Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Giant Frickin' Apes! | Main | Confidence In European Union Crashes To Historic Lows »
November 08, 2005

General Vallely (Ret'd): Wilson Outed His Wife To Me Three Times In 2002

Sounds like a witness in Libby's trial to me... to prove the non-materiality of the alleged lies:

A retired Army general says the man at the center of the CIA leak controversy, Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, revealed his wife Valerie Plame's employment with the agency in a casual conversation more than a year before she allegedly was "outed" by the White House through a columnist.

Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely told WorldNetDaily that Wilson mentioned Plame's status as a CIA employee over the course of at least three, possibly five, conversations in 2002 in the Fox News Channel's "green room" in Washington, D.C., as they waited to appear on air as analysts.

Strata-Sphere has found at least four occasions when Vallely and Wilson were guests on Fox at about the same time.


posted by Ace at 01:58 PM
Comments



Valerie Plame worked for the CIA?!?

Huh.

BTW, dunno if you caught Drudge. . . sounds like there might be a chance that *somebody* in Congress is unable to differentiate between "good leaks" and "bad leaks," and instead just sees "leaks."

Whaddya know-- classified info might actually be. . . CLASSIFIED!

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on November 8, 2005 02:08 PM

Ahh.. World Net Daily, great source.

Kinda Like the National Enquirer for bedwetters.

Posted by: X. on November 8, 2005 02:17 PM

Oh, Tubinoooooooo.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 8, 2005 02:17 PM

Vallely was on Hannity's show yesterday too. Said he'd be happy to testify under oath.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 8, 2005 02:42 PM

Nice try - you can't distract from Libby's indictment!

I'l put my hands over my ears and say LALALALALALALALALALA now...

Posted by: The Dying Hopes of an Increasingly Unhinged Left on November 8, 2005 02:52 PM

Hmmm ... a battle royal of trustworthiness and political credibility, huh? Sounds interesting.

"In the black (ops) corner, weighing in with years of actual battlefield and intelligence experience ... General Paul Vallely!

... and in the (Commie-symp) red corner, weighing in with a pink-diaper-baby wife who's employed by a seditionist government agency actively campaigning against a sitting President during wartime ... (Pot) Smokin' Joe Wilson!"

Frankly, I like the General's odds in this one.

Posted by: 12" Saturday Night on November 8, 2005 02:53 PM

I don't want to seem petty towards the General here, but isn't this something he could have maybe mentioned, I don't know, a YEAR AGO!?

Posted by: Tony B on November 8, 2005 02:54 PM

TonyB, are you questioning the timing?

Seriously, though, that's a valid point. Mentioning this earlier would have been really, really helpful.

Posted by: utron on November 8, 2005 02:58 PM

I figure this is a good time to point out that there is a defense contained with the IIPA, "It is contained in Section 422 (of Title 50, U.S. Code), and it provides that an accused leaker is in the clear if, sometime before the leak, "the United States ha[s] publicly acknowledged or revealed" the covert agent's "intelligence relationship to the United States[.]"

It sort of fits in with Wilson's loose lips as well.

However, someone else had earlier pointed out that Josh Marshal had wished it weren't so, so I am countering with this link. I was going to link to my ferret, but its been down in the dumps ever since the Wash Post outed our black ops jails.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 8, 2005 02:59 PM

but its been down in the dumps ever since the Wash Post outed our black ops jails.

But Drudge says they're going after the leakers.

Posted by: geoff on November 8, 2005 03:04 PM
But Drudge says they're going after the leakers.

Bring it on. Imagine months and months of reminders of govt secrecy, to hide a policy that our president denies even exists.

It won't take long before the GOP realizes they don't really want a debate on torture, or on some right to preserve secret gulags.

Wasn't it just a few months ago that there was OUTRAGE that Amnesty International used the word GULAG about Gitmo?

And now we're supposed to switch from denying the existence, to not only accepting it, but being outraged at this non-news being made official by leaks?

Honestly, who can keep up?

Posted by: tubino on November 9, 2005 11:24 AM
TonyB, are you questioning the timing?

Seriously, though, that's a valid point. Mentioning this earlier would have been really, really helpful.

Gee, ya think? And not just ONE year ago, but two.

Of course, if we're going to play THAT game, then why didn't Bush get the truth from Rove TWO years ago? And from Cheney? Ari Fleischer? Libby?

Have you all forgotten that your president confirmed that his staff had not leaked? Libby, technically, reports to Bush as well as to Cheney, BTW.

Wouldn't it have been helpful if they had told the truth then?

Or maybe they did -- but then Bush has been lying for two years.

Anyway, I think these folks who suddenly found their repressed memories can still testify to the FBI. Who can then have a chat with Victor Davis Hanson.

Anyone ready to place a bet? I'm betting these new slimers will never offer their testimony to the FBI or Fitzgerald. If they were willing, they would have done it TWO YEARS AGO, and Fitz could have subpoenaed Hanson and the rest.

Posted by: tubino on November 9, 2005 11:37 AM

Everyone is a liar EXCEPT for Wilson.
Wilson's story is unraveling like a loose thread on a wool sweater, but that's only the rightwingnut smear machine working with the biased corporate media like the NYT.

Posted by: Toobeano on November 9, 2005 07:58 PM

Vallely is a lying sack of crap.

Posted by: Hesiod on November 10, 2005 09:31 AM

Yes! Media Matters! There’s an unimpeachable source.

I particularly like the part where Joe Wilson calls somebody a liar.


Irony is so, ironic.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 10, 2005 09:42 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Elric the Blade says he's no longer sure that Trump will have the right to appeal in the NY fraud case:
Yesterday, I thought that Trump had an appeal as of right on the fraud liability, based upon news reports that cited the second opinion as declining to find in favor of liability. That would give Trump at least 2 dissenting judges for an appeal as of right.
But now, after seeing the actual decisions, I'm not so sure. Sorry, guys. I've never seen or heard of what the second opinion did. They dissented, but ... decided not to dissent? I'm not sure what the effect is in terms of whether Trump has a right to appeal. I doubt anyone does.
I think even if Trump doesn't have a right of appeal, the Court of Appeals (NY's highest court) will take the case. But ... it's a liberal court so who knows how they'll rule. I have the docket number so I can track what gets appealed to the Court of Appeals. If Trump wants to appeal, I think he might file an appeal as of right and a petition for permission to appeal. His lawyers know this case much better than I, but even they might know what the effect of all the opinions are.
I don't think they'll take the appeal. Judges are lazy and cowardly and will duck any hot potato case they can. These judges are also liberal hacks, and do not want to deliver Trump a full victory.
FBI raids home of John Bolton, former Trump national security advisor "The probe is eyeing multiple instances of the use of classified documents in leaks to news media. NBC reported that the investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration, but did not go further before President Joe Biden left office in January." [CBD]
Money Wired to Mexico Hits a Decade Low as US Immigration Policies Take Hold
Now bump the fee to 10%, and mandate proof of legal residence for all money transfers out of the United States [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Boots on the ground in Ukraine? We're against it! Trump shines a light on voting, Miss Universe wearing a suicide vest? And more!
"As the discussion continued, Fox News host Charlie Hurt asked Trump directly to confirm there will be no U.S. troops involved in this potential security umbrella for Ukraine. "Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president," Trump replied."
Good! I hope I am wrong! [CBD]
Lost Seventies Mystery Click: The Darkest Song Ever Recorded?
I think Professor of Rock (on YouTube) claimed this song was so upsetting that people used to pull over to the side of the road when it came on the radio. It's about a fatal plane crash, but obviously it suggests a fatal car crash too, which could wig out a driver.
It's like one of those nasty 70s anti-war body horror movies. Not for the squeamish. I'm not even going to post the lyrics because they're upsetting too.
Compilation of Naked Gun intros
That theme gets me charged.
Compilation of all Police Squad! openings. They're all the same except for the last few seconds where they reveal the Special Guest Star and the title(s).
Pitch Meeting: Amazon's new, terrible War of the Worlds
I don't know why these tech monopolists spend so much money on ripoff/sequel/remake slop. I like popcorn entertainment but is it legally required to be terrible?
Lost 90s Mystery Click: College Radio Edition
Well you look fantastic in your cast-off casket
At least the thing still runs
This nine to five bullshit don't let you forget
Whose suicide you're on.

Also:
You wax poetic about things pathetic
As long as you look so cute
Believe these hills are starting to roll
Believe these stars are starting to shoot
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: In the last Episode of the season CBD and J.J. Sefton chat about Texas Gerrymandering, The Islamist who is about to be the mayor of NYC, Jim Acosta's ghoulish interview, Israel needs a new strategy for Gaza, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Garrett's Favorite Band Edition
Everybody wants you
Everybody wants your love
I'd just like to make you mine, all mine
Recent Comments
Piper: "So, what's your tribe? Posted by: TheJamesMadison ..."

W Shakespeare: "My dangling participle brings all the girls to the ..."

RODNEY: "Keep your Dildos off my Grits! ..."

Posted by: Stateless - VERY GRATEFUL, BLESSED, LOVED AND HAPPY! -- - New Life Creation - 18.1%: "Needs more trannies dildoing themselves.... ..."

Chuck Martel: "302 Wait until Taylor writes a song about when Tra ..."

Kindltot: "what is "beyond yoga" made of? It doesn't sound t ..."

wferrin: "Eric Swalwell remembers D-Day and Little Roundtop? ..."

Symbian: "[i] It's only a matter of time before those buyers ..."

Ian S.: "[i]I don't see how they're going to arrange for th ..."

Common Tater: "which is the same argument feminsts use with human ..."

beckster: "Swalwell's looking a bit beefy these days. ..."

TheJamesMadison, growing up with John Hughes: "Cast off the white dudes over 50. They don't kn ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives