Germans totally clueless? Jeez, read an Arabic newspaper in English- let alone Arabic, and you'll find enough to make you wonder about the goals of some of the more radical elements of Islam. It's all out there, Europe is just choosing not to see it.

Posted by: Jack Grey on November 17, 2004 09:40 AM

Going on what Ron said, that "Christians don't preach hatred and intollerance" -- well, when I lived in Germany, the "free churches" (Baptists, Methodists, even Mennonites, all of whom were considered quite literally as cults by my classmates and host family) said that they were the only churches allowed to preach anything they wanted, as long as it didn't stray too far into the radical. The Established churches (Lutheran and Catholic) could speak only within government parameters. The Catholic sermons I heard, supporting homosexual behavior and abortion, would lead me to believe they were right! So, if Christians in Germany don't preach what other people see as hatred and intolerance, it's because of the same government control the German government wants over the Mosques. (They've also banned scientology, and some job applications I've seen ask if you've ever *read* Dianetics, regardless of what you thought of it -- and also ask if you're a member of a "free church". State control of religion's nothing new there.)

It may be frightening, but at least it's equal treatment -- and watching the people with more of a recent history of calling for mass murder, rather than only those who haven't really done that for quite some time.

Posted by: Adrianne Truett on November 17, 2004 09:49 AM

Muslims shave their armpits?! I mean who knew?
A friend of mine was stationed in Germany years ago and she explained that germans usually take a bath every week or so and apply cologne and perfumes to control the body odor. The result is a sickening sweet smell of stinky BO and old cologne. So maybe the Muslims are on to something. But how sad that Muslims are bitching about the Germans personal hygiene.

Posted by: Marty on November 17, 2004 09:53 AM

Well, Germany has already banned or severely restricted Scientology. (I don't remember the specifics.) Maybe they could just turn the Scientologists and the Islamicsts on each other.

Posted by: Eric on November 17, 2004 10:24 AM

Aw, come on, man!

If they invade France do we have to go save their sorry asses again?

Posted by: Just Don on November 17, 2004 10:32 AM

German television chiefs shocked by typical response: “If you insult Islam, you have to pay,”??? This is a newsflash? Yes, all infidels must pay in Blood! But Allah The Merciful also accepts cash, credit card, installment payments (easy terms available), or check (we trust you). Europe's silly teenagers are just beginning to sense the trouble they are in, because the Moslem occupies every country where he sets his feet. And Allah shall conquer all of Europe. Praise Mighty Allah!

Posted by: 72VIRGINS on November 17, 2004 12:00 PM

Aw, Ace,

The Krauts (and I'm an American one, so don't give me any shit) can be trusted to only attack Islam, and Islam needs it (that's true enough now, isn't it?). There's no danger at all in it spreading past that. It's not like the Germans have a history of such things. *cough*

But seriously, this shows more the problem with teh collective myopia of the Europeans. For years the muzzies have been saying they were going to attack Europeans, and it wasn't until Van Gogh (and that after Pim Fortuyn) that these moron wake up. All the time they're accusing America of "intolerance." (really sean, you should look up that word in regards to religion, I do not think it means what you think it means).

Now, when they get scared they immediately launch into full oppression mode (which the EUnichs do so well). There's just no middle ground with them. "Germans, they're at your throat or at your knees." - Churchill


Posted by: hobgoblin on November 17, 2004 12:13 PM

All questions of tolerance and scary Germans aside -- really, everything I have heard from the emissions of these Islamic "holy persons" sounds like the sorts of talk we train our toddlers out of using in public: "You smell! You dress funny! I don't like you! This food is yucky!"

Posted by: Andrea Harris on November 17, 2004 12:24 PM

Jeez, haven't these guys ever heard of linguists? Translators? People that can listen in on the hateful diatribes in Arabic and understand them?

And since when is tipping the bad guy off that you're listening in, and indeed telling him to repeat his nefarious plans in a language the cops can understand, considered a fruitful strategy?

Should have let the Kaiser have the whole damned continent...

Posted by: Ken on November 17, 2004 12:41 PM

Seriously though, shave yer pits and use some deodorant. The Islamofacists are right.

Posted by: MitchieVille on November 17, 2004 01:08 PM

Please shave your armpits
Or Islamists will kill you
Deodorant helps

Posted by: MitchieVille on November 17, 2004 01:13 PM

Hey, folks, I understand that if you strongly believe in your faith, you probably believe that adherents of other faiths are going down the wrong path. That's fine and dandy.

What I was talking about was a matter of tone. You can make a statement about your own strong faith without resorting to calling the other guy's religion a cult or talking about his "false prophet," and you'd be especially wise to avoid that sort of thing when trying to paint yourself as the tolerant guy.

That said, Germans really do stink, but not as badly as Frenchmen.

Posted by: Sean M. on November 17, 2004 01:30 PM

Islam is political party as much as a religion. It's both, and a culture as well. You can't say "This is culture, this is religion, this is politics." It's all the same to them.

Frankly, it's a set of beliefs that encourage action. That action is anti-social and dangerous to others.

Posted by: Brock on November 17, 2004 04:21 PM

What would you guys do without your stereotypes?

Posted by: Krautmeister on November 17, 2004 04:27 PM

We Americans use stereotypes because we are all fat, lazy, arrogant cowboys.

Posted by: lauraw on November 17, 2004 05:37 PM

Regarding the smelly Germans theme. Reuters carried this:

Nov 17, 8:56 AM (ET)


BERLIN (Reuters) - Germans find smelly co-workers to be the most annoying aspect of their jobs, according to a survey by the German business magazine Junge Karriere.

The survey found 38 percent of German office workers were "most bothered" by the smells of their colleagues, 15 percent said they were annoyed by co-workers socializing too much, and 14 percent by untidy desks.

The poll of 354 participants found 26 percent were content with their jobs and have nothing at all to complain about.

Posted by: Pigilito on November 18, 2004 04:50 AM

Jesus loves you Allah wants you dead (according to the FALSE prophet Muhammad, who was a man afflicted with epileptic seizures not visions from Allah). For more truths about the life of Muhammad all should read "Sword of the Prophet" by Serge Trifkovic.

Remember Jesus Christ is the anti-(opposite of) Muhammad, and conversely Muhammad is the anti-Christ.

Posted by: ghost in the attic on November 19, 2004 12:02 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Recent Comments
SMOD: " Joshua Hall @JoshHall2024 🚨BREAKING: ..."

Smell the Glove: "Can't watch Bartiromo's show because the rehab pla ..."

18-1: "[i]To stop the threat we either need to end the re ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]... to be this platform of power projection for ..."

Eeyore: "Bad news for Campa-Najjar: Democrats fight like do ..."

Don Black: "I was thinking about the current unpleasantness in ..."

Thomas Paine: "Is it not a military problem but one of insurance& ..."

NR Pax: "[i]It's a wonder the justice system participants d ..."

18-1: "[i]I've said for years now that I don't want (and ..."

Yep: "[i]I've said for years now that I don't want (and ..."

Eeyore: "“I think the most important thing is that we ..."

Another alternative: "To stop the threat we either need to end the regim ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives