Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Quattrocchi Execution Video Shown On Italian TV | Main | John Fund: GOP Must Get Serious On Pork Or Lose Power »
January 10, 2006

Der Spiegel Gets Serious About Iran

Thank goodness Europe is waking up:

Iran has broken the seals at nuclear facilities signaling its intention to start production of enriched uranium anew. This is seen as a major provocation in Europe and many newspapers in Germany warn that it's time to drop the carrots and starting wielding the sticks.

Iran has called the Holocaust fiction, it's called for the destruction of Israel and, on Monday, it removed the seals from nuclear fuel research facilities so it could resume uranium-enrichment work. It's been an escalation in antics from the mullah-led country that has caused many in Europe to throw up their hands in dispair after months of exhaustive diplomatic work and painstaking negotations.

Officials in Europe and the United States fear the enriched uranium will be used by Tehran for a suspected clandestine project to produce the mullah regime's first nuclear warhead. Monday's move drew sharp criticism in both Europe and the United States. In Germany, Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier said the move "cannot be left without consequences," adding he would discuss the issue with France and Britain later this week. In Germany, most newspaper editorialists say there's been enough talk -- now it's time for stronger measures.

Emphasis in original, though I think they just do that with their lead paragraph.

The Allahpallooza rolls on.


posted by Ace at 02:29 PM
Comments



I always hate these wishy-washy statements:

"Officials in Europe and the United States fear the enriched uranium will be used by Tehran for a suspected clandestine project to produce the mullah regime's first nuclear warhead."

Fear? Fear?? What the hell is Iran going to do with enriched uranium BUT build a nuclear warhead? Build self-heating homes? Sterilize sheep?

Seriously, whenever I see that kind of lame-ass press equivocation, I want to smack someone, as if there's any other purpose for this stuff than the blindingly obvious.

It all makes me feel like paraphrasing the immortal words of Austin Millbarge-- "You know what enriched uranium can do? It'll suck the paint off your house and give your family a permanent orange afro."

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 10, 2006 03:00 PM

This reads too good to be true. It sounds so perfectly politically aligned with me that I doubt it comes from Europe. Is Der Spiegel a conservative media outlet?

Also, the top picture kicks ass.

http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,384240,00.html

Posted by: Rip on January 10, 2006 03:09 PM

Chirac is finally shouting out like he has a pair:
Iran would be committing a serious mistake if it ignored the international community on its nuclear program

Posted by: Duhgee on January 10, 2006 03:24 PM

Acually, the enriched uranium could, and i really use this word loosely, could be used for a breeder reactor. Don't know why they'd build one except for non-wastefull power generation or as a way to make ALOT of really enriched stuff really fast...which could be used for more reactors...or more likely, nice big Nukes.
Seriously, if the Germans are calling for your ass, you are well and truely fucked my fine freinds.
Next thing you know China will be saying something along the lines of "rouge states shouldn't posses nuclear potential...." and then, oh, it's ON.
But I can just dream. Mostly I dream of a second revolution, some trees and a whole lot of rope (or, y'know, cat 5 cable. whatever, y'know, however it goes). Give the youth blue jeans and rock and roll (or more likely blogs, cell phones and aim) and let them start a good civil war/rebellion.

But i'm just a dreamer.

Posted by: Pharniel on January 10, 2006 03:25 PM

Sure, Pharniel. That is technically possible.

Of course, it's also technically possible that your average San Francisco resident supports medical marijuana for their glaucoma.

Riiiiight.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on January 10, 2006 03:32 PM

hey, that's why I italicized 'could'. Smart money is on nukes, and the scary bit is they'll get idiots from Iraq to carry them wherever 'cause I don't see Iran with a successfull space program or other reliable means of delivery.

Posted by: Pharniel on January 10, 2006 03:55 PM

Why do I think that the next step after "breaking the seals" is going to be "crossing the streams"?

Posted by: Eric J on January 10, 2006 03:57 PM

Time for Old Europe to resort to the Emergency Concession proposal to bring those Mad Mullahs back in line.

Posted by: Mark on January 10, 2006 04:49 PM

"rouge states shouldn't posses nuclear potential...." Got it in for metrosexuals, have you?

Posted by: Brown Line on January 10, 2006 04:52 PM

Their getting serious about it? sounds great

Posted by: spurwing plover on January 10, 2006 09:22 PM

Completely OT: on that website, the bottom-most picture, of Putin.

You know what that shield symbol thing is?

Emblem of the old KGB.

Just saying.

(Maybe the Cold War hasn't ended, to a degree.)

Posted by: Muslihoon on January 11, 2006 12:47 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Recent Comments
jim (in Kalifornia): "203 OK, thx. But light has photons, does an electr ..."

NaCly Dog: " jim (in Kalifornia) Do they have a Visa to arr ..."

Oldcat: "The natives of England are overwhelmingly atheist ..."

Forest Service Redditor: "195 MontanaFreePress.org has an article about the ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "OK, thx. But light has photons, does an electromag ..."

Eromero: "191 Charles doesn't have to convert he just needs ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "192 Are the people of Pluto Plutans, Plutites, or ..."

13times: " King Charles Vegetarian starters and alcohol-fre ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: "Laura Ingraham has a spot about illegal aliens. Th ..."

illiniwek: ""The electric field of an electromagnetic wave (li ..."

publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): " Live NASA stream of the upcoming TLI burn: ht ..."

Robert Boyle: ">>> I gotta admit, I could not give a detailed exp ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives