Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« Leif Garrett Charged With Heroin Possession | Main | The Sort of Incisive Commentary Time Pays St. Andrew For »
January 18, 2006

Again: Rapist (Teacher!) Given No Time

Unbelievable.

It was actually statutory rape (WND waits a bunch of paragraphs before letting you know that), but still: a teacher had gay sex with his 15-year-old student.

No jail time. A 2 1/2 year suspended sentence plus five years' probation.

I'm not sure this is the outrage it seems. Or at least-- it's not the uncommon outrage it seems. I don't think teachers typically do jail time for statutory rape of their charges.

But still. Not even six months?

Plus Five Counts Of Possession Of Child Porn On His Computer: I forgot that part. Yep, stat rape of a 15 year old boy, five counts of child porn... sounds like suspended sentence to me.

Why not just throw him a fucking parade while we're at it?


posted by Ace at 09:57 PM
Comments



He also had five counts of Child Porn on his computer.

Posted by: Jay on January 18, 2006 10:00 PM

*I won't say it* I won't say it*

Everyone here knows what I want to say, right?

Posted by: Rightwingsparklew on January 18, 2006 10:15 PM

Okay, I'll say it:
They do have a parade for this guy. It's called the NAMBLA section of most any gay pride parade.

Posted by: Nathan on January 18, 2006 10:24 PM

Yeah, but NAMBLA are party crashers. Nobody wants them there. Trust me on this one. I've got friends in SF who do the whole gay pride day parade stuff (yeah, Bart, I know) and they have nothing but contempt for pedophiles.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 18, 2006 10:27 PM

Nope. That wasn't it.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 10:29 PM

Something about a biological predisposition towards diddling students, perhaps?

Posted by: sandy burger on January 18, 2006 10:31 PM

Something about it being a lesser crime when a teacher messes with a teenage boy instead of a teenage girl maybe?

Posted by: lauraw on January 18, 2006 10:37 PM

"Everyone here knows what I want to say, right?"

Mr. Pibb + Red Vines = crazy delicious?

Posted by: The Unabrewer on January 18, 2006 10:37 PM

If the 15 year old willingly went along with it, they should throw him in prison too.

Posted by: Otho Laurence on January 18, 2006 10:44 PM

I think Laura got it, and I'll embellish...

I seem to recall a very large number of jokes being told when the teacher in question was both female and good-looking.

I suppose this child molester wasn't hot enough to be given a pass (except by the judicial system).

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 10:54 PM

Pills.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 10:58 PM

Yeah, but you love us.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:01 PM

I love you much like a 10 year old loves his hot Spanish teacher, Senorita Myrowitz.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:03 PM

Ew.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:05 PM

Ok, maybe yall haven't heard me rant about porn in general enough. So here goes.

You know the other teachers, the goodlooking female ones? what do you want to bet they were into porn too? What else would get someone so hot they would go for a child??? And it's not just child porn either I'm betting, although I am sure it would make all of you feel better to think that it was.

Yall can joke about porn here all you wish but it really is a horrible terrible thing that damages how we are intimate with those we love. It damages who we are. As I have said before, sex is meant to be had, not watched.

These kinds of things are the result. Spare me your justifications, ok? Because I have heard them all.

*end of rant*

You still like me, right??? right????

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:07 PM

As I have said before, sex is meant to be had, not watched.

Oh yeah, right. Have sex. Giggle.

What color are the skies in your world, RWS?

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:09 PM

You still like me, right??? right????

Huh! What? Oh. Sorry. Was thinking about Scarlett Johanssen's dress.

Posted by: on January 18, 2006 11:10 PM

Oh, so I guess Laura DIDN'T get it. She must've been too busy surfing for that Hot And Hung website I told her about...

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:11 PM

Ace,

Well if you weren't so "a-scared" of girls you might have sex with one.

;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:11 PM

Right, maybe I'll just flap my arms and fly to the moon while I'm at it.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:12 PM

I actually typed "have sex with me" Heh!!! Thank God I previewed!

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:12 PM

Brokeback Classroom?

Posted by: Iblis on January 18, 2006 11:12 PM

match.com?

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:13 PM

Have "sex." With "girls."

Guess they just elected a new Mayor of Crazytown.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:14 PM

Ace, RWS, would you two just go get a room already? Jeez.

Posted by: See-Dubya on January 18, 2006 11:15 PM

Gee whiz, Ace, all those slutty NY liberals and you're having trouble??? It's sad when you can't get laid in a whoretown.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:16 PM

A "room." With a "woman." Ka-zing!

Nice one, See-Dub.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:16 PM

Kinda off topic here, but have yall seen Beauty and the Geek? I love that show. The guys are so sweet and seem so grateful to be around a hot girl. And in the shows I watched, the girls really start to appreciate the geeks. In one show one of the beautys goes to snuggle with one of the geeks in bed (with the help of some drinks) and he is in heaven.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:18 PM

Oh, no, bbeck. I'm having lots of "sex" with "girls." Why, just the other day I was cleaning my unicorn of excess starshine and fairydust, and then I fell into a chocolate river and "made love" to an ice elf princess.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:18 PM

I don't need to watch, RWS, I live it.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:19 PM

You guys are funny.

What a bunch of weisenheimers.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:19 PM

well I only dress as an ice elf to make ace happy.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:20 PM

Ace, I thought you stopped playing DnD when you hit 30.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:20 PM

bbeck,

Well, that was kinda my point...;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:21 PM

Sorry, RWS, still shaking the "Ice Elf having sex with Ace" image out of my head...and the only thing good I can say about it is that it replaced the "Ace viewing porn alone" image.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:26 PM

bbeck, how about another cartwheel for uncle Billy?

Posted by: William Howard Taft on January 18, 2006 11:30 PM

Most people who look at porn never screw kids.
Try another theory, RWS.

Posted by: harrison on January 18, 2006 11:30 PM

And if you're into kids, you're looking at kid-porn.

If you're looking at, say, Jenna Jameson, you're not into kids. She can't be mistaken for a kid.

Actually, anyone seen her lately? I'm not sure she could be mistaken for a human.

Nice plastic surgery, Jenna.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:32 PM

If one can make something be anything just by passing a statute, then the statutory whatsit was indeed a rape. But, speaking now of truth rather than law, I wonder if we can just admit that, by the time a guy's 15, he knows what he wants, and leave it at that.

Posted by: Jacarutu on January 18, 2006 11:33 PM

anyone see lauren holly's plastic surgery over on Wizbang? It was the year in pictures, maybe the third or fourth of January.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:35 PM

I did forget to type "princess' there, didn't I? That does change the visual.

Ok, well think of me as an ice elf PRINCESS. Does that help?

*although you would think that Ace's fantasys might not include "ice' or "elf" but hey, to each his own.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:35 PM

although you would think that Ace's fantasys might not include "ice' or "elf" but hey, to each his own.

I think Ace's fantasies would include just about anything as long as he's wedged in there somewhere.

And I didn't see Lauren Holly's surgery. What did she do to herself?

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:39 PM

Lauren Holly's new stripper-sized cans.

No, seriously, they look natural. I'd never guess.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:39 PM

Who is she?

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 18, 2006 11:42 PM

She was the girl in Dumb & Dumber, briefly married to Jim Carrey.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:42 PM

The chick who lost a briefcase or something?

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 18, 2006 11:43 PM

yep.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:44 PM

and now she's got two cantaloups tapped to her chest.

Posted by: Otho Laurence on January 18, 2006 11:45 PM

"Who is she?"

She's a lady with big cans.
What else is there to know?

Posted by: harrison on January 18, 2006 11:45 PM

Lot of good pics here, not all safe for work.

I especially like Paris Hilton's overexposed pose.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:46 PM

I do not get the fake boob thing. Everyone who knows you knows they aren't real and it seems like girls love to announce it anyway. It can't feel right.

Guys can't like that. Can they?

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:46 PM

Holy crap.

Those are too big for her frame (and every single one of you gentlemen would hit it). To cut her some slack, they only look AWFUL in the pic the shows the cleavage-you-could-drive-a-truck-through. That's the sign of a bad job.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:48 PM

Oh good grief! Did I get Ace started?????

Sorry I mentioned it!

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 18, 2006 11:48 PM

Heh.

Posted by: harrison on January 18, 2006 11:48 PM

Well, we're supposed to say "no," but really, "yes."

But there are limits. Lauren Holly is supposed to be an actress, and those are porn-cans. They're cartoonish. How will she get work with those?

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:48 PM

I do not get the fake boob thing.

You were not brought upon this world to "get it," Ms. RWS.
- Lo Pan

Posted by: geoff on January 18, 2006 11:48 PM

give me a pair and I'll get back to you

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 18, 2006 11:49 PM

"She's a lady with big cans.
What else is there to know?"

- Her hopes
- Her aspirations
- What makes her laugh
- What makes her cry
- Whether there are thick bushes outside her windows
- What nights she puts her garbage out

I hope you now realize how shallow you were being.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 18, 2006 11:49 PM

I'm with RWS. I don't see how men can find fake breasts attractive.

And doesn't any man on this entire site like legs? Why the hell am I running 10 miles a week?

Posted by: Mrs. Peel on January 18, 2006 11:49 PM

How will she get work with those?

I don't think anyone's been beating down her door lately anyway.

Would WE be talking about her now if she hadn't done that to herself?

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:50 PM

Steve-
Sorry.
My bad.

Posted by: harrison on January 18, 2006 11:50 PM

hahaha... compelling. And rich.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:50 PM

I don't know what plastic is.

But I do know what legs are.

Posted by: William Howard Taft on January 18, 2006 11:51 PM

Every guy likes legs. But we don't brag about getting "raw knee" off a girl.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:52 PM

Sharon Stone's boobs look painful.

I mean really. Just get a blow up doll. At least you won't have to pay for dinner.

Posted by: Rightwingsparklew on January 18, 2006 11:53 PM

I think, Mrs. Peel, there have been skin shots requested of you already.

Posted by: Steed on January 18, 2006 11:53 PM

I'm not a fan of the fakes - guess I live in the wrong place.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 18, 2006 11:54 PM

I mean really. Just get a blow up doll.

Done and done. And I mean done.

Posted by: Principal Skinner on January 18, 2006 11:54 PM

A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

But her legs are the shizzle.

--Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 18, 2006 11:54 PM

I feel fairly certain that most, if not all, the male posters here would do a woman with no breasts..but they would not do a woman with no legs.

But that's a guess.

Posted by: bbeck on January 18, 2006 11:54 PM

but they would not do a woman with no legs.


no legs and no boobs, or like, no?

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 18, 2006 11:56 PM

I think a lot of the male posters here would do a woman with no head.

Posted by: ace on January 18, 2006 11:56 PM

What's the worst part about eating vegatables?

Posted by: harrison on January 18, 2006 11:56 PM

I like a natural girl like these.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 18, 2006 11:57 PM

I feel fairly certain that most, if not all, the male posters here would do a woman with no breasts..but they would not do a woman with no legs.

That would be discriminatory towards the differently-gaited.

Posted by: geoff on January 18, 2006 11:57 PM

This is like the Ginger-Maryanne argument. I'm always curious-- would you rather do a nice-looking head with no body, or a really great body with no head?

This is not entirely a hypothetical question.

Posted by: Ed Gein on January 18, 2006 11:58 PM

When you say "no" do you mean complete absence, or just unattractive.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 18, 2006 11:59 PM

Well I like a girl to be real skinny, 5'8" or taller, chest in proportion to all the rest. One whose figure cuts a nice trim line through the air. So there's your choice, two giant fake cans or a nasty eating disorder. Just don't mix the two, that looks strange.

Posted by: Otho Laurence on January 19, 2006 12:00 AM

Commerce with all legs, alliance with none, should be our motto

-- Thomas Jefferson

Look, I don't make these up, I just point them out.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 12:00 AM

And what about a really hot gnarled dismembered arm? Gotta be something hot you can do with one of those.

Wait, just checked under my couch. Two of those.

Posted by: Ed Gein on January 19, 2006 12:01 AM

THANK you, Steve, for asking. I was a little too freaked out to type the question.

Otho, I'm 5-7 and proportioned. Close enough? ;)

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:02 AM

this is funny!

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:03 AM

Ed - Are they a matched set or 2 lefties/righties?

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:04 AM

Great innovations should not be forced on slender majorities. bbeck's cans are just right.

--Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 12:05 AM

bbeck:
After looking at steve_in_hb's link, I'd like to retract my previous comment and say that this lady at the bottom is more what I had in mind.

Posted by: Otho Laurence on January 19, 2006 12:07 AM

Complete absence??? Why are you even discussing this???

Freaks.

;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:08 AM

Ed - Are they a matched set or 2 lefties/righties?

Yeah, right, like I can ever find a matching pair. They're like socks. They're everywhere.

One of these days I have to get organized. And then I have to make a grandfather clock out of a living woman.

Posted by: Ed Gein on January 19, 2006 12:08 AM

I'm an ass man, myself. Boobs are secondary. Sir Mix-a-lot said it best:

So your girlfriend rolls a Honda
Playin' workout tapes by Fonda
But Fonda ain't got a motor in the back of her Honda
My anaconda don't want none unless you've got buns hon...Give me a sista I can't resist her
Red beans and rice didn't miss her...I like big butts and I can not lie.


I concur with Sparkles. Porn is poison. There isn't a single positive aspect to pornography.


Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 12:08 AM

bbeck's cans are just right.

I knew it was only a matter of time...

They're real and they're spectacular! :)

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:08 AM

Bart - If you saw my muscular right forearm you wouldn't be so dismissive.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:10 AM

Otho, gahhh....

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:10 AM

I'm gettin' too old for this shit.

Posted by: steve's muscular right forearm on January 19, 2006 12:11 AM

bbeck - What are you intimidated by her womanly body?

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:12 AM

I think some of those girls may be "stuffing."

Posted by: ace on January 19, 2006 12:12 AM

I'd just like to sit in between them and go to sleep, as though I were back inside my mother's womb...

Posted by: Otho Laurence on January 19, 2006 12:14 AM

History, in general, only informs us of what bad cans are.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 12:14 AM

Oh LOOK! A guy that agrees with me!!!! YAY!!!

Bart, tell the others what real sex is like! I think they would be interested!

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:14 AM

What are you intimidated by her womanly body?

No, but I'm scared $hitless at the thought of having sex with her.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:16 AM

Only on this site could a discussion about sentencing turn into a discourse about breasts versus legs.

For the record, though, I don't think fake breasts are attractive. It's not nice to mess with Mother Nature.

Posted by: Slublog on January 19, 2006 12:16 AM

I'm imagining what those girls are thinking. "Your going to pay me just to take my picture in a huge, stuffed bra rig? And some white boy, somewhere is going to get off on that?"

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:16 AM

You could've mentioned this was in Massachusetts. Saved me the time of clicking on the link. This is too lame to get onto Boston Public.

Posted by: Karl Maher on January 19, 2006 12:17 AM

RWS- Why not both?

Posted by: harrison on January 19, 2006 12:17 AM

so, anti-porn, but pro-actual-sex?

Pervert.

Posted by: ace on January 19, 2006 12:17 AM

I think breasts are winning hands down (so to speak), Slu.

Posted by: Mrs. Peel on January 19, 2006 12:18 AM

bbeck - definitely could see some black eyes if things get rigorous. Guess kissing is out - you can't penetrate the protective barrier.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:20 AM

I like large breasts in the right context.

And by "context," I mean china cabinet.

Posted by: Ed Gein on January 19, 2006 12:20 AM

I know real sex might be scary ace, but give at try it won't bite...much.

Posted by: yls on January 19, 2006 12:21 AM

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.

and fake cans look crooked to me. could be I'm not looking square on. I'll get back to you on that.


-- Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 12:21 AM

Yes, I am pro-actual sex, you 'ice elf princess doing it in a chocolate river" (as opposed to nagin's chocolate city) fantasy freak!

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:21 AM

Okay, the Ed Gein stuff is creeping me out, so I'll stop it.

Posted by: ace on January 19, 2006 12:21 AM

The "Ed Gein" posts are ruining my appetite...

Posted by: on January 19, 2006 12:22 AM

harrison, both what?

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:22 AM

yls,

nah. Sounds spooky. I heard about a guy who "did it" once and he was never the same.

Had this pitiable "confident swagger" and horrifying "satisfied glow." All the other kids used to laugh at him.

Posted by: ace on January 19, 2006 12:24 AM

I like Ed. But I am glad he wasn't a real poster.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:24 AM

That was you? Uhh, nice "role-playing", or something.

Posted by: someone on January 19, 2006 12:25 AM

I cannot live without cans.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 12:25 AM

Physical sex with another and porn.
The best of both worlds.

Posted by: harrison on January 19, 2006 12:26 AM

Ed Gein, model for Psycho, "Buffalo Bill," etc.

Posted by: ace on January 19, 2006 12:26 AM

Oh, and "Leatherface," of course.

Posted by: ace on January 19, 2006 12:27 AM

What Harrison said. I mean, since network television sux, why else have a TV in your bedroom?

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:27 AM

Legs?
Shoot, I got legs.
I want what I don't have -- boobs and a cooch.

(Sorry, was that too heteronormative?)

Fags. You guys suck.

~Benedict Arnold

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 12:28 AM

I think the Ace role playing thing has been well established...

harrison,,,,ewwww

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:28 AM

A song for Ed...

TV Set by The Cramps

oh baby i see you on my tv set
yeah baby i see you on my tv set
i cut your head off and put it in my tv set
i use your eyeballs for dials on my tv set
i watch tv i watch tv
since i put you in my tv set

oh baby i hear you on my radio
yeah baby i hear you on my radio
you know i flip flip flip for my radio
you're going drip drip drip on my radio
am radio pm radio
since i tuned you inside my radio... like this!

oh baby i see you in my frigidaire
yeah baby i see you in my frigidaire
behind the mayonnaise, way in the back
i'm gonna see you tonight for a midnight snack
but though it's cold you won't get old
'cause you're well preserved in my frigidaire yahhhhhhh....

oh baby look so good in my crib at night
yeah baby look so good in my crib at night
i could give you a million hugs
you look so good all covered up in bugs
oh, i missed some there under your chair
but that's all right, i'll sweep you under the rug...
ah ha ha!

oh baby i see you on my tv set
yeah baby i see you on my tv set
i cut your head off and put it in my tv set
i use your eyeballs for dials on my tv set
i watch tv i watch tv
since i seen you i've been so upset

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:28 AM

Having actually met Ace, I can confidently say:

He's had sex. With Allah. Often.

Posted by: someone on January 19, 2006 12:29 AM

RWS- I just like jerking your chain. Nothing personal.

Posted by: harrison on January 19, 2006 12:30 AM

Nah, Allah and Ace are completely platonic.

If by 'platonic' you mean the whole Oz role-play thing.

Posted by: Slublog on January 19, 2006 12:31 AM

Having actually met Ace, I can confidently say:

He's had sex. With Allah. Often.

And the visuals keep coming.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:32 AM

whoa. page 457 of Stuff Jefferson Said

I believe that every human mind feels pleasure in doing one another.


-- Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 12:32 AM

To record Ace having sex you need one of those high speed cameras they fild hummingbird wings with. Anything slower and you miss the "magic" and only see the awkward goodbyes.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:32 AM

Prison, or munchkins?

Posted by: someone on January 19, 2006 12:33 AM

Uh yeah, uh, Harrison, I was, like, joking, too. Who'd even THINK of doing porn and sex together? Er, that's TOTALLY icky. Right.

Besides, a portable DVD player is really hard to balance on your a$$.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:34 AM

Prison, of course.

Munchkins would just be teh ghay.

Posted by: Slublog on January 19, 2006 12:34 AM
And the visuals keep coming.
Wait, RWS, you mean your brain is watching a gay porno?

Eew.

Posted by: someone on January 19, 2006 12:35 AM

this is what drives me crazy. I picture Allah as a middle eastern guy even though I know he isn't but the name you know...

Now Ace, I think I know what he looks like. I found an old pic of him playing with his buddies in college. He is the one with the glasses.

So there is my visual.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:35 AM

bbeck

Like the bloodhound gang song..

"Then we'll do it doggy style so we can both watch x files."

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:35 AM

Bbeck- Oh, you were talking about watching it.
I was talking about making it.

Posted by: harrison on January 19, 2006 12:36 AM

Ice Elf Queens???

Posted by: Jay on January 19, 2006 12:36 AM

What Harrison said. I mean, since network television sux, why else have a TV in your bedroom?

So that Mrs. Harrison can watch Home & Garden Television during sex.

Posted by: Wichita Lineman on January 19, 2006 12:37 AM

I sent Slulog a pic of me and Ace in college, but he didn't put it up.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:37 AM

you people are disturbed.

my goodness.

is that fried chicken?

Posted by: William Howard Taft on January 19, 2006 12:37 AM

What's that, Sparkles, the Jeff Foxworthy Fan Club?

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 12:39 AM

"X Files?" XXX Files, maybe. :)

And thanks for the clarification, Harrison. It scared me to think I was the most perverted person posting. Well, except for "Ed."

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:39 AM

Look, he helped me out of a chocolate river, but nothing happened. I don't care what he says...he's never had a piece of this.

Posted by: Ice Elf Queen on January 19, 2006 12:39 AM

Hey! Where is the Ace Faces page? Isn't it on the sidebar or something?

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:39 AM

"So that Mrs. Harrison can watch Home & Garden Television during sex."

Brother, how'd ya know.

Posted by: harrison on January 19, 2006 12:39 AM

well, they say you are an elf queen,
but, Sparkle, I don't think it's truue...

Posted by: Dex in TX on January 19, 2006 12:40 AM

Yeah, where'd that go? I sent Slu my glamour shot.

Well, Ta ta for now.

Posted by: See-Dubya on January 19, 2006 12:41 AM

Bart! Can't you see what they are playing????

Posted by: Rightwingsparklew on January 19, 2006 12:41 AM

Besides, a portable DVD player is really hard to balance on your a$$.

Depends on the a$$. Yours appears be ample enough to accommodate a wide-screen.

Posted by: Wichita Lineman on January 19, 2006 12:41 AM

Oh, crap, steve...I forgot about that one.

I'll put it up tomorrow sometime. Sorry about that. I must not have put it into the 'pictures' folder in my inbox.

Posted by: Slublog on January 19, 2006 12:42 AM

http://www.slublog.com/faces.htm

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:42 AM
Posted by: Wichita Lineman on January 19, 2006 12:43 AM

Make sure you are clear who is who. I would hate for folks to be confused.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:44 AM

Found it. Faces from Ace.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:45 AM

I assumed it was p*ker.
On a second glance, I was hoping it was scrabble.

Dear lord, please don't tell me it's D&D.


P.S. Do NOT watch Lord of War. It sucks. Worse than The Hulk almost as bad as Batman.

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 12:45 AM

I would never confuse the two of you.

Posted by: Slublog on January 19, 2006 12:47 AM

Just so we are clear:

I am NOT posting as Wichita Lineman.
That wasn't me, bbeck.

For the record, I would be very pleased if you did indeed carry lots of junk in your trunk.

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 12:48 AM

I'm a great believer in luck and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it. But these girls have heard it all. Dammit!

-- Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 12:48 AM

Depends on the a$$. Yours appears be ample enough to accommodate a wide-screen.

You're confusing me with your mom, you sweet talker, you, and I'm sure she could manage a wide-screen for you if only you had the money.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:48 AM

Bart, I figured it was someone crying for attention. It's been taken care of.

And sorry to disappoint, but I'm an hourglass, not a pear.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:50 AM

Bart - It's not junk in the trunk, its precious cargo.

I'm also fond of "I like that wagon that you're dragging."

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 12:51 AM

Bart! Yes, Dungeons and Dragons! That is how I knew it was Ace. And you can see he is not denying it...;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:51 AM

bbeck:

I will confirm that Bart is not the Wichita Lineman.

Normally, a couple of suction cups are necessary to keep that big plasma screen in place, but I'm thinkin' that won't be necessary with you.


Posted by: Wichita Lineman on January 19, 2006 12:51 AM

and your pretty dog too!

Posted by: the Wicked Witch of the West on January 19, 2006 12:53 AM

Lord of War is that bad? Geez, what has happened to movies these days? I've recently been arguing with my history buddies who insist that Kingdom of Heaven wasn't crap.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 12:55 AM

Ace never wore plaid in his life.

Hourglass, mmmmmmm

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 12:55 AM

And doesn't any man on this entire site like legs? Why the hell am I running 10 miles a week?

For a nice ass.

Posted by: on January 19, 2006 12:55 AM

Are yall saying you like big asses? cuz I don't believe that for a second!

Big boobs maybe, but never big asses.

liars...;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:55 AM

Kingdom of Heaven flunked the Doze-O-Meter test, i.e., I fell asleep during battle scenes and I was only mildly wasted.

Posted by: Michael on January 19, 2006 12:59 AM

Hmmm... no hourglass here. More of a goldie hawn type. Small. Less for gravity to pull on, so I aint complaining.

Let's talk men for a change. I like hairless chests. Solid legs. I don't like alot of muscle like they work out all the time. Too...much..or something. I like skinny too.

bbeck? Mrs. Peel?

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 12:59 AM

Big boobs maybe, but never big asses.

If by "big asses" you mean like Jennifer Lopez, then believe it. But if by big you mean like Ace's mom, then no thanks.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:00 AM

RWS, these guys like FEMALES. The particulars aren't that important.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 01:00 AM

bbeck - Don't be so restricting - I've seen Ace chat up some latina trannys.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 01:02 AM

breathing ones preferably ... but that's not an deal breaker

Posted by: tres on January 19, 2006 01:02 AM

You guys asked for it.And I am completely silly and bored right now. forgive me.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 01:02 AM

I do not get the fake boob thing.

Me neither. But then again, I've never, uh, "experienced" a pair before, either.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:02 AM

And doesn't any man on this entire site like legs? Why the hell am I running 10 miles a week?

This puzzles me also, Mrs. Peel, given that you seem strangely unwilling to share with the rest of us the results of your strenuous exertions.

And what exactly is that goofy pose on your site (with the long concealing dress)?

Posted by: Wichita Lineman on January 19, 2006 01:03 AM

RWS nothing there

Posted by: Tres on January 19, 2006 01:04 AM

Fair Flower of Southern Womanhood:

That link goes nowhere.

Posted by: Wichita Lineman on January 19, 2006 01:05 AM

I should have said dandled a pair. Thanks again, Monty, for the new vocabulary.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:05 AM

Geoff is the only man here that likes the "athletic" look. Most men appreciate a full and round posterior. I sure do.

Boobs serve very little purpose in the bedroom. Unless they're big. Then it's fun to watch them swing, jiggle, and bounce.

B the way, I have no body hair. But I ain't skinny. I resemble an aging weightlifter, cuz that's what I am.

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 01:07 AM

That's weird. When i click on it I get it.

It's probably for the best. You could have nightmares.

http://stop-dikke-konten.tripod.com/big_ass_beer_rest1.jpg

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 01:07 AM

RWS, I actually think you're probably right about porn being bad for us.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:08 AM

Male physical traits...

I like a good pair of shoulders; that's the MOST important aspect of the male body that you can see when they're clothed. Short hair (or bald), preferably blond but I'm flexible. Blue eyes are nice, but if you have big brown ones like Sean Connery or James Garner then that works, too. Strong jaw line (weak chins should be covered with a beard) and NO pug or smallish noses 'cause they look girly. He should be taller than I am in heels (me in heels, not the guy).

I just described my husband. Go figure.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 01:08 AM

Thanks Sandy! flirting is much better for all of us and we don't even have to use our credit card!...;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 01:09 AM

RWS, these guys like FEMALES. The particulars aren't that important.

Aw, c'mon, that's not fair. Most of us have standards. Like, for example, we insist on woman who have a pulse.

Posted by: Wichita Lineman on January 19, 2006 01:10 AM

That's weird. When i click on it I get it.

It works if you cut-and-paste it into your browser. (If you click on the link, your browser sends a referrer link, which this site has been configured to reject.)

Oh, and thanks for posting that picture, RWS. Sexy! But that beer bottle is definitely photo-shopped in. I distinctly remember it was a Coors when I took the picture.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:13 AM

Re: the pics
Most guys won't admit it, but Day-UM!

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 01:13 AM

Blue eyes are nice, but if you have big brown ones like Sean Connery or James Garner then that works, too.

So, green eyes are out?

Posted by: Michael on January 19, 2006 01:14 AM

Bart,

What? the ass?????

Good grief!

Hey. Did Ace go to bed? Do you think we are talking too loud?

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 19, 2006 01:15 AM

Sorry, did I say "bad for us"? I meant to say "naughty for us".

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:15 AM

Lord of War is pathetic. It attempts to pander to anit-gun/war/West and be cool. Complete garbage. Pointless, even. I've never seen a movie that covers a nineteen year span of time and they don't even attempt to age the characters.

As soon as I realized it was a movie in which the main character, Nick Cage, narrates, I knew it was going to be bad.

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 01:19 AM

So, green eyes are out?

Nah, just naming preferences. One guy I dated for 3 years had green eyes, so they must not have bugged me too much.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 01:19 AM

Absolutely! If that girl has a pretty face, then it's even okay to bring her out in public. Otherwise, she's a booty call.

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 01:22 AM

Okay, Bart, I won't watch Lord o' War, you've convinced me.

I was just really annoyed at Kingdom 'cause I'd been looking forward to it for so long and it turned out so BAD. Admittedly, tho, I did buy it on DVD for the costuming...but I can't stand to sit and watch it.

And speaking of historical type movies, I heard Tristan and Isolde stunk it up, too.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 01:25 AM

so they must not have bugged me too much

Cold comfort, bbeck. I'm thinking that you, me, and a wide-screen are not happening anytime soon.

Posted by: Michael on January 19, 2006 01:25 AM

Michael, you, me, and a portable DVD player won't be happening either.

On a related topic; a big screen plasma HDTV is the ONLY way to go. Really people, you can't afford NOT to have one.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 01:28 AM

Does the Tristan movie story follow the Wagner opera in story line? Does it have any of his music in it? I haven't seen a new movie in about a decade or so, but if this is Wagnerized, I just might.

Posted by: Otho Laurence on January 19, 2006 01:28 AM

bbeck, I've got long hippy hair and a small chin ("weak", as you so cruelly put it). I am the exact opposite of your dream man. Physically, too.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:28 AM

Bart, how's your relationship with your mother? I'm working on a theory...

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:30 AM

Otho, it's supposed to be the same plot without the music, so save your time unless you want to see an opera sans song (ack).

And okay, Sandy, I'll stop lusting after your intellect, then.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 01:31 AM

Sandy -

Maybe you could cut the hair and built some sort of chin prostheses with it. Kill two birds with one stone.

Speaking of stone, getting stoned is probably easier than the whole chin thing;-)

Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 19, 2006 01:31 AM

Bart wrote:
I resemble an aging weightlifter, cuz that's what I am.

Oh, great. Just great. I've spent much of my time on AoS HQ insulting a guy who could probably kick my ass.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:33 AM

Stow it.

I liked Kingdom of Heaven. I was rooting for Saladin to win, he was the best character. Plus Orlando Bloom didn't look like a homo in this film.

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 01:33 AM

On a related topic; a big screen plasma HDTV is the ONLY way to go. Really people, you can't afford NOT to have one.

I've been thinking about this. I'm pretty satisfied with my obsolete (five years old) rear screen projection home theatre system, but I know the technology has moved rapidly. HDTV is really stunning. In my mind, the question is -- how long do I wait for prices to fall before I buy in?

Posted by: Michael on January 19, 2006 01:37 AM

I'm going to wait until I have to go digital before I buy one. That's a couple of years from now.

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 01:39 AM

I'd wait a few years.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:41 AM

I'm going to wait until I have to go digital before I buy one. That's a couple of years from now.

That's pretty much what I was thinking. Right now, I've got college tuition to pay for, and I have to get a new truck.

Posted by: Michael on January 19, 2006 01:44 AM

You guys just need to come to our house for Movie Night, then. We've had ours for about 6 months and it was worth every penny... but we're waiting until the prices fall to get a second one for the master bedroom.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 01:47 AM

bbeck: Did you somehow miss all the Kingdom of Heaven threads here, on lgf, etc.? Can't imagine you'd be positively anticipating it after those...

Posted by: someone on January 19, 2006 01:59 AM

Michael: Wait till till cablecard-enabled HD Tivo comes out.

I'd say the monitor technology has already matured; it's all the rest that needs catching up.

Oh, yeah, and if you know anyone with a big HD screen, go see the Super Bowl on it. Amazing how good football looks on those things.

Posted by: someone on January 19, 2006 02:03 AM

Someone, no, I didn't see them, but I probably would have gone to the movie anyway, seeing as how I'm into that sort of history and I like Ridley Scott. The movie was good for about 5 minutes, and then Bloom murdered the mouthy monk (which was supposed to be okay for our "hero" to do), and it went downhill from there.

BUT it's too late at night to launch into a diatribe, and Hubby's about to come home from his flight. Night all.

Posted by: bbeck on January 19, 2006 02:07 AM

So, I've been out this evening. What have I missed?

Posted by: Jack M. on January 19, 2006 02:09 AM

Yeah, but NAMBLA are party crashers. Nobody wants them there. Trust me on this one. I've got friends in SF who do the whole gay pride day parade stuff (yeah, Bart, I know) and they have nothing but contempt for pedophiles.

Sorry, but I can't trust you. I was living in SF when it was revealed that NAMBLA was being allowed to use a meeting room at a branch library in Bernal Hts at 3 or 4 pm during the week. The library is packed with children at that time. I remember the librarians and city officials, who were gay, trying to justify this bullshit on civil liberty grounds.

I don't know if you have been watching those Dateline specials where they film pedophile stings. It's odd that they have not conducted any in SF. They would have a field day.

Posted by: on January 19, 2006 05:48 AM

The thing about NAMBLA is they may not be welcome at Gay Pride Parades, but it isn't necessarily because the organizers have any moral issues with them. It's just because NAMBLA is bad PR for gay rights.

Posted by: V the K on January 19, 2006 09:15 AM

how long do I wait for prices to fall before I buy in?

Morning update. Prices have already fallen 50% in a year. Until early 2005, there were only 4 manufacturing plants online making plasmas, all in S. Korea. There are now 16 plants in production.

Appears as though we could see another 30-40% drop by November 2006

Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 19, 2006 09:17 AM

Screenplay:
The Blackboard Bunghole

Posted by: Joe Mama on January 19, 2006 09:52 AM

I don't mean to be bashing gay people. The majority find pedophilia abhorrent. However, I found in SF the gay community was more accepting of deviancy, including pedophilia.

Posted by: on January 19, 2006 10:03 AM

The proctor buys a pupil ices
And hopes the boy will not resist
When he attempts to practise vices
Few people even know exist

- E. Gorey

This kind of story is OLD. Millenia old, and pornography may be a tool of inspiration, but without it, deviant people think this stuff up anyway. The behaviour was probably passed down from a previous, generation.

The abuser views himself as initiating the young lad into his special sort of world.

Posted by: SarahW on January 19, 2006 10:51 AM

OMG, Andy was on Colbert Tuesday, where have I been?
Ace, do something, demand equal time.

Posted by: betty on January 19, 2006 11:19 AM

I don't think teachers typically do jail time for statutory rape of their charges.

Obviously, not in Masshole. Actually, teachers are routinely sentenced to jail/prison over this. Mass. has a terrible record when it comes to crimes against children and sex crimes.

Posted by: shawn on January 19, 2006 11:32 AM

Dear Lord:
Please don't Sodomy and Gommorahy us just yet. We will fix the outrage of these judges asap.
Thank you.

Posted by: Duhgee on January 19, 2006 01:17 PM

However, I found in SF the gay community was more accepting of deviancy, including pedophilia.

I agree. I think it's for the same reason that the SF community (straights, gays, whoever) is sympathetic to Tookie, and Mumia, and Palestinian suicide bombers, and so on. This bizarre nihlistic philosophy permeates the city. I have some friends in the city, so I often spend time there, and I just don't get it.

Posted by: sandy burger on January 19, 2006 01:20 PM

If you think porn is bad for us the terrorists have already won. What's next, Burkhas?

Posted by: on January 19, 2006 01:59 PM

OMG, Andy was on Colbert Tuesday, where have I been?
Ace, do something, demand equal time.

Oy, if Ace appears on Colbert, I'll go verklempt!

Posted by: Muslihoon on January 19, 2006 02:06 PM

This is ridiculous. That man knew what he was doing and there is no excuse for molestation or child pornography. What the hell is up with some of the judges these days? I'm gay and I sure as hell do not approve of the "relationship" that took place here!!! Straight or gay doesn't matter, you diddle some kid and you go to jail, what the f' is so difficult to understand??? I do not care what this man's childhood was like, it matters squat whether his victim wanted the "relationship" or not, etc. The victim was a minor and the rapist was an adult, simple facts to comprehend for the most addle-minded of judges.

As for NAMBLA and the gay parades, beats me as I care for neither. Too many liberals and genuine freaks at the parades and every member of NAMBLA needs to be put behind bars, after being chemically-castrated.

Posted by: AGJ on January 19, 2006 02:17 PM

Former elementary teacher Daniel Cliatt has 162 counts against him for nailing the boys in his class. We probably won't suspend his sentence.

Posted by: Donnah on January 19, 2006 04:01 PM

SF community...is sympathetic to Tookie, and Mumia, and Palestinian suicide bombers[...]This bizarre nihlistic philosophy permeates the city.

Why can't it be a simpler reason, Sandy? You give me shit about my "theories" but it seems that your conclusion is very close to mine -- these people are rebelling against authority figures. If the authorities, i.e. parents, govt. pope, say "wrong" they say "right." If the authorities say "illegal" they "legal."

Posted by: Bart on January 19, 2006 07:38 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
This isn't Christmas Eve fare, and I thought about waiting until the 26th to post it, but supposedly an amateur detective has solved the Zodiac killer mystery. And the horrific Black Dahlia killing. He says it's the same person! I always thought of them as very far apart in time but I think Black Dahlia was mid-fifties (nope, 1947) mid and the Zodiac murders began in 1968 so it's possible it's the same killer.

The killer, if it's the same man, would have been in his 20s when he killed the Black Dahlia and his 40s when he did the Zodiac murders. Possible.

A little caveat: I saw someone snark on Reddit, "The Zodiac case gets solved more often than Wordle." There are a ton of coincidences here, supposedly, like a Zodiac cipher being solved by the name "Elizabeth." Elizabeth Short was the name of the so-called Black Dahlia.

If you don't know about the Black Dahlia, don't look it up. Just accept that it's grisly on the level of Jack the Ripper.

Yes, the named suspect resembles the police sketch of Zodiac.

Here's a podcast with the amateur sleuth who claims he cracked the Zodiac.
Daily Mail article.
Link to get around the LA Times' paywall for their article.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The great Trump fleet? The economy is solid, Somalia's corrosive effect on America, Merry Christmas, and more!
Former Republican liberal Ben Sasse announces that he has stage IV metastasized pancreatic cancer: "I'm gonna die"
It's not just a "death sentence," as he says, but a rapidly coming one. I hope he can put his affairs in order and make sure his family is in a good as a position as they can be.
Brown killer takes the coward's way out. Naturally.
Still not identified, for some reason.
Per Fox 25 Boston, the killer was a non-citizen permanent legal resident
It continues to be strange that the police are so protective of his identity.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Will Ukraine be a flashpoint for a Korean conflict, Trump's intemperate Reiner comments, it's the economy stupid! the Monroe/Trump Doctrine, Bondi, Brown, MIT, and more!
Fearful French cancel NYE concert on Champs-Élysées as migrant violence grows
The time is now! France must fight for its culture! [CBD]
Megyn Kelly finally calls out Candace Owens
Whoops, I meant she bravely attacks Sydney Sweeney for "bending the knee." (Sweeney put out a very empty PR statement saying "I'm against hate." Whoop-de-doo.)
Megyn Kelly claims she doesn't want to call people out on the right when asked about Candace Owens but then has no compunctions at all about calling people out on the right.
As long as they're not Candace Owens. Strangely, she seems blind and deaf to anything Candace Owens says. That's why this woman calls her "Megyn Keller."
She's now asking her pay-pigs in Pakistan how they think she should address the Candace Owens situation, and if they think this is really all about Israel and the Jews.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Pete Hegseth is everything the left hates...and we love! Illinois is the next flashpoint for federal supremacy with regard to our borders, Trump's communication leaves something to be desired, and more!
I have happily forgotten what Milo Yiannopoulos sounds like, but I still enjoyed this impression from from Ami Kozak.
More revelations about the least-sexy broken relationship in media history
I'd wanted to review Parts 2, 3, and 4 of Ryan Lizza's revenge posts about Olivia Nuzzi, but they're all paywalled. I thought about briefly subscribing to get at them, but then I read this in Part 2:
Remember the bamboo from Part 1?

Do I ever! It's all I remember!
Well, bamboo is actually a type of grass, and underground, it's all connected in a sprawling network, just like the parts of this story I never wanted to tell. I wish I hadn't been put in this position, that I didn't have to write about any of this, that I didn't have to subject myself or my loved ones to embarrassment and further loss of privacy.

We're back to the fucking bamboo. Guys, I don't think I can pay for bamboo ruminations.
I think he added that because he was embarrassed about all the bamboo imagery from Part 1. He's justifying his twin obsessions: His ex, and bamboo. Which is not a tree but a kind of grass, he'll have you know.
Olivia Nuzzi's crappy Sex and the City fanfic book isn't selling, says CNN (and CNN seems pretty pleased about that)
On Tuesday, the book arrived in stores. At lunchtime, in the Midtown Manhattan nexus of media and publishing, interest in Nuzzi's story seemed more muted. The Barnes and Noble on Fifth Avenue had seven copies tucked into a "New & Notable" rack next to the escalator, below Malala Yousafzai's "Finding My Way." Not many had sold so far, a store employee said.

A few blocks uptown, at a branch of the local independent chain McNally Jackson Books, a few volumes lay on a table of new and noteworthy nonfiction near the front of the store. No one was lining up to get them, or even browsing. Bookseller Alex Howe told CNN around 3 p.m. that though the store had procured "several dozen" copies, not a single one had yet sold -- a figure he said was surprising, considering how many people in media and publishing work in the area.

"We ordered a lot and so far, people have not been beating down the door," Howe said. "I'm not sure where we're gonna put them because right now, supply is outpacing demand." (A manager at McNally Jackson noted that Howe was speaking only in a personal capacity, not as a representative of the store.)

She trashes Ryan Lizza for his "Revenge Porn" here. Emily Jashinsky says that when the Bulwark's gay grifter Tim Miller asked why she didn't report on the (alleged) use of ketamine by RFKJr., she broke down in tears and asked to end the interview.
Canada Euthanized a Record 16.4K People Last Year
Aktion T4, now with Poutine! [CBD]
Recent Comments
C. Tarlson: "Anyone who opposes the jihadist takeover of the We ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/i][/u]: "maybe he went to prison under a fake name during t ..."

mindful webworker - jingle them bells: "Merry Mindful Christmas, y'all. 🎄Heap o ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Merry Christmas, dear dread Horde! ..."

ace: "also he used fake names maybe he went to prison ..."

ace: ">>It's very possible it's him. The other thing tha ..."

Tom Servo: "During war, men get into positions a lot earlier t ..."

Case: "@94 Everything Paul McCartney ever touched....... ..."

Opinion fact: "Posted by: publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb) at ..."

Puddleglum at work: "[i]116 Favorite serial killer movie was the fictit ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/i][/u]: "right but i'm saying is that all known as document ..."

Additional Blond Agent, STEM Guy[/i]: "Checked the IMDB.com and in The Many Loves of Dobi ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives