Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Feds Indict Two In Anti-Aircraft Missile Sting | Main | 230 Years of "Serv[ing] To Advantage By Sea" »
November 10, 2005

Missed This: "Main Street" Republicans Blocking ANWR Drilling Funded By... George Soros

Check the 1pm Update.


posted by Ace at 04:23 PM
Comments



Love your site, but let's not engage in that which disgusts us about the MSM.

Your headline should read, "...Republicans Blocking ANWR Drilling Funded In Part By... George Soros"

The link to the proof (http://www.opensecrets.org/527s/527events.asp?orgid=53) offered by Malkin doesn't even describe Soros as the heaviest donor.

I know it's not as hard-hitting of a headline, but at least it's honest.

Posted by: Jason on November 10, 2005 04:48 PM

Sesame Street Republicans.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 10, 2005 04:53 PM

Yeah, it's a common point of confusion, right? I mean, when I hear someone gets funding from some source, I always assume that's the only friggin' source funding them, don't I? This especially applies to politicians, so many of them only seeking funding from one source and all.

Dipshit.

Posted by: spongeworthy on November 10, 2005 04:54 PM

Soros was number 2 (that about fits) on the list of donors.

Also, looking at the list of Main Street Republicans you find some fairly big names who have presidential aspirations:
John McCain (which is no surprise), but I was slightly surprised to see Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney.

If Romney wants to make endroads with conservatives wary about voting for a New Englander, he could do that by distancing himself from this bunch of idiots and maybe even publicly removing his name from their membership. Then explain how he wants to help the average American with the prices at the pump and their heating bills by using our own natural resources, not relying on Middle Eastern oil.

None of them are in my state, but if you see one from your state I would recommend letting them know your dissatisfaction.

Posted by: Aaron on November 10, 2005 04:59 PM

Raising CAFE standards does more to reduce demand than ANWAR will do to increase supply.

Why can't citizens in a democracy vote to protect some areas of OUR land? Conservatives can be conservationists. Drilling in ANWAR is NOT popular, folks.

And guess what? If people change their minds in 10 or 20 or 40 years, and want to drill there, the oil WILL STILL BE THERE. Imagine the endgame of oil, when it is getting really scarce. Are you gonna be glad the US spent its supply decades ago, or will it be kinda nice to have a bit in the ground still, for security purposes?

Why rush to squander our supply while there is no supply problem? Sure, it takes 7-10 years to get it to market... fine. What's the hurry?

Puzzler: what if the chaos in Iraq means that its oil supply remains unsquandered for the next decade or two? How will its holdings increase in ratio to the rest of the world's?

Posted by: tubino on November 10, 2005 05:15 PM

Well, mine ain't there, because he's a Democrat. But I'm astonished to see Ohio has rep named Steven LaTourette. You reckon he pops up and screams "fucking shit!" on the floor of the House every once in a while?

Damn, I'd move to Ohio and vote for him if I thought so.

Posted by: S. Weasel on November 10, 2005 05:17 PM

Great, looks like most of the entire IL Republican delegation is on Soros's Payroll.

Oh wait since, Soros is not the sole funder, I'm actually being disingenuous. He probably doesn't even support them, its just a check he flushed down the toilet.

Dipshidiot

Posted by: HowardDevore on November 10, 2005 05:19 PM

Checkit! California has a Jerry Lewis! "Hey laaaaaaadyyyy! With the voting and the motions and the legislaaaaationnnnn!."

Yeah. I think I'm building a Fantasy Congress over here.

Posted by: S. Weasel on November 10, 2005 05:25 PM

Raising CAFE standards does more to reduce demand than ANWAR will do to increase supply.

"A 1999 USA TODAY analysis of crash data and estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found that, in the years since CAFE standards were mandated under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, about 46,000 people have died in crashes that they would have survived if they had been traveling in bigger, heavier cars."*


We don't want any more of your blood for caribou.


* James R. Healey, "Death by the Gallon: Push for Better Mileage Raises Death Tolls," USA TODAY , Special Reprint Edition, reprinted from MONEY , July 2, 1999; based on previously unpublished fatality statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Posted by: Master of None on November 10, 2005 05:53 PM

Well, I wrote a stiff note to my reps and senators.

The note was polite. I asked them if something had been put in the water, since the GOP has been truly f'n up lately!

Posted by: Maranna on November 10, 2005 06:26 PM

Rudy isn't on the list, is he?
(fingers crossed)

Posted by: Knemon on November 10, 2005 07:54 PM

And guess what? If people change their minds in 10 or 20 or 40 years, and want to drill there, the oil WILL STILL BE THERE.

Yeah, and I'm sure you're not being the least fucking disengenuous when you say that.

Don't worry, foax, tubino wil be behind drilling 100%...someday when we really need it. Honest.

Posted by: Sean M. on November 10, 2005 09:18 PM

George Soros should be deported to San Fancisco

Posted by: spurwing plover on November 10, 2005 10:00 PM

For Christmas, I want a funnier troll.

Posted by: The Warden on November 10, 2005 10:45 PM

Anybody who thinks that the US is killing its wild land through drilling or development is out of his gourd or stuck in a past which no longer exists.

Wild land has actually been in an expansion phase since the 1920s, '30s.

Only about 2% of the continental US now is classified as 'built up.'

Our wild land is VAST.
Even the areas that have people on it in any moderate density is home to much wildlife.

The amount of wild land in this country has been and is increasing every year, thanks to modern agriculture and industry.

I see it around me; farmer's lots are given over to wild land all over the place in the Northeast.
Modern technology as benefactor of the natural environment. Imagine that.

Excuse me, I have to shoot those nocturnal flying squirrels that keep raiding my birdfeeders at night. They're a damned nuisance. I get both the red and the grey ones here in Connecticut.

If it weren't for all the owls around here, I'd never keep up with them.

I fault the thick tree cover in this state.

Posted by: lauraw on November 10, 2005 11:12 PM

Those letters to Dennis Hastert that Malkin published are so well-written. And so polite. Here's mine. It didn't make the cut:

Dear Dennis:

You fat bastard. Can't you even hold the line on ANWAR? It's our own goddammed land. Mooses don't give a shit about oil rigs. You want us permanently hitched to the middle east? And those asshole, fey Republicans you let take over didn't stand to lose a single vote from their respective constituents. As if. As if someone was going to say to themselves, "Hmm, Congressman Smallberries voted for ANWAR a year ago. He'll pay for that now, by god." Get your shit together, fatboy.

Yours truly,
RD

Posted by: rd on November 11, 2005 12:43 PM

Ace, can we have a flame thread for Hastert and members of the "Republican Main Street Partnership"? You know, so we can write some practice letters? Maybe get some literary feedback?

Posted by: rd on November 11, 2005 12:48 PM

I've read that letter three times, rd, and I can't for the life of me figure out what was wrong with it.

It is insightful and factual, with a certain indefinable zestiness that conveys your genuine interest in the subject matter.

Submit it again, maybe Ms. Malkin didn't read it in the right frame of mind the first time.

Posted by: lauraw on November 11, 2005 01:08 PM

Oh wait since, Soros is not the sole funder, I'm actually being disingenuous. He probably doesn't even support them, its just a check he flushed down the toilet.

Considering how well his funding of lefty websites and other propaganda outlets worked in chucking Dubya out of the White House, I'd say flushing checks down the crapper is his standard operational procedure.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 11, 2005 04:16 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Recent Comments
Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "Off to nood. ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "#Winning ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "FIRST!!!!! ..."

zombie Robert Redford: "Crowrdinary People. ..."

Anna Puma: "The Matese Crow ..."

crow politician: "The dormant account was Becerra's. Who claims to k ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]------------- Wait your turn Posted by: Kud ..."

Common Tater: "They might technically be retarded, but a lot of & ..."

Stu Podaso : "The Greatest Crow on Earth ..."

Admiral Ackbar: "[I]That Ukrainian dickbag who threw a huge rock at ..."

ShainS [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "308 Crow Magnon Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. a ..."

Heroq: "In 1970 the federal budget was $200B. Adjusted for ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives