Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Italian TV Proves There Were WMD In Iraq... Used By America! | Main | Chemical Attack By Americans Kills Two Iraqi Freedom Fighters »
November 07, 2005

The Sixties: The Only Decade You’ll Ever Need

Much like Iraq can only be understood through analogies to Vietnam, the media is moving towards the “Paris is Burning” story as another 60’s narrative.

Yesterday, Craig Smith, the Paris correspondent of our media’s bellwether, The N.Y. Times, gave us his take. While initially looking at the more recent Katrina riots, the ’92 Rodney King mayhem, Smith gets down to the heart of the matter, the 1960’s:

Although many Americans feel that their country still has a lot of work to do to close the gap between blacks and whites, the social protests and urban upheavals of the 1960's produced a stream of measures intended to increase political and economic opportunities rapidly for members of minority groups, and to stress the value of diversity to a democracy. By contrast, the French model has so far relied largely on expensive measures to keep poor Muslims fed, housed and educated, but has not effectively addressed the social or political isolation they feel from job and housing discrimination, and has actually limited their ability to define themselves as a political interest group. Affirmative action, a cornerstone of the American approach, has been a taboo here.

Okay, putting aside the media’s favorite decade/Rosetta stone for a moment, how much of this has any truth to it? How many suburban Paris car fires are the result of job and housing discrimination?


The Brussels Journal (and you really should be reading them on this Paris thang) responds:

Most observers in the mainstream media (MSM) provide an occidentocentric analysis of the facts. They depict the “youths” as outsiders who want to be brought into Western society and have the same rights as the natives of Old Europe. The MSM believe that the “youths” are being treated unjustly because they are not a functioning part of Western society. They claim that, in spite of positive discrimination, subsidies, public services, schools, and all the provisions that have been made for immigrants over the years, access has been denied them.

This is the marxist rhetoric of the West that has been predominant in the media and the chattering classes since the 1960s. But it does not fit the facts of the situation in Europe today.

And, responding directly to the N.Y. Times article:

Those media that tell us that the rioting “youths” want to be a part of our society and feel left out of it, are misrepresenting the facts. As the insurgents see it, they are not a part of our society and they want us to keep out of theirs. The violence in France is in no way comparable with that of the blacks in the U.S. in the 1960s. The Paris correspondent of The New York Times who writes that this a “variant of the same problem” is either lying or does not know what he is talking about. The violence in France is of the type one finds when one group wants to assert its authority and drive the others out of its territory. American MSM who imply that there is a direct line from Rosa Parks, the black woman who refused to stand up for a white man on an American bus in 1955, to the rabble that are now throwing molotov cocktails into French buses containing passengers, are misrepresenting the facts. (The only comparison between America and France is that many of the bus drivers in the Parisian suburbs, like those in New Orleans, seem to be white women whose vulnerability attracts rioters and looters).

I won't touch that analysis of the situation. I'm not there, I don't know. But the point is, I wouldn't find out listening to our media. They're not there either. They're somewhere, trapped on some alternate dimension college campus, in the 1960's.

Seriously, how did journalists operate prior to that decade? Did they all just sit around, staring at each other, slack jawed, waiting for a 10 years span to come along and explain everything? Putting aside their conversations amongst each other (can you imagine the awkward empty gaps?), their columns, what did they pad them with? Recipes?

Or did they have another decade to romantically obsess over? Say, the 1890's? Another touchstone of “fly your own freak flag” unrest and college activism with everyone tripped out of their minds on Laudanum? Was WWI or that bastard Woodrow Wilson, all haunting echos from analogues in that bloodthirsty fascist, Grover Cleveland’s administration?

And nowadays, why do colleges, history departments, bother teaching anything else? Since all events are just ‘everything old is new again’ rehashes of the sixties, what’s the point?


Q: Dear MSM, The Colts are taking on New England at Foxborough tonight. New England’s pretty beat up, but Manning can’t seem to get past them – like they’re in his head or something. The Colts are laying 4 and ½. Who should I go with?
A: The Sixties.

Q: Dear MSM: Social Security Private Accounts seem-
A: The Sixties.

Q: My aunt has an arthritic-
A: Sixties (You people ask a lot of questions, don’cha. Oh, and um… the sixties.)

Well, I guess I shouldn’t complain. We’ve been fortunate so far. I do worry though, how long this can continue? If history will just keep repeating itself so nicely for us or will some new event come along that would require original thought, some different means of analysis?

Luckily – and I watch the news closely waiting – foretidings of such an event have not materialized in the past thirty five years. Sleep safely, America.

[Correction: AoS' resident sheep fancier, BumperStickerist, corrects my earlier, mistaken use of 'Bellweather.' Check comments for interesting etymology.]

posted by Dr. Reo Symes at 04:07 PM
Comments



the social protests and urban upheavals of the 1960's produced a stream of measures intended to increase political and economic opportunities rapidly for members of minority groups, and to stress the value of diversity to a democracy.

It wasn't our "measures" that made the difference. It was the change in our societal values, combined with a determined effort to rid out unconstitutional racist bigotry in the legal system.

France's problems aren't gonna be legislated or spent away.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 7, 2005 04:23 PM

I think journalists in the old days probably concentrated on reporting the objective facts with editorializing their reports according to their worldview.

Posted by: Moonbat_One on November 7, 2005 04:29 PM

At least in decades to come they'll relate everything to Iraq, rather than Vietnam. One hopes.

Posted by: Knemon on November 7, 2005 04:39 PM

Hmm... marginalized ethnic group, treated as second-class citizens, with historically high unemployment rates, with mostly low-pay jobs when employed...

Watts? Kinda, but... the residents of Watts were NOT "immigrants."

Look, the French are no saints in the area of bigotry! The French have defined their own culture in such a way that immigrants are still called immigrants after THIRTY YEARS of living in France.

Most of the EU countries are having a hell of a time with immigrants and integration.

I think we in the US can feel proud , on the whole, for our acceptance of immigrants and the contributions they have made to our country. (FWIW, I'm a mix, with ancestors on one side coming here from England and Scotland in the 18th century, and on the other side they came over on boats in this century.)

What the French have done is a kind of hard secularism, and insistence on a rigid cultural definition. We in the US have been much more flexible and adaptable, in language, culture, dress, food.

Comparisons with civil rights progress in the 60s and 70s is somewhat useful, somewhat misleading, but a damn sight better than talk of "appeasement" or Islamic determinism to explain what's going on there.

Poor marginalized people get fed up, burn and tear stuff up. It has happened here, it has happened everywhere. It ain't a specific race or religion thing.

Posted by: tubino on November 7, 2005 05:03 PM

These "youths" are a lot more marginialized than they are poor. I have no doubt that there is a lot of racism against darker folks in France, but the reaction of a lot of these immigrant-descendants has been to turn to a radical form of sometimes-Islam that allows them to feel superior to, and thus despise, the French while providing a ready-made excuse for their inability to improve themselves, plus the authority to treat women like dirt. Historicaly, almost all imigrant groups have faced discriminiation, especially at first - Irish, Jews and Italians in America are notable examples of disliked immigrants that are now pillars of the community.

The thing is - these groups fought for acceptance - the Jews fought the quotas to get into the Ivy League schools, etc. The "youths" in these Franco-Burbs are not really fighting for inclusion - they are fighting to remain seperate yet on the rather generous dole. They want the French taxpayer (an endangered species, apparently) to continue to pay for their football, pot and designer clothes lifestyle, while at the same time maintaining that the write of French law does not run in their neighborhoods.

That's not to say that there aren't those who integrate successfully, but they are not the issue here - they're probably too busy working to burn cars.

The "Root Causes" here are numerous, complex and interlocking - and none lend themselves to an easy solution. The aggressive secularism of the French State is an extra irritant that provides friction not found in other western contries - or at least not the same degree (ie headscarf ban).

Had the French government tried to address these concerns 20 years ago it would have been hard - now it may be impossible wihtout rivers of blood.

Posted by: holdfast on November 7, 2005 05:18 PM

While I appreciate Tubby's alternate worldview, I must disagree.

These people are not rioting because they want French society to be more inclusive. Most have no desire or intention of assimilating to Western culture.

The problem is they want to force their culture on the French. And, unfortunately...they have reached critical mass. They now routinely accost French women who are not wearing the hijab.

Posted by: TheShadow on November 7, 2005 05:30 PM

Long, but interesting article from Hugh Fitzgerald over at DhimmiWatch

Fitzgerald: Voila, deux-rivistes of the world

Posted by: TheShadow on November 7, 2005 05:40 PM

I will be so glad when the mindset of the '60s generation dies off (actually, since I'm younger than that and will be paying for their crabby, freeloading asses for years to come, I won't be shedding any tears when the whole friggin' generation dies off, but I'll save that diatribe for the next time a Social Security post rears its head).

Anyhoo, I've noticed the same thing, that for the media and America's far left, it's like they're still stuck in 1968 or something, mindlessly chanting Marxist platitudes and somehow confusing long-since discredited utopian nonsense with an actual plan for what we ought to be doing now.

Good post.

Posted by: Blacksheep on November 7, 2005 05:50 PM

You know what I remember about the 60s? Whenever there was a riot, we called out the f'k'n National Guard. So, when the hell are they going to call out the g-d damned army?

Posted by: on November 7, 2005 06:15 PM

I have seen this left-wing-fantasy interpretation a lot: we got over our racial conflicts by catering to left-wing demands for affirmative action, a giant welfare state, etcetera. Well, we did do those things, and they only made race relations worse. What finally worked (exemplified by Guiliani's NY) is effective law enforcement. Now that crime doesn't pay, fewer blacks are turning to a life of crime. We still have a long way to go, but we are getting there. Europe, in contrast, has almost no law enforcement. That's why they are doomed to receive a very loud wake up call. It's a 1 on the Richter scale now. My prediction: when it hits 9, they actually will wake up.

Posted by: Alec on November 7, 2005 06:23 PM

Which is wh Rudy can't fail.

*

tubino - can't it be resentment over discrimination etc. etc. AND islamist? Rather, the former exploited by the latter?

Posted by: Knemon on November 7, 2005 06:26 PM

Alec,

I think you're right. It seems the French prefer to run their suburbs like the Democrats ran New Orleans, leaving whole neighborhoods lawless with disastrous results.

We shouldn't, however, underestimate how the effect of the general population's subservience to governmental authority has in creating this lax attitude toward law enforcement. Over the past few decades, the French have successfully inculcated in their kids a general aversion to challenging criminals or standing up to bullies. I don't seriously believe that much of French society has any clue what they are up against, and even if they did, wouldn't be able to muster the courage to stand up to it because they have been taught to walk away from fights, i.e. be the better man.

I'm glad I visited France again this past summer. It really was a beautiful place.

Posted by: EricTheRed21 on November 7, 2005 06:45 PM

The Pats ARE in our heads, and for us true Colt fans, tonight's game is the first superbowl of the season.

go blue!

Posted by: moflicky on November 7, 2005 06:54 PM

oh yeah....

I predict a score in THE SIXTIES!

Posted by: moflicky on November 7, 2005 06:55 PM

Dr. Symes -

It's 'bellwether', not 'bellweather' ... this isn't a rebuke or anything, it's the blog equivalent of saying you've got a piece of salad stuck in your teeth.

cheers.

for the future Jeopardy! contestants, a bellwether was the wether (a sheep) that had a bell around its neck. The other sheep were trained to follow the sound of the bell. Thus, the shepherd only had to get the bell-wether to go in a direction and the rest of the sheep would follow.


Posted by: BumperStickerist on November 7, 2005 06:57 PM

my dictionary has a wether as a castrated ram.

ewe!!!!

(whew, that hurt)

Posted by: moflicky on November 7, 2005 07:02 PM

I think we in the US can feel proud , on the whole, for our acceptance of immigrants and the contributions they have made to our country.

******

Unless your name is Dances with Rain Forest, we are ALL immigrants in the US. The reason we accept new arrivals basically with open arms, is because of this historical fact. You remember, that whole huddled masses thing. Its only in the last 40 years or so, not coincedentally, around the 60's that this whole multi-cultural, moral equivalence, hypenate everything bullshit started that we started having a good deal of the societal problems we now have.

Very few if any countries in the world share this background. They are for the most part ethnically pure and despite their claims to the opposite they are not very welcoming to immigrants. France, by its own admission, has done a terrible job of assimilating this latest wave of immigrants into their society and has purposefully kept them seperated in enclaves and affectively isolated them from the mainstream society.

Some interesting facts about these youths.

They aren't just youths from Africa. They are overwhelmingly from Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco. What do these countries have in common? All were up until recently colonies of that imperialistic nation, France. All are now almost 100% Muslim.

Here are a couple messages from blogs (ya gotta love the irony) these youths have been using to communicate:

"The cops are petrified of us, everything must burn, starting Monday, the operation 'Midnight Sun' starts, tell everyone else, rendezvous for Momo and Abdul in Zone 4 ... jihad Islamia Allah Akhbar."

"You don't really think that we're going to stop now? Are you stupid? It will continue, non-stop. We aren't going to let up. The French won't do anything and soon, we will be in the majority here."

The youths are also being reported on French TV to be shouting "Allahu Akbar" has they display their angst by burning cars, buildings, schools, buses and the occassional disabled woman.

No this ain't Watts and this ain't the 60's. This is worse and shows signs of getting very, very bad unless France and soon Germany and the rest of Europe wakes up and forcefully puts a stop to this insanity.

A simple "Welcome to France. Become French, adopt our ways or go back where you come from." would be an excellent start.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 7, 2005 08:20 PM

"I think we in the US can feel proud , on the whole, for our acceptance of immigrants and the contributions they have made to our country."

A good illustration of this: Ray Suarez, on the Lehrer NewsHour (yeah, yeah, I know), seemed very confused - several times he asked his interviewees "But these aren't immigrants, they're second or third-generation - why are they not assimilated?"

Because ... America, Fuck Yeah! Apparently we* can *do something right.

Posted by: Knemon on November 7, 2005 09:29 PM

Jackstraw:
Even Dances with Rain Forest was an immigrant (granted much longer ago).

Oh, and I am NOT a crabby, freeloading 60's person! I will no doubt be working until I drop, dagnabbit! Far longer than YOU, young whippersnapper!

I am proud to be a Senior working slob!

Posted by: Maranna on November 7, 2005 09:38 PM

re: BumperStickerist--
'...Or, as Truman Capote said of Jacqueline Susanne, "She doesn't write, she types." '

Actually, it was said by Capote of Jack Kerouac and "On The Road", not Susanne.

y'know, ....while we're at it.

Posted by: T. Marcell on November 8, 2005 01:59 AM

I will be so glad when the mindset of the '60s generation dies off (actually, since I'm younger than that and will be paying for their crabby, freeloading asses for years to come, I won't be shedding any tears when the whole friggin' generation dies off, but I'll save that diatribe for the next time a Social Security post rears its head).

I was born in 1952, so I'm smack in the middle of the BB (although sans the 60s mindset), and I'm getting pretty sick of them/us myself. One of my main pains is those fawning financial commercials targeted at Boomers: "You were (this), you were (that), you were (everything that is wonderful) *first*." Feh. I don't think the Boomers ever faced anything remotely like the people at the turn of the 20th century, or the "greatest" generation did. I can't imagine coping with the changes of the nineteen-teens, or the Great Depression, or World War II - when the populace had to actually sacrifice on a personal level to support the war effort and the troops. What a bunch of ninnies we are.

Posted by: iamfelix on November 8, 2005 05:16 AM

Now that crime doesn't pay, fewer blacks are turning to a life of crime.

I guess that explains why the US incarceration rate is higher than any other developed country.

They aren't just youths from Africa. They are overwhelmingly from Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco.

Um... those are IN Africa. Now, do you notice anything else about those countries? Hint: colonial past.

Knemon asks, tubino - can't it be resentment over discrimination etc. etc. AND islamist? Rather, the former exploited by the latter?

Could be, for all I know. But sounds more about class and culture than religion to me. You know how the conflict in Northern Ireland is always reported as Catholics vs. Protestants, but isn't about religion at all? Like that.

A simple "Welcome to France. Become French, adopt our ways or go back where you come from." would be an excellent start.

They've been trying that, or something darn close. I know this must really hurt you anti-American types, but the US path of LIBERALISM really WORKS. The French could learn from us. BTW, if you look at the Turks in Germany, and North Africans in Spain, you see parallels... some things done better, too.

These people are not rioting because they want French society to be more inclusive. Most have no desire or intention of assimilating to Western culture. Inclusion does not always mean assimilation. There's your problem, right there. In the US, waves of immigrants have changed the culture -- it's not just the other way around.

Unless your name is Dances with Rain Forest, we are ALL immigrants in the US. The reason we accept new arrivals basically with open arms, is because of this historical fact.

Yes, of course... but there is a virulent anti-immigrant movement in the US -- as there has been in France for years. First you heard of this? Our history is not necessarily our future.

Posted by: tubino on November 8, 2005 10:32 AM

Tubino,

The reason fewer blacks are turning to crime is that they see more criminals going to prison. Moreover, if the criminals are in prison, they can't commit crimes against general populace. Thus, the crime rate goes down. Funny how that works.

That doesn't mean there aren't geographical differences. American liberals ran New Orleans and Louisiana and the result of their stewardship was high levels of crime and corruption. Then, the hurricane hit and the next thing we see is an unbelievable disaster complete with looting and social disintegration.

You know what is also in common with Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco besides their French colonial past? They are predominantly Muslim. Now, the modern practice of Islam worldwide appears to be disproportionately infected with a violent philosophy. The "scum" burning cars and churches are predominantly Muslim, spouting the same violent and destructive crap that the Palestinian terrorists and the Wahhabists spew.

Now, obviously, the French have a particularly repressive colonial past, particularly in Africa. I'm not excusing their attitudes toward their immigrants. But I find it difficult to believe that it is justifiable for anyone to go out and burn cars and churches simply because you're being rejected by the French. The French are assholes. That's to be expected when living in France.

We in America, like France, have accepted many immigrants. My family came back in the 70's. And it is true that the culture has changed a little because of that. But all immigrant groups which have succeeded here accepted all of the main American values and in particular, have accepted the need to be loyal to the nation itself. These "immigrants" in France don't see the need to be loyal to France, they consider it merely an administrative formality that their identification papers show them to be part of the French Republic.

These "youths" may feel alienated from the rest of France, but their communities have not always done a great job of demonstrating they want to be part of France either.

Posted by: EricTheRed21 on November 8, 2005 11:24 AM

They aren't just youths from Africa. They are overwhelmingly from Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco.

Um... those are IN Africa. Now, do you notice anything else about those countries? Hint: colonial past.

Yes indeed I did notice it. Thats why this was the next statement I made, the one you left out when quoting me.

What do these countries have in common? All were up until recently colonies of that imperialistic nation, France.

I thought I was equally clear of my understanding of their geographic location with my first sentence of that paragraph.

They aren't just youths from Africa

Perhaps I should have been more explict. FRENCH colonialism. I'm sure you didn't mean to try to imply I was misleading or missing something by selectively quoting me. That would be, well liberal.

Why don't you get back to me and tell me all about the horrors of US colonialism. I am late for my immigrant stomping session.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 8, 2005 02:01 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "I think RAH published "By His Bootstraps," a 1940s ..."

Alteria Pilgram - My President has convictions: "Another guy who puts his sex fetishes into his nov ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, Buy ammo [/b] [/i]: "172 I think Heinlein was trying to be jarring. I'm ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, Buy ammo [/b] [/i]: "Jack L. Chalker has a particularly weird form of t ..."

Alteria Pilgram - My President has convictions: "I think Heinlein was trying to be jarring. I'm sti ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "Weis and Hickman with the Dragonlace world was bri ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, Buy ammo [/b] [/i]: "time travel is also impossible, logically so. So h ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, Buy ammo [/b] [/i]: "163 Well, in a moment. I love world building in ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]26 -- Wolf -- The Star Trek writers' guide spec ..."

Tom Servo: "Avatar got its world from a Yes album cover. ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]Jack L. Chalker has a particularly weird form o ..."

Alteria Pilgram - My President has convictions: "The Avatar movies do a bang up job at world buildi ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives