Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Red Sox Fans Turn on Kerry | Main | Ace of Spades HQ: The Internet Innovator for Interblog Invective »
October 12, 2004

Good Heavens-- Have You Seen This?

"Racism" is only racist if it can be pinned on a conservative.

Now, let me say something. I actually think there is far too much PC in this world. I don't think that making some lighthearted jab about race or sexuality is necessarily hateful -- context and spirit are important -- but this is pretty offensive.

And it's also offensive that all this talk of "sensitivity" is so transparently used for a purely political purpose. If liberals really cared about sensitivity, they wouldn't indulge themselves in gratuitiously offensive jokes like this. They care primarily about strong-form "sensitivity" -- Thou Shalt NEVER Say Anything Even Close to Being Hurtful or Offensive -- as a weapon to use against conservatives.

Via Michelle Malkin.

Update: A cartoon in the spirit of Danziger, with Al Sharpton as a pimp.

Look, you traffic in this sort of crap, and they you can't whine about "sensitivity," Jeffy.


posted by Ace at 04:01 PM
Comments



Will I out myself as stupid if I admit I don't get it?

Posted by: Karol on October 12, 2004 04:16 PM

Really sickening. And he's some kind of major cartoonist. The funny thing is, the stereotype is not only racist, it's outdated, by at least 50 years - "I knows"? Danziger must think he knows black people from having seen Gone With the Wind.

Posted by: Yaron on October 12, 2004 04:20 PM

Karol - it's a take-off of a scene in "Gone With the Wind" when Scarlett O'Hara is in labor and the only people with her are her former slaves. The youngest ("Prissy," I think) when told to help says "I don't know nuthin about birthin' babies!"

Posted by: Branford on October 12, 2004 04:28 PM

Argh - she said "I don't know nuthin about birthin' no babies" - I think that's correct!

Posted by: Branford on October 12, 2004 04:29 PM

The congenitally sensitive need to own their feelings. No one makes them do anything, much less feel offended. And if the speaker had no intent to offend, then the offendee is doubly at fault.

"You made me take a flying fuck on a rolling doughnut. That offended me. And now I have all this icing...."

Posted by: rdbrewer on October 12, 2004 05:03 PM

another issue with this guy: several of the other cartoons in the slideshow deal with BUSH reinstituting the draft.

if you had been out of the country for a while and saw one of these cartoons in the NYTimes you would assume (quite reasonably) that Bush or his minions must have proposed a Draft.

But WE know that hasn't happened. So the NYTimes doesn't require this "speech" to have a single iota of truth underlying it?

Posted by: sonofnixon on October 12, 2004 05:03 PM

Danziger is a freakin moron. He's the featured cartoon on the editorial page of the Sac Bee almost every day. The Ted Rall of the west.

My two year old is more insightful on his magna-doodle.

Posted by: Bud Tugley on October 12, 2004 05:27 PM

OK, this man is clearly afraid of a strong, intelligent woman who is a minority. This ugly cartoon was published and approved of by someone. Has the left gone mad?

Stupid question, sorry, I should know better.

The moral and intellectual corruption on display here has gone past disgusting, and entered the realm of...no, pathos doesn't cover it...bathos.

Posted by: Dianna on October 12, 2004 05:56 PM

Just to correct about the movie reference, it is Scarlett's friend Melanie who is having the baby, not Scarlett.

And now to my other comment: why is it that 4 or 8 or 12 years ago we heard so many put-down comments about "angry white men" voters against Clinton and Gore, with anger being cited as a point against right-leaning voters, yet now, with the left so much more rabidly angry than the right ever was, we never hear that put-down description about them? Oh, I forgot: anger against conservatives is the rational reaction to morally outrageous positions, while anger against liberals is an irrational reaction to the loss of the ill-gotten fruits of society's bigotry. Now I remember.

Posted by: sissoed on October 12, 2004 06:00 PM

I get the GWTW reference, but tubes? What current event do I know nothing about here?

Posted by: lime on October 12, 2004 07:26 PM

the aluminum (sp?) tubes we thought Hussein was using for uranium enrichment but instead turned out to be for making milkshakes or some such.

Posted by: Josh Martin on October 12, 2004 09:34 PM

Oddly enough racism didn't occur to me when I saw the cartoon. I thought it was a play on how 'women-folk don't need education, they ought to be kept bare foot and pregnant'. But the Gone With the Wind reference was lost on me since I've only read the book and not seen the movie.

Regardless, it is bigoted and offensive.

Posted by: Justin on October 12, 2004 10:08 PM

If you think that one is bad click on the via malkin link and look at what a Democratic candidate is sending out to voters. REALLY disgusting.

Posted by: on October 12, 2004 10:56 PM

You must remember, liberals are not held to the same standard as conservatives in the eyes of the MSM. That's how an obviously racist cartoon can be published without reservation. That is how a
Democratic congressman can use a gay slur and be forgiven. That is how Bush=Hitler can go unchallanged.

Posted by: mbranca on October 13, 2004 07:24 AM

Like a poster above, I don't get it. What does the president's NSC adviser have to do with aluminum tubes? Anyone who does get this "cartoon," pls fill me in. Email address erp617@yahoo.com.

Thanks.

Posted by: erp on October 13, 2004 10:30 AM

"Jeffy"?

Posted by: Jeff G on October 13, 2004 10:36 AM

The Following is the text of a letter sent to me by the NYTimes in which Bill Borders admits that the Danziger Cartoon is OBVIOUSLY both RACIST and OFFENSIVE.

"Mr. McBryde:

It is of considerable importance to us. I haven't gotten back to you again because I didn't have all the facts. I still don't, but I can see that I should have given you an interim report.

Obviously the cartoon is racist and deeply offensive. Whether that means that Danziger himself is racist I don't know and don't much care. My only real concern is whether and to what extent this cartoon had any relation to The New York Times. (It certainly was not published in the newspaper.) As soon as I can answer that question for you, I will. In the meantime, thank you for bringing it to our attention.

Best, Bill Borders"


Hugh McBryde
Prakk@aol.com

Posted by: Prakk on October 13, 2004 03:06 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Ireland's 'Air Force One' lacks a key safety system for fog -- thanks to country's ban on Israeli products
Ireland's best emigrated 150 years ago. The current Ireland is a sad joke. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: More Iran bluster from Trump? Enough! Deportations hit a record, and that is a good thing for all, Todd Blanche's nomination is out of committee, the DSA is on the march, and more!
The Short Unhappy Life of a Russian Soldier: Why recruits die in 20-30 minutes
Interesting video. Some key parts: drones were responsible for 70-80% of all battlefield deaths in mid-2025, and I bet it's higher now. The Russian army is incredibly corrupt. Men get assigned to the most dangerous frontline units, the "Storm" units, unless they pay a superior $2,000 to be assigned to a different unit. Furthermore, there is often no real training for recruits -- commanders pocket the money that would have gone towards fuel and ammo costs incurred during training. Much "training" consists just of taking a single picture of soldiers doing something soldier-y, like fording a river, and publishing that as proof that the training was done. Even when it is done, training is only two weeks long.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the Berlin attack, Iran...Again! Sefton's mini Odyssey review, Data Republican's blockbuster reveal about the DNC, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
She's totally committed to major independence
She's a lady through and through
She gives them quite a battle, all that they can handle
She'll bruise some, she'll hurt some too
I got something done yesterday and am exhausted.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky
[CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Illegals registered and voted in NJ! Leftist violence is baked into the Democrat cake, Iran's capabilities are being degraded, Londonistan? And...come on SC...no senate dynasties!
Update to the video of a Russian soldier being spun around and thrown by the machinegun he was operating: The soldier was testing an old, archaic Russian machinegun intended to be mounted to a helicopter. The old gun was pressed into service as a possible anti-drone gun. The Russian army is generally depleted and being forced to bring a lot of old, unreliable weapons and platforms to the front.
Also: Ukranian drones have destroyed damaged [CBD] over 147 Russian warships and shadow fleet oil tankers in the Black Sea over the past ten days.
Top Men!
FDA is providing an update regarding the sample of lettuce supplied by Taylor Farms de Mexico which was reported positive on July 18, 2026. Due to the complexity in detection of Cyclospora, FDA laboratory experts re-reviewed the sample results and have concluded that the finding does not represent true amplification and should be considered a false positive. Information about the sample has been removed from the July 18, 2026, update below. FDA has notified Taylor Farms and continues working with the firm to ensure product implicated in this outbreak has been removed from the market. FDA and state partners continue to collect and analyze product samples. As of July 19, 2026, there are no confirmed positive sample results for product testing for Cyclospora.
[CBD]
FEDERAL APPEALS COURT STRIKES DOWN NJ "ASSAULT WEAPONS" BAN/MAGAZINE BAN! Let's see if it reverts to the previous 15 round limit or I can actually run my weapons as God intended! [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Trump Slaps Mullin down; he wants the auto stops to continue, we need employment enforcement at our big corporations, The gerontocracy in the Senate, the Iranian junta is true to form, but Trump responds forcefully, and more!
Recent Comments
Rodrigo Borgia: "The F-22 Raptors out of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richa ..."

San Franpsycho: "/Flip Wilson sock off ..."

Jed, Earl of Clampett: "I reckon we gonna put off that visit to Castle Cla ..."

Frank Barone: " Too many out of staters are in Texas now. They b ..."

Skip: "Good evening everyone ..."

Geraldine Jones: "10-punkte-Programm ..."

Delurker: "Carlson's manifesto is pretty much what I expected ..."

Don Black: "The devil made him buy that dress. ..."

Frank Barone: " Flip Wilson > Rue Paul ..."

New York Mohel: "[i]Do Texan mohels yell “yee-HAW” at t ..."

ChristyBlinkyTheGreat: "Is it me or have people gone more insane this summ ..."

Eromero: "92 If everyone is a faction, then no one is a fact ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives