Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« "Follow the Money" | Main | Victory of the Blogosphere Bonus Top Ten:
Top Ten Dan Rather "Folksy Texas Sayings" About What Went Wrong »
September 20, 2004

Orchestrated By "Political Partisans"?

Baseball Crank "raises some questions" I'd like to see Dan Rather, Terry McAuliffe, and Joshua Micah Brandybuck Hezekiah Cougar Mellancamp Marshall all answer.

Ben Barnes supposedly didn't contact 60 Minutes until the Republcian National Convention. Fair enough.

But there does seem to have been a kind of stealth buzz campaign going on on left-wing blogsites before then.

Josh Marshall, August 22nd:

Now, as fate would have it, Ben Barnes is a Democrat. Was then, is now. And he supports John Kerry.

But he's never really spoken openly about how he helped Bush hop in front of everyone else or other aspects of the president's abbreviated military service, about which he is said to know a great deal.

Maybe now would be the time?

Texas politics is different from Washington politics. Dems and Republicans are often tight. And I believe Barnes' is a state lobbyist nowadays. So while supporting the Dem nominee may be an acceptable deviation, nailing the president on the Guard issue in what is now a Republican-dominated state probably wouldn't be good for business.

But maybe now's the time for him to step up to the plate ...

Can't we get Molly Ivins or some other worthy to put in a call? Maybe just ask him what he thinks of the Swift Boat business.

Josh Marshall, August 27th:

You'll want to link through to this one -- it's a video clip of Ben Barnes, the former Speaker of the House in Texas, the guy who got President Bush into the Texas Air National Guard.

I'm told the tape is from a recent Kerry rally and in it Barnes says the following...

...

Now, I don't know what Ben Barnes looks like. And I do not independently know the provenance of the tape. But I've spoken to two sources who know Barnes. And they tell me that that is Barnes on the tape.

One of those two men is Jim Moore -- co-author of Bush's Brain. Moore told me this afternoon that the clip is from June 8th of this year, at a Kerry rally in Austin. Moore assures me that the tape is legitimate.

I placed a call to Barnes' office and left a message with one of his assistants; but the request for comment has not yet been returned.

Josh Marshall, September 1st:

bit more on Ben Barnes, the guy from Texas who got President Bush into the Guard way-back-when.

Apparently, the attacks on Kerry's war record just proved too much for him. As we've noted previously, for almost a decade now Barnes has gone to great lengths to avoid causing trouble for the president on the Guard matter. And the Bush folks in Texas have made it clear to him during this election cycle that if he spills the beans about the president that they'll do everything in their power to put him out of business in the state (Barnes is now a lobbyist). And that heat has, I'm told, increased dramatically in recent days.

But apparently those threats haven't done the trick because he has already taped a lengthy interview slated to appear in the not-too-distant future on a major national news show in which he'll describe the strings he pulled to keep Bush out of Vietnam and apparently more.

(Between you and me, according to my three sources on this, Barnes told his story to Dan Rather -- remember, the Texas connection -- for 60 Minutes.)

Now, I'm not saying that Joshua Boutros-Boutros Marshall did anything wrong. He's a transparent political hack; he's supposed to pimp bullshit claims by partisans like Barnes. That's his job.

But I'm curious:

Who where Marshall's sources?

Or, more specifically: Were Marshall's sources at CBS or in the DNC?

Based on Marshall's record, I think there's a good chance he was getting this from the DNC.

And if the DNC knew that all of this was coming before even CBS did...

Well-- I hope Mr. Marshall will forgive me when I echo him and say I question the timing.

And one more question: Was Barnes' change of heart about "speaking out" on his claims as "sudden" as has been suggested, or was this all part of a long-planned DNC-CBS joint venture?

This looks less like a meticulously-researched "breaking news scoop" and more like the publicity campaign for a long-scheduled theatrical release -- Fahrenheit 9-08 -- with Josh Marshall serving up the teasers, sneak previews and general pre-release hype, a kind of hyperpartisan hack Harry Knowles of Ain't It Cool News.

Since the liberal media is breathlessly reporting the Republican affiliation of those who truthfully debunked the forgeries, perhaps they'll soon become interested in the Democratic affiliation of those who created, delivered, and breathlessly hyped the forgeries and the Ben Barnes "suprise revelation."

I expect they'll be right on that.

Any. Minute. Now.

He Questions the Timing of My Questioning the Timing Update: Memento Moron wants to know what the hell took me so long.

Well, I've been too busy planning what color Ducati I'm going to buy, when all that crazy blog-money I've been dreaming of finally starts rolling in.

Any. Minute. Now.


posted by Ace at 03:32 PM
Comments



And one more question: Was Barnes' change of heart about "speaking out" on his claims as "sudden" as has been suggested, or was this all part of a long-planned DNC-CBS joint venture?

Good question. Now I have one for you: What took you so long?

Posted by: Brian B on September 20, 2004 04:15 PM

Ace, check email from 9/14. 'DNCBS NEWS' with dan rather (ahem) 'reporting'.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on September 20, 2004 04:16 PM

Ace! Please check this out! Hear me out. I know this is a highly questionable bush-hate site, but the article consists of a testimonial from someone who interviewed Burkett and several people around him. I believe this Author could have had some function in making CBS deem that their source (burkett) was "unimpeachable". There is quite a bit of insight into the perspective of people who probably had a hand in making this happen. You will probably also find some other gems in here. See: http://www.buzzflash.com/buzzscripts/buzz.dll/sub2

Posted by: VI on September 20, 2004 04:27 PM

Gotta be faster than that. I linked that piece in my first Burkett piece, the Sunday before last.

Posted by: ace on September 20, 2004 04:29 PM

"Joshua Micah Brandybuck Hezekiah Cougar Mellancamp Marshall"

It's Heinz-Marshall you ill-mannered redstate idiot scumbag.

Sincerely,

Teresa Fauntleroy-Forbes Heinz-Heinz-Kerry

Posted by: on September 20, 2004 04:34 PM

Last comment was from me - didn't mean to post anonomously.

Max

Posted by: max on September 20, 2004 04:36 PM

We're missing an end-tag somewhere, Ace. Italics everywhere...

Posted by: on September 20, 2004 04:50 PM

PS - I purchased Josiah Micah Mellencamp Fauntleroy Constipation Ticking Timebomb Heinz-Marshall on eBay last fall, and he's now MINE. Don't even think about turning him to your side. The next thing you know, you'll being trying to take one of my butlers away, and I won't allow that!

Sincerely,

Teresa Fauntleroy-Forbes Heinz-Heinz-Kerry

Posted by: max on September 20, 2004 04:51 PM

Thanks for the tip on italics.

Closed now.

Posted by: ace on September 20, 2004 05:18 PM

LIKE a hyper-partisan Harry Knowles? Have you read any of his reviews when politics are involved? The guy thinks Michael Moore walks on water. You couldn't be more partisan than Knowles without going the John Wilkes Booth route.

Posted by: Eric Pobirs on September 20, 2004 06:40 PM

Ace,

I've been traveling quite a bit lately but still have had some time to catch your posts.

Duped?

Bullshit.

It strains all belief that CBS as a news organization, and Dan Rather, an uberexperienced journalist were duped by forgeries that provided the "smoking gun" to a long-ago predetermined conviction (or fantasy) that Bush was AWOL.

And once the dispositive memos were outed as fake, both the organization's president and its talking figure head steadfastly maintain the truthfulness of the story?

When else has a news story of this magnitude been shown to have been based on forged documentation, and the news organization and the journalist who delivered the story cling to their forgone conclusion of the story's narrative?

The temerity of Dan Rather is nothing short of stunning.


Posted by: MeTooThen on September 20, 2004 07:36 PM

Dude,

Thanks for the link. Very gracious.

Posted by: Brian B on September 20, 2004 07:44 PM

This also explains why my Sitemeter traffic report just spiked like a mutha.

Posted by: Brian B on September 20, 2004 07:46 PM

nice Work!!

Posted by: Jon on September 28, 2004 09:45 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
Recent Comments
JackStraw : ">>Amen. He has taken a big risk. I don't think he ..."

Kindltot: "The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee 3h Trump Begins ..."

mindful webworker - so much for March: "The March Cafes came in like a lion and is going ..."

JQ: "Howdy, BSM! ..."

BarelyScaryMary: "I see you, JQ. ..."

JQ: "Huh. Same hash. No problem. ..."

JQ: "What a day! Got my taxes done (whew!) and don't ow ..."

publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): ">> What if Artemis takes off during Trump's speech ..."

Smallish Bees: "Ace, Ace, Ace! I've been waiting to read your comm ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " [i]AOP should be nominated for territorial gover ..."

Kindltot: "[i]But when Alberta stops sending tax payments to ..."

Thomas Bender: "@237 >> Your own personal sycophant. I use m ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives