Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Andrew "Less Than Zero" McCarthy Lights Up the New York Times | Main | Hey, If You Live in South Dakota, You Really Have to Vote »
October 27, 2004

Coming Soon... The Coveted Ace of Spades HQ Endorsement For President

As most of you know, I have been, like Andrew Sullivan, a confirmed "independent eagle" on the question of who should be the next President. Much like my guiding muse Mr. Sullivan, I have been posed on the knife's edge between endorsing Bush, endorsing Kerry, or not endorsing any candidate at all.

Yes, it's a three-edged knife. That's how complicated my decision has been. Don't nit-pick, dick.

I have watched with great fascination at Andrew Sullivan's difficult wrestling with this key question. It's been so difficult to divine precisely where he'd come down on the issue; and so it has been too, for me. Yes, I did give an interview to Al Goldstein's Screw magazine in which I said I could never, ever support John Kerry as a heterosexual man who retains full use of his balls and spine; but that was for a different audience. You musn't take that as some sort of early judgment on the issue.

I have been straight with you. I said I was undecided, and I remain undecided. I'm "undecided" in the sense that I haven't yet announced my decision. Sort of like Oliver Willis just before he gets to the order-taker at McDonald's.

And, like Andrew Sullivan, my independent-minded, non-partisan struggle with the issue has caused me to lose some of my more knee-jerkedly partisan readers. The Batman, for example. (If that is his real name.)

Yes, The Batman still occasionally shows up to taunt me in my moment of doubt, but does he ever give me a "You go girl" or even a "Ohhh, snap! No you didn't!" ? Well, let me assure you, he does not. And it stings.

As a straight man living in New York City, my occasional defenses of President Bush have caused me a great deal of heart-ache in the social circles I run in. Just the other day I was out with the girls for a mani-pedi, and just as I was having my callouses buffed, I accidentally said, "Is it just me, or does Karen Hughes seem to have a pretty nice rack on her?" Well, I was just about ostracized from the group entirely; somehow my invite to Sandy's The O.C. season-debut viewing party went "missing."

Missing? Or just vindictively sent to Joanie instead, who thinks she's all that, but she ain'?

But all this Hamlet-like vacillation on the issue must come to an end, I fear.

I don't want to give away my decision, but look, if you're a John Kerry supporter who just comes here for the discussions about Billy Squire and Streets of Fire, maybe you ought to send in your donation now, rather than just putting it off until tomorrow.

Oh, not for any reason. It's just that you don't want to be a Procrastinating Paula, right? No one likes that.

Also, if George Soros is about to offer me some cash to pimp for the liberal Senator from Massachusetts engage in some spirited analysis that contributes to a return to American greatness, maybe we ought to get those contracts signed quick, huh?

At any rate, it's time for me, like the brave Andrew Sullivan, to make my own courageous and utterly unpredictable endorsement. I hope you will understand the gutsy choice I find myself forced to make.

Update: I think Mrs. Jeff Goldstein has the right attitude on Mr. Sullivan.

Then again, maybe not. I can't make up my mind. What is a Guiliani-Schwarzenegger-McCain-Peter Allen independent eagle to think of all this?

Questions, questions.


posted by Ace at 01:33 AM
Comments



Ace--

I question your timing.

BTW, permit me the opportunity to use your esteemed web publication to announce my endorsement for President, 2004:

Mr. Matt Hooker.

http://www.matthooker.com/

Not only is he just the kind of insanity we need, his brand of pure leftist/Venusian insanity skips straight to the punch. No need to take that watered-down corporatist rhetoric of Ralph Nader.

Besides, the best thing about Matt Hooker? HE STALKED NICOLE KIDMAN.

Oh, he says he didn't stalk her, of course. He says it's all a Zionist plot by the Jewish lobby.

I am not making this up.

But hey, there was a nice tidy court case a few years back, and he's been milking the free publicity ever since.

I think it's time we voted Matt Hooker for President.

Or hell, how about T.J. Hooker? Or Matt Houston?

Man, I miss Lee Horsley. . . he was a hunk of burning love.

Cheers,
Dave

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 27, 2004 02:09 AM

Smart ass. BTW, I know you're on the Kim Richards kick, but Nicole Kidman is the ultimate female specimen. My wife doesn't even give me shit when I say that because it's so true. I just mentioned it to her again tonight when we saw an ad for her new movie in which she has very short hair. This (the haircut) is a goddamn crime against humanity and John Kerry should pay for it on Nov 2.

Posted by: Dear Johns on October 27, 2004 02:29 AM

Hey Johns, I take it you didn't see poor Kidman in "The Stepford Wives." Her recent, obvious cosmetic surgery had the skin around her eyes pulled so tightly behind her head that she looked positively Asian. As for the body type, IMO I think the waifish, emaciated look is only preferable when you have to sit next to someone in Coach. And evidently, unless you're a complete weenie like Tom Cruise -- and I don't think any person who reads this blog could possibly be -- your chances of attracting her attention just aren't very good.

But I'm a chick, so what do I know? Heh, I know enough to say that Catherine Zeta-Jones is HOT even tho her taste in men stinks, too.

Posted by: bbeck on October 27, 2004 10:00 AM

Meow.

Seriously, no , I didn't see Stepford Wives. But I thought the whole point to that movie involved producing an improved version of wives. One of the reasons I didn't go see it was that the notion of producing an improved version of Kidman was silly. I can't image what they needed to do to make her look plain or sub-perfect.

Zeta-Jones is beautiful but Selma Hayek is far better. Anyway, I'm a slave to the beauty of Celtic and Nordic women, both in visage and temperment. They're like living fire. It's genetic for me. Maureen O'Hara is the model. Kidman broke it. Boy, I miss the young Teri Garr.

Posted by: Dear Johns on October 27, 2004 06:25 PM

Aren't you about eight months late pimping your endorsement? Say what you will about Andrew Sullivan, but the man knows the tease! He plays the slatternly coquette better than Elizabeth Beridge in "Amadeus"

Posted by: Jimmie on October 27, 2004 07:39 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Ireland's 'Air Force One' lacks a key safety system for fog -- thanks to country's ban on Israeli products
Ireland's best emigrated 150 years ago. The current Ireland is a sad joke. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: More Iran bluster from Trump? Enough! Deportations hit a record, and that is a good thing for all, Todd Blanche's nomination is out of committee, the DSA is on the march, and more!
The Short Unhappy Life of a Russian Soldier: Why recruits die in 20-30 minutes
Interesting video. Some key parts: drones were responsible for 70-80% of all battlefield deaths in mid-2025, and I bet it's higher now. The Russian army is incredibly corrupt. Men get assigned to the most dangerous frontline units, the "Storm" units, unless they pay a superior $2,000 to be assigned to a different unit. Furthermore, there is often no real training for recruits -- commanders pocket the money that would have gone towards fuel and ammo costs incurred during training. Much "training" consists just of taking a single picture of soldiers doing something soldier-y, like fording a river, and publishing that as proof that the training was done. Even when it is done, training is only two weeks long.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the Berlin attack, Iran...Again! Sefton's mini Odyssey review, Data Republican's blockbuster reveal about the DNC, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
She's totally committed to major independence
She's a lady through and through
She gives them quite a battle, all that they can handle
She'll bruise some, she'll hurt some too
I got something done yesterday and am exhausted.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky
[CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Illegals registered and voted in NJ! Leftist violence is baked into the Democrat cake, Iran's capabilities are being degraded, Londonistan? And...come on SC...no senate dynasties!
Update to the video of a Russian soldier being spun around and thrown by the machinegun he was operating: The soldier was testing an old, archaic Russian machinegun intended to be mounted to a helicopter. The old gun was pressed into service as a possible anti-drone gun. The Russian army is generally depleted and being forced to bring a lot of old, unreliable weapons and platforms to the front.
Also: Ukranian drones have destroyed damaged [CBD] over 147 Russian warships and shadow fleet oil tankers in the Black Sea over the past ten days.
Top Men!
FDA is providing an update regarding the sample of lettuce supplied by Taylor Farms de Mexico which was reported positive on July 18, 2026. Due to the complexity in detection of Cyclospora, FDA laboratory experts re-reviewed the sample results and have concluded that the finding does not represent true amplification and should be considered a false positive. Information about the sample has been removed from the July 18, 2026, update below. FDA has notified Taylor Farms and continues working with the firm to ensure product implicated in this outbreak has been removed from the market. FDA and state partners continue to collect and analyze product samples. As of July 19, 2026, there are no confirmed positive sample results for product testing for Cyclospora.
[CBD]
FEDERAL APPEALS COURT STRIKES DOWN NJ "ASSAULT WEAPONS" BAN/MAGAZINE BAN! Let's see if it reverts to the previous 15 round limit or I can actually run my weapons as God intended! [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Trump Slaps Mullin down; he wants the auto stops to continue, we need employment enforcement at our big corporations, The gerontocracy in the Senate, the Iranian junta is true to form, but Trump responds forcefully, and more!
Recent Comments
Rodrigo Borgia: "The F-22 Raptors out of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richa ..."

San Franpsycho: "/Flip Wilson sock off ..."

Jed, Earl of Clampett: "I reckon we gonna put off that visit to Castle Cla ..."

Frank Barone: " Too many out of staters are in Texas now. They b ..."

Skip: "Good evening everyone ..."

Geraldine Jones: "10-punkte-Programm ..."

Delurker: "Carlson's manifesto is pretty much what I expected ..."

Don Black: "The devil made him buy that dress. ..."

Frank Barone: " Flip Wilson > Rue Paul ..."

New York Mohel: "[i]Do Texan mohels yell “yee-HAW” at t ..."

ChristyBlinkyTheGreat: "Is it me or have people gone more insane this summ ..."

Eromero: "92 If everyone is a faction, then no one is a fact ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives