Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Media Declares War on Truth | Main | Paul Johnson Beheaded »
June 18, 2004

Poll: 100% of All Current Russian Presidents Believe George W. Bush Will Win Re-Election

How else to explain Putin's suprise announcement of credible intelligence of planned Iraqi terrorist attacks on the US?

Was Hussein really planning such attacks? I'm inclined to think he was. The left has portrayed Saddam Hussein as utterly peaceable and without any malign intentions, but they never seem to acknowledge that Saddam attempted to murder a former US President using terrorist assassins as revenge for his military defeat.

And that, of course, was during the magical age of "containment."

It would also seem that Bush is on better terms with one of our vaunted "allies" than Kerry and the DNC maintain. The left will spin this as an utterly baseless claim and a mere political favor to Bush.

All right. Let's say it is just a political favor.

Why is the President of Russia, whom the left claims is so completely alienated by Bush, doing him such enormous favors? You'd almost think Russia was engaging in friendly diplomacy with the unilateralist warmonger Bush.

Glib Minds Also Think Alike Update: Now I don't trust Putin in the slightest. But if he's lying that's interesting and if he's telling the truth, that's interesting.


SHOCKING NEWS!!!

Believe it or not -- I'm sure you're having trouble with the very notion -- but the liberal media isn't covering this story at all.

Thanks to RDBrewer for alerting me to this absolutely-shocking development.

PS: Those sirens are "ironic sirens." I am not actually surprised. I am not, in fact, a retard.


posted by Ace at 12:59 PM
Comments



I think you misread the context.

One word: Chechnya.

The Bush administration has said a few negative things about Russia's handling of Chechnya, but has expended little real political resources in trying to paint the Russians as the bad guys.

I think Putin views a Kerry administration as potentially hostile to his Chechnya policy.

Bush, at least, has some sympathy with Russia as he probably views that conflict as part of the larger civilizational conflict/war on terror. Kerry has been hostile to the broader war on terror, and while he uses the words 'WoT' what he means is 'War on Al Qaeda', not any broader war against jihadis as Bush uses the words.

So again: Chechnya. In Russia, Chechnya is a BIG DEAL.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on June 18, 2004 01:27 PM

re: The left has portrayed Saddam Hussein as utterly peaceable and without any malign intentions, but they never seem to acknowledge that Saddam attempted to murder a former US President using terrorist assassins as revenge for his military defeat.

A-fucking-men.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on June 18, 2004 02:26 PM
Posted by: rdbrewer on June 18, 2004 04:27 PM

Thanks, RD. You've just earned yourself the very first instance of an ironic double-drudge siren.

Posted by: ace on June 18, 2004 04:34 PM

Yessss! The first and soon to be coveted double-drudge siren!

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 18, 2004 04:44 PM

Trying to assassinate our president doesn't count if he's a Bush; from what I've seen it's merely a cause for snarkiness and derision.

Not that I'm questioning their patriotism or anything.

Posted by: Brian on June 18, 2004 10:51 PM

More than Chechnya, I do not forget that Bush and Putin had enough of a good relationship that GWB could persuade Putin to agree to the scrapping of the ABM and to say so even as Bush told him that the Democrats would go along with it because they trusted Putin more than they did Bush.

I think that the same play is being run here. GWB likes to repeat his plays on the libs because they very stupidly believe that he is not smart enough to outsmart them.

I'm not denying the truth of Putin's statement, but I think that the significance of the words coming from Putin himself, rather than from Bush, has to do with the leftist anti-Bush audience in this country.

That Putin went along with Bush again tells me that there is much we don't know about the Bush-Putin relationship. Over the past year, Putin has established that he's not Bush's lackey; now he seems to be signalling that, contrary to popular expectation, he and GWB may have retained a good enough links that GWB could personally thank the Russian agent who passed him the info.

Finally, it may be that Putin is doing his bit to ensure GWB will win re-election. He may well think that, apart from Chechnya, GWB rather than Kerry will -- in the face of MidEast oil problems -- act to establish closer ties with Russia whereas Kerry might go the Jimmy Carter conservationist route. In the end, Putin may be backing GWB for business reasons; he may have realized that the Franco-German alliance is not good for Russia economically, but one with the world's fastest growing economy is.

Posted by: Helen on June 19, 2004 01:21 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
Archimedes: "The only thing worse than analysis paralysis is an ..."

gKWVE: "I read [i]Orthodoxy[/i] and came away unimpressed ..."

Blonde Morticia: " Do you think the next step from the internet - r ..."

weft cut-loop[/i][/b] [/s]: "40 x 32 ??? Shit, dude. Time for some bowling. ..."

SSBN 656 (G): "There is no try. There is do or do not. Posted by ..."

the lower depths: "31 That tracks with the current trend of woke p ..."

JackStraw : ">>Ok, time to be honest. How many of you thought " ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Inbility to act can be a sign of ADHD - executive ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "I am genuinely wondering-- just who is the "other ..."

AmericanKestrel: "Do you think the next step from the internet - rob ..."

Denny Crane -- Because I'm [i]Denny Crane[/i].: "Ok, time to be honest. How many of you thought "ye ..."

Huck Follywood: "You want a Hot Take? Here is an awesome Hot Take ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives