Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Optimistic State Poll Numbers | Main | Polls, Schmolls-- It's All Psychohistory Now, Baby »
November 01, 2004

Tom Wolfe-- Bush Supporter?

Okay, the ascot, the Southern-gentleman throwback style of dress. But I figured that was just an affectation-- archliberal Senator Paul Simon wore a bowtie, after all.

But he, like, gets it:

"Here is an example of the situation in America," he says: "Tina Brown wrote in her column that she was at a dinner where a group of media heavyweights were discussing, during dessert, what they could do to stop Bush. Then a waiter announces that he is from the suburbs, and will vote for Bush. And ... Tina's reaction is: 'How can we persuade these people not to vote for Bush?' I draw the opposite lesson: that Tina and her circle in the media do not have a clue about the rest of the United States. You are considered twisted and retarded if you support Bush in this election. I have never come across a candidate who is so reviled. Reagan was sniggered it, but this is personal, real hatred.

"Indeed, I was at a similar dinner, listening to the same conversation, and said: 'If all else fails, you can vote for Bush.' People looked at me as if I had just said: 'Oh, I forgot to tell you, I am a child molester.' I would vote for Bush if for no other reason than to be at the airport waving off all the people who say they are going to London if he wins again. Someone has got to stay behind."

Where does it come from, this endorsement of the most conservative administration within living memory? Of this president who champions the right and the rich, who has taken America into the mire of war, and seeks re-election tomorrow? Wolfe's eyes resume the expression of detached Southern elegance.

"I think support for Bush is about not wanting to be led by East-coast pretensions. It is about not wanting to be led by people who are forever trying to force their twisted sense of morality onto us, which is a non-morality. That is constantly done, and there is real resentment. Support for Bush is about resentment in the so-called 'red states' - a confusing term to Guardian readers, I agree - which here means, literally, middle America. I come from one of those states myself, Virginia. It's the same resentment, indeed, as that against your own newspaper when it sent emails targeting individuals in an American county." Wolfe laughs as he chastises. "No one cares to have outsiders or foreigners butting into their affairs. I'm sure that even many of those Iraqis who were cheering the fall of Saddam now object to our being there. As I said, I do not think the excursion is going well."

Now, I'm not a huge fan of Tom Wolfe's, though I only read Bonfire of the Vanities (didn't see what all the fuss was about). Maybe I'll have to actually read something of his-- The Right Stuff, he wrote that, right?

I know from a book called The Devil's Candy, about the making of the film Bonfire of the Vanities, that he cared not at all about how they made the movie or whether or not they were faithful to his book; he pretty much just wanted the money.

He just. Could not. Care less. I think his attitude from the start was that they were going to make a terrible movie, so there was no point arguing about anything.

I can sooo respect that.

Huh. Conservative celebrities are like gay celebrities-- you just never can tell.

I'm a Moron Update: Well, my readers were kind enough to, as usual, embarass me for my glaring ignorance. Tom Wolfe's conservatism shouldn't be a surprise, especially given such essays as Radical Chic.

The benefit of being stupid is that you're constantly suprised by life, however.


posted by Ace at 09:03 PM
Comments



I don't think he's the greatest writer ever or anything, but I do like Tom Wolfe. I can also totally respect his attitude towards the filming of BotV. I remember reading stories of Michael Crichton getting pissed off and throwing chairs and storming off the set of "Rising Sun." There's no sense in subjecting yourself to that as a writer. Just cash your check and move on.

Years ago, an interviewer once asked William Faulkner his opinion of what Hollywood had done to his books. "Hollywood hasn't done anything to my books," he answered, indicating the bookshelf behind him. "They're all still right over there."

Posted by: Barry N. Johnson on November 1, 2004 09:17 PM

Ace - I've read a few of Tom Wolfe's books and based on the content could tell he leaned to the right. His support or semi-support of Bush doesn't surprise me, though the fact it's public does. I recommend "A Man in Full" by the way. Long, but worth it.

Posted by: Chris on November 1, 2004 09:20 PM

I'm surprised you didn't know about Wolfe's political predilections, Ace. He's written articles for the American Spectator and The Weekly Standard before, also.

You absolutely MUST do yourself a favor and get your hands on a copy of two of his most famous essays (they basically made his reputation back when he was just starting), which usually come bundled together in one book. The first is called "Radical Chic," and is an utterly devastating documentary disembowelment of the pretentions of the New York liberal elite during the late 60's and its obsession with White Guilt, centering around a benefit party thrown by Leonard Bernstein for the Black Panthers. It's just the most perfectly mean (yet rather po-faced, which is its brilliance) essay you'll have had the pleasure of reading in quite some time. Even back then, when he was writing about Ken Kesey's Merry Pranksters and dropping acid (his first book was The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test, Wolfe fundamentally got it.

The second essay is called "Mau-Mauing the Flak-Catchers," and it mines a similar vein, this time in Oakland, again focusing on the ability of black "activists" (who were clearly obvious frauds, as described by Wolfe) to pressure, outright intimidate, and guilt-trip white liberal government establishment into throwing them piles of money, no strings attached.

Both essays say far more trenchant things about the peculiar state of race-relations in the Democratic party than nearly anything written in the next twenty years. Also: both are quick reads, an hour tops for each.

Posted by: Jeff B. on November 1, 2004 09:24 PM

I didn't love "A Man In Full," but I did enjoy "Bonfire," and it's acerbic take on New York society. I took "The Right Stuff" out of the library a few years ago; let it gather dust and a hefty fine, before returning it unread. Guess I just wasn't in an astronaut place at the time. Maybe I should give it another shot.

Posted by: Scout on November 1, 2004 09:24 PM

Man that Tom Wolfe is one snappy dresser. Thats pretty much all i have to add to this thread.

Posted by: atomic_amish on November 1, 2004 09:29 PM

The first is called "Radical Chic," and is an utterly devastating documentary disembowelment of the pretentions of the New York liberal elite during the late 60's and its obsession with White Guilt

I've read bits of that. I forgot about that essay, but still, just because someone ridicules liberal culture doesn't make him a non-liberal.

Look at Hunter S. Thompson, for example.

I mean, some people are just contrarians. Or pricks.

Posted by: ace on November 1, 2004 09:43 PM

Another excellent book--though its so short it's more like a VERY long magazine article--is "From Bauhaus to Our House." An elegant putdown of modern architectural pretence.

Cordially...

Posted by: Rick on November 1, 2004 10:05 PM

All of Tom’s books are full of insightful observations about American society. And all of his books show that he is a poltical conservative.

Tom Wolfe is America’s greatest writer and I can hardly wait for his new book.

Posted by: Jake on November 1, 2004 10:13 PM

The Right Stuff is a great movie except for the way it treats Gus Grissom. It's ambiguous (and even slightly blaming,) re: the blown hatch. Later NASA investigations prior to the movie (and book,) showed that the hatch did malfunction. Grissom was later selected for the fateful Apollo I mission, proving NASA's faith in him.
The movie is stirring and would be one of my favorites, if not for it's malicious treatment of a great Amercian.

Posted by: Trevor on November 1, 2004 10:15 PM

I read some of Bonfire but I can't remember any of it. I saw the movie The Right Stuff. Based on this, I am qualified to speak authoritatively about Tim Worf.

He is the single most writer that has ever. Furthermore, no other writer can in anyway more that he, as far as you know.

I heard, he ghost wrote "God is Dead" for Nietzsche, but only because Allah hasn't posted anything since the ALCS.

I have a lovely bunch of cocoanuts. Is the election over yet?

Posted by: Dear Johns on November 1, 2004 11:11 PM

Wolfe is a southern boy. An oddly effete one, but he's a writer from Virginia, so there you go. He still knows a war when he sees one, and I'd like to sit around drinking and smoking with him.

Don't bother with MIF. He missed that one by a mile. If you do read MIF, understand that he's severely hating on the Southern aristocrat (a despicable character, no matter who's writing) and there's a lot of collateral damage.

The Right Stuff is brilliance, and you should be ashamed for not having that one under your belt. Hang your head.

Posted by: Scott Chaffin on November 1, 2004 11:31 PM

To follow along with Trevor, I formed a pretty low opinion of the Right Stuff after reading Wolfe's treatment of Grissom. He didn’t panic. After Mercury, NASA picked Grissom for choice assignments, commanding the first Gemini and Apollo flights. Grissom knew that the Apollo flight was exceedingly dangerous and he died in the commander’s seat. He didn’t panic there either. Trevor is right – he was a great American.

Posted by: John on November 2, 2004 01:14 AM

When people ask my politics I often say I'm a Tom Wolfe Republican.

To the pair - Radical Chic and Mau-Mauing - recommended by Jeff B. above, I'd add The Painted Word. He takes modern art down to Chinatown simply by telling the truth about it. The three together make a very nice stiletto thrust into the vitals of modern snobocratic liberalism.

A Tom Wolfe novel and a Dylan autobiography come out within a month of each other and here I am reading blogs all day...

Posted by: Brian on November 2, 2004 02:31 AM

Well, tried as I might to spin my way out of embarassment, it does appear that I ought to have known the man leaned right, but I didn't.

What can I say? I'm a moron.

Posted by: ace on November 2, 2004 02:44 AM

Nah, you were right the first time. Believe me, if faux-populism, say, were the ethic of some puffed up Midwesterners who backed up their beliefs with a sack of horseshit and a smile, Wolfe'd be the first one in line to write a scathing book about it.

He likes bringing folks down a notch or two. (Being a bond trader like Sherman, I have suffered a few of his slings and arrows.) He's no more conservative than a guy like Bill O'Reilly, though he does seem to understand the threat posed by Islamo-nutters.

Posted by: spongeworthy on November 2, 2004 08:52 AM

The effete literati HATE Wolfe, he's been skewering them for years. MUST READ: his essay In the Land of the Rococo Marxists (from Hooking Up), in which he traces the intellectual vacuity of the liberal elite. On Sontag's 1967 Partisan Rvw essay which breathlessly gushed 'The white race is THE cancer of human history':

"Who was this woman? Who & what? An anthropological epidemiologist? A renowned authority on the history of cultures, a synthesizer of the magnitude of Max Weber, a Joachim Wach, a Sir James Frazer, an Arnold Toynbee?

"Actually, she was just another scribbler who spent her life signing up for protest meetings & lumbering to the podium encumbered by her prose style, which had a handicapped sticker valid at Partisan Review. Perhaps she was exceptionally hell-bent on proving Marshall McLuhan's line about indignation endowing the idiot with dignity, but otherwise she was just a typical American intellectual of the post-World War II period."

Posted by: jeff on November 2, 2004 10:07 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
FBI investigating reports of an effort to bomb SpaceX's Boca Chica Starship facility In an interview Friday, he said he was there on the afternoon of Christmas Eve when an SUV pulled up with five male passengers who rolled down their windows to converse. They said they were from the Middle East. “I said something like, ‘What are y’all here for? ’ and the driver said, ‘Oh, we’re here to blow (Starship) up,’ ” Wehrle said. “I just went stone cold, and he said, ‘Oh, I got you. I was joking.’ ” As the conversation went on, though, Wehrle’s visitors said at least three times they were in South Texas to attack Starship. He reported the incident to SpaceX and the sheriff’s office and said he was contacted later by an investigator.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Happy New Year! We discuss the New Orleans Islamic terrorist attack, the stupidity of the current security apparatus, and more!
Election Night, as the taxpayer-funded PBS covered it
Jonathan Capeheart is just a hissing, squealing deflating balloon!
Once again I'll be taking Wednesday and Thursday off, with open threads and cafes, unless there's big news. I'll post on Friday.
Here is an excellent IBD article on Jimmy Carter: Profile In Incompetence. It's a downloadable PDF.
2 Oregon men found dead from exposure in forest while looking for Sasquatch
Nonsense. They were killed by Sasquatch, and Ewoks and Sasquatch are related. Just sayin'. [CBD]
"The notion that CO2 is pollution is absolutely preposterous... The idea that [it's] going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the Earth is totally ludicrous." "But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO2 is pollution, there's no human activity that doesn't result in CO2 emissions.." [dri]
Just to amplify the last entry: We started paying for pay-TV services so that we would not have to watch commercials, and could watch the original uncensored versions of movies.
Amazon and many other pay TV services now force you to watch commercials unless you pay even higher monthly fees, and now we're back to watching the same censored versions of movies we used to see on TBS.
Vandals: Amazon Prime cuts the key scenes in It's a Wonderful Life of George Bailey contemplating suicide
The whole plot of the movie concerns an angel's intervention, showing George what everyone's life would be like without him in it. If you cut the scenes of him thinking about exiting his life, then what is even the point of the movie?
Remember when we naively thought that Bezos and Amazon were generally on the right side of things? How absurd we were.
I re-watched The Name of the Rose this past year on Amazon and noticed that the semi-important scene of Christian Slater's character losing his virginity to a peasant girl were cut out. My thought was that Amazon must be using a cut of the movie shown on TV or something. I don't know if Amazon is aware it is running censored content, or if they're demanding these cuts, or seeking out versions of the film that remove politically-sensitive material. Whatever the reason, they should be ashamed and run the actual movies again. What is the point of any communications platform that engages in censorship?
Via Black Orchid, Nichole Shanahan's thoughts on the tech/H-1B debate
It is nice that we are actually permitted to debate actual policy questions again. You know, like the right guaranteed to Americans in the Constitution as our inalienable birthright, which we had until the past ten years of authoritarian tyranny by the Deep State and intelligence services.
All I want for Christmas is more leftwing fruitcake cope videos
BTW I cued up that video after he played the Don LeMon "Elon is really president" video. I figured you saw that in a prior post. But if you don't read my posts, just go back a couple of minutes to see it.
Recent Comments
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "[i] Now, who's going to be awake at 2am? Posted ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "Mornin' Horde. Bacon, eggs, and coffee time. ..."

Skip : "Capt popped in New Year eve or day maybe, saw ment ..."

JM in Ill -- Behold the Manchurian Candidate: " And my online guide shows that Janssen's 1970s PI ..."

Brother Francis Gerard, Albertian Order of Leibowitz: "[i]Turns out there is a rather simple fix. Skip th ..."

Your Betters: "[i]Gas water heater? Biden admin blasted for move ..."

Skip : "With luck DC is getting snow, nothing here ..."

JM in Ill -- Behold the Manchurian Candidate: " 465 Turns out there is a rather simple fix. S ..."

Ciampino - Si Ispettore, sonoq tutti bastardi: "Repost Great article. https://tinyurl.com/3rmn ..."

Skip : "Time to get rolling ..."

JM in Ill -- Behold the Manchurian Candidate: "426 372 I friggin' love Nick Searcy. In a not-gay ..."

Miflin: "Does anyone have info on a fellow traveler, Captai ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives