Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Farrelly Brothers Complain South Park Ripped Them Off | Main | It's Official: Democrats Have No Position On Iraq »
December 16, 2005

Reality TV Dickhead of the Year

I didn't mind Randall on The Apprentice. I didn't think he or Rebecca, his cute, spunky competitor, were stand-out stars, but neither was either incompetent or objectionable as a person.

Until.

Trump began tipping his hand that he was inclined favorably to both candidates early in the finale. I began to wonder if he would offer both jobs. Maybe both wouldn't be officially "The Apprentice," but both would wind up with essentially the same contract from Trump.

At the end of the show, Trump gave the nod to Randall. Randall made more sense on paper (better education, better experience), but hadn't done an especially good job on the show, especially in its later half. It wasn't surprising Trump picked him.

But then Trump asked Randall if, in Randall's opinion, Trump should hire Rebecca as well. All he had to do was say, "She's a great person who'd work well in your organization," and Trump would have offered her a job as well. He said as much later.

But Randall, selfish as sin, told Trump that there is only one Apprentice, not two "Apprenti," and so that Rebecca shouldn't also be offered the job.

Deferring to the winner (which makes some sense-- he did kinda win), Trump didn't make the offer, though he did say that a good word from Randall would have increased the nation's jobs creation figures by one.

Randall won; he was officially the Apprentice. He had a nice one-year contract at a prominent company and all the press one could wish. But he couldn't stand the idea of sharing any of the limelight.

Well, now he will be known as a major-league asshole. The guy who, with one word, given a job to a friendly rival with little cost to himself, but chose instead to deny her that.

That audience booed, feeling as betrayed as Rebecca must have, and as Randal jogged to the end of the stage to wave at the crowd, he was facing a group that had lost some of their respect for him; their clapping and cheering was subdued, and boos were still audible.

Rebecca just shook Trump’s hand and said, “That’s unfortunate.”

Randall's probably regretting his decision right now. So, for that matter, is Trump.

Thanks to Chickpea.


posted by Ace at 10:37 AM
Comments



though he did say that a good word for Randall would have increased the nation's jobs creation figures by one.

Do you mean "a good word FROM Randall"?

I don't do this for a living.

Posted by: Lipstick on December 16, 2005 10:43 AM

Randall was the clear leader of that season since episode 1. I didn't even realize that he had those academic creds too. The spunky little brunnette, on the other hand, wasn't anything great.

I don't see why Randall should have to undercut his own achievements by splitting the glory with Rebecca. Trump's question to him was a feel good lay up, which was amazingly assholish. "Here, its up to you to make the hard decision, Randall." Sort of like proposing to your girlfriend on the jumbotron at half-time or on Jay Leno.

I appreciate the premise of the Apprentice being that the shnook with no high-faluting education can come in and get himself a big time job, but Rebecca ain't that. I would rather Trump bring back Troy than slap Randall in the face like that.

Randall was put in a hard spot, he won and Trump should have had to the balls to not put a hard decision like that in Randall's court, or the brains not to raise such an indecision. Why not hand out three gold medals for each event at the next olympics?

Posted by: joeindc44 on December 16, 2005 10:45 AM

I bet it is staged anyhoo for more ratings. At least that ending part.

Posted by: Greg on December 16, 2005 11:07 AM

nice leadership

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 16, 2005 11:11 AM

Like Trump needed Randal's permission to hire anyone.

In Randal's place I would have done the same damn thing. This isn't the Outcome-Based Apprentice where everyone is a winner. If Trump and Burnett wanted to change the rules of the game, let them be upfront about it instead of waiting until 10:58 pm est and forcing the legitimate winner to make their decision for them.

Posted by: John Tant on December 16, 2005 11:11 AM

I really don't care much for the show, but my girlfriend watches it, so I got stuck seeing it quite a bit this season. She liked Randal, but was pissed at him after that. She thought both would be hired. Personally, I think Trump's kind of a jackass, so in a sense, Rebecca wins by not having to work for him (provided he doesn't actually hire her too, off camera).

Anyway, I kinda thought Randal was overrated. He seemed to coast by on reputation alone, passing responsibility and blame onto others, although more subtly than other players. In other words, he played the game well, but I wasn't particularly impressed by him. And academic credentials don't really mean much of anything. Nice to have, but not essential.

But I don't blame Randal for telling Trump not to hire Rebecca. He was on the show to win the contest, not really to get a job. From the sound of it, he didn't really need the job anyway. If you're in it to win it, you're not going to share the prize at the end.

Posted by: Jason on December 16, 2005 11:16 AM

There can be only one.

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 16, 2005 11:19 AM

And Ace, "Asshole of the Year?"

Over the top.

If she's good, she got the venue to show her stuff, and that's more than most people get.

And what is Trump doing playing games like that? It's his decision and his company. The last thing I would do is make someone make a decision that sticks their neck too far out.

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 16, 2005 11:23 AM

The Apprentice is basically about a lot of rat bastards being rat bastards to each other - so when one at the end behaves like a corporate rat, you're surprised?

Having said that, I can kinda of see where Randall's coming from - it's really hard to get ahead in the corporate environment. When you can measure someone's performance by how many widgets they slap together, that's one thing - but with office types and the notorious "wearing of many hats" that is encouraged by management, job titles blur, and the door thrown open for just about anyone to compete for promotions or just for simple security of jobs they already have.

And that includes people who get ahead by taking credit for other people's achievements. Rightly or wrongly we've all felt that way about others at one time or another - and it encourages a kind of jealous protectiveness of any achievement we consider "ours", a desire to kind of push back on and shut out those who seem to be hooking onto your coat tails either by their efforts or because upper management is uncomfortable with giving you too much of the glory regardless of merit.

And it can get nasty - this is what happened with Randall. Regretable? Probably, but The Apprentice is corporate America on steroids, and I think it's a bit disengenuous expecting to see a lot of goodwill and love for the common man here...

Posted by: Scott on December 16, 2005 12:22 PM

I think people are being too hard on Trump.

I think the Donald probably thought it was a foregone conclusion that Randall would say yes, and wanted to provide a nice ending by highlighting the previously unprecedented chemistry that the two finalists had exhibited. Randall and Rebecca were a very good team who appeared to have nothing but complete respect for each other... until the last 10 seconds.

I think Trump was probably as shocked as the rest of us, and simply didn't want to immediately overrule the guy he had just hired on national television. In other words, a ratings ploy backfired.

I'm with you ace... assohole of the year.

Posted by: Dave S on December 16, 2005 12:39 PM

Sure, Randal came off as an asshole.

But I agree with the other commenters on the point that Trump shouldn't have put him on the spot like that.

That's akin to asking the winning Super Bowl team during the trophy presentation if they think the loser ought to get a Pete Rozelle trophy as well.

Posted by: Brandon on December 16, 2005 12:41 PM

I don't think so. There really can only be one Super Bowl Winner.

Trump specifically mentioned 2 projects that he needed done, and asked them each which they would choose. They chose different ones.

Plenty of room there.

Posted by: Dave S on December 16, 2005 12:58 PM

Aw, c'mon. Randal not only came off as a bastard, he came off as a stupid, stupid bastard. The Apprentice is really about the PR, not corporate standing, and he just ruined his own.

Trump gave him an opportunity to come off as a great, gracious guy, someone the media could have cooed over. Instead, he'll now be remembered as the asshole who wouldn't let Trump hire an amazing 23-year-old (well, amazing by show standards anyway, and I do think she'd fit the description of apprentice much better).

Like ace said, Randall won, that was made very clear. Trump very well could have split the win, but he didn't. If Trump had hired Rebecca too like he wanted, that would have taken the thunder away from his win. Instead, offering the decision was a great compromise. Maybe hiring two people wouldn't be fair to Randal, but this was TV and Trump, and it's all about the ratings and twists and all that reality jazz. Randal just ruined his reputation with a lot of the fans who could have probably bought his books and gone to his public appearances.

LOL, damn, sorry, I just never had my respect for a person fall so sharply before.

Ace, you magnificent bastard, I love you. I can't stay away from this blog's mix of politics and really bad pop culture.

Posted by: mary on December 16, 2005 12:59 PM

And this is exactly why Randall will be making a million dollars next year and the rest of us will be commenting on this blog.

C'mon, Ace, tell me you would have had this opinion if Rebecca had a penis or was fat and ugly.

You don't get ahead in top organizations by being nice. You get ahead by knowing when to be an asshole. In Randal's spot I would have done the same thing because it could have been a trick? Trump COULD have said, "My apprentice needs the confidence to take the prize when it's his to take."

Besides which Rebecca--a journalist mind you, and someone, the few times I watched the show, did little but sit back and stay out of the way--got offered a job at Yahoo this morning.

Posted by: ken on December 16, 2005 01:16 PM

Geez, A-hole of the year? What, with 2005 coming to a close, the worst thing you have heard someone say is this? Were you even paying attention? cough*deanmurthasheehankerrytookie*

Trump basically forced Randall into a halftime marriage proposal on the jumbotron, at least Randall had the nards to say no.

Posted by: joeindc44 on December 16, 2005 01:22 PM

No way! He won fair and square. Maybe he has his own reasons for not wanting her as a coworker too. That's his right to take it for himself with no shame or guilt.

Posted by: Village Idiot on December 16, 2005 01:57 PM

I think Trump was thinking of Rebecca as an apprentice for the Wife #4 position. Or is it #5? I lose track. I was getting the creepy Humbert Humbert vibe every time he looked at her.

Rebecca did OK on the show, but the real competition for Randall would've been ruthless Alla.

And I agree -- to say "hire her" would've cost Randall nothing, and made him look like a nice guy. Instead, he came off as the heavy in the whole thing.

Posted by: The Colossus on December 16, 2005 02:20 PM

Randall came off as awesome. Despite being put on the spot, and despite the way many people would react to it, Randall told the truth. I already like the guy but now I respect the hell out of him.

Trump can hire Rebeka any time he wants, duh.

Posted by: Harkonnendog on December 16, 2005 02:40 PM

I can't believe a couple of posts point out that it was unfair to give Randal such a hard decision to make. Wasn't that what the show was about. About who could make the right decisions under pressure which would indicate how you would do in the real corporate world.

Posted by: roc ingersol on December 16, 2005 02:42 PM

Colossus,
No way she'd be wife #4. A lady journalist got wayyyy too much sass-mouth to be a Trump wife. He learned his lessons from the first two.

Posted by: ken on December 16, 2005 02:50 PM

"There can be only One!"

or, if you prefer:

"Two go in, One comes out!"

[gotta support an alum]

Posted by: geoff on December 16, 2005 02:51 PM

You know, for all of Trump's pre-series gloating about how he'd handpicked the contestants (except one -- I'm guessing Markus) and they were the best ever, there wasn't a single finalist who wouldn't have been stomped by Kendra.

Not even "Ecstacy".

Posted by: someone on December 16, 2005 02:55 PM

He would have come off much better by saying...

"I'd appreciate it if we could make tonight my night, but tomorrow, I'd like to be the first to extend my hand to Rebecca."

He has the win, the title, the job, the magnanious gesture, and the power to call the shot.

Win/Win

Because the competition is now over...or is it?

Frankly, I have difficulty believing that, with a few more years under her belt, she wouldn't be very stiff competition for him.

I wish my daughter was half as together as she.

Posted by: JMFLYNNY on December 16, 2005 03:03 PM

Randall blew it 100%. He had already won, so the notion of sharing the glory is bull. This was about payback. Rebecca had slagged him a couple of times when she felt he didn't produce and, if you recall, he got all upset about it. I think this was his chance to throw it back in her face.

If he had just said, "Give her the job," he would have been the big hero everyone made him out to be. Instead he is a sore winner.

Posted by: Steve L. on December 16, 2005 03:15 PM

I NOW HATE RANDALL -
I liked him up to that point. The person who pointed out that this is about PR was right. Randall could have been a gracious winner, but instead he was an egotistical insecure jerk.


As my Uncle Leon would say... he showed his ass.

Posted by: Tony on December 16, 2005 03:30 PM

Ace -

Rutgers graduate Randal Pinkett, RC ’94

Rutgers - no wonder he's a ballbuster.

Posted by: steve_in_hb on December 16, 2005 03:42 PM

I don't think Randal is an ass. I respect him. I just think he messed up by saying what he said, especially knowing Rebecca's loyalty and reputation. I think she took it like saint. I wish both of them the best.

I just hate how this has been turned into a race issue. I posted about this topic on my blog and drew the ire of some people.

JLP

Posted by: JLP at AllThingsFinancial on December 16, 2005 03:52 PM

I just hate how this has been turned into a race issue.

I've read quite a bit about this from several sources today and this is the first mention of race I have heard. It had nothing to do with race.

Posted by: Steve L. on December 16, 2005 04:40 PM

Steve L.,

I got the impression it was turned into a race issue by the comments to this post on my blog.

Posted by: JLP at AllThingsFinancial on December 16, 2005 04:54 PM

I read the Television Without Pity boards (even though I usually end up irritated and hating myself for going back for more. Liberals can be truly sick creatures, and every episode of every show seems to garner at least one anti-Bush, anti-Republican crack, even harmless saccharine shows like Extreme Home Makeover).

And yes, the racial aspect has been brought up several times. Some people think the fact that Trump wanted to hire Rebecca proves that he's a racist who refuses to let a black man shine or have the spotlight alone. Complete BS for so many reasons.

Posted by: mary on December 16, 2005 04:54 PM
Complete BS for so many reasons.
Including the fact that the season was very probably a setup to have a black guy (or girl -- Marshawn was miles better than previous black women on the show) win... Randal turned out to be a weak winner, but from day one he was clearly the class of the field they picked.

Season 3 was probably rigged to get a woman, too, though it turned out that Kendra was excellent anyway.

Posted by: on December 17, 2005 04:36 AM

The Trump organization needed a "token". Otherwise Jessie Jackason and Al would of been whining.

Posted by: steve on December 18, 2005 10:39 AM

Asshole of the century. He could of helped her, seeing as they were supposed friends. In the last episode I felt that Randal was extremely arrogant and up himself. Did u see the way he stared when rebecca made comments or trumph asked her a question. He doesn't deserve it. Mr Trumph has made the worst mistake EVER! He fills his company with loyal people and Randall just failed the loyality test. His absolutly greedy. Fuck. I was so pissed.

Posted by: anon on December 27, 2005 09:34 AM

There would have been a cost to Randall if you listened to the final words of Mr. Trump they would have shared the salary.

Anyway Rebecca was 1 and 2 as a PM why was she ther

Posted by: arli on December 27, 2005 11:49 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_

NEW: Just heard something extraordinary from a former White House official who worked with former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in Trump45's NSC: "McMaster had weekly phone calls with George Soros. We have no idea why." Neither could be reached for comment.
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton dissect the Iran treaty but praise the great U.S. military, decry the deep state's influence on SAVE and FISA, talk marijuana and guns, mock the Northeast's racism, and Go Knicks!
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Recent Comments
Skip: "Starmer falling on a sword so his replacement can ..."

Bonecrusher: "Read the content, now to the foreshadowing of one ..."

It's me donna : "Morn'all.. So another day of Trump's a poopyhead s ..."

Skip: "Good morning JJ and horde ..."

Smell the Glove: "Starmer is a murderous lying sack of crap. Good ri ..."

Will Robinson : "To eliminate fraud in the system, you have to elim ..."

man: "So much ink spilled on a matter about which none o ..."

Martini Farmer: "Does the UK government just swap out politicians w ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]First, eliminate the fraud in the system, which ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]Every decision I’ve taken has been about ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]A number of good essays in the links that illus ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "FIRST!!!!! ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives