Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« Hey, If You Live in South Dakota, You Really Have to Vote | Main | Pat Caddell: Undecideds Go For the Incumbent »
October 27, 2004

Ann Coulter Speaks (Kinda)

Actually, she responds to an email interview; for some crazy reason, she doesn't trust the liberal media to print her answers accurately.

Some good stuff, some vintage Ann, but I liked this especially:

Q: Why don't you convert to libertarianism? You and John Stossel could get married and save America.

A: Libertarians are potheads posing as right-wingers. But John Stossel is a fine fellow. I just don't think I could go along with working "give me a break" into the wedding vows.

Yup-yup. Libertarians are nice people and all, but seriously, a political philosophy has to be built on a more vigorous intellectual foundation than Weeeeeeeeeeeed! Weeeeed! Weed, man! Weeeeeeeeed!

I mean, seriously. Conservativism goes back to John Stuart Mill, Edmund Burke. People like that. Big thinkers.

Near as I can tell, libertarianism was born after a midnight showing of Cheech & Chong's Nice Dreams.

And reliable sources inform me that most votes for a libertarian candidate are cast due to losing a bar bet of some sort.

Come on, libertarians. Straighten up. Fly right. Come in on the winning team for the big win.


posted by Ace at 02:15 AM
Comments



Uh, Ace, why didn't this turn up first on your blog?

Posted by: someone on October 27, 2004 02:27 AM

With your cries of "Weeeed!" I thought you were channeling Bill & Ben, not Cheech & Chong.

Posted by: Pixy Misa on October 27, 2004 05:56 AM

Damn, I guess that means my chances of getting a more conspicuous link are down the shitter.

I didn't register as a Libertarian- I just voted that way. ish.

Posted by: thebastidge on October 27, 2004 06:25 AM

You and Coulter couldn't be more right about Libertarians, at least the ones in my state. All they care about is changing cannabis laws. Oh, one guy is obsessed with banning the draft, and seems to have made it his mission in life. I mean, he was trying to get laws passed forbidding it in the 90's.

Posted by: Moonbat_One on October 27, 2004 06:46 AM

Ha! Well said, Ace. And as for the two-party system, I posit most wars are not three-sided affairs. Michael Moore, a hungry beefalo, and a plateful of tacos? That's a three-sided affair.

Posted by: Velociman on October 27, 2004 07:08 PM

Um, Ace, John Stuart Mill was a libertarian.

David Hume, now there's a good atheist conservative for you.

You're right about the pot thing, though.

Posted by: See-Dubya on October 27, 2004 07:08 PM

I always liked the definition of a libertarian as "A Republican without the morals." I think that sums up my political philosophy rather well.

Posted by: francisthegreat on October 27, 2004 07:25 PM

There's a big difference between _l_ibertarians, and _L_ibertarians.

Mainly, the little ell folk vote sanely. And I'd call Ann Rand one of the leading lights - though they're calling AnnRandism 'Objectivism' or something.

And francis - I don't think it's without _all_ the morals. Personal property rights/self-defense and a few others can be considered 'morals'.

Posted by: Al on October 27, 2004 09:28 PM

I'm with See-Dubya, Mill was a libertarian. He made me into a Libertarian.

Look, Ann is right that we Libertarians need to talk less about drug legalization. It's but one part of the Libertarian platform, and a fairly unpopular one at that.

For the record, I ran for state house as a Libertarian, but I'm voting for Bush because the Libertarian Party is wrong on the war on terror.

Posted by: libertarianjim on October 28, 2004 12:22 AM

Libertarians are not conservatives. They are not liberals. They are not moderates/statists.

http://lawgovpol.blogspot.com/2004/09/political-philosophies.html

Posted by: Niffur on October 28, 2004 12:40 AM

Since folks are talking libertarianism here: check out this long letter to an undecided libertarian blogger from Ohio. HD Miller (at Travellingshoes.blogspot.com) linked to it a couple days ago:

http://fladenexp.blogspot.com/2004/10/clint-taylor-elliot-you-better-vote.html


Posted by: See-Dubya on October 28, 2004 01:15 AM

I used to like Ann Coulter but lately she has made some stupid remarks and her latest libertarian remarks show what schmuck she really is. What did Bush say "I once tried blow but I didn't like the smell" rofl. Yes legalization is but one of their many rational ideas. Comming soon to a theater near you: Bush Vs. Kerry - Who ever wins, we lose.

Posted by: gothpunkr on October 28, 2004 10:59 AM

Libertarianjim said==>Libertarian Party is wrong on the war on terror. Really? America's imperialist policty is guaranteed to result in terror just as every imperialist entity throughout history has experienced terror. Why do we support the Saudi Royal Family? Money and Oil. Lets get all of our troops out of Saudi Arabia I personally could give a crap where the price of gas goes, its cheap as hell inflation adjusted here at $50/barrel (was $80/barrel during first gulf war in adjusted dollars).

Posted by: gothpunkr on October 28, 2004 11:10 AM

One wouldn't expect coherent arguments from someone who uses the s/n "gothpunkr."

And one would be absolutely right.

Posted by: zetetic on October 28, 2004 11:24 AM

Of course your use of the "ad hominem" invalidates your views. Your a putz but not in an ad hominem sort of way.

Posted by: gothpunkr on October 28, 2004 12:16 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
If you think that Brattleboro's reputation is unfounded, here is their selectboard meeting [CBD]
Three good short essays from our very own RI Red: Let's Talk, More Talk, and Even More Talk. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: J.J. Sefton and CBD discuss the outrageous denial of legitimate, constitutionally-mandated federal activity by the blue states, China's army is purged, the Democrat playbook never changes, the Donroe Doctrine, 20cm artillery shells, and more!
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast:Jim Lakely of The Heartland Institute joins us for a wide-ranging discussion of Heartland's recent Anti-Davos initiative: The World Prosperity Forum. We also discuss MN's all-encompassing graft, free markets as an antidote to misery, the truth behind the ICE riots in Minneapolis, and more!
A new account spotlights Candace Owens attempting to read the stupid words Candace Owens wrote for her teleprompter scripts
We need to do more gatekeeping in this movement. This "Big Tent" idea is gay and retarded.
The account is so funny it's racist
"legititimize"
When Candace Owens comes across a word she doesn't know how to pronounce, she must consult this resource
NASA Set to Launch First Manned Moon Rocket in 50 Years
Or they're just going to call an Uber. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk about insurrection in MN coming to NYC? Trump's Greenland rhetoric was over the top, the Gaza Peace Panel is anything but, Minnesota churchgoers need to step up, and is it possible that if the Persian people toss out the Mullahs they will begin a Muslim reformation?
Judge Bars LAPD's Use of Less-Lethal Foam Bullets on Protesters
Judicial Overreach example #62,904. What law was broken? [CBD]
Long-time Coblogger and commenter "Niedermeyer's Dead Horse" is having significant health issues, and would appreciate the thoughts and prayers of The Horde. If you wish to reach out, use @NiedsG on X/Twitter. [CBD]
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv

30m

JUST IN - DOJ investigating Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for conspiracy to impede immigration agents -- CBS
Recent Comments
BarelyScaryMary: "ONT ..."

JohnFNotKerry: "top ten? ..."

Gunslinger: "That extremely beautiful Amaryllis pic… Grr ..."

SuperCountyJudgeCandidateSuperRonNirenberg-Buffest Hack Politician Ever: "Thank you moviegique for an always enjoyable and i ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "I'd have been here sooner but I couldn't find the ..."

Pug Mahon, Rock 'n' Roll Martian: "Last movie I saw in the theater was one of them bu ..."

Accomack : "Yep ..."

BarelyScaryMary: "Saturday ONT, yay! ..."

nurse ratched: "Whoohoo! LETS GO SEAHAWKS! ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: " shitweasels ..."

Blanco Basura - Z28.310 [/i] [/b] [/u] [/s]: "Yay, ONT! ..."

Blue retard: "World Championships are more coveted by athletes t ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives