Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« War Porn: 240,000 Rounds Per Minute | Main | American Meddling in Canadian Elections »
January 23, 2006

Yet ANOTHER Election Stolen!

Poor Democrats. They can't win for losing.

NBC canceling 'West Wing' after 7 seasons
I demand a recount! I want to make sure every vote is counted. How do we know that the evil Diebold voting machines used by the NBC executives who voted to cancel this show actually counted the votes? How do we know that Dick Cheney did not hack into the computer to change the results? You must prove a negative to satisfy my conspiracy bloodlust.

This is horrible. What will Liberals do without their fantasy, alternate reality? Man, talk about harshing their groove.

At least one day a week they could turn the TV on and bask in the glow of the way things SHOULD be, if it wasn't for that damn puppet, ChimpyMcHitlerBurton Bush and his black hearted masters! The cold hand of government repression is upon the TV industry. Dissent is no longer tolerated.

Martin Sheen in '08!

My Bizarre Analogy Update From Dave At Garfield Ridge: Hearing about the cancellation made me think up an analogy this morning: the West Wing was the television equivalent of Andrew Sullivan.

In the beginning, it was must-see/must-read. Even if you didn't agree with everything that was said, you had to admire the craft. The writing was excellent, really whip-smart stuff, and if you lived inside the Beltway, you simply had to tune in.

But then, ratings declined, sweep stunts got introduced (terrorist kidnappings and/or gay marriage obsessions), and both lost their focus. Even attempts to reinvent the formula (presidential campaigns, guest bloggers, moves to Time Magazine) didn't pay off. All attempts at political fairness were swept away as the liberal bias, previously secondary to good writing, moved to the foreground. Nothing could be done to salvage things-- what was once essential viewing/reading became laughably non-essential, a punchline.

And so here we are, where both go away with a whimper. Well, okay, Sullivan's still writing. Or so some people tell me.


posted by WunderKraut at 08:03 AM
Comments



Not only that, but the Geena Davis show is losing audience fast. It probably won't make it through the spring.

Ouch.

Posted by: Dogstar on January 23, 2006 08:16 AM

You mean Dick Cheney DIDN'T hack into the voting machines?

What, to simple? He sent his low level lackeys to do it?

Posted by: Sinner on January 23, 2006 08:32 AM

This was actually a decent show for a couple of years. Once they got full of themselves, it went downhill.

I was turned off when they had a show about tax cuts. They had one of the people giving a lecture to other staffers about their tax plan. They had 4 columns, each with a differnt income and tax rate. The first was something like $20,000 and a 15% rate. The character said, "This guy pays 15% times 20,000 or $3000 in income tax." Of course, that's not hpw tax is figured. He went on to the next two columns of something like 40,000 and 60,000 and did the same thing. Of course he didn't mention that those rates are MARGINAL rates and not total rates. He also didn't factor in exemptions and deductions.

He then got to the fourth column which was $16,000,000 and a 40% tax rate. He conveniently failed to make the same tax calculation which would have yielded $6,400,000. Instead he said, "We are only asking them to contirbute a measly little 1% more so that we can cut taxes for everyone else."

I wrote to the producers of the show pointing out their blatant distortion of our tax system. For some reason, I never heard back. But, then again, I never watched their show again, so I guess it evened out.

Posted by: Steve L. on January 23, 2006 08:36 AM

I never got into that show. It is an organ of the liberal/ Democratic Party and nothing more. Jeanneane Garafalo's (sp?) character was so like her in real life--gobsmackingly vile. She sealed the coffin for that show.

Jack Bauer should be loosed on their pansy asses during the last episode.

Posted by: KevlarChick on January 23, 2006 08:47 AM

West Wing? Never watched a full episode. Never liked that particaular style of drama -- two or three people speeking at each other in a fast-paced monotonous tone while walking down a hallway. It's silly. What are these people, robots? (Or, as Dr. Zoidberg would say, robits.

Can someone tell me why Don Imus is still on the air?
I really don't get it. What's his appeal?

Imus on MSNBC is like watching a freak show. A grown man, in the autumn of his years, who dresses like a 6 year old boy, is surrounded by cackling ninnies jumping through hoops seeking their master's approval.

Posted by: Bart on January 23, 2006 09:22 AM

A grown man, in the autumn of his years, who dresses like a 6 year old boy, is surrounded by cackling ninnies jumping through hoops seeking their master's approval.

You mean something like this?

Posted by: on January 23, 2006 09:30 AM

There's a show called "West Wing?" Is it a sitcom?

Posted by: Border Reiver on January 23, 2006 09:38 AM

Did anyone catch Sen. Windsurfer on ABC with George Stuffitinmyass?

Man, did Kerry look French, or what.
And he sure was shrill. He sounds more and more like Algore everyday.

Posted by: Bart on January 23, 2006 09:48 AM

It was funny reading comments at jumptheshark.com about Aaron Sorkin's previous show, Sports Night. After many commenters had complained about the show's blatant liberal messages, a liberal commenter came back with:

What exactly are the preachy, liberal ideals forced upon the hapless viewer in this show?? Granted the music can be a maudlin at times, but the writing is some of the most intelligent on television (currently in repeats on Comedy Central). I guess if one is forced to think or feel during a "comedy" it must be liberal!!

and another:
Too liberal?? What, exactly, is too liberal?

and another:
What's up with all the whiney conservatives complaining about this supposed propaganda devise? What Sorkin propaganda did SportsNight espouse?

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Posted by: geoff on January 23, 2006 10:09 AM

I enjoy the West Wing because they show the process of things. I agree the liberal garbage annoys me but I enjoyed watching how things worked. Of course now in the Presidential campaign they have a "Republican" played by Alan Alda running for President who has the same views as Arnold in CA, pro-choice, non-religious, etc. The implication is that the only acceptable Republicans are ones like Rudy Guiliani who are socially liberal but fiscally conservative.

And also Richard Spencer died and he was the best actor on the show.

Posted by: bcb0225 on January 23, 2006 10:12 AM

I actually started watching WW this year, my 16-year old daughter joined me, and we both like it, and it is not as preachily liberal as I thought it would be (even though it is obviously a liberal fantasy: namely, the Dems are not national laughingstocks on defense issues and the Republican presidential candidate is pro-abortion and doesn't like Christian conservatives). I think they may have toned down their preachiness from earlier years. At any rate, I'm sorry to see it go.

Posted by: OregonMuse on January 23, 2006 10:24 AM

OregonMuse, check out the first couple of seasons on DVD. It really was a sharp, cleverly-written show. What you're watching now is a pale shadow of its former self.

I was saddened by the cancellation of West Wing three years ago; y'know, when they decided to stop being entertaining.

Posted by: Pompous on January 23, 2006 10:32 AM

West Wing, when it could refrain from priostitute sub-plots, and the like, was a well produced, directed and written show. I watched even as I cringed with some of the feel-good politics they espoused.

The transitions from scene to scene were some of the best on tv. The timing was excellent. I'm also glad to see it go, after the Sorokin/Schlamme period ended.

Posted by: Tom M on January 23, 2006 11:01 AM

West Wing was a fantastic show for the first few seasons. When Sorkin left, the writing got less interesting, and the kidnapping plot nonsense is what finally drove me away from the show. The political preachiness was bearable, but the bad writing and increasingly-soap operaish plotlines were just too much to take.

Posted by: Slublog on January 23, 2006 11:04 AM

Loose sh*t - prostitute - how did I mess that one up?

Posted by: Tom M on January 23, 2006 11:07 AM

Don't miss Commander and Chef, Sorkin's newest drama about the adventures of the senior cook aboard the HMS Poufter.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 23, 2006 11:09 AM

The first couple of seasons were OK - with Slick Willy in the White House, Jed Bartlett was actually a pretty appealing Pres, and you always knew that Leo was there to provide some adult supervision.

Posted by: holdfast on January 23, 2006 11:24 AM

I must admit that I enjoyed the first three seasons and tuned in occasionally for the rest. When it was good it was awesome and the late John Spencer was always mind-blowing. Anyone who's seen him explain his alcoholism is likely to remember that moment for a looong time.

Yeah, it was Democart Porn for the most part. But that made those rare moments of sobriety all the more entertaining. Like Alan Alda advocating drilling in the ANWAR or Toby bitchslapping activist Moonbats. Good times.

Time to put it out of its misery.

Posted by: Sunshine on January 23, 2006 11:27 AM

Back a few years ago MARTIN SHEEN took part in a antiwar protest in which he put duct tape with PEACE written on it over his mouth well now he can put the same duct tape over his mouth put use the word CHUMP instead

Posted by: spurwing plover on January 23, 2006 11:28 AM

WW was a well-written show, but its glory days are long past. Time to pull the plug, I think. Incidentally, WaPo has a great article on the cancellation, where Martin Sheen explains that the show was always "dead center" politically; it was the country that shifted after Bush snuck into the white House.

Kind of a West Wing-centric view of the political spectrum.

Posted by: utron on January 23, 2006 11:28 AM

Never liked that particaular style of drama -- two or three people speeking at each other in a fast-paced monotonous tone while walking down a hallway.

Same here -- first and last time I watched it, it seemed like a cross between the Sunday talk shows (which I also can't stand) and The Blair Witch Project.

Posted by: JSinger on January 23, 2006 11:38 AM

YES! I've made it though another show w/o tuning in ONCE. 7 years isn't a personal record, but still something to be proud of.

Posted by: carin on January 23, 2006 11:48 AM

Would "tuning in" be considered an anachronism? Funny how we still use that expression. I suppose technically cable satellite converters use some form of tuning, but my TV has been tuned into Channel 3 for 6 years.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 23, 2006 11:54 AM

carin:

Ditto here too -- never saw a single episode. It struck me as a series version of The American President. (Democrats always get to be president in movies and on TV; Republicans get to be president in real life. I guess it's a fair trade).

Are we starting a dead pool for Commander In Chief?

Eh. As long as Monk and BSG are on. If it weren't for those two shows, I would just get rid of my television altogether.

Posted by: Monty on January 23, 2006 12:21 PM

At least the West Wing was more plausible than Fox News.

Posted by: scarshapedstar on January 23, 2006 12:21 PM

"The West Wing" is still ON?

Network television is $HIT, people. Even "24" -- the only show I've made a point to watch (for the first time this season) -- is only good when compared to all the other crap that passes as entertainment these days.

I'm also stuck with "Amercian Idol" because I watch it with my daughters as a family thing, and I'm stuck on Full Cringe Mode the entire time. Really, why doesn't Fox just take a camera to the local nuthouse and film the mentally challenged instead? It would be cheaper and the audience would be forced to realize that they're sitting at home and laughing at a bunch of sad, hopeless wretches. Oh, but THAT would be PI.

Posted by: bbeck on January 23, 2006 12:23 PM

I never got into WW and I could never get into Commander in Chief from the very beginning. They would do HD promos for the the show during Monday night football and it was very disturbing. What the hell happened to Geena Davis's face? HD does not help Geena Davis at all. I could not watch the show at all.

Posted by: Shtetl G on January 23, 2006 12:23 PM

Sure, it was a liberal wet dream at times but I always enjoy watching the reruns on Bravo.

John Spencer's Leo was a good character. So was Rob Lowe's Sam Seaborn and Emily Proctor's token GOPer. The show went downhill once they left.

Never understood how the Toby charcter would have lasted 2 months though.

Posted by: Bob on January 23, 2006 12:23 PM

I never watched it; Sheen's presence was enough by itself to keep me away - his protest antics were simultaneously pointless and hysterical and I have to assume the same to be true of the producers' political views since his podium came in large part from his role on their show.

Buh-bye, and may Geena's hard-choice-dodging farce not be far behind.

The only presidential show I'd watch is one that shows the damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don't-dilemma routinely faced by modern presidents and gives equal airtime to the idiots on both sides of the aisle and the real life problems they exacerbate or sometimes cause - including the part played by the clueless media. Also they'd need to show foreign governments esp incl the UN as something less than immortal/superior.

Meaning I'll be scanning the channels for a prez drama series when I look out the window and see pigs flapping past.

Posted by: Scott on January 23, 2006 12:34 PM

Andrew who?

Posted by: Sean M. on January 23, 2006 01:11 PM

I probably watched the show once, in the early years.

The show I enjoy, although it's always trying to inject the liberal lesson du jour, is Boston Legal. My husband & I crack up at William Shatner!! He saves the show!

Posted by: Ruth on January 23, 2006 01:15 PM

At least the West Wing was more plausible than Fox News.

Oh, a Fox News slam! How refreshing! How original!

Never heard that before!

Posted by: Lee Atwater on January 23, 2006 01:19 PM

Lee Atwater:

Yeah, mentioning Fox News to a leftie is like prodding a mean dog with a stick. They just can't help going into a foaming-spittle rage! Faux News seems to be the favored insult, but you'd think they could come up with something more clever -- especially since the network is hammering CNN and MSNBC like hot horseshoes in the ratings.

What really cracks me up is when I hear some DU denizen slamming on CNN for being -- get this -- too conservative. I mean, that's the kind of entertainment TV just can't provide anymore!

Whatever. Fox News still has the best looking anchor-cupcakes around. I usually watch it with the television muted. I bet if there was enough incentive, Rupert Murdoch would order his news-bimbos to work naked. I live for that day.

Posted by: Monty on January 23, 2006 01:32 PM

Back a few years ago MARTIN SHEEN took part in a antiwar protest in which he put duct tape with PEACE written on it over his mouth well now he can put the same duct tape over his mouth put use the word CHUMP instead

Y'all have to admit, that was good.

P.S. Speaking of chumps, did you see Chump Bailey and the loser Broncos lose to the Steelers?

Posted by: Bart on January 23, 2006 01:51 PM

Bart:

I agree. Spurwing got off some funky poetry with that one!

Back a few years ago
MARTIN SHEEN took part
in a[n] antiwar protest
in which he put duct tape with PEACE
written on it
over his mouth
well now
he can put the same duct tape over his mouth
but use the word CHUMP
instead

Genius. Absolute frickin' genius.

Posted by: Monty on January 23, 2006 01:55 PM

"...you'd think they could come up with something more clever -- especially since the network is hammering CNN and MSNBC like hot horseshoes in the ratings."

Monty, you forget that the people in question consider themselves more intelligent, refined, and aware than the average bear. If you consider the average person in this country to be stupid, racist, narrow minded, etc, the ratings success of Fox News merely confirms your low opinion of it.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 23, 2006 02:07 PM

Hey Monty, thanks for the poetry slam. I now read Spurwing Plover in a whole new light. And you're absolutely right, Plover is a f'n genius. e.e. cummings is a barnyard hack compared to our Spurwing.

Posted by: OregonMuse on January 23, 2006 06:02 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Recent Comments
JQ: "Not starting out well, turned coffee off before it ..."

four seasons: " Dang ..."

Simp for the Machine[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]175 Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me Unle ..."

four seasons: " Skip, I hope your day gets better. ..."

Skip: "Not starting out well, turned coffee off before it ..."

JQ: "Not paying in for 30 years, duh... she got the pol ..."

JQ: "A friend from work, bought "long-term care" policy ..."

four seasons: " Jim, One of husband's brothers bought some ty ..."

JQ: "That's great, jim. We saved what we could. Not ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "508 It costs a small fortune for those places and ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "506 JQ, It costs a small fortune for those pla ..."

four seasons: " Yep ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives