Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Andrew "Less Than Zero" McCarthy Lights Up the New York Times | Main | Hey, If You Live in South Dakota, You Really Have to Vote »
October 27, 2004

Coming Soon... The Coveted Ace of Spades HQ Endorsement For President

As most of you know, I have been, like Andrew Sullivan, a confirmed "independent eagle" on the question of who should be the next President. Much like my guiding muse Mr. Sullivan, I have been posed on the knife's edge between endorsing Bush, endorsing Kerry, or not endorsing any candidate at all.

Yes, it's a three-edged knife. That's how complicated my decision has been. Don't nit-pick, dick.

I have watched with great fascination at Andrew Sullivan's difficult wrestling with this key question. It's been so difficult to divine precisely where he'd come down on the issue; and so it has been too, for me. Yes, I did give an interview to Al Goldstein's Screw magazine in which I said I could never, ever support John Kerry as a heterosexual man who retains full use of his balls and spine; but that was for a different audience. You musn't take that as some sort of early judgment on the issue.

I have been straight with you. I said I was undecided, and I remain undecided. I'm "undecided" in the sense that I haven't yet announced my decision. Sort of like Oliver Willis just before he gets to the order-taker at McDonald's.

And, like Andrew Sullivan, my independent-minded, non-partisan struggle with the issue has caused me to lose some of my more knee-jerkedly partisan readers. The Batman, for example. (If that is his real name.)

Yes, The Batman still occasionally shows up to taunt me in my moment of doubt, but does he ever give me a "You go girl" or even a "Ohhh, snap! No you didn't!" ? Well, let me assure you, he does not. And it stings.

As a straight man living in New York City, my occasional defenses of President Bush have caused me a great deal of heart-ache in the social circles I run in. Just the other day I was out with the girls for a mani-pedi, and just as I was having my callouses buffed, I accidentally said, "Is it just me, or does Karen Hughes seem to have a pretty nice rack on her?" Well, I was just about ostracized from the group entirely; somehow my invite to Sandy's The O.C. season-debut viewing party went "missing."

Missing? Or just vindictively sent to Joanie instead, who thinks she's all that, but she ain'?

But all this Hamlet-like vacillation on the issue must come to an end, I fear.

I don't want to give away my decision, but look, if you're a John Kerry supporter who just comes here for the discussions about Billy Squire and Streets of Fire, maybe you ought to send in your donation now, rather than just putting it off until tomorrow.

Oh, not for any reason. It's just that you don't want to be a Procrastinating Paula, right? No one likes that.

Also, if George Soros is about to offer me some cash to pimp for the liberal Senator from Massachusetts engage in some spirited analysis that contributes to a return to American greatness, maybe we ought to get those contracts signed quick, huh?

At any rate, it's time for me, like the brave Andrew Sullivan, to make my own courageous and utterly unpredictable endorsement. I hope you will understand the gutsy choice I find myself forced to make.

Update: I think Mrs. Jeff Goldstein has the right attitude on Mr. Sullivan.

Then again, maybe not. I can't make up my mind. What is a Guiliani-Schwarzenegger-McCain-Peter Allen independent eagle to think of all this?

Questions, questions.


posted by Ace at 01:33 AM
Comments



Ace--

I question your timing.

BTW, permit me the opportunity to use your esteemed web publication to announce my endorsement for President, 2004:

Mr. Matt Hooker.

http://www.matthooker.com/

Not only is he just the kind of insanity we need, his brand of pure leftist/Venusian insanity skips straight to the punch. No need to take that watered-down corporatist rhetoric of Ralph Nader.

Besides, the best thing about Matt Hooker? HE STALKED NICOLE KIDMAN.

Oh, he says he didn't stalk her, of course. He says it's all a Zionist plot by the Jewish lobby.

I am not making this up.

But hey, there was a nice tidy court case a few years back, and he's been milking the free publicity ever since.

I think it's time we voted Matt Hooker for President.

Or hell, how about T.J. Hooker? Or Matt Houston?

Man, I miss Lee Horsley. . . he was a hunk of burning love.

Cheers,
Dave

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 27, 2004 02:09 AM

Smart ass. BTW, I know you're on the Kim Richards kick, but Nicole Kidman is the ultimate female specimen. My wife doesn't even give me shit when I say that because it's so true. I just mentioned it to her again tonight when we saw an ad for her new movie in which she has very short hair. This (the haircut) is a goddamn crime against humanity and John Kerry should pay for it on Nov 2.

Posted by: Dear Johns on October 27, 2004 02:29 AM

Hey Johns, I take it you didn't see poor Kidman in "The Stepford Wives." Her recent, obvious cosmetic surgery had the skin around her eyes pulled so tightly behind her head that she looked positively Asian. As for the body type, IMO I think the waifish, emaciated look is only preferable when you have to sit next to someone in Coach. And evidently, unless you're a complete weenie like Tom Cruise -- and I don't think any person who reads this blog could possibly be -- your chances of attracting her attention just aren't very good.

But I'm a chick, so what do I know? Heh, I know enough to say that Catherine Zeta-Jones is HOT even tho her taste in men stinks, too.

Posted by: bbeck on October 27, 2004 10:00 AM

Meow.

Seriously, no , I didn't see Stepford Wives. But I thought the whole point to that movie involved producing an improved version of wives. One of the reasons I didn't go see it was that the notion of producing an improved version of Kidman was silly. I can't image what they needed to do to make her look plain or sub-perfect.

Zeta-Jones is beautiful but Selma Hayek is far better. Anyway, I'm a slave to the beauty of Celtic and Nordic women, both in visage and temperment. They're like living fire. It's genetic for me. Maureen O'Hara is the model. Kidman broke it. Boy, I miss the young Teri Garr.

Posted by: Dear Johns on October 27, 2004 06:25 PM

Aren't you about eight months late pimping your endorsement? Say what you will about Andrew Sullivan, but the man knows the tease! He plays the slatternly coquette better than Elizabeth Beridge in "Amadeus"

Posted by: Jimmie on October 27, 2004 07:39 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "SO...Starmer is getting his ass kicked. Nice. ..."

...: "Posted by: nurse ratched at May 07, 2026 09:38 PM ..."

mikeski: "[i]ace is sort of updating it in the Side Bar Pos ..."

...: "Fetterman should change his name to Will Fetterman ..."

The rest of Tennessee: "[i]167 The left has killed itself through mal-educ ..."

runner: "ace is sort of updating it in the Side Bar ..."

runner: "Labour is having a very very very bad night! ..."

clarence: "GIB = Guy in Back or in this case Goober in Back. ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: " The left has killed itself through mal-education ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I don't allow my kids on social media. I guess the ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: " May I please ask for prayers for Zoe. Her gran ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I just heard a cool saying on an old episode of Wa ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives