Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« A Little Perspective | Main | Media Can't Say Who's Right on Jobs Creation »
June 04, 2004

German Report: Taliban Offered to Extradite OBL... to Clinton

Offer was made "about a year" before the September 11 attacks:

ZDF reported that American and Taliban officials met secretly in Frankfurt in November 2000 to discuss deporting bin Laden long before his al Qaeda terrorist network successfully hijacked airliners and crashed them into New York's World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington in 2001.

The television documentary, which aired Thursday evening in Germany, said the Afghan-American businessman Kabir Mohabbat tried to broker a deal between the U.S. government and the hard-line Islamic Taliban. Mohabbat quoted the Taliban foreign minister, Mullah Wakil Ahmed Mutawakil, as saying: "You can have him whenever the Americans are ready. Name us a country and we will extradite him."

Ever notice that when the media is reporting on something that is potentially damaging to Clinton, they get very vague about the administration the event occurred under? They can never bring themselves to say "Clinton." The best they can do is provide a vague date that allows you to figure out who was the President at the time.

I can't help but think they're hoping readers don't bother doing the math themselves.

I've seen this dozens of times. Hell, I've even seen them misidentify the President during 1999 or 2000 as George Bush in their rush to pin something on the current administration. Anyone remember that story? Let me know in the comments if you do. I know Instapundit covered it.

Ooooh! Here's another recent example! Here's the MSNBC story regarding a walk-in tipping the US to a planned Al Qaeda jet attack, a year before 9-11. The walk-in was disbelieved, and no action was taken on his tip.

Now: Go to the top of the article and search for "Clinton."

Who was President when this occurred? Who knows? It's a mystery. A stone-cold whodunnit.

Maybe it was Clinton. Maybe it was Bush. It's hard to say, and really, why should we get all hung up on "basic facts" anyway? Let's keep our eyes on the bigger picture: George Bush is ruining this country and he caused 9-11.

Ace of Spades Readers are Awesome: Golden Boy remembers the story in which Clinton's failure to follow-up on an offer to extradite OBL is blamed on Bush:

The report revealed that in a previously undisclosed secret diplomatic mission, Saudi Arabia won a commitment from the Taliban to expel bin Laden in 1998. But a clash between the Taliban’s leader, Mullah Mohammad Omar, and Saudi officials scuttled the arrangement, and Bush did not follow up.

Bush didn't follow up?

From Austin, Texas?

What the fuck was he supposed to do? Don his famous cowboy garb and "Yeee-haw!" his way into fucking Kabul and lasso hisself some terrorist?

Who knew that the President of the United States had, in 1998, delegated terrorist-lassoin' activities to the governor of Texas?

If that were the case, the media really should have made that clear, as it would have disproved the notion that Bush had "no" foreign policy experience. If a guy has been de-pu-tized by the head American Marshall to take his trusty horse Nugget and his keen-nosed smell-hound Arrow, and then gallop off to foreign capitals to russle hisself up some evil-doers, then I gotta say, I count that as foreign policy experience of some sort.

By the way, MSNBC apparently has corrected their original error. They deleted the reference to Bush not following up.

So, did they say that Clinton did not follow up?

Nope. They said the United States did not follow up.

Odd, that. When they think it's a Bush failure, they personalize the failure. When it turns out to be a Clinton failure, it's a failure of all Americans.

And they once again cagily avoid mention of the man in charge at the time.


posted by Ace at 04:15 PM
Comments



Who needs facts when there's an election to be won!

Posted by: Da Goddess on June 4, 2004 05:08 PM

Ace,
Here's some info on that MSNBC story Instapundit linked: http://www.thatliberalmedia.com/archives/001737.html

Posted by: Golden Boy on June 4, 2004 05:20 PM

Da Goddess,

Precisely. As Howell Raines recently opined, "facts" are not as important as the "truth" that Bush caused 9-11.

Golden,

Awesome. Awesome, awesome, awesomely awesome. Thanks.

Posted by: ace on June 4, 2004 05:41 PM

I find that hard to believe. The saudis came to Afghanistan to ask them to surrender Bin Laden in 1997, they were were denied by Mullah Omar. So the idea the Taliban would offer OBL freely to the US seems rather far-fetched. Unless the Taliban were like, GRATEFUL for the US role in fighting the USSR out of Afghanistan or the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of relief aid to the Afghan people. But they were probably as grateful as OBL was.

Posted by: Moonbat_ONe on June 4, 2004 05:48 PM

The United States also declined the handover of Bin Laden while getting a blow job in the Oval Office.

Posted by: on June 4, 2004 07:18 PM

Hell, I've even seen them misidentify the President during 1999 or 2000 as George Bush in their rush to pin something on the current administration. Anyone remember that story?

NK was just just discussing Enron with GregD re blaming Bush for Enron overcharges that happened in 2000 while Clinton was in office. Read that post et seq.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 4, 2004 07:50 PM

Actually, the discussion starts here, a few posts earlier, with NK's link to a O-Dub and a CBS video associating Bush with Enron overpricing.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 4, 2004 07:59 PM

Hey, CNBC changed their post:

"But a clash between the Taliban’s leader, Mullah Mohammad Omar, and Saudi officials scuttled the arrangement, and the United States did not follow up."

Classy.

Posted by: McGurk on June 4, 2004 10:31 PM

I saw the United States promoting a book recently.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 4, 2004 10:41 PM

To get the full effect of the Enron report, you really have to view the CBS video Odub linked.

Two highlights: Opens with a forest fire and Enron executives cackling over it: "Burn, baby, burn!"

No date is ever given for when this occurred but I'd bet money it was June 2000 because California had horrible forest fires then and the power crisis was going then. I doubt they had horrible forest fires in January, February or March (i.e., after Bush took office and when the crisis was winding down).

Bill Clinton is never mentioned in the video, and you know, I really don't blame him for the California power crisis anyway. *But* after playing this footage and then a tape of Enron employees cackling about stealing from grandmothers and how they'll fix prices once Bush is elected, they cut to footage of Bush opposing price regulation.

Like all this happened before the crisis.

It didn't and it couldn't have (the guys couldn't have been talking about what would happen once Bush was elected, if he had already been in office, right?).

Still, CBS tried their best to damn Bush by association. Which is exactly what Odub does as well.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on June 4, 2004 10:44 PM

All this garbage just to get Kerryt elected. How pitiful they are.
If they can't even get dates roght with who is in the White House, what the hell are they doing at a media outlet. They should join up with MIchael Moore and lie with him in a fakumentary.

Posted by: Stix on June 5, 2004 04:36 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
ANOTHER LEFT WING ASSASSIN ATTEMPTS TO KILL TRUMP
If I understand this, the left-wing Democrat assassin attempted to get into the White House Correspondents Association dinner, and was stopped at the magnetometers, which detected his gun. I guess he pulled out the gun and was shot by Secret Service agents.
Erika Kirk was present.
Forgotten 70s Mystery Click
You made me cry
when you said good-bye

70s, not 50s
Now that is a motherflipping intro
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD wonder about the Chaos that Trump is creating in the minds of the Iranian junta, Virginia redistricting is pure power grab, Ilhan Omar is many things ...and stupid too! Amazon censoring conservative thought again, and the UK...put a fork in it!
NYT Melts Down Over Texas Rangers Statue Outside... Texas Rangers' Stadium
"The Athletic posted a lengthy article about a statue outside Globe Life Field, presenting a virtue-signaling moral grievance as unbiased news coverage." [CBD]
Important Message from Recent Convert to Christianity and Yet Super-Serious Christian Tuq'r Qarlson: Actually Muslims love Jesus, it's Trump and his neocons who hate him
Tucker Carlson Network
@TCNetwork

The people in charge [Jews, of course -- ace] don't want you to know this, but Muslims love Jesus.

Islam reveres Him as a major prophet and messenger of the Lord, believes He performed miracles, and states that He will return to Earth to defeat the Antichrist. That's why Donald Trump's painting depicting himself as the Son of God offended the president of Iran. It was an attack on his religion as well as Christianity.

Trump's trolling tweet was ill-advised, but Tucker is just lying when he claims the Christianity-hating President of Iran was "offended" by this.
He's one step away from announcing his official conversion to Islam. He literally never stops praising Islam. Well, he suddenly became Christian two years ago, there's not much stopping him from converting again.
You can track Tuq'r's official conversion to Islam with this Bingo card.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk Orban losing, but is it the end of Hungary? The Irish start a brawl, but is it enough, Pope Leo wades into politics, Trump calls Iran's bluff and blockades Hormuz, Artemis II! Swallwell is scum, and more!
People say that the bearded man in the video of Fartwell molesting a hooker looks like Democrat Arizona Senator Rueben Gallego, said to be Swalwell's "best friend" and known to take vacations with him.
@KFILE 21m

Politico is reporting that multiple people have abruptly resigned from Eric Swalwell's gubernatorial campaign: "Members of senior leadership have departed the campaign, including Courtni Pugh, a strategic adviser who served as Swalwell's top liaison to organized labor groups."

So the campaign is collapsing due to the truth of the sexual harassment allegations.
That hissing sound you hear is the air going out of the Swalwell campaign. UPDATE: No it wasn't, it was just Swalwell one-cheek-sneaking out a fart on camera
Eric Swalwell more like Eric Farewell amirite
thanks to weft-cut loop.
This is the dumbest AI bullslop I've seen in a while: the CIA can use "quantum magnetometry" to track an individual man's heartbeat from twelve miles away
I wouldn't click on it, it's not interesting, it's just stupid clickslop. I just want to share my annoyance with you.
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
Recent Comments
[/i][/s][/b][/u]blaster - [b]Fortis Fortuna Adiuvat[/b]: "Billy Idol. A few (must be almost 20 now!) years ..."

JM in Illinois : "So I watched a video of young people out boating g ..."

tankdemon: "16 I might never eat another PB&J again. Posted b ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "but scientists have now shown that this famous bot ..."

JackStraw: ">>Would anything like this happen today? I doubt i ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "Evenin' ..."

Archimedes: "The guy in the Bud Light video was just a wee bit ..."

[/i][/s][/b][/u]Oddbob: "The influencer vid and the "teach a gay man" vid s ..."

tankdemon: "If that top photo isn't a mystery click to "Stand ..."

Archimedes: "[i]and the iconic Armani jacket as a defining elem ..."

tankdemon: "I might never eat another PB&J again. ..."

AZ deplorable moron: "Thank you Doof ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives