| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Sunday Overnight Open Thread - June 14, 2026 [Doof]
Gun Thread: Pre-NoVAMoMe Edition! Food Thread: Bread And Butter...A Match Made In Heaven First World Problems... FISA Is A Catastrophic Failure, And Should Be Allowed To Die Sunday Morning Book Thread - 6-14-2026 ["Perfessor" Squirrel] Daily Tech News 14 June 2026 Saturday Night Club ONT - June 13, 2026 [D&D] Saturday Evening Movie Post [moviegique]: Backrooms Hobby Thread - June 13, 2026 [TRex] Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« McCain Defends War, Attacks Congressional Defeatists |
Main
| Open Source Respectability? »
November 17, 2005
Open Source ConfusionStop the ACLU rounds up reactions from the blogosphere, much of which is critical and skeptical. RiehlWorldView is one of the skeptics, and has decided to remain an independent. Then again, he's got major-league traffic lately, and I'm not sure he'd have much to gain from aggregating with a host of (mostly) smaller blogs. I don't know either way. I will say that, from the beginning, I never really understood what OSM was intended to be. I was one of the bloggers contacted for early sign-up -- I didn't really sign up; really they just wanted me to sign up so they could present potential investors with a list of blogs that might be involved in the thing when it launched -- and I never "got it." Not to be too mercenary, but the only thing that I really understood and anticipated was the possibility of higher ad rates, something that I thought a bunch of big machers, backed by venture capital, might be able to swing. But as everyone now knows, the rates offered by OSM are not so terribly different from those offered by BlogAds. A little higher, maybe, but then the (basically) flat-rate contract offered by OSM doesn't allow for increasing rates based on increasing traffic. And of course most bloggers plan to, or at least hope to, grow their audience. The other part of it -- the "Drudge Report Round Up" of blogs, the "original reporting from all over the globe" part -- I don't really get at all. There already is a Drudge Report of blogs-- called Instapundit. And original reporting is rare, only happening during a major disaster or, even rarer, a controversy in which there can be some advancement of the story through largely Internet-based investigation (i.e., Rathergate). I don't know how the fact that there are a lot of non-reportage blogs now aggregated into a big confederation of bloggers is going to increase the opportunities for original reportage. There will be more original reporting on the Internet, but it will still be quite rare, and I don't see how OSM is going to change that much. Except that, OSM being dedicated to such original blog reportage, they will of course feature such posts and send traffic to such bloggers, increasing the benefit to bloggers for doing such reportage and thereby encouraging it. But then... Instapundit and other big bloggers already tend to highlight original blog-reportage, even when it involves fairly local issues. I always thought that someone in the organization was pretty psyched about creating a truly revolutionary media venture, and was determined to have such a revolution as part of the company's mission statement, but... never really got around to figuring out how exactly that revolution would come to be. Kinda like the underpants-theiving gnomes on South Park. They knew what they had and they knew where they wanted to go, but that crucial "Step Two" was always left blank, the details to be provided at a later date. So I don't know. There's a bottom-line cash-money part of the project which is, while nice, very incrementalist, and a more ambitious and idealistic plan for a really revolutionary change in information-delivery, but which seems sketchy and unlikely. posted by Ace at 05:00 PM
CommentsWhat could be more dysfunctional than our existing mainstream media? I have no understanding of this new attempt, but I wish them luck! Posted by: Village Idiot on November 17, 2005 05:16 PM
OK, I'm stupid. How exactly are these guys different from Blog-ads. I understand the 'lock in your numbers' part of the deal. I also get the impression that they'll do that they'll take some of the legwork in running down ads out of daily life for you (does blog ads not already do this for you?). But is there something else? Sure, this whole 'become reporters thing,' well, I just don't see that happening. But so what? Isn't the blog ads-esque portion the important part? Maybe their model will encourage people to 'slack off' but is there any other reason to think their aggregation-selling ads portion won't work? I guess I'm trying to understand all the hostility and the hubbub. Is OSM going to have some sort of editorial/censorial say-so over their bloggers that blog-ads doesn't have? Is it all just that this is a big (though inside baseball) thing to bloggers and, bloggers being bloggers, they're just going into hyper-criticizing mode cause it's what they do? What's up here? Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on November 17, 2005 05:18 PM
My prediction - their traffic will drop significantly. Posted by: RangerX2005 on November 17, 2005 05:19 PM
Well, if this thing is meant to be a big site that aggregates a lot of bloggers in one place, like a Huffington Post with a higher sanity-to-madness ratio, I could see a lot of people checking it out regularly. But maybe I misunderstand the model. Posted by: Guy T. on November 17, 2005 05:21 PM
On censorship: Luke Ford, a porn-blogger, was dropped out of OSM because advertisers or investors didn't feel comfortable with him on the list. This worries me greatly, as, let's face it, I'm kinda on the line as regards content. I don't write anything that wouldn't be acceptable for National Lampoon but I do worry that I'll be the next to be disinvited. Posted by: ace on November 17, 2005 05:23 PM
ace, any discussion of demographic measurements? advertising obviously is big business, but you gotta show em you're reaching the people they want to reach. it's confusing to me, which ain't necessarily the kiss of death but it will probably confuse potential investors too. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 17, 2005 05:38 PM
Don't get the big deal about ads at all. Well, that's a lie. I get it, Traffic/clicks = Money = Good. However, since I use adblock for firefox, I don't see (or even download) any ads from any of you. (Which means I don't really care who is hosting them). I also don't appear on your sitemeter/clickcounter/etc. for the same reason. I do feel kinda bad about not supporting my favorite blogs in such a minor way as being counted as a reader, but it's just so darn nice not to have to wait for ads or sitemeter to load. In the long run, I'd be surprised if ad filters don't become more common. Posted by: Gabriel Malor on November 17, 2005 05:41 PM
Ace needs to get in on the real crazy blog-money: inline advertising. In the future, maybe his posts will look like this: Cutting to the chase: there are only two possible "exit strategies" in Iraq. Victory or defeat. Oh, and by the way, I could really go for a nice refreshing Guinness. Posted by: sandy burger on November 17, 2005 05:53 PM
If I could combine Real Clear Politics, Powerline, Ace of Spades, Ann Coulter, Fox News Channel, and the National Review Online, I would be a very happy and content chap. I neither need nor have the time for anyhting else. (Except for Blame Bush and Town Hall Conservatives.) That's where I think we are heading: the consolidation of the blogosphere and the bloggers to be absorbed into the folds of online mainstream organizations. "Packages"like the one above will be offered consisting of a broad consortium. Big conglomerate sites will receive a lot of more traffic as a whole than the individual site would receive. Thus the advertising dollars will follow. Posted by: Bart on November 17, 2005 05:53 PM
I haven't read Luke Ford for a while. I know he wrote about the porn business but I thought he stopped that when he went all jew crazy (he converted and has the fanaticism of a convert). He does write some very good in depth interviews. Posted by: on November 17, 2005 05:53 PM
Good choices, Bart. That's close to my set. And I combine them myself, by opening each one in a tab every morning and refreshing from time to time. It's not all that onerous. I tried an RSS dingus, but didn't see any advantage. But I'm willing to take a wait-and-see on OSM. Posted by: S. Weasel on November 17, 2005 06:52 PM
Kinda like the underpants-theiving gnomes on South Park. They knew what they had and they knew where they wanted to go, but that crucial "Step Two" was always left blank, the details to be provided at a later date. Exactly. Posted by: HayZeus on November 17, 2005 07:02 PM
porn-blogger Have I been missing out on something? I didn't even know there was such a thing. I live such a sheltered life... Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 17, 2005 07:15 PM
My $.02, I think OSM is forgetting what's attractive to people who read blogs; the ability to interact. I know that some of the highest traffic blogs don't allow comments, but I would be willing to bet if you added up the traffic of blogs who do allow comments vs. the aggregate of those who don't, you'd find some interesting results. I do not read any blog, with the exception of Iowahawk, that does not allow comments. I'm pretty sure that no major advertiser is going to drop money on blog ads that run on sites where nobody has control of the content. Posted by: BrewFan on November 17, 2005 07:58 PM
Luke was raised in an ultra conservative 7th Day Adventist family. His dad was kicked out and formed his own church. Then there was that porn gig and now he is an orthodox jew. Weird, but very likeable and a good writer. Posted by: on November 17, 2005 08:21 PM
Been reading Ford, myself, for a long time. To the anon commenter above about his stopping with the porn blogging - yeah, he did stop. Sold his old domain, but couldn't resist and started anew at http://www.lukeisback.com/ Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on November 17, 2005 08:32 PM
Reo: Hmm. I'm not quite sure how that works with the orthodox Judaism. Do you? Posted by: on November 17, 2005 08:37 PM
No. And neither does Ford. Therein lies his medicated charm. Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on November 17, 2005 08:45 PM
Well, I wasn't going to bring that up. lol! Nevertheless, I hope he finds what he is looking for. Posted by: on November 17, 2005 08:55 PM
Actually I do do original reporting on the drug war. What I have learned is that people take drugs for the same reason doctors prescribe them. To solve medical problems. Like PTSD and others. Roger Simon is well acquainted with my work and my politics is not far from his. Never got invitied and when I e-mailed the normally polite R. Simon did not reply. I do not believe that original investigations are of any interest. At least if my interaction with Silk Pajamas is any indication. Posted by: M. Simon on November 18, 2005 12:13 AM
I'm getting crazy blog cash now. Crazy! And all it cost me was my soul and any chance I ever had to get in Althouse's bloomers. Posted by: Jeff G on November 18, 2005 12:17 AM
A look at OSM's front page only adds to my confusion. Right now they are featuring an article on a House spending bill. Under the "Dig Deeper" section, which links bloggers writing on related subjects, they list four blogs. One cut and pasted McCain's remarks taken from the New York Post via Powerline, under the headline: McCain for President 08'! Another cut and pasted an article from The Hill. What is this supposed to be? You #1 source for excerpts of articles from major publications (with Hat Tips to other blogs)? Posted by: on November 18, 2005 12:53 AM
But then... Instapundit and other big bloggers already tend to highlight original blog-reportage, even when it involves fairly local issues. Um, not always. You have to contact them, and it has to be a hot-button issue. Whatever it is, it may just turn out to be a chance to consolidate power. We'll see, but I'm skeptical so far. Posted by: bryan on November 19, 2005 01:11 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals. The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite. Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
English racist garbage-person who's on the wrong side of history warns the corrupt Regime that the people cannot take much more of this -- and won't take much more of this
The English have rebelled before.
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
Odd 90s-Retro Susan Collins ad against the Nazi Hotchkiss "hobby farmer"
I like the throwback AOL style of the ad.
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD] Mary Margaret Olohan
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Whoops! I posted about Dan Goldman losing the NY congressional primary. He might do that, but it won't be tonight -- the primary isn't held until June 23.
One race to keep an eye on: the Levi's heir nepo baby and egregious "Designated Liar" Dan Goldman -- one of the Democrats from a safe district Democrats send out to spread their most indefensible lies -- may actually lose his lower Manhattan/Brooklyn set due to, get this, antisemitism in the Democrat primary electorate.
Antisemitism? In the anti-Nazi Democrat Party? Sounds crazy, I know, but apparently the anti-Nazi Party wants to eliminate Jews. Henry Rosoff Oh my Totenkopf Tattoo, that is a DRUBBING! I'm usually very anti-antisemitism but if the Communist Antisemite Jihadists can pull this one off, Go Communist Antisemite Jihadists, Go!
Democrat Senator Rueben Gallego, who served his wife with divorce papers when she was nine months pregnant so that he could marry his side-piece, counsels us that we should not judge Graham Platner for his infidelity because these things are personal matters, Racists:
Sahil Kapur I like that he says that it's okay that Graham Platner sexted 12 different women within months of marrying the woman to sponge off her because he wasn't then "living a political life" -- the clear meaning being, "We all cheat, we just don't cheat when we're running for office, and he didn't know he was running for office when he was sending dicpics to half the women he ran into." Except he was running: His own wife turned the sexts over to his campaign. And obviously Reuben Gallego didn't let his "political life" get in the way of his extramarital dating life: ![]() Recent Comments
Schnorflepuppy (OT but harmless) [/s] [/b] [/i] [/u]:
"[i]208 S Puppy
How are you, sweet man?
Posted ..."
tcn in AK: "206 204 I’m A Dork! Posted by: nurse ratc ..." nurse ratched. : "tcn, In your neighborhood, Shoot Shovel Shu ..." Itinerant Alley Butcher: "What? No ONT? ..." tcn in AK: "You don’t know how many times I’ve dre ..." Alex deWynter: "Backrooms looks like standard horror stuff. 1) cr ..." Itinerant Alley Butcher: "As it is the intersection of many great anniversar ..." nurse ratched. : "S Puppy How are you, sweet man? ..." Hour of the Wolf: "As Wenda said earlier, "Balderdash!" ..." Schnorflepuppy (OT but harmless) [/s] [/b] [/i] [/u]: "[i]204 I’m A Dork! Posted by: nurse ratch ..." whig: "Y'all have a good and pleasant evening. Oil price ..." nurse ratched. : "I’m A Dork! ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|