Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Update on American Soldiers Who Burned Dead Taliban | Main | Andrea Mitchell: Dazed and Confused »
November 27, 2005

Defending Al Gore

A little at least. I hate doing this. But...

TigerHawk argues that Al Gore is being disingenuous on the subject of "extraodinary renditions," because he previously (as VP) expressed strong support for the practice. And now of course he speechifies against it.

The trouble is that there are two sorts of actions described by the jargon/euphemism "extraordinary rendition." One is an illegal snatch of a terrorist or other criminal. There's no arrest by the host country, no agreement for rendition to the US. We just grab him off the street and stuff him into a CIA plane (hopefully not one of the dozens outed by the NY Times as part of the nation's covert airwing.)

Thus "extraordinary rendition" means an extralegal rendition.

The second sort of extraordinary rendition is a clandestine, not-quite-legal (in the sense that typical legal formalities aren't observed) delivery of a terrorist to a third country, one which has a less squeamish view of the efficacy of coercion as an interrogation tool.

The quote TigerHawk has dug up (from Richard Clarke's book) shows him in favor of the first sort of extraordinary rendition ("He's a terrorist. Go grab his ass") but his speechifying on the subject seem to concern the second sort.

One involves taking someone (illegally, but justifiably) into US custody. The other involves delivering someone (again, somewhat illegally but justifiably) out of US custody and into the tender mercies of, say, Saudi Arabia's secret police. We have evidence no smoking-gn quote to prove he's ever been a strong supporter of the second.

Well, at least TigerHawk's quote doesn't establish that. Certainly, though, continuing to serve in an administration that admitted it had performed the second sort of E.R. is evidence of a tacit acceptance of the practice, at the very, very least.

But that doesn't advance the ball much. We already knew all of that. We've known for years that Clinton performed the second sort of ER, and no one in the liberal press made much of an issue about it. Far from it-- the practice was put forth as evidence that, contrary to public perception, Clinton really was "tough on terrorists."

And while Clinton did this without much criticism -- from Gore, from Kennedy, from the rest of the yowling, yapping puppies of the not-entirely-loyal opposition -- suddenly when Bush does it it's a major breach of international law and proof that we've "lost our country" and are degenerating into a 21st Century Gestapo state.


posted by Ace at 12:47 PM
Comments



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/26/AR2005112600745_pf.html

Sorry to be OT a bit, but I thought the "patriots" who think siding with Zarqawi would like to know how effective they are and how truly hated they are.

Posted by: eddiebear on November 27, 2005 01:04 PM

Nice link, eddiebear. I wonder if we'll see this poll cited on the nightly news? I'm not holding my breath...

Posted by: BrewFan on November 27, 2005 01:13 PM

Hey, don't get lost in semantics. Extralegal, extrashmegal. I don't know if there is some American law or treaty that forbids grabbing shitbirds off the street in another country, but it seems that doing so is merely an extraordinary act.
Basically, screw diplomacy, we are going to exercise our perogatives on someone else's soil.

So, I don't think its illegal, its just likely to piss off another country. But the president has that sort of power. Sort of like bombing them. Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke. Seriously, this is where countries differ, where diplomacy and war powers start mattering. If Maryland started yanking Philly Eagle fans off of their McDonalds jobs, there would be legal difficulties, but not so much in the international sense.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 28, 2005 01:15 AM

Nice job in distinguishing modes of ER.

When talking legal status, these distinctions matter.

This distinction of sending to another country, secretly, in violation of all kinds of treaties, seems to be central in the EU uproar about the planes with prisoners landing on their turf.

Posted by: tubino on November 28, 2005 10:36 AM

This issue was tossed around a bit in the comments to my post, and in the comments to the linking post at Protein Wisdom. I don't disagree with your argument -- the quoted bit from Clarke's book does not prove that Gore supported that "snatch and render" bit. Two points though. The Clinton administration did plenty of the other type as well, and I, for one, have not found any statement by Gore saying he supported snatches but objected when the prisoners were rendered. Second, Clarke did not draw this distinction in his book, so it is not clear that the differences loomed as large in the 90s or even when Clarke was writing 18 months ago than they do in the presently charged climate. In any case, I was less condemning Gore than wondering why MSM journalists had not pushed him on this topic. Perhaps they have, and I've just missed it.

Posted by: TigerHawk on November 28, 2005 08:09 PM

AL GORE mr HOT AIR himself

Posted by: spurwing plover on December 1, 2005 05:22 PM

scat domination shit fetish eating shit sick shit do niggers shit more than white ppl video scat funky shit crazy shit scat movies free scat movies scat free shit girls eating shit shit eating drawbacks crazy ass shit shit face scat porn fucked up shit gay shit kazaa lite without the shit scat fetish funky shit

Posted by: scat lovers on January 7, 2006 08:12 AM

Oh God, I just clicked on Scat Lovers link... I thought it was a site about Mel Torme or Ella Fitzgerald. It wasnt.


skiddley-boo-bop-poop

Posted by: The Velvet Amish on January 7, 2006 09:10 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Department of Energy Announces American Nuclear Supply Chain Loans
$17.5B is a good start. Now add two zeroes to that number! [CBD]
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_

NEW: Just heard something extraordinary from a former White House official who worked with former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster in Trump45's NSC: "McMaster had weekly phone calls with George Soros. We have no idea why." Neither could be reached for comment.
Deport...Deport...Deport The F***ing Lot! A new UK anthem? [Hat Tip: S.E.] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton dissect the Iran treaty but praise the great U.S. military, decry the deep state's influence on SAVE and FISA, talk marijuana and guns, mock the Northeast's racism, and Go Knicks!
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
Recent Comments
Tom Servo: "I would be worried about the socialist mayors IF I ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]People of Scotch! Your favorite wee dram will s ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i] Why you expect them not to cheat? Posted by: ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]I confess that I misread Cornyn. I thought that ..."

fd: ""Massive cheat or did they actually win? " Why ..."

naturalfake: " *sigh* necessary = unnecessary Stupid fing ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]GOP Voters Dumped Cornyn. He’s Responding ..."

NR Pax: "[i]They aren't socialists. They are communists. [/ ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]Am I the only one who has noticed that as more ..."

naturalfake: "[i] Ha ha! Troll just admitted he's getting his di ..."

Huck Follywood: "We're letting them. Posted by: Martini Farmer at ..."

NR Pax: "[i]75 I would like the internet to flood Popehat w ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives