Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Confidence In European Union Crashes To Historic Lows | Main | Panic Stations: Ace Solo on Hoist The Black Flag Today At 4PM »
November 08, 2005

Required Reading: The CIA's Black Ops Against The American Government

Momentum is building.

Jed Babbin notes that not only was Joe Wilson "unspeakably unqualified" for the Niger mission, not only did he tell everyone he interviewed he was a representative of the United States Government (which seems intended to make sure no one told him anything the US Government wouldn't like to hear), not only wasn't he signed to a confidentiality agreement, which seems by design, so that he would take his non-findings about his non-secret-mission public in an election year, but that the CIA's criminal referral to the Justice Department is possibly a felony, if the CIA had reason to know no crime was committed. (Which no crime was, of course).


The American people need this matter investigated forthwith, and not -- God help us -- by yet another special counsel. The Senate Intelligence Committee should, immediately, investigate and cause the following questions to be answered publicly as soon as possible:

1) What precisely does the CIA criminal referral that started the Fitzgerald investigation say? It should be declassified and published;

2) Who approved the criminal referral and why?

3) Was Pavitt the person who approved the Wilson mission? Who else approved the mission and how it was to be performed?

4) Why did they choose Wilson instead of someone qualified?

5) Why wasn't Wilson required to sign a confidentiality agreement?

6) Were his various op-eds vetted at CIA?

7) Who else, beside Vallely and his wife, knew Plame was a CIA employee, when did they know it and from whom?

8) Who was Bob Novak's source? Was it Wilson? Pavitt? Someone else at CIA?

There are hundreds of other questions that should be answered publicly. Let's get ol' Joe in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee, under oath and with the television cameras on. Let's see if he does as well as George Galloway did in front of Norm Coleman's Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. I have no doubt he'll fail to rise to even that standard.

Just because a lot of people are saying similar things doesn't mean we're right. But it does increase the odds we'll get some traction on this with government officials who can, maybe, tell us if we're right.


posted by Ace at 02:18 PM
Comments



Whether or not Wilson was qualified is really a matter of opinion. I just give them the benefit of the doubt and assume for the sake of argument that he's very qualified so the discussion moves on to the important stuff.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 8, 2005 02:44 PM

It is relevant whether or not he was qualified to be an objective, knowledgeable observer, or if he was qualified to be a biased, agendized hit man for the anti-Bush crowd at the CIA. It seems to me that is the entire point.

Posted by: robert108 on November 8, 2005 03:08 PM

Suweet. It looks like the anti-Miers backlash has reminded Republicans of who elects them.I'd say they've actually grown a pair for once if this goes through

Posted by: HowardDevore on November 8, 2005 03:20 PM

Wilson's qualifications - or lack thereof - are a place to start. Possibly the CIA can explain why they used a political activist with a predetermined agenda rather than a professional spy. Perhaps they can explain the irregularities in his employment.

Wilson appears to have been chosen to do exactly what he did - conduct a cursory sham 'investigation' in order to create the illusion of credibility, and then return home and go on the offensive against the administration with a mix of lies and half-truths.

Posted by: lyle on November 8, 2005 03:31 PM

It'd be poetic justice to have Plame frog-marched out of the white house.

Posted by: Iblis on November 8, 2005 03:38 PM

The fact that he's a political activist is the main problem.

When people talk about "qualifications", I usually think more of the sort of things he'd write on his resume.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 8, 2005 04:14 PM

Yeah, and I'm still waiting for that bike I asked Santa Claus to bring me when I was 8...

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 8, 2005 04:17 PM

Are you all listening to Ace on Hoist?

Posted by: on November 8, 2005 04:22 PM

Great. Have the Senate Millionaires Club Intelligence Committee investigate the Wilson/Plame/CIA shenanigans. Turn Jay Rockedollar loose to pontificate about the eee-vil Republicans. Has anyone ever wondered how an organization like the Seante can allow Jay anywhere near anything remotely connected to intelligence when he so obviously has none of his own?

Posted by: Border Reiver on November 8, 2005 04:52 PM
... but that the CIA's criminal referral to the Justice Department is possibly a felony, if the CIA had reason to know no crime was committed. (Which no crime was, of course).

You forgot to say how you know this. I'm curious to know how you got access to classified information.

When people talk about "qualifications", I usually think more of the sort of things he'd write on his resume.

Wilson addresses this point in his letter, which I produced entirely in another thread. How about addressing the facts, since they are available?

If you want to eliminate political activists (Wilson gave to republicans, was praised HIGHLY by Bush sr.) from politics... good luck. Wilson was a diplomat and ambassador.

Bush just appointed 9 political fundraisers out of 16 for a serious intel policy committee. He thinks our security is a fucking joke, just payback positions for fundraising. Ambassadorships have always been that, but now it's raised to the most serious positions.

Heckuva job you're doing, George!

Posted by: tubino on November 9, 2005 11:50 AM

I just paid $2.13/gallon for gas.

Posted by: Bart on November 9, 2005 12:15 PM

Yeah, momentum is building. The Republicans totally have the Democrats on the run. If you ignore the fact that Reid is schooling Frist on a regular basis, and the Republicans have to deal with the fact that it looks like one of their own leaked information that Cheney provided only to Republican Senators (wait till they dig into that one) and that the Administration is starring in Voyage to the Bottom of the Polls. But wait!. Four ballot measures in Ohio were defeated! Can't you hear the thundering hoofbeats?

You guys do have a talent for continuing to declare victory even as the opposing General is breaking your sword over his knee.

You guys seem to think that still another article full of suppositions and half truths is somehow a great leap forward. Babbin mostly goes over a lot of tired ground. And I can't believe you guys are so dense that you haven't gotten it yet, so we'll go over it again. It doesn't matter if what Libby told the reporters was true or not. He's not charged with lying to the reporters. He's charged with lying to the Grand Jury and the FBI. You can continue to smear Wilson all you want. It doesn't change a thing about Libby.

And I do find it interesting that the only people that can actually come forward and claim Wilson told them about his wife's work are partisan right wingers. He sure picked a funny bunch to confide in.

Babbin's article is full of a lot of speculation and suppositions along the lines of "I can't think of another reason why something happened, so it must be the reason I can think of."

And I notice he plays investigative reporter with all of his suppositions about who authorized Wilson's trip. Can't you guys keep your story straight? Plame did. Jesus, don't back away from that one now. You almost had me believing it.

Posted by: Chris on November 9, 2005 03:58 PM
And I notice he plays investigative reporter with all of his suppositions about who authorized Wilson's trip. Can't you guys keep your story straight? Plame did.

Chris, here's the deal: in one story, Plame was a nothing clerk in the CIA - so no real outing occurred. She couldn't authorize purchase of paperclips.

In the other story, Plame had the high level CIA status you would need to authorize an international trip with sensitive diplomatic implications -- and her status was secret.

The wingers want to claim the second (nepotism!) AND the first (no crime!), even though neither one is consistent with the evidence, or Libby's indictment.

It's a tough road for them. So they fall back on sliming Joe Wilson, as though if any of it sticks, that makes it okay to reveal classified info.

Be nice to them. After they dug their holes, they threw the shovels at people like me, so they are REALLY stuck now. And desperate.

Posted by: tubino on November 9, 2005 10:58 PM

That's quite interesting. You can visit the mentioned site for free blogs and have a great blogging experience.

Posted by: Richard on November 10, 2005 02:04 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "278 Happy to be wrong that the judiciary isn't com ..."

People's Hippo Voice: "Correction: Both the entire VA state house and s ..."

Washington Nearsider: Gotterdammerung: "I bet he's sanded and stained about eight tables a ..."

ShainS [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "'Cause Dr. Muldoon always delivers! Posted by: ..."

banana Dream: "I'm hoping for Ace on a real tear regarding the VA ..."

Rork Glanf: ""Now I need to buy a couple or three motherboards ..."

Washington Nearsider: Gotterdammerung: "Happy to be wrong that the judiciary isn't complet ..."

Smell the Glove: "Awright. I said during JJ 's report that I thought ..."

People's Hippo Voice: "The Dems had banked those 4 extra seats as a done ..."

m: "272 Not sure how my nick got screwed. Posted b ..."

Chuck Martel: "VA has a very strong state legal framework and con ..."

Stateless - He ain't heavy, he's my dog: "267 Is that wrong? Posted by: Bruce Springst ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives