Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Worst Night of Rioting Yet In France | Main | World Shocked As Media "Duped" By Left Winger's Lies »
November 06, 2005

First-Ever Patent Issued For... Screenplay Storyline??!!!

One of the requirements for a patent is the non-obviousness of the thing to be patented. I have to say, this storyline is not really non-obvious -- who hasn't fantasized about this?

Further to a policy of publishing patent applications eighteen months after filing, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is scheduled to publish history’s first “storyline patent” application today. The publication will be based on a utility patent application filed by Andrew Knight in November, 2003, the first such application to claim a fictional storyline.

Knight, a rocket engine inventor, registered patent agent, and graduate of MIT and Georgetown Law, will assert publication-based provisional patent rights against anyone whose activities may fall within the scope of his published claims, including all major motion picture manufacturers and distributors, book publishers and distributors, television studios and broadcasters, and movie theaters.

...

According to Berman, “Non-obviousness probably presents the biggest challenge to patentability” because minor variations on a central theme may generate so many different storylines. Nevertheless, Knight asserts that his claimed storyline meets all statutory requirements, including nonobviousness.

The fictitious story, which Knight dubs “The Zombie Stare,” tells of an ambitious high school senior, consumed by anticipation of college admission, who prays one night to remain unconscious until receiving his MIT admissions letter. He consciously awakes 30 years later when he finally receives the letter, lost in the mail for so many years, and discovers that, to all external observers, he has lived an apparently normal life. He desperately seeks to regain 30 years’ worth of memories lost as an unconscious philosophical zombie.

I'm going to patent my storyline idea, "A man has a dream and strives against a corrupt system to achieve it at great personal cost," as long as a related patent for "Starring Tom Hanks and the chick from that movie where she pretended to have a dick."


posted by Ace at 02:41 PM
Comments



Well, he can keep his patent. No one is going to pay money to see a movie about a guy who's that anxious to get into MIT.

Posted by: SWLiP on November 6, 2005 02:51 PM

Chick with a dick? Could you give us a second clue, please?

Posted by: on November 6, 2005 02:56 PM

Shouldn't that have been copyrighted, instead of patented?

Posted by: Dogstar on November 6, 2005 03:14 PM

You can have that one. I want dibs on "a bunch of inept kids are paired with a lovable loser of a coach and achieve their athletic dreams" and a hot one I'm working on "a tale of star-crossed lovers."

Posted by: Ayes of Death David on November 6, 2005 03:16 PM

Shouldn't that have been copyrighted, instead of patented?

I agree, Dogstar. I thought copyright protection went for 100 years, while patent protection went for 20. I've got a couple of patents, but I can't see an advantage for an author to patent (presumably in addition to copyrighting). The article says there are extra protections - could one of our resident attorneys tell us what those might be?

Maybe I should copyright my next invention: "look a the design, it's art!!"

Posted by: geoff on November 6, 2005 03:25 PM


It's important to note that this is NOT A PATENT being issued. It is a PATENT APPLICATION being published. Big difference.

Patent applications are not patents. They are, well, applications for patents. Getting an application published is as easy as filling out the application, submitting the appropriate paperwork, and paying the fees. Anyone can do it. No attorney even required. And if you don't tell the USPTO not to publish the application, they will publish it, since the application is a filing of public record.


This means NOTHING as far as an actual patent is concerned.

To give a sense of how this works, I and some co-inventors filed a handful of patents 5 years ago. We filed them "secretly" at first, and now they are public. After 5 years, they are just now getting around to examining them. And now they are asking for "more information". My point being, there can be a very long gap between "I filled out the patent application" and "I was granted a patent", if the patent is ever granted at all.

Makes for great publicity, though. Official-looking government document. You're on the USPTO web site and everything, even got a "number". You can even legally say "Patent Pending". And you indeed must defend your "provisional patent rights" as the 'inventor' indicates he will.

But it is NOT a patent. It is kind of like getting a marriage license and not having gotten married yet. Big whoop.

Mark

Posted by: Mark on November 6, 2005 03:44 PM

Mark,

I agree - the article is, after all, a press release by the patent firm, and it is just a provisional. But do you see any advantage in patents over copyrights (other than doubling the business for attorneys)? Seems to me the legal case and benefits would be far better for going the other way (getting copyrights for inventions).

Posted by: geoff on November 6, 2005 03:50 PM

I wish someone *could* patent the most cliched ideas, just to keep them out of circulation. If I never read another high fantasy story about a girl who can talk to dragons, it will be too soon. Bonus points for girls from cartoonishly misogynist societies who can talk to dragons. Extra bonus if they can't use "thee" and "thou" correctly. And horror stories about serial killers get old pretty fast too.

The trouble is that once in a while somebody takes a stale-ass storyline and turns it into a story that will knock your socks off. So maybe patenting isn't the way to go - at least, not until I finish my incredibly original new story about "a cloning experiment gone horribly wrong"!

Posted by: Sonetka on November 6, 2005 04:02 PM

Geoff

Seems to me that a patent would allow the collection of royalties from all the people who created works covered by your patent. They would still be allowed to make those works, but they would have to pay the inventor bux for every instance of the patent. Every copy of the work. So monetarily, a patent could mean more than a copyright.

With a copyright you'd have to sue for damages, and go to court over the amount. With a patent, you just have to say, pay me seven cents per view of the movie so I don't have to take you to court.

A patent could be a better way to make money off other people copying your work, with you doing none of the work. If you're a hack writer with a good idea, then you'll make more money off a patent than a copyright, generally speaking.

Not that I think patents on stories is a good idea.

Mark

Posted by: Mark on November 6, 2005 04:37 PM

With a copyright you'd have to sue for damages, and go to court over the amount.

My understanding of patent litigation (which, fortunately, I've only had described to me), is that when I violation of patent rights occurs, you also have to sue and have the court assess damages.

Posted by: geoff on November 6, 2005 04:42 PM

Geoff

Yes. But the way it usually works is that under threat of litigation, the parties agree to a royalty fee and the inventor lets the infringer continue to manufacturer the (formerly) infringing item.

Or alternatively, lawsuits don't occur, and the inventor licenses the patent outright, again for a royalty.

But the licensee has to do all the work of manufacturing, distribution, sales, etc. The inventor just sits back and collects checks.

This arrangement is not common in copyrights. If you lose a copyright case, you generally have to stop publishing the infringing work. The royalty stream would dry up. You could license the right to copy your work, of course, but then YOU have to do all the work of actually writing the pesky words.

All theoretical, of course. Patents aren't technically allowed on stories. Yet. We'll see...

Mark

Posted by: Mark on November 6, 2005 04:56 PM

This is the same patent office who issued a patent decades ago for how a mouse cursor is drawn on a screen though.

Any programmer with a half a brain would use the XOR method described in the patent, because well...XOR is obviously the most efficient way to do it. any other scheme would be grossly inefficient.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 6, 2005 06:04 PM

Sonetka, you are so, so right. What is it with the wise, nurturing, pacifist dragons? Also, as Ace noted, vampires who are beautiful, pale, brooding, byronic anti-heroes are terribly overdone.

Posted by: Sarah Brabazon-Biggar on November 6, 2005 06:05 PM

"Patents aren't technically allowed on stories."

Not true. I have a patent for my "Lovable deaf/mute boy learns to communicate by using the awesome power of his balls" storyline.

Posted by: Andrew on November 6, 2005 06:09 PM

My company recently won a patent lawsuit against another manufacturer. As part of the settlement the offending company had to destroy all of their products that used our design. So they were out the cost of manufacturing, the cost of the lawsuit, and they had to pay some people to destroy their products as well. Throw the cost of shipping into the mix too. We also got proof of destruction just in case they decided to try pulling a fast one.

I think we wanted to burn their factory down and pour salt on the earth, but the judge thought that was a bit too much.

This screenplay story looks a lot like the one I sent to a well known blogger 2 days ago, but I never heard back from him.

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on November 6, 2005 06:12 PM

"Patents aren't technically allowed on stories."

Not true. I have a patent for my "Lovable deaf/mute boy learns to communicate by using the awesome power of his balls" storyline

Andrew, I stand corrected.

And I guess I owe you $0.07, too. Your royalty check is in the mail.

Posted by: Mark on November 6, 2005 06:53 PM

What if you patented certain types of crimes?

Or maybe a particular vacation route, covering two dozen landmarks in almost as many states, including the order visited, amount of time spent, etc.?

Damn, I smell some big, big money...

Posted by: Dogstar on November 6, 2005 07:24 PM

Well, if a patent does get allowed for this thing, its not for the play itself. If this thing is the same as certain patents on computer programs, it comes under the idea that the arrangement of ink on paper that the screen writer has composed is itself novel.

I will check my books on this, but the sad thing is, its ink on paper arranged in this order. But who knows, the Court of Appeals for the Fed. Cir. has been pretty open with what comprises a patent, "anything under the sun created by man," so they say. But who knows, I am just enjoying a redskins win, and a few beers. As far as I know, I am writing in the area reserved for the size of the Chinese amphibious assault fleet. Those diesels better be busy, because an aegis cruiser will sink those phib-bitches fast.

As previously mentioned, the protection is only for 20 years, not quite as hard core as a copyright. So way to go, clever guy.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 7, 2005 12:01 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Update on Jasmine Ratchet: The DEI Dum-Dumb is eyeing a Senate run, because why should Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke get paid millions every two years to get blown out in the Texas senatorial election? Shouldn't she get some of that sweet sweet Act Blue graft?
Crockett addressed the possibility in an Instagram post where she said she would make a decision "depending on how many people reach out," but that her main focus has been legislating in the House of Representatives.
The post came after a poll from the National Republican Senatorial Committee was published showing that she was leading the pack of candidates with 35 percent in a hypothetical primary and was leading former Senate candidate Colin Allred, who was at 20 percent, per the Latin Times.

The Republican Senatorial Committee claims that she's ahead? LOL, that might be a little troll-poll.
Forgotten 90s Mystery Click: When Grunge Ruled the Earth
Did you hear the distant cry
Calling me back to my sins?
Like the one you knew before
Calling me back once again
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Judicial Overreach gets even more ridiculous, Epstein coverup? Elon Musk's new party, Tucker Carlson is an idiot, Fauci is scum, is Trump punishing Putin, and more!
Vlogging the Revolutionary War
[Hat Tip: Vox Clamantis] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The shit sandwich of a spending bill that the Senate wants us to eat, NYC is screwed, the military rebounds, Iran may be stuck in its Mullah nightmare, and much more!
NeverTrump Nebraska Congressman Don Bacon throws in the towel, won't seek reelection in 2026
I wonder if he's the one who complained about the BBB imposing work requirements on able-bodied adults without children for Medicaid.
Ever Wonder How The Woke Left Can Be So Obviously Hypocritical And Automatically Reject All Opposing Facts? Below are four short 5 minute videos of author Melanie Phillips explaining why. The Disturbing Logic Of The Left.*** The Psychology Behind Why the WOKE Left Can't Win Arguments.*** The Bizarre Union of Woke and Jihad.*** Truth is a Right Wing Concept. [dri]
Wow, Katie Perry is having a rough couple of years: like her career, her engagement to Orlando Bloom is now over
The Trump Curse strikes again. She went from an apolitical ditz to a Hillary Clinton Crusader in 2016 and her career bottomed out like Hillary Clinton's blood sugar level after a weekend of vodka and self-pity. The Trump Curse even follows you into space, yo. Or at least into the lower upper atmosphere.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click, I Can't Believe It's Not Night Ranger Edition
If you would just be sensible
You'd find me indispensable
I pray deep down to destiny
That it places you with me
Whoa, wanting you here in the sheets
Wandering around incomplete
Waiting so long

I'm pretty sure I've linked this before but it's a banger.
Republican running for Mitch McConnell's seat literally trashes him in new ad
Recent Comments
Give gp Some Of That Good Stuff: "Pallas cats are cool. We should try to naturalize ..."

MkY: "When I was building my woodshop, twice in one week ..."

mindful webworker - inevitably indefatigable: "This cafe has been brought to you by mostly YouTub ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " Where e'er the Catholic sun doth shine, There's ..."

Give gp Some Of That Good Stuff: "309 If you don't achieve at least one DWI every fi ..."

runner: "Wisconsin is the beeriest state in the nation. ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/u][/i]: " I had a bobcat walk right in front of me on the B ..."

RickZ: "[i]I had a bobcat walk right in front of me on the ..."

Give gp Some Of That Good Stuff: ""Pretty cool, really." Unforgettable moment. I ..."

Tom Servo: "Oh yeah, like there’s a German anywhere in t ..."

Puddleglum, chillin in Amish Country : "I had a bobcat walk right in front of me on the Bl ..."

gKWVE: "Wisconsin is the beeriest state in the nation. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives