| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Appeals Court Rules That Trump Doesn't Have to Pay Lunatic Fantasist E. Jean Carroll for the "Defamation" of Continuing to Deny This Vicious Fruitloop's Sex Fantasy About Him
Tennessee Strips Democrat Racial Insurrectionists of Their Committee Seats Wednesday Morning Rant Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 5/ 13/26 Daily Tech News 13 May 2026 Tuesday Overnight Open Thread - May 12, 2026 [Doof] Walking on Air Cafe Obama's Oxygen Thief HHS Secretary, Xavier Becerra, Is Currently the Leading Democrat for California Governor and Cannot Answer Questions About His Record Without Begging for Mercy South Carolina Dixiecrats Tank Effort to Gain a Congressional Seat, Voting With the Declared Democrats to Kill It Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Boys Vs. Girls In The World Series Of Love |
Main
| 61% of Americans Support Torture In Rare Cases... As Do Half of the French »
December 07, 2005
Vote Early, Vote OftenWell, if you feel like it. I'm not the boss of you or anything. posted by Ace at 01:25 AM
Commentshow in the world am I the first person to post something here? huh. anyways, vote for me, too! please? Posted by: MacStansbury on December 7, 2005 03:29 AM
Ahem. Can I get a crumb? The Top 250? All my competitors are a bunch of slack-jawed booger-eaters who kill puppies and kittens, make babies cry, and hate their mothers. And love Osama bin Laden. And gerbils. If you know what I mean. Posted by: Beth on December 7, 2005 03:29 AM
Beth, we need to stop meeting like this Posted by: MacStansbury on December 7, 2005 03:30 AM
Quit stalking me! Posted by: Beth on December 7, 2005 03:43 AM
I just noticed I have 5 different tabs open with varying pages from these two threads. why, for the love of shrimp, am I still awake? Posted by: MacStansbury on December 7, 2005 03:45 AM
I vote from home and from work every day. So count on me for 18 votes. Posted by: Chequers. on December 7, 2005 05:07 AM
your doing pretty well on there Ace....looks like that automatic voting software I'm using is pretty effective. Posted by: Joe on December 7, 2005 07:51 AM
If you vote for Ace, he'll thank you personally. Posted by: spongeworthy on December 7, 2005 08:41 AM
If you vote for Ace, he'll thank you personally. Ouch. Not nice, sponge. Funny, though. Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 08:44 AM
funny heh. yeah it was. that and the stuff about gerbils. and stalking. jeez this is a weird thread. Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 7, 2005 09:00 AM
I'm not completely "in" with all of this "blog" "stuff", but someone explain to me why Jesus' General has over 2000 votes for funniest blog, outpacing blogs like IMAO or Iowahawk. I went there, I trolled. The posts are just snarky, obscure, 'all Christians are sexual deviants' remarks, and the commentors are beyond description. I would've kept trolling, but it was just so painful to scroll through the comments, people faking southern accents and praising Jay-sus, etc. I'm trying to be impartial, but there's just nothing funny there, and I think they are somehow cheating. Is that possible? Posted by: adolfo velasquez on December 7, 2005 09:34 AM
I AM THE BEST OF THE TOP 3501-5000 BLOGS! I HAVE A THOUSAND YEARS OF POWER! I HAVE MY CAPS LOCK ON! CHEERS, P.S. Yeah, please vote for me. I'm a needy bastard who needs the affirmation of total strangers stupid enough to enjoy my crappy blog. Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 7, 2005 09:45 AM
Rumor has it, that Jesus blog is HIL-AR-IOUS to the liberal crowd, and gets linked by some of the biggies. Posted by: carin on December 7, 2005 09:45 AM
It's entirely possible. You could program a bot to vote for you. Of course, given that Atrios is able to get 9 gazillion comments on each of seven open threads per day, maybe it's possible the blog really is getting all of those votes. Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 09:46 AM
Rumor has it, that Jesus blog is HIL-AR-IOUS to the liberal crowd, and gets linked by some of the biggies. But how? I can laugh at funny left stuff, The Daily Show, SNL, Simpsons (less often than I used to), but JG just isn't. I've completely lost faith in the Weblog awards and, without that, what do I have? Posted by: adolfo velasquez on December 7, 2005 09:47 AM
DAVE I VOTED FOR YOU. WHERE'S THE MONEY YOU PROMISED? Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 09:50 AM
Well, I can't even beg on my own blog since I am pausing to do holiday things!!!! Please guys! Go vote for me in the 1000-1750 category. I have ALMOST caught up with the teenagers who are ahead. We grownups CAN NOT LET THEM WIN!!! Show some love for Rightwingsparkle!!!(vote every day too!) Ace, Of course I voted for you! Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 10:25 AM
Slublog-- Your money's on the dresser, chocolate. Cheers, Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 7, 2005 10:31 AM
Sweeet. Thanks, sugar daddy. Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 10:37 AM
I don't get the "thank you personally" insult. Please explain. Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 10:43 AM
Have you ever been in a situation where you’ve competed with other bloggers over reader's votes? Dave – “No. I’ve never had much competition. I remember girls competing over me, which was very exciting, to say the least. Except one had a hump and the other, with whom I ended up, was an ungodly squirter. I could never tell if she was coming or going. More likely the latter, seeing how I’ve never been able to satisfy a woman. Or a man for that matter. But hey! Doesn’t matter, as long as I get those votes full of aggrandizing bloggy goodness.” Ace - "This life is a crazy one, and I get a lot of attention, and I get pressure from a lot of people, especially shemales, who don’t understand. For me, it’s about staying patient and being who I am. I’m sorry, what was the question again?” I voted for both you dorks and will continue to do so. Not because I placate. I don’t. I tell it straight up. I love you guys. Much in the same way a starving gerbil loves the piece of peanut it finds in Richard Gere’s colon. Posted by: compos mentis on December 7, 2005 10:48 AM
I believe the lad is taking a pot shot at ace for being tardy with the thank you email to those who contributed funds a few weeks ago. Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 7, 2005 10:48 AM
RWS - I voted for you as well you sweet angel and will do so again in 24 hours.
Posted by: compos mentis on December 7, 2005 10:54 AM
"I love you guys. Much in the same way a starving gerbil loves the piece of peanut it finds in Richard Gere’s colon." Compos, your way with words leaves me revolted and nauseous. Bravo, good sir. Bravo. Cheers, Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 7, 2005 11:05 AM
RWS-I voted for you as well you sweet angel and will do so again in 24 hours. Actually Dave, I rather love compos's way with words. Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 11:10 AM
revolted and nauseous You know, I hate it when those pussies at Webster's just give up and say "that word means whatever the hell people think it means". They threw in the towel on irregardless too. Wimps. is this nit-picking? am I killing this thread? I'll just go vote. Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 7, 2005 11:25 AM
Hey, I'm with you Dave, irregardless of what you write. Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 7, 2005 11:31 AM
Yes, Dave, I love it when people announce that they cause others to be nauseated. Makes me giggle. Some standards please, dictionary people!! Posted by: Lipstick on December 7, 2005 12:02 PM
You could be more sympathetic, Lipstick. Dave always gets a little nauseous when he feels his period coming on. BTW, Dave, you got my vote. I kid because I love. Posted by: utron on December 7, 2005 12:09 PM
I voted for all you needy bastards. All you have to do is ask, much like my dating policy. Posted by: JackStraw on December 7, 2005 12:17 PM
Awwwww, now you've done it. Irregardless is not a word, regardless of what the dictionary says. And I couldn't care less what you say to that. DDG (who could care less, but is taking some poetic license, like the Patriot, or Reuters) Posted by: Dee Da Go on December 7, 2005 12:20 PM
I'm voting for you too, Dave. And RWS. And Ace. Posted by: Michael on December 7, 2005 12:28 PM
The libs are pulling the same shit as they did last year. Did you see how many votes the Lefty blogs are pulling in? Fucking cheaters. Posted by: Bart on December 7, 2005 12:33 PM
If there were a "funniest commenter" category, compos mentis' jaw-dropper in this thread would earn him my vote. Posted by: someone on December 7, 2005 12:41 PM
I voted for Dave in Garfield, but I didn't know that Feisty was in the same category. Now I'm torn between two lovers feeling like
Posted by: Bart on December 7, 2005 12:50 PM
The Top 501-1000 category is dominated by two left-wing blogs. Annoying. Posted by: Will Franklin on December 7, 2005 12:51 PM
I voted for Dave in Garfield It's Dave AT Garfield. "IN" would hint at committment, and Dave just doesn't roll like that. He's a love 'em and leave 'em kind of guy. Just like Klein. Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 12:55 PM
Yes, it seems in some categories where there are many excellent rightwing or right of center blogs, there is only one liberal blog. (thus showing balance, don't cha know) and since that is the case, our votes are split and theirs are not. Same thing happened to me for homecoming queen in high school. 3 cheerleaders and one band nerd. Life is never fair. ;-) Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 12:55 PM
You already got my vote for today, Sparkles. Don't pander. Posted by: Bart in Chair on December 7, 2005 01:03 PM
Bart, pan-der- intr.v. 1. To act as a go between or liason in sexual intrigues; function as a procurer.
;-) Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 01:22 PM
Hey, band geeks need attention, too. Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 01:23 PM
Looks like your building a nice little lead there Ace. Good luck! ps I was the 666th vote, am in trouble now? Posted by: rakmjn1 on December 7, 2005 01:39 PM
You've got my daily vote, oh Emperor of the Internets. Now, return the favor and vote for me in the 251-500 ghetto. Posted by: Nickie Goomba on December 7, 2005 01:54 PM
But you are bossy. Which is why you are going to hell. Posted by: chickpea on December 7, 2005 01:58 PM
I was totally kidding about the homecoming queen thing btw. I actually graduated high school at 16. (skipped my senior year) It was a formerly all black inner city school in Mississippi as well. Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 02:04 PM
Wait a sec there RWS. Do I detect a Steve Martin skit coming up? "I was born a poor black child . . ." Posted by: compos mentis on December 7, 2005 02:32 PM
Was that "The Jerk?"...Heh. Nah. I was just part of the great civil rights experiment in the 60's and 70's. It's not quite worked out the way we had hoped. Except for the opportunity part. Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 02:38 PM
I am a mere 18 votes from being ahead at the Weblogs. Come on guys!!! Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 02:43 PM
A two-piece swimsuit can attract a lot voters. I'm just sayin'... Posted by: Bart on December 7, 2005 02:48 PM
P.S. Not 100% sure that Feisty is not a man. As it's been said a million times, all women on the Internet are men. So yes, she is a man. That's how she knows all of the dirty things you want to hear. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on December 7, 2005 03:25 PM
P.S. Not 100% sure that Feisty is not a man. I thought she was a man at first too, but she's not. Someone who knows FOR SURE told me. (I've got all the dirt on everyone...muahahaha!) (Which is why you should vote for me, BTW. "Or else.") Posted by: Beth on December 7, 2005 07:33 PM
Ah, fuckit. Don't waste your vote in the Top 250 category. Vote for Belmont or Vodkapundit there and don't let that asscrumb FireDogWhatever win it. Has anyone noticed how many votes the leftards have in all the categories compared with the number of votes cast in the "Liberal" (illiberal) category? Either they're not voting in that one, or they're a bunch of cheating fucks. And this year, they won't advertise it at Kos. Unlike this Moby dick: Nice try, asshole. Posted by: Beth on December 7, 2005 07:41 PM
P.S. Not 100% sure that Feisty is not a man. I'm not sure Ace is a man. What kind of man uses the nickname "Snuggles"? He must be new to the INTERNET or something. Posted by: on December 7, 2005 07:48 PM
Ace, are you going to bump this up so we don't forget to vote? Well, actually, the truth is I think we can see some booby in exchange for some votes. I know RWSparkle is ready to show a litttle skin. Feisty can prove she's a girl. And Beth is just horny, so she's up for it. Posted by: Bart on December 8, 2005 01:20 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust. Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Recent Comments
Grayman27:
"Top 10?
And greetings. ..."
Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "FIRST!!!!! ..." Elric The Blade: "The awards shows are sleazier than the pornos they ..." Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon: "Willowed. Yes - Holy Lamb https://youtu.be/T ..." XTC: ""New Teeth For Homeless Crackheads" doesn't seem l ..." Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon: "And I nooded first. ..." Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "Top Gun. ..." Diogenes: "BREAKING: L.A. Mayor Karen Bass calls for taxpayer ..." Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon: "lolgf ..." ...: "What's really sad to me is the way some men think ..." Admiral Ackbar: "360 229 Debbie Does ____ ...a Dallas Resident P ..." Archimedes: "New one: Appeals Court Rules That Trump Doesn ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|