Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Drama Queens: Snivelling High School Punks Want to Call for Bush's Death at Talent Show | Main | Chris Matthews: Terrorists "not bad guys especially, they're just people who disagree with you" »
November 16, 2004

Iraqi Minister: 1,600 Terrorists Killed in Fallujah

Al Jazeera has a different theory: They were all poisoned by those cunning Israelis.

1,600 is a nice number. A nicer number is "10,000." Nice and round and voluptuous.


posted by Ace at 03:21 PM
Comments



1,600? It could have been more. The total killed could have been 16,000 or 160,000 it wouldn't matter. We still would have gone in and rocked em clean. And we STILL would have been right for doing so. It's our Nation's duty to protect its citizens lives.

Quote: "Most civilians are believed to have fled Falluja ahead of the offensive, some of them to nearby villages. Daoud said more than 90 percent had left.."

If this is the case then we could have spared the lives of 34 U.S. Soldiers. We should've rained fire from the sky. Turned the place into molten glass. Non-nuclear of course. 75 to 100 MOABS would have done it. Expensive? Yes, but far cheaper than the lives of 34 U.S. Soldiers that we can never bring back.

Posted by: Joseph McLaughlin on November 16, 2004 03:38 PM

McLaughlin - You have to accept that war means American casualties. You can't win by safely bombing from the air. You must go in, shed blood, and root the enemy out. If you are looking for magic high tech weapons to avoid all US casualties - you lose.

As it was we had a 47:1 kill ratio advantage, and we nailed many of the assholes that killed our guys, foreign & Iraqi civilians before with suicide car bombs, IEDs, and mortar attacks. Our rate of taking casualties in a war as important to our security as WWII - is 1/400th the rate US soldiers fell in WWII.

We cherish our guys in uniform precisely because they may suffer and die for us - but we should never hesitate to send them in harm's way if our nation's security depends on it. The opposite way of thinking - that nothing is worth the life of a single soldier - is what allowed Hitler to rise, Vietnam to fall, and 9/11 to happen.

Posted by: Cedarford on November 16, 2004 05:26 PM

Cedarford, occasionally you actually sound reasonable.

Posted by: The Black Republican on November 16, 2004 07:40 PM

Cedarford - First I understand that you can't fight a war like Clinton tried to lobbing cruise missiles at the enemy. And yes I know that you have to get down in the dirt and fight the enemy face to face.

Second, I also understand the ratios that we have. I can't even believe you mentioned that. Hello, what do I need a history lesson? I know how many died in Vietnam WWII. Yes, we have excellent ratios compared to those wars.

My point was simply, that if we would have bombed the hell out of them (more than we did) we would have killed a lot more of them, perhaps saving more U.S. lives than we lost. After the bombs are dropped, then we go in and route out the rest of them. And that's just what we did in Falluja. I just wanted to see more bombs fall. But with the U.S. footing the bill for the reconstruction effort that works against them only costing them more in rebuilding.

Posted by: Joseph McLaughlin on November 17, 2004 10:51 AM

Bit of Fallujah satire;

http://blamebush.typepad.com/blamebush/2004/11/httpnewsyahooco.html

Posted by: lauraw on November 18, 2004 11:00 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Recent Comments
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "Nood ONT ..."

mindful webworker - deliver the letter the sooner the better: "So soon the moon he did croon ..."

runner: "@344 the full size one??! ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Who built the moon. ..."

whig: "Might want to hold off on Anthropic, ===== Acti ..."

Tonypete: "Good evening good people. ..."

Anna Puma: "Okay, I have had the Horde on tenterhooks for seve ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "Almost nood time. ..."

Dr. Varno: "'White Otter' is actually a 'brand' of black marke ..."

runner: "I think he is relying on something in the NYT.... ..."

Anna Puma: "These people leak like sieves just for likes. B ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]Stateless, I've said this before but I'll repea ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives