| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Daily News Stuff 6 April 2026
Sunday Overnight Open Thread - April 5, 2026 [Doof] Gun Thread: Happy Easter Edition! Food Thread: Lamb Or Ham, Sam I Am First World Problems... Solid Jobs Report With A Delicious Bonus! Tousi TV: Second F-15 Pilot Rescued as Iranian Civilians Aid American Operation to Rescue Him Sunday Morning Book Thread - 4-5-2026 ["Perfessor" Squirrel] “WE GOT HIM!” – Shot Down Airman Rescued by US Forces in Iran Daily Tech News 5 April 2026 Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Real Clear Politics: Bush Leads Electoral Count, But He's Not Over 270 |
Main
| "Dear Limey Assholes:" Tim Blair Gets Results »
October 18, 2004
What's the Deal With Texas Democrats?Has anyone else noticed this? We've all become familiar with various varieties of liberals, but Texas Democrats -- such as Bill Burkett and his promoter Dan Rather -- seem to be a stridently partisan and nasty breed. The Weekly Standard examines the heart of lunatic Texas liberal partisanship-- the city of Austin: ...Austin is, as Jeff says, the "anti-Texas," where "Texans who don't really like Texas" choose to live. More important, it has also, in a larger sense, exported its own peculiar brand of Bush hatred to Democrats from one coast to the other. I think that idea-- "Texans who don't really like Texas" -- explains 50% of politics, and 90% of liberal politics. People vote against whatever party seems more comfortable with the sort of people who gave them grief (real or imagined) as teenagers. For every Blaine from Pretty in Pink that exists in the real world, there are now a dozen committed liberals. Thanks a lot for that, Blaine. Maybe if you hadn't been such a prick to Ducky we wouldn't have had to suffer through two terms of Clinton. Liberals from the coastal cities aren't quite as nasty, or flat-out lunatic, as Texas Democrats seem to be. And maybe that's because coastal liberals are more smug and self-satisfied with their liberalism -- living as they do in a reassuring liberal bubble-- while Texas liberals, on the other hand, are not protected by any such bubble. Unlike their San Fransisco correligionists, they feel threatened and marginalized, and are determined to lash out -- thuggishly, if necessary -- against their perceived oppressors. Pauline Kael famously pronounced that no one she knew voted for Nixon, even as he managed a landslide victory in 1972. New York liberals get to remain blissfully ignorant that a little more than half the country considers their politics daft and dangerous, while Texas liberals have the evidence of that rubbed in their noses every day. And there's a reason Texas liberals feel so marginalized. Because they are: Yet the feeling that runs through Texas liberalism--the feeling of being besieged, outgunned, impotent if not hopeless--is well-founded. Even paranoids are sometimes on to something. For nearly a century, Texas liberals shared the majority party in Texas, the Democratic party, with conservatives. It was an uneasy alliance but it satisfied both factions with separate spheres of influence. No more. The good news for Texas progressives is that they've finally purged the Democratic party of right-wingers and now have it all to themselves. The bad news is that the party is roughly the size of a well-attended kegger. And it promises to stay that way for the next generation. Jim Hightower, Molly Ivins, Dan Rather, Bill Burkett-- the lot of them are all just fucking bananas, driven crazy by an unsettlingly-quick loss of political power and by their own personal antichrist, George Walker Bush. They really ought to just get themselves a nice hobby to occupy their time instead of always making right jackasses out of themselves. Self-Promoting Update! Dummocrats.com riffs off by Blaine comments and coins a new term: Pretty in Pink Democrats. Not to be confused with Footloose liberals, liberals who are convinced that this really is 1952 and America is in danger of having John Lithgow take away their right to dance. Also not to be confused with Dead Zone liberals, who wake up with night-terrors at the thought of a Republican President praying to God and then nuking the world like the mutants from Beneath the Planet of the Apes. Creepy atonal organ music features prominently in these nightmares, as do frequent flashes of James Fransiscus' little white ass.
posted by Ace at 03:43 AM
CommentsAustin turned out Stevie Ray Vaughn. It can't be ALL bad. Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer on October 18, 2004 04:13 AM
"Liberals from the coastal cities aren't quite as nasty, or flat-out lunatic, as Texas Democrats seem to be." That has not been my experience, after living on both coasts as well as in the middle. Though not Texas. Posted by: See Dubya on October 18, 2004 04:45 AM
I lived in Austin for 10 years. I love the place and I miss it terribly. It's pretty and warm and great for hiking and movies and has great music and food and Barton Springs. But everything in this article is true. Did you see "Slacker"? Well, then. Posted by: Yehudit on October 18, 2004 05:05 AM
I had a college friend who moved from San Fransisco to Austin, and he found Austin to be Hell on Earth. He has since moved back to SF, where he's working in financial services. I think that tells you a little bit about Austin. That's all I have to say. Posted by: Sean M. on October 18, 2004 06:10 AM
We call it our very own Berkley here in TX. You're 100% right about Texas Dems - they're crazier than shithouse rats. Posted by: Rachel on October 18, 2004 07:37 AM
Having spent considerable time in Texas, I concur. I found Texans to be perhaps the most patriotic people in this county. Although, one wonders, are they patriotic towards America or to Texas. The answer is both, but Texas would come first...and I have no problem with that. (they have a saying down there, you can become an American, but you have to be born a Texan) That must be a driving factor in the liberal's nutty-ness. That unwavering sense of loyalty and pride that Texans have to State and Country that liberals find so, so primal and ignorant. Posted by: sonofnixon on October 18, 2004 08:40 AM
Having grown up in Austin, I can attest that 100% of the article is correct. Fortunately, I escaped, but sadly, my mom and sister did not. They are stuck in this hell. Of course, in true liberal fashion, many of them are hypocrites. I knew people that had never in their entire lives voted for a Republican. Publicly, they said all the right things. Privately, I heard them make fun of minorities in the exact same way they accuse Republicans of doing. They saw nothing wrong with the city council authorizing benefits for unmarried (read: same-sex) couples but went bonkers when the taxpayers rose up and rebelled against it and demanded a vote. Personally, I think most of the people in that area really don't care. However, the radicals have hijacked so many aspects of the society that they just get tired of fighting back all the time. In the South, the Democratic party still holds power at the local level. Too many people remember the days when the Southern Democrats were the most conservative bunch going. Over time, many of them have learned that it is not the case any more. They have switched allegiance to the Republicans. As the article pointed out, Tecas elected it's first Republican governor since Reconsruction in 1978. In the 26 years since then, the governor has been a Democrat for only 8. The Austin Democrats just don't get it. Posted by: Steve L. on October 18, 2004 08:44 AM
I found the "Liberals from the coastal cities aren't quite as nasty" impossible to believe, until I realized that I don't really know any Austin liberals personally. So it's quite possible they are a psychosis beyond my imagination. The more experienced comments seem to back you up. Posted by: The Black Republican on October 18, 2004 08:51 AM
The sense of entitlement that Dems have regarding their "right" to control the U.S. House of Representatives pales in comparison to that of Texas Dems -- mainly because until recently they totally controlled the state and ran unopposed for decades. The older FDR and LBJ "yellow dogs" are dying out and most of sensible Dems have switched over to the Republican side, leaving a high concentration of moonbats -- kind of like the sludge in Barton Springs Pool after the creek floods. Like elections, you put up with the inconvenience of draining the pool periodically to power wash away the sludge and then it's back to a constant 68 degrees and crystal clear. Posted by: capitano on October 18, 2004 08:59 AM
Ok...as a Texan in San Antonio which is as you know a spit from Austin I have a suggestion I have offered over and over to fellow Texans. The source of this hideous liberal nonsense is in fact Austin as you point out. Before all the left coast silicon valley guys started infecting Austin it was not so bad. See, those hideous California genetics have tainted the dna here. Most of the Dems here were in fact Union guys working within the oil and petrochemical industries. How do you think Jack Brooks managed to get reelected for over 40 years. BTW that was my home district at the time and you could not have unseated that old fart with dynamite. In the end he cut his own throat and voted for gun control legislation. Where I grew up you can't throw a dead cat without hitting a hunter. My suggestion to deal with the Austin problem is a wall. If we built a wall around Austin it would contain the outbreak. Starve em out. It is the only way! Posted by: Jennifer on October 18, 2004 09:17 AM
The Dems aren't just marginalized in the state - they're getting marginalized within the area. Williamson County and Round Rock to the north are well-known in the region as a strong conservative area. Northwest Austin was just added to a strong conservative district in the redistricting that took place. And where are the high-growth areas in the Austin metro area? That's right, north and northwest. There will always be a liberal stronghold in the central city - the combination of the University of Texas and the union state workers will ensure that. The problem is that the outlying regions have been unwilling to assert themselves in local politics. As a result, the city government continues to lean way to the left. However, there is hope that the city's mismanagement of the regional transportation plans will inspire a bit of a shift to the right. Not much hope, but some. Posted by: Ross on October 18, 2004 09:29 AM
I work in Austin and live in the suburbs. I've pretty much grown up here, although I did spend a few years in college at Texas A&M. The politics in this town are a tremendous boil on the ass of the great state of Texas. Sadly, Austin is an island of lunacy in a sea of otherwise good folks. However, things are looking up. Travis County is the heart of the liberal cancer, but the fastest growth in the area is taking place in Williamson County to the north, which is a steadfast Republican stronghold. Also, the wacked-out "Keep Austin Weird" lefties here are aging rapidly. Austin will always be an anomaly - the presence of the University [sic] of Texas and the Texas Legislature ensures that - but things may be changing. At least I hope so, but it will take another 30 years for this place to even come close to resembling the rest of Texas politically. But hey, Protest Warrior has set up shop here, so that's good. Posted by: Scott on October 18, 2004 09:37 AM
I live in Texas and the only Democrats left in the state are San Francisco style liberal freaks. They have lost power in this state (not one state wide elected pol)and they are just completely losing it. A Texas Democrat is somewhat akin to those protestors that crash G8 summits. They are mean, they are nasty, and they all live together in Austin. Posted by: Robert on October 18, 2004 09:57 AM
The article is spot-on. The seige mentality among the Lefties is not only omnipresent in Austin, but they wear it as a badge of honor. It is like music -- Austin is filled with people who have spent their whole lives telling people that they "listed to [insert band here] before they became popular." That self-selected misfit-ostracism is summed up in the pro-local-business bumper sticker campaign that Scott mentioned: "Keep Austin Weird." I had planned to make a rival bumper sticker: "Force Austin to Become Normal," but we moved away before I got around to it. I grew up in San Antonio, went to school at UT, and lived in Austin for a while as an adult. Having moved back there after a considerable absence, I noticed immediately the intense anti-Republican, anti-conservative vibe. My perspective shifted when I transitioned from school to work. As a student, I never ventured much from the student enclaves, and I naturally suffered from a soft-headed, namby-pamby kind of juvenile liberalism. That all ended when I became an adult. But Central Austin is the land that time forgot. The biggest cultural factor is, of course, the University. It attracts an academic set from around the country. Academics are just grad students with less hair. You should not be surprised if you hear French being spoken (loudly) in the French cheese aisle at the grocery store, the fucking posers. Posted by: George on October 18, 2004 10:07 AM
Another Austinite here.. (now living in LA though). Yup its all true.. Not one wrong comment on this thread about Austin.. I grew up in South Austin (most liberal part) and I was infected early on. It took me nearly 30 years to shake that nasty liberal mentality, but I do credit that time in my life for my particularly strong libertarian positions today. The rest of my life will be a sustained backlash against the desperate stupidity that surrounded me as a kid.. as nasty and pathetic as Austin Liberals are, they are fun as hell to get drunk with. Sooner or later, like me, they wake up. (however judging from the geriatric condition of the bulk of the people in those "I'm sorry Saddam" pictures, I could be wrong. Arvin Posted by: Arvin on October 18, 2004 11:18 AM
Liberals from the coastal cities aren't quite as nasty, or flat-out lunatic, as Texas Democrats seem to be. "AHhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahannnnnnnnnnope," he corrected, kindly, from the god-forsaken liberal abscess better known (and justly ridiculed, worldwide) as "Seattle." Posted by: Kent on October 18, 2004 11:23 AM
Geez Ace-- way to start using John Hughes analogies to describe lefty politics. Too bad I beat you to the punch: http://garfieldridge.blogspot.com/2004_09_26_garfieldridge_archive.html Cheers, Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 18, 2004 11:33 AM
Ace: you know and I know which specific bit of '80s iconography, really and truly, is most perfectly suited to pithy analogizings of rote, braindead liberal bleatings: Mark. Alan. JJ. Nina. Martha. The original MTV Veejays. :) Posted by: Kent on October 18, 2004 11:41 AM
'Nother Austinite here. I was born and raised there until I went to college. The liberalism there (to a kid growing up, anyway) is like water to a fish. You have some sense that it's there, but you can't quite see it because it's too pervasive. I just knew that 'reality' didn't quite hold together. It took a decade or so of self-deprogramming to get my brain well ordered. All those years being brainwashed *did* teach me how to blend in with liberals, though I prefer not to. Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic on October 18, 2004 12:37 PM
This is the danger of a minority party without any real responsibilities. As some have pointed out, there is a line over which Bush could not go during the debates to defend himself because he actually has to govern. For instance, he couldn't properly defend himself on Iraq because he can't hold up the French, German and Russian involvement with Oil-For-Food because he has to actually work with those governments on a whole range of issues beside Iraq. Kerry, on the other hand, has no real responsibility so he can say whatever irresponsible thing pops into his liberal head. Austin is a perfect example of such thinking. They don't have to worry about bipartisanship and making sure they don't step over the line too far because they don't have to worry about working with the other side in order to make progess. They're out of power. They know there's no likelihood of a return to power. So they indulge their inner psychotic and let loose with every attack imaginable. This is the fate of the national Democratic Party when they lose the upcoming election. Be afraid... Posted by: Jim B on October 18, 2004 12:55 PM
Here's yr average Molly Ivins column: "Oh Lordy, things are SO BAD! Stupid stupid stupid! God, that rams my pussy! OH LORDY KOFI HELP US!" Posted by: jeff on October 18, 2004 12:57 PM
We're just always ahead of the curve down here. You damn yankees™ will understand once you catch up in the next 20 years. :) Posted by: Elric on October 18, 2004 01:08 PM
As for SonOfNixon asking whether a Texan's patriotism is for Texas or the U.S., that's not really important because the rest of the U.S. isn't going to do anything that pisses us off badly enough to make it important, RIGHT? ;) Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic on October 18, 2004 01:31 PM
Point of order here: Stevie Ray Vaughn is from Dallas, not Austin. They just did a good job of stealing his history. Another point: we have successfully corralled and marginalized the vast majority of the Loony Left in one city in our state. They're necessary to take on the soul-grinding work of administering our ridiulously massive state govt. No self-respecting conservative or libertarian would ever be happy with a lifelong gummint job. Posted by: Scott Chaffin on October 18, 2004 01:47 PM
To avoid any confusion, I believe that the Texan's love of Texas should be considered a compliment. No disrespect meant. I love every part of Texas that I visited...from Beaumont to Fort Worth, from Dallas to San Antonio. (Didn't enjoy the I-10 traffic in Houston, though) Posted by: sonofnixon on October 18, 2004 02:39 PM
No display of ruffled feathers intended, sonofnixon. I was just agreeing with you, albeit indirectly. Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic on October 18, 2004 04:42 PM
Hey guys: I've lived in Austin for over twenty years after moving here from Ann Arbor. Great place and every one gets along. I know lots of folks from both sides of the aisle and they all love the town. Remember besides GWBush for seven years, Lance Armstrong calls Austin home and that great all American wealth producer Michael Dell lives here. In fact young conservative republican Michael has made many of the liberals in town very rich so they do not bash conservatives all that much here in Austin. Michael is also very active socially and philanthropically with many of the more liberal arts organizations in town. The only two exceptions to getting along are those two old dames-- Molly Ivins and 'Ma' Richards and both have really left town. Molly to Marathon, Texas out in the western wilds and 'Ma' Richards to anywhere but here. I don't think anyone really misses them. (The real reasons Texas works is that we elect our state judges so there are no outrageous state judicial rulings. (plus no income tax.)) Posted by: mostlyright on October 18, 2004 05:00 PM
Ace, Vulture 6 Posted by: Vulture 6 (Scott) on October 18, 2004 05:06 PM
Most of this is spot on... except that the "born a Texan" bit, while true, is a bit misleading. Some people are born Texans, but unfortunately the stork makes a mistake and delivers them to some other, misbegotten portion of the Earth. The lucky ones find their way here before it's too late, and we welcome them and try to help them adjust so's to be able to claim their birthright. George Bush is one of those. Capitano has it absolutely correct. The recent furore over redistricting, and occasional sourness still arising from it, illustrates that perfectly. Even people who know about it, though, aren't usually aware that it was the second time it had happened. The first time, after the 1990 census, there were still quite a few Democrats in power, and the "run to Oklahoma" tactic worked. Texas Democrats still haven't quite adjusted to the fact that it didn't, this time. Kent, I hope you get an opportunity to make an extended visit to Austin. Jim B is correct. I've been in and around Seattle off and on for the last twenty years, and I can assure you that, however much it may make you wince, Austin beats Seattle in Democratic lunacy by several points. (9.9 from the East German judge.) Seattleite Democrats still have a hope of remaining in, and perhaps gaining, power for their party. Austinite Democrats have been watching their power not trickle away, but gush away like a broken dam, and it makes them confused and desperate. It's still fun to go listen to the music, though, and there's lots to see in the area. I like visiting Austin, but I'm glad I don't live there. Regards, Posted by: Ric Locke on October 18, 2004 10:29 PM
Austin isn't so bad, but I lived in Berkeley for more than two years and never had the vicious debates I have here all the time with liberals. They are deeply hurt by just about everything, but they aren't Texans, not by any stretch of the imagination. Not to me and not to themselves. Self-loathing to the bone. But it's a nice place to live, when it's not summer. Nice to be near so much water, and great mountain biking at Emma Long park. Some of the best I've seen. "Live Music Capitol of the World" is a big stretch, but the Austin City Limits Music Festival is the best outdoor event I've ever been to two years in a row. Really a fantastic time. Eric Johnson may not be from here, but he seems to live here, and so does that guy who played Lowell on Wings, can't remember his name but he seems nice enough. I was lucky enough to attend a Richard Garriot party one July 4th and it was an absolute blast. Lots of naked people and fire jugglers/breathers/dancers/walkers, and a huge fireworks show overhead. It was a Thunderdome theme (we were greeted at the gate by a guy with a real MG42 and most of the Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome characters were portrayed by Garriot's friends), and they had an actual Thunderdome, a huge hemispherical jungle gym in which partygoers could strap into the bungie rigs and battle each other with fake axes and maces and such. Then at night they had a suspension show in there, people hanging from fishhooks through the flesh of their backs, bouncing around on the bungies and bleeding. They had a big tent under which beanbag chairs and pillows lay on a big tarplike floor, and a roast pig and half a roast cow were served. No utensils, just roasted meat on bread plates, and napkins. Garriot came to the middle of the tent to make a welcome speech and someone nailed him in the chest with a hunk of roast pork, which started a food fight I had to escape after someone fastballed half an ear of corn into the side of my skull from about eight feet away. DAMN that was a fun party. I wore a loincloth without underwear and felt right at home until we did the fire walk. Oh boy. Memories . . . that reminds me, I've got to find the pictures and post them. Posted by: Uncle Mikey on October 19, 2004 12:59 AM
I forgot to bring up the best thing about this town: pretty girls everywhere you look. Posted by: Uncle Mikey on October 19, 2004 01:04 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Ryan Long goes to the No Kings rally to pick up young liberal hotties and is greatly disappointed in the quality of the mish
thanks to stevey You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things? I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023. He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)* Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown. A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask). * Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV. Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR. Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him. LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR. Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too. LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others. But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring: "But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said." In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power." I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron. Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring. I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do. But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Batman fires The Batman
Batman is disgusted by the Joachim Phoenix version of Joker Batman tries to fire Superman Batman is still workshopping his Bat-Voice
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please I'm even on knees Makin' love to whoever I please I gotta do it my way Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Sec. Army recognizes ODU Army ROTC cadets for their bravery and sacrifice in private ceremony
[Hat Tip: Diogenes] [CBD] Recent Comments
m:
"w00t ..."
Pixy Misa: "Morning! ..." clarence: "😻 ..." Tuna: "Morning all ..." clarence: "Is this the day that Aussie savings time starts? ..." clarence: "🌠 ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "Time for me to hit the road too. To all the ghosts ..." Born Free: "I had a blue Brooks Brothers seersucker suit, acqu ..." SciVo: "Good night, AOP and JQ. ..." SciVo: "[i]319 Weird. This hotel, a real nice Super 8 mote ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "'night JQ. ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "'night AOP. ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|