Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Update on American Soldiers Who Burned Dead Taliban | Main | Andrea Mitchell: Dazed and Confused »
November 27, 2005

Defending Al Gore

A little at least. I hate doing this. But...

TigerHawk argues that Al Gore is being disingenuous on the subject of "extraodinary renditions," because he previously (as VP) expressed strong support for the practice. And now of course he speechifies against it.

The trouble is that there are two sorts of actions described by the jargon/euphemism "extraordinary rendition." One is an illegal snatch of a terrorist or other criminal. There's no arrest by the host country, no agreement for rendition to the US. We just grab him off the street and stuff him into a CIA plane (hopefully not one of the dozens outed by the NY Times as part of the nation's covert airwing.)

Thus "extraordinary rendition" means an extralegal rendition.

The second sort of extraordinary rendition is a clandestine, not-quite-legal (in the sense that typical legal formalities aren't observed) delivery of a terrorist to a third country, one which has a less squeamish view of the efficacy of coercion as an interrogation tool.

The quote TigerHawk has dug up (from Richard Clarke's book) shows him in favor of the first sort of extraordinary rendition ("He's a terrorist. Go grab his ass") but his speechifying on the subject seem to concern the second sort.

One involves taking someone (illegally, but justifiably) into US custody. The other involves delivering someone (again, somewhat illegally but justifiably) out of US custody and into the tender mercies of, say, Saudi Arabia's secret police. We have evidence no smoking-gn quote to prove he's ever been a strong supporter of the second.

Well, at least TigerHawk's quote doesn't establish that. Certainly, though, continuing to serve in an administration that admitted it had performed the second sort of E.R. is evidence of a tacit acceptance of the practice, at the very, very least.

But that doesn't advance the ball much. We already knew all of that. We've known for years that Clinton performed the second sort of ER, and no one in the liberal press made much of an issue about it. Far from it-- the practice was put forth as evidence that, contrary to public perception, Clinton really was "tough on terrorists."

And while Clinton did this without much criticism -- from Gore, from Kennedy, from the rest of the yowling, yapping puppies of the not-entirely-loyal opposition -- suddenly when Bush does it it's a major breach of international law and proof that we've "lost our country" and are degenerating into a 21st Century Gestapo state.


posted by Ace at 12:47 PM
Comments



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/26/AR2005112600745_pf.html

Sorry to be OT a bit, but I thought the "patriots" who think siding with Zarqawi would like to know how effective they are and how truly hated they are.

Posted by: eddiebear on November 27, 2005 01:04 PM

Nice link, eddiebear. I wonder if we'll see this poll cited on the nightly news? I'm not holding my breath...

Posted by: BrewFan on November 27, 2005 01:13 PM

Hey, don't get lost in semantics. Extralegal, extrashmegal. I don't know if there is some American law or treaty that forbids grabbing shitbirds off the street in another country, but it seems that doing so is merely an extraordinary act.
Basically, screw diplomacy, we are going to exercise our perogatives on someone else's soil.

So, I don't think its illegal, its just likely to piss off another country. But the president has that sort of power. Sort of like bombing them. Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke. Seriously, this is where countries differ, where diplomacy and war powers start mattering. If Maryland started yanking Philly Eagle fans off of their McDonalds jobs, there would be legal difficulties, but not so much in the international sense.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 28, 2005 01:15 AM

Nice job in distinguishing modes of ER.

When talking legal status, these distinctions matter.

This distinction of sending to another country, secretly, in violation of all kinds of treaties, seems to be central in the EU uproar about the planes with prisoners landing on their turf.

Posted by: tubino on November 28, 2005 10:36 AM

This issue was tossed around a bit in the comments to my post, and in the comments to the linking post at Protein Wisdom. I don't disagree with your argument -- the quoted bit from Clarke's book does not prove that Gore supported that "snatch and render" bit. Two points though. The Clinton administration did plenty of the other type as well, and I, for one, have not found any statement by Gore saying he supported snatches but objected when the prisoners were rendered. Second, Clarke did not draw this distinction in his book, so it is not clear that the differences loomed as large in the 90s or even when Clarke was writing 18 months ago than they do in the presently charged climate. In any case, I was less condemning Gore than wondering why MSM journalists had not pushed him on this topic. Perhaps they have, and I've just missed it.

Posted by: TigerHawk on November 28, 2005 08:09 PM

AL GORE mr HOT AIR himself

Posted by: spurwing plover on December 1, 2005 05:22 PM

scat domination shit fetish eating shit sick shit do niggers shit more than white ppl video scat funky shit crazy shit scat movies free scat movies scat free shit girls eating shit shit eating drawbacks crazy ass shit shit face scat porn fucked up shit gay shit kazaa lite without the shit scat fetish funky shit

Posted by: scat lovers on January 7, 2006 08:12 AM

Oh God, I just clicked on Scat Lovers link... I thought it was a site about Mel Torme or Ella Fitzgerald. It wasnt.


skiddley-boo-bop-poop

Posted by: The Velvet Amish on January 7, 2006 09:10 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
BIG NEWS UPDATE NOT FIRED

From her lawyer

"The irresponsible reports that have been published stating that Maria Bartiromo was fired or is no longer an employee of Fox are absolutely and unequivocally false," Freedman said Friday. "Make no mistake, we have the receipts and witnesses and they will come out whether through the courthouse or otherwise."

He added: "Those reporting her firing or the incredulous facts supporting that fiction have exhibited a complete and utter reckless disregard for the truth."

from anon2020
So what, she quit?
Megyn Kelly (accursed be her name) used to say all the time that Fox has a top female PR person who is a nasty pitbull and leaks nasty claims about anyone Fox is at war with, including those who have left the network. So I guess maybe she technically resigned? I don't know.
NEW: @FoxNews has obtained Lindsay Clancy defense attorney Kevin Reddington's appeal filing to the MA Supreme Court, which includes Reddington accusing the lone holdout juror of being "biased" against those with "debilitating mental illness", which he says is a protected category.

Thanks to Mark1971
Holiday Break: I've had a rough couple of weeks -- the shoulder is healing now and I'm finally getting decent sleep -- and I've decided to take a long weekend.
I'm taking Friday off, and then Monday off, too.
I have Open Threads for both days and I will post if big news breaks, but if it doesn't -- and it probably won't, news is slow before a holiday weekend -- I'm going to take a four day weekend.
Sh0eOnHead discusses the Psychotic Cult of Lindsay
Real quotes:
"This case has me feeling like I'm on Law & Order with you guys!"
"We literally binge true crime as a hobby, we've been trained for this moment"
Worth the watch. If you haven't seen the genuinely upsetting insanity motivating thousands of women, you should watch this just to see how society is crumbling.
Ban TikTok, Trump. I don't care if Barron tells you it's popular with the yutes. It is an evil Communist China op and it is driving women insane.
Dolly Parton tells the story of the supposedly real-life Jolene
As Andrew Branca says, can we see this Jolene, finally? Who was this hottie that was a genuine sexual threat to Dolly Parton?
I think this is Fake News personally. When a magician claims he learned a trick from a Himalayan wise man, I don't believe him either.
Peter Cullen, voice actor for Optimus Prime (among many others) dies at home surrounded by family at age 85
RIP and Roll Out!
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Dolly Parton...an American classic, Michigan's El Sayed is part of our future destruction, More Global Warming nonsense, mail-in balloting restrictions, Darline Graham? Get rid of family dynasties...and more!
Breaking news: Dolly Parton had a real pair of 38s
Or at least one. She carried it everywhere for protection.
This joke brought to you by Benny Hill. And speaking of the British: The Buckingham Palace guard tributed her yesterday
1977 interview shows that Barbara Walters has always been a seaward and Dolly Parton always had "country class"
Walters actually asks Dolly Parton if she knows that people think she's a joke. This because Walters can't get over the fact that a show-woman has 1, big breasts, and 2, dresses a bit outrageously because, get this, she's an entertainer. A stage performer. You know, someone people pay money to see live and expect them to put on a show.
She never would attack Liberace for wearing glitter-tuxedos. But she's mad that Dolly Parton makes Barbara Walters look bad through association (by being a woman). Babs, you wish people associated the two of you. Believe me, we can tell the difference.
Recent Comments
FenelonSpoke: "50 Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhe ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]And Millard ( name after Millard Fillmore, the ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " Her Majesty is working on submitting the documen ..."

FenelonSpoke: "And Millard ( name after Millard Fillmore, the pre ..."

Advo: "That the defense attorney would claim the juror wh ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: Notsothoreau at September 05, 2026 04:4 ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "She murdered her children. She is a murderer and ..."

FenelonSpoke: "I like the top cartoon. We have pet insurance for ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "None of my cats have ever been nervous about thund ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at September 05 ..."

Notsothoreau: "Fen, Patsy was maybe five or six months old whe ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives