Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« Man Threatening Life of President Bush Disappears | Main | Shock: Producer for Rathergate Forgery Story Worked for Liberal Democrats »
September 28, 2004

It's Real: New Jersey is in Play

A FreeRepublic poster digests Rasmussen's state-by-state polls, showing Kerry with a [edited due to Rasmussen's complaint about proprietary information] small lead in the Garden State.

FreeRepublic also points me to this poll by StrategicVision (no, I've never heard of them before either) which finds that Kerry leads by a single point -- 45-44 -- among likely voters.

Now, that isn't much of a lead at all. That really is a virtual tie.

These latest polls seem to confirm previous indications of a big shift in favor of Bush. One earlier poll had the race tied; another had Bush ahead by 4. I don't believe Bush is ahead in NJ, but I do now believe the race is approximately tied.

In 1992, Peter Jennings called Bush the Elder's loss of New Jersey as "the dagger in George Bush's heart," or something very close to that. That wasn't really true at all -- NJ had been Republican a long time ago, but, by 1992, it was a true swing state and trending Democratic -- but whatever. I don't think that's liberal bias; I just think that's a guy trying to fill time on a boring election night, and saying dopey things.

But I'm hoping we'll get to see New Jersey finally get to play a genuine "dagger in the heart" role 12 years after Jennings' premature announcement of its blade-like qualities.

Update: Robert comments:

Since the Democrats held their convention in July, and the Republicans in August this allowed the Bush campaign to spend money from his war chest much longer than Kerry. Kerry had to move to the $75 million 5 weeks before Bush. Now that all of the "safe" blue states are suddenly in play, he probably can't afford to advertise in all of them. Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan, even Oregon for Gods sake. Not to mention of course Florida and Ohio...

This is true, and especially true with regard to New Jersey, one of the most expensive media markets in the country. NJ doesn't really have its own TV stations (not big ones, anyway); it gets its broadcast signals from two of the priciest markets in the nation (NYC and Philly).

But I don't know if that matters. I always think that a candidate has to act as if his base is secured -- there's no point pouring money into NJ; if NJ isn't in the bag on election night, ad-blitz or not, then Kerry's going to lose. I think he has to just assume/hope that NJ is in the bag and continue putting the bulk of his resources into the so-called swing states, even if many of them seem more like Bush states than swing states at the moment.

Bush will certainly visit NJ a couple of times, though. To gin up support, to show the flag, and to announce that he's now playing on Kerry's assumed turf.

Can Bush win NJ? I really think he might. Kerry has to hope for more bad news on the economy and in Iraq/the GWOT and that such news changes the polls in NJ for free.

As if he wasn't doing that already.

Update: Gerry from Daly Thoughts says that StrategicVisions is a polling firm which has previously done most of its political work for the Republican Party, although they're now doing their own independent polls to increase their visibility. But, as he says, keep in mind the possible bias.

Gerry is also proud he's been calling New Jersey a battleground for quite some time. Big deal. Ever been to Newark?

FreeRepublic pulled the thread on the state-by-state numbers, as that's Rasmussen's proprietary (i.e., subscription only) information. So I'll be a stand-up guy and pull the numbers, too.

I'll just say that Kerry's lead right now is the same number that King Arthur was supposed to count to before releasing the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch. Not the number he did count to, mind you; the number the Book of Armaments instructed him to count to.*

"Two" points is not the lead; neither shalt thou say that "four" points is the lead.

"Five" is right out.

* If right now you're dying to tell me he did eventually count to the number I'm talking about, you're a big freakin' dork.

Don't run from it. Own it.

Yet Another Update: Joe the Unabrewer points out that the Philly market has lots of campaign ads running, because Pennsylvania is in play. So NJ -- especially southern & western NJ -- will see lots of Kerry ads, whether Kerry makes a specific play for NJ or not.

Duh. I should have known that.


posted by Ace at 01:10 PM
Comments



The mods at FreeRepublic pulled the thread: proprietary info.

Posted by: conelrad on September 28, 2004 01:21 PM

Don't get too excited about this one. All Kerry has to do is have a gay affair with an Israeli poet and then accuse Republicans of hate-mongering, and I'm sure his numbers will shoot right up.

Posted by: Sobek on September 28, 2004 01:21 PM

Is it fair to say that Kerry "apparently" leads in NJ?

Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on September 28, 2004 01:24 PM

Strategic Vision is a polling firm normally associated with Republicans that apparently is doing a branding campaign (trying to build name recognition) by doing lots of polls this year not at the behest of any party or candidate. Their results have been pretty good (meaning- in line with what other polls have been showing) but one does need to keep in mind from whence they came.

That said, New Jersey is absolutely in play. Rasmussen has shown it tight (without giving the exact numbers, he publically has had it floating into and out of the 'tossup' designation, and watch later today to see where it goes for a feel where his latest puts it). But more importantly, unaffiliated pollsters like Quinnipiac (tied), SurveyUSA (Bush +4), and Rutgers (Kerry +3) all have it a horserace, as did Rasmussen's last publically available survey (Kerry +4, 9/3). American Research Group has Kerry a bit further ahead (+8).

If I can brag a little, on my site I had named New Jersey as a battleground state for this year back in February (along with 13 other states).

Posted by: Gerry on September 28, 2004 01:31 PM

I'm in the Philly market, so I'm seeing lots of campaign commercials. Especially during the nightly news. Sometimes Bush and Kerry ads are practically back-to-back.

But I'm only in the Philly market; Delaware is as blue as it gets. Only 3 electoral votes worth though. Maybe I could get my XGF to let me use her place of residence in PA and register somewhere that my vote will matter.

Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer on September 28, 2004 02:12 PM

NEE!

Posted by: fat kid on September 28, 2004 02:16 PM

I'm not sure how it works with being able to post polling data. If you have to be a subscriber or not. I know perhaps the AP and newspapers subscribe to certain pollers and release lots of details no one else can, but then it seems that rivals are free to publish the basic results. i.e. Fox reports on the results of the CNN-Time Poll, Drudge reports the CBS polls shows Pennsylvania a toss up.

I know other Internet sites religiously post each poll conducted in each state and the final results.

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/

The first site shows you an electoral map showing a gratifying "spread of the red" day by day, and if you click on a state, it shows the most recent polling results, inc. Rassmussen's.

Realclearpolitics is a political junkie's dream. Check it out. Like the 1st site, it gives you all the poll results and adds tools, commentary, etc.

Posted by: Cedarford on September 28, 2004 02:36 PM

According to the Kerry Spot on NRO, Bush will be up 48-40 in today's Pew Poll, up from 45-42.

Posted by: Mark on September 28, 2004 02:39 PM

* If right now you're dying to tell me he did eventually count to the number I'm talking about, you're a big freakin' dork.

He counted to it, but he skipped 3 and 4:

"One... Two... Five!"
"Three, Sire!"
"Three!"
BOOM!

Yeah, I embrace my Dork Side.

Posted by: Brian B on September 28, 2004 02:42 PM

On the other hand, isn't the Philadelphia media market overwhelmingly Democratic? So even given that Pennsylvania's a "battleground" state, Kerry might still have to spend money there he'd rather spend in Pittsburgh or something.

Posted by: David C on September 28, 2004 03:09 PM

Philly is overwhelmingly Democratic, otherwise John Street would not be the mayor of the city (for those of you that don't know, John Street being the Mayor of Philadelphia is tantamount to Marion Barry being the Mayor of DC).
Is anyone else excited by the fact that Bruce Springsteen's home state may just slip through the greasy fingers of the Dems this year? Actually after they stole the Senate election last year this is only really a payback of sorts.

Posted by: Jersey Matt on September 28, 2004 04:56 PM

Yes, Philly is overwhelmingly Democratic. However, the Philly viewing area probably encompasses another several million people above Philly itself. The viewing areas surrounding the metro area are surprisingly rural, including the SE quarter of PA, the northern half of DE, and the southern half of NJ, and even the most extreme NE corner of MD. However, a good chunk of that region is Democratic as well. I can certainly vouch for northern DE as Democratic.

I'm guessing Bush really only needs to siphon a few votes from those Philly suburbs to put the state in play, so he's hitting the advertisements hard.

Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer on September 29, 2004 12:23 AM

This morning, I saw a Kerry ad on CNN....in California!!

Does this mean California is in play?!? If so, hoe-lee-she-boy-gun!

As someone regularly disenfranchised by the electoral college, THAT would be a pleasant surprise.

Posted by: cthulhu on September 29, 2004 01:06 AM

This morning, I saw a Kerry ad on CNN....in California!!

I don't think so. I don't know how cable sells its ads, but broadcast cable sells national slots and local slots. You might have just been watching an ad bought for the national slot, playing in all markets.

Posted by: ace on September 29, 2004 01:20 AM

This endorsement should clench it for Kerry:

http:\\www.cpusa.org -- Yup, the Communist Party USA

Posted by: Sharpshooter on September 29, 2004 07:26 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Recent Comments
m: ">>>files, some of them classified Destroy Before R ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Instrumental version of hymns and Fall foliage: ..."

m: "18 Disclaimer: Sorry folks, comments are closed. T ..."

Alteria Pilgram - My President has convictions.: "Disclaimer: Sorry folks, comments are closed. The ..."

m: "12 Moose out front shoulda told ya. Posted by: Pi ..."

Pixy Misa: "[i]13 ...it's been shipped off to the Computer His ..."

FenelonSpoke: "You didn't ask for this 😉, but you did men ..."

m: "license plate: (1) LUV ME (2) NEVADA MAMA ..."

Bitblt: "[I]...it's been shipped off to the Computer Histor ..."

Pixy Misa: "Moose out front shoulda told ya. ..."

Pixy Misa: "I did need to make a small edit after first postin ..."

m: "yay! ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives