Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« "Follow the Money" | Main | Victory of the Blogosphere Bonus Top Ten:
Top Ten Dan Rather "Folksy Texas Sayings" About What Went Wrong »
September 20, 2004

Orchestrated By "Political Partisans"?

Baseball Crank "raises some questions" I'd like to see Dan Rather, Terry McAuliffe, and Joshua Micah Brandybuck Hezekiah Cougar Mellancamp Marshall all answer.

Ben Barnes supposedly didn't contact 60 Minutes until the Republcian National Convention. Fair enough.

But there does seem to have been a kind of stealth buzz campaign going on on left-wing blogsites before then.

Josh Marshall, August 22nd:

Now, as fate would have it, Ben Barnes is a Democrat. Was then, is now. And he supports John Kerry.

But he's never really spoken openly about how he helped Bush hop in front of everyone else or other aspects of the president's abbreviated military service, about which he is said to know a great deal.

Maybe now would be the time?

Texas politics is different from Washington politics. Dems and Republicans are often tight. And I believe Barnes' is a state lobbyist nowadays. So while supporting the Dem nominee may be an acceptable deviation, nailing the president on the Guard issue in what is now a Republican-dominated state probably wouldn't be good for business.

But maybe now's the time for him to step up to the plate ...

Can't we get Molly Ivins or some other worthy to put in a call? Maybe just ask him what he thinks of the Swift Boat business.

Josh Marshall, August 27th:

You'll want to link through to this one -- it's a video clip of Ben Barnes, the former Speaker of the House in Texas, the guy who got President Bush into the Texas Air National Guard.

I'm told the tape is from a recent Kerry rally and in it Barnes says the following...

...

Now, I don't know what Ben Barnes looks like. And I do not independently know the provenance of the tape. But I've spoken to two sources who know Barnes. And they tell me that that is Barnes on the tape.

One of those two men is Jim Moore -- co-author of Bush's Brain. Moore told me this afternoon that the clip is from June 8th of this year, at a Kerry rally in Austin. Moore assures me that the tape is legitimate.

I placed a call to Barnes' office and left a message with one of his assistants; but the request for comment has not yet been returned.

Josh Marshall, September 1st:

bit more on Ben Barnes, the guy from Texas who got President Bush into the Guard way-back-when.

Apparently, the attacks on Kerry's war record just proved too much for him. As we've noted previously, for almost a decade now Barnes has gone to great lengths to avoid causing trouble for the president on the Guard matter. And the Bush folks in Texas have made it clear to him during this election cycle that if he spills the beans about the president that they'll do everything in their power to put him out of business in the state (Barnes is now a lobbyist). And that heat has, I'm told, increased dramatically in recent days.

But apparently those threats haven't done the trick because he has already taped a lengthy interview slated to appear in the not-too-distant future on a major national news show in which he'll describe the strings he pulled to keep Bush out of Vietnam and apparently more.

(Between you and me, according to my three sources on this, Barnes told his story to Dan Rather -- remember, the Texas connection -- for 60 Minutes.)

Now, I'm not saying that Joshua Boutros-Boutros Marshall did anything wrong. He's a transparent political hack; he's supposed to pimp bullshit claims by partisans like Barnes. That's his job.

But I'm curious:

Who where Marshall's sources?

Or, more specifically: Were Marshall's sources at CBS or in the DNC?

Based on Marshall's record, I think there's a good chance he was getting this from the DNC.

And if the DNC knew that all of this was coming before even CBS did...

Well-- I hope Mr. Marshall will forgive me when I echo him and say I question the timing.

And one more question: Was Barnes' change of heart about "speaking out" on his claims as "sudden" as has been suggested, or was this all part of a long-planned DNC-CBS joint venture?

This looks less like a meticulously-researched "breaking news scoop" and more like the publicity campaign for a long-scheduled theatrical release -- Fahrenheit 9-08 -- with Josh Marshall serving up the teasers, sneak previews and general pre-release hype, a kind of hyperpartisan hack Harry Knowles of Ain't It Cool News.

Since the liberal media is breathlessly reporting the Republican affiliation of those who truthfully debunked the forgeries, perhaps they'll soon become interested in the Democratic affiliation of those who created, delivered, and breathlessly hyped the forgeries and the Ben Barnes "suprise revelation."

I expect they'll be right on that.

Any. Minute. Now.

He Questions the Timing of My Questioning the Timing Update: Memento Moron wants to know what the hell took me so long.

Well, I've been too busy planning what color Ducati I'm going to buy, when all that crazy blog-money I've been dreaming of finally starts rolling in.

Any. Minute. Now.


posted by Ace at 03:32 PM
Comments



And one more question: Was Barnes' change of heart about "speaking out" on his claims as "sudden" as has been suggested, or was this all part of a long-planned DNC-CBS joint venture?

Good question. Now I have one for you: What took you so long?

Posted by: Brian B on September 20, 2004 04:15 PM

Ace, check email from 9/14. 'DNCBS NEWS' with dan rather (ahem) 'reporting'.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on September 20, 2004 04:16 PM

Ace! Please check this out! Hear me out. I know this is a highly questionable bush-hate site, but the article consists of a testimonial from someone who interviewed Burkett and several people around him. I believe this Author could have had some function in making CBS deem that their source (burkett) was "unimpeachable". There is quite a bit of insight into the perspective of people who probably had a hand in making this happen. You will probably also find some other gems in here. See: http://www.buzzflash.com/buzzscripts/buzz.dll/sub2

Posted by: VI on September 20, 2004 04:27 PM

Gotta be faster than that. I linked that piece in my first Burkett piece, the Sunday before last.

Posted by: ace on September 20, 2004 04:29 PM

"Joshua Micah Brandybuck Hezekiah Cougar Mellancamp Marshall"

It's Heinz-Marshall you ill-mannered redstate idiot scumbag.

Sincerely,

Teresa Fauntleroy-Forbes Heinz-Heinz-Kerry

Posted by: on September 20, 2004 04:34 PM

Last comment was from me - didn't mean to post anonomously.

Max

Posted by: max on September 20, 2004 04:36 PM

We're missing an end-tag somewhere, Ace. Italics everywhere...

Posted by: on September 20, 2004 04:50 PM

PS - I purchased Josiah Micah Mellencamp Fauntleroy Constipation Ticking Timebomb Heinz-Marshall on eBay last fall, and he's now MINE. Don't even think about turning him to your side. The next thing you know, you'll being trying to take one of my butlers away, and I won't allow that!

Sincerely,

Teresa Fauntleroy-Forbes Heinz-Heinz-Kerry

Posted by: max on September 20, 2004 04:51 PM

Thanks for the tip on italics.

Closed now.

Posted by: ace on September 20, 2004 05:18 PM

LIKE a hyper-partisan Harry Knowles? Have you read any of his reviews when politics are involved? The guy thinks Michael Moore walks on water. You couldn't be more partisan than Knowles without going the John Wilkes Booth route.

Posted by: Eric Pobirs on September 20, 2004 06:40 PM

Ace,

I've been traveling quite a bit lately but still have had some time to catch your posts.

Duped?

Bullshit.

It strains all belief that CBS as a news organization, and Dan Rather, an uberexperienced journalist were duped by forgeries that provided the "smoking gun" to a long-ago predetermined conviction (or fantasy) that Bush was AWOL.

And once the dispositive memos were outed as fake, both the organization's president and its talking figure head steadfastly maintain the truthfulness of the story?

When else has a news story of this magnitude been shown to have been based on forged documentation, and the news organization and the journalist who delivered the story cling to their forgone conclusion of the story's narrative?

The temerity of Dan Rather is nothing short of stunning.


Posted by: MeTooThen on September 20, 2004 07:36 PM

Dude,

Thanks for the link. Very gracious.

Posted by: Brian B on September 20, 2004 07:44 PM

This also explains why my Sitemeter traffic report just spiked like a mutha.

Posted by: Brian B on September 20, 2004 07:46 PM

nice Work!!

Posted by: Jon on September 28, 2004 09:45 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "BOING! What's Better than The Count on Sesame S ..."

Village Idiot's Apprentice: "60.3 degrees out, with 97% RH. Not bad weather ..."

m: ">>>The planned musical interlude appears to be hol ..."

Puddleglum at work: "Mornin' ..."

Village Idiot's Apprentice: "G'morning, all! ..."

Skip: "G'Day everyone TGIF ..."

m: "w00t ..."

m: "Pixy's up! ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "Only been cat napping last few hours Posted by: ..."

Skip: "Only been cat napping last few hours ..."

Warai-otoko: "OK, he isn't running for governor but you would th ..."

Warai-otoko: "This has been happening practically every day sinc ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives