Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
The Morning Report — 8/4/25
Daily Tech News 4 August 2025 Sunday Overnight Open Thread - August 3, 2025 [Doof] Gun Thread: First August Edition! Food Thread: Truffles Have Ridges? First World Problems... The West And Islam Are Incompatible: We Just Haven't Admitted It Yet Sunday Morning Book Thread - 8-3-2025 ["Perfessor" Squirrel] Daily Tech News 3 August 2025 Saturday Night "Club ONT" August 2, 2025 [The 3 Ds] Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Update: Patrick Fitzgerald Explains Why The Secret-Prison Leak Is Not A Crime |
Main
| Greenpeace Fined For Clear-Cutting Ecologically-Sensitive, Old-Growth Coral Reef »
November 02, 2005
Watts Riots, European StyleFor once I really take no glee in the troubles of Europe. I suppose I could note the smug condescension they showed regarding our own racial problems, and the country's alleged racism and hard-heartedness in failing to redress the "underlying issues." Our racial problems are largely getting better -- black home ownership is at an all-time high, for example -- and Europe's are getting worse, and, the thing is, they're likely to get exponentially worse. The sixth day of rampant violence and rioting in a Parisian ghetto of North and Central African immigrants angry about the deaths of two criminals who died when fleeing from police. They weren't even shot. They were electrocuted when they ran into a power transformer (or something like that; I don't grok power distribution). In Arhus, Denmark, a riot of immigrants (Palestinian and Turkish) wasn't even spontaneous. It was planned for three weeks. The goal, shockingly enough, was to claim a piece of land for Muslims: Rosenhøj Mall has several nights in a row been the scene of the worst riots in Århus for years. "This area belongs to us", the youths proclaim. Sunday evening saw a new arson attack. Back in June 2001, similar race riots engulfed Leeds, England. In that case, as in Paris, the riots were sparked because the legitimate authorities of the state had the termerity to arrest a man of Bangladeshi descent. The problem here isn't religious per se. It's political, or the political aspects of the religion. There are certain politically-oriented commands in the Muslim religion -- take territory to expand the Muslim world, do not submit to any authority except a Muslim one, etc. -- that are going to make it very hard for any state to accomodate a rising population of often-poor and unemployed young Muslim men whose sense of self-worth comes chiefly from a radical, violent vision of Mohammad the Conqueror. The usual caveat: Of course not all Muslims are like this, or believe in rioting for purposes of expressing cultural solidarity and superiority, or to effectively conquer a territory through lawlessness and mayhem. But a distressing number do, and it's getting harder and harder to finesse the problem away with happytalk and pointless meetings with "Muslim leaders." French Chickens Coming Home To Roost? Update: Shtetl G doesn't even have my moderate level of sympathy for the French-- I've have no sympathy for the French at all. Intifadas are real bitch, oiu? France has been shilling for Arafat for years precisely to keep their muslim population in check. They practically started the most recent antifada(in Israel) with their bogus staged video of palestinian boy being shot. I guess there's something to that. A nation can't be one of the foremost advocates for the proposition that an angry minority is justified in using violence to achieve its political desires and not expect similar angry minorities inside that nation to think, "Hmmmm..." posted by Ace at 12:15 PM
CommentsIf we had wished the Iraq war over hard enough, we would have negotiated with the people who really matter: the French! That's what all the talks with muslim "leaders" is all about: talk to the people who really don't have one iota of control over a situation, and make like that really matters. If Islamists (radical, "moderate", or "mainstream") wish to exist in the world as it is today, they'd better listen up to the message that's being heard increasingly day by day. You can believe what you want, but as soon as you cross the line and start forcing others into the real slavery of your "religion of peace", you're gonna get your gonads stomped and you'll run out of virgins before you can enjoy them in your "Paradise". Bottom line is, "Back off, suckers. This ain't Mohammed's world to screw around with, and it certainly ain't yours!" Posted by: Carlos on November 2, 2005 12:30 PM
As I understand it, in France certain ghettoes are allowed to have their own kind of 'law,' and police do indeed stay out, except for certain cases which unavoidably interest them. So, they're already giving up territory. And this isn't like the Amish or the Native Americans in this country, who have legitimate land claims and rights to a degree of sovereignty. This is just a bunch of, sorry, foreigners stealing what isn't theirs, and a nation willing to put up with extortion. Posted by: lauraw on November 2, 2005 12:30 PM
The sad irony is that the Europeans are facing the prospect of civil uprisings and (literal) race war that American extremists like the Black Panthers and Weathermen tried but failed to provoke in the 70's. I wonder how American intellecuals who gleefully anticipated the 'rising of the street' in America will react to open civil strife in their European model societies. Posted by: cjan on November 2, 2005 12:32 PM
I've have no sympathy for the French at all. Intifadas are real bitch, oiu? France has been shilling for Arafat for years precisely to keep their muslim population in check. They practically started the most recent antifada(in Israel) with their bogus staged video of palestinian boy being shot. Fuck 'em. Posted by: Shtetl G on November 2, 2005 12:44 PM
Even though the French lionized Arafat, demonize Israel, and gloat over our social problems here in the US, I still wouldn't wish what's happening in France on anyone. I wonder if the Europeans have the will to save their own skin before it's too late. Posted by: Moonbat_One on November 2, 2005 12:51 PM
So it seems the Arab street we were told would rise in rage is actually rising, in France, and Denmark. That appeasement stuff isn't working out too well. Posted by: Retread on November 2, 2005 12:53 PM
I think the factor that doesn't get mentioned enough is Europe's generous welfare state. These countries pay young Muslims to sit around and do nothing, which at the same time strips them of their dignity as breadwinners and gives them the leisure time to sit around and fester and become radicalized. France, the Scandinavian countries and the rest are in a sense subsidizing their own destruction. I really believe that if had American-style welfare reform, within 10 years would most of their inner-city problems would go away. Posted by: Yaron on November 2, 2005 01:06 PM
I await the headline that blames America's occupation of Iraq as the root cause of their anger. Posted by: spongeworthy on November 2, 2005 01:08 PM
They have these banlieu riots every couple of years. Nothing new here, though I admit the problem is getting worse. Posted by: on November 2, 2005 01:10 PM
Mmmm. Love that Fun Pizza. Posted by: Pizza Guy on November 2, 2005 01:12 PM
Will there ever by the equivalent of a Pearl Harbor in this war? How many 9/11s have to happen before the allies come together, unified and destroy the enemy? Posted by: Duhgee on November 2, 2005 01:32 PM
I wonder how long it will be before France starts mass deportations of troublesome immigrant populations? And don't thnk they're not capable of it. We may laugh at those cheese-eating surrender monkeys, but you don't want to mess with the French national security apparatus. Mais oui, they're tough SOBs and they don't put up with any sh*t. Just ask Greenpeace Posted by: OregonMuse on November 2, 2005 01:48 PM
Um, watch the "Fuck 'em" double standard here. The enemy isn't the French, it is the finatical Muslims that Ace has identified as trying to usurp authority from those that govern the land, to their own law. Chirac is a jackass, but guys like Sarkozy are trying to deal with the problem now. I strongly disagree with many of the French positions on fighting terrorism abroad, however, we had some pretty soft responses for terrorism prior to 9-11 too. That doesn't mean we were at fault, and I was just as harsh in my criticisms on the same grounds of the French who said "Fuck 'em" to us in response. Fanatical Islam is the enemy, and the more we degrade ourselves, even those irritating Western countries that still don't have a grip on the stakes involved, the harder it is going to be for us to win this thing. "Fuck(ing) em" aint going to help. Especially if they don't shave their legs first. Posted by: TF6S on November 2, 2005 01:48 PM
An overwhelming number of Parisians hate the Muslims who live in the cités just outside Paris. This is a cultural clash. Most Muslims are from Algeria and came to work in the industrial centers around Paris, which have now closed shop. The relationship between France and Algeria was, well you know, horrendous (bloody bloody conflict). What's happened in the last several years is a policy by the French government to stay out of all cultural issues concerning Muslims, (i.e. domestic violence in the cités for instance). In fact, several years ago the French government began funneling money to Muslim organizations within the cités so that they would police themselves with the money. Here's the rub: Journalists have traced the money to radical Islamic groups. Besides that-Some of the self-regulation of the cités includes drastic measures against women, especially women who are entering puberty and are ready for marriage. Several young girls have been burned to dealth for refusing to marry or travel to Algeria for marriage. This is just a small part of what is happening in France, regarding its "Muslim" problem. This is (one reason) why, I would argue, France decided to stay out of the war. But it looks like their powder keg is exploding anyway. Posted by: ChrisG on November 2, 2005 01:53 PM
"Um, watch the "Fuck 'em" double standard here. The enemy isn't the French, it is the finatical Muslims that Ace has identified as trying to usurp authority from those that govern the land, to their own law. Chirac is a jackass, but guys like Sarkozy are trying to deal with the problem now. " Naww - Fuck 'em all - the French think that they can selectively crack down at home while felating the regimes and terrorists that inspire this shit. They are throwing their "friends" to the croc in the hopes that it eats them last. Posted by: holdfast on November 2, 2005 02:57 PM
If Islam was behaving as poorly in the tenth century as they are in these times, is it any wonder that the Crusades occured? I guess they didn't learn, the first time around. Posted by: Snorkel on November 2, 2005 02:58 PM
TF6S wrote many fair and logical points. My reply is still Fuck 'em. I would have worked in the word schadenfrued in my original post if I had a clue how to spell it and any inclination to look up the word. The French may not be your enemy but they've been my people's enemy for thousands of years (OK maybe just a thousand years). The current French gov't has been tolerating and stoking anti-semetism for years to avoid their own muslim problem. Fat load of good it did for them. I do have some sympathy for the Danes but its been a long time since anyone has paid them Danegold. Posted by: Shtetl G on November 2, 2005 03:28 PM
" you don't want to mess with the French national security apparatus" Too true. Especially the soldier/cop/paramilitary types who check the buses coming from Amsterdam. Trust me on this one. Posted by: on November 2, 2005 03:45 PM
Maybe this will take some of the heat off of Oriana Fallaci, who's due for trial next summer. Posted by: geoff on November 2, 2005 03:45 PM
Another vote for fuck 'em. France was as duplicitous as any country or group in the years of the Oil for Food debacle and the leading member of the Security Council roadblock prior to the Iraq war. If they had stood with us and actually helped enforce the very sanctions they helped craft (by the by the REAL justification for the current war) then there would have been a much better chance we could have avoided the war altogether. But no. Their smary oh so condescending lecturing of the US/UK position re: Saddam helped split world opinion and probably cost US lives. Let's not forget it was Chirac who sold Saddam his first reactor prompting an appropriate although highly condemed reaction from the Israelis, a few well placed rockets. This action helped demonize Israel in the eyes of the multi-culturalists, the French and of course escalated tensions with Iraq including Saddam's financing and rewarding of suicide bombers in Israel. Yes indeed, fuck the Fench and no cuddling afterward. Perhaps a few months of the results of appeasement well help them remember that bony thing running from their neck to the top of their ass is called a backbone. Posted by: JackStraw on November 2, 2005 03:56 PM
I just want to comment that I am in no ways condoning any of the French policies or strategies in fighting terrorism. I am strongly against how they've conducted themselves so far, and I think the French are worse off, and making the fight against terrorism harder for all of us. However, geeze guys, the Islamic nutters are the ones ultimately responsible for this mess. If you take the "Fuck 'em they brought this on themselves" approach, than you can't make the "they don't hate us for what we do, but for who we are" argument anymore. The Islamic Fascists aren't just attacking America, they are attacking non-fanatics around the world, and yes it is because of who they are too. French policies have made them more vulnerable to attack, but ultimately, the Islamists are the ones conducting the violence. For the record, I can't bloody believe that I am defending the damn French... Posted by: TF6S on November 2, 2005 04:08 PM
Yes, but remember, the French bloodied Algeria. They hate Algerians. And most of their Muslim population- let me restate, most of their unemployed, unemployable, Muslim population, is from Algeria. They've used a "hands off" approach to problems within the Muslim community (living in the projects or cités as they are called) in part because they do NOT want to mainstream Muslims into their culture. Between the two, we will continue to find metal sparking on metal. Posted by: ChrisG on November 2, 2005 04:41 PM
TF6S: I admire that you can place the French Intifada in the proper context with war against Islamic extremism (or whatever they call it now a days). I can't. After years of reading about Jewish cemetaries being defaced and Jewish youths being attacked in France with the tacit aproval by the French gov't("what can you expect with how horrible Israel treats le palestinians"), I have very little sympathy left for France. France has been doing what every 2bit ME dictator has been doing for the last 50 years, blaming the Jews/Israel for their own problems to keep all hell from breaking loose. Never again? More like never again until we have an un-assimilated radical muslim immigrant problem to deal with. Fuck 'em. Posted by: Shtetl G on November 2, 2005 04:49 PM
I'm all for the fuck 'em line too. And I'm getting tired of this idea of the "moderate" vs. radical muslim. They all believe the same thing! The "moderates" are just more patient. They still want you infidels dead. They're just not ready to put their asses on the line. Posted by: Iblis on November 2, 2005 05:59 PM
Iblis, Then what in the hell are we doing trying to build Iraq then? Posted by: TF6S on November 2, 2005 06:40 PM
If this blows into the Eurabian civil war, Milosovic may be remembered by history as a European leader who was ahead of the curve. A horrible thought, really. Posted by: Darth Bubba on November 2, 2005 07:07 PM
I'll take a shot at that TF6S. I think we are trying to create what really doesn't exist today. A country which is both Islamic and moderate. Some are quick to deny it but most democracies today are in fact of the Judeo/Christian origin. In many ways I think you can trace the moderation of both Christianity and Judiasm to their existence within democracies. That is the "laws" of the religions can co-exist and be tempered by the laws of democracy. Respect for the individual, for concepts such as majority rule, freedom of the press and thought, these things are allowed to thrive in a democracy. They can shine a light on religious intolerance and bring it to heel. Christianity was allowed to run rampant during the time of monarchies when kings made side deals with the church to gain its support. The Middle Ages are replete with examples of this. Will it work with Islam? Who knows. But leaving it alone has clearly not worked and won't work. My thoughts anyway. Posted by: JackStraw on November 2, 2005 07:10 PM
In Iraq we're setting the conditions that will be more favorable to fostering our philosophy. Posted by: Iblis on November 2, 2005 07:12 PM
TF6S, I see what you're trying to say, and to a certain degree you're right, the Islamists are the enemy and source of the problem. But you are definitely understating France's role here. It would be one thing, if we were talking about an ineffectual country like, say, Monaco or Luxembourg, that has a history of making fun of our problems. After all, such countries could only talk. But it is completely different when we're talking about France. Surprisingly, France, although a shadow of its former imperial self, does have a fairly active diplomatic service which works to directly undermine US foreign policy, often with some success. Much of it was used when the US was looking for UN Security Council support and Turkey's permission to allow the 4th ID to launch a ground invasion into the north of Iraq. Turkey's refusal, done at least partially at the behest of France, probably cost us the decisive victory over the Baathists that would have saved lives in the long run. Instead, the Baathists dissolved themselves into the population and so we get a long, drawn-out insurgency campaign. So you see, the "Fuck 'em" sentiment has substantial justification. France's actions often lead to American deaths. In fairness, we apparently do get good intelligence support from them, at least with regards to terrorism, but from a geopolitical perspective we need to treat them as an unreliable opportunist. Posted by: EricTheRed21 on November 2, 2005 07:44 PM
Eric, I completely agree with the fact that France has been a geopolitical enemy. Their ideology is based on the West in general, or democracy, but around trying to preserve and expand everything French. Their behavior has been one of holding onto a Tiger by its tail. They've actively supported the Palestinian Intifada in addition to the prefidity with hindering our efforts in the Iraq War like you previously mentioned. If I was a French policy maker, I would be questioning the very policies that have led to prioritizing opposing American intrests over combating Islamists. There is so much perfidity around French policy right now, it is obscene (whether it be from kickbacks ala Saddam, or general ideological opposition). This has led to so many contradictions, it is amazing they can hold their country together. But my point is, regardless of the French decision to hold on to the tail of the tiger, the tiger is still the killer. There could be some light regarding the future with France here. While France is still very anti-American, they are still pro-France. Guys like Sarkozy have been gaining traction, and while we have a looog way to go before we're holding hands on a honeymoon (if at all), the swing in power towards guys like that can really be a positive development for us in the War on Terror. For this reason, I'm not ready to Fuck the French, yet. I'm not advocating that we actually trust these people again, but they could be useful idiots for us for change. Posted by: TF6S on November 2, 2005 08:07 PM
Jack/Iblis: Thanks for the thoughts. I don't think our thoughts are too far from each other's--we've just come to different conclusions. ...for now. ;-) Posted by: TF6S on November 2, 2005 08:09 PM
FUCK THE FRENCH: They collaborated with the Natzis in persecuting Jews and gave up Jews for slaughter in the concentration camps. FUCK THE FRENCH: They started the the modern history of political genocide in the French Revolution in the 1790's known as the "reign of terror"-- an idea and example which ultimately led to the Natzi death camps and the Russian gulags. FUCK THE FRENCH:They abandoned Nato in 1965 and declared their neutrality between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. FUCK THE FRENCH: They sided with Mugabe (a dictator in Africa) as he slaughtered tens of thousands and starved millions of people. FUCK THE FRENCH: They profited in the oil for peace scam, esentially trading political protection for Saddam and his murderous regime for cheap oil. FUCK'EM IN THE MORNING, FUCK'EM IN THE EVENING, FUCK'EM AT SUPPER TIME EVERY DAY EXCEPT SUNDAY. DOUBLE FUCK'EM ON SUNDAY IN THE NAME OF THE LORD. P.S. If I had more time and energy I'd tell you what I really think of the French, but I'm so mellow today that I can hardly get started. Posted by: john on November 2, 2005 09:20 PM
No, don't "f--- the French." They're not the enemy. Frenchies may be rude, smelly, hirsute, arrogant, insufferable, etc., but they're not the enemy. At least, not in this fight. Let's all go whack the Islamo nutters together and then afterwards we can concentrate on trashing the French. Posted by: OregonMuse on November 2, 2005 10:13 PM
The French have been an enemy for a very long time for all the reasons above and more. The fact that they are enemies of one of our other enemies does not make them allies. As allies, they are useless. They have exactly zero ability to engage an enemy militarily. That's not slamming them as cowards; it's slamming them as impotent. Financial help? Please! Money is a big part of their problems. France, like the other Euro states, is in demographic decline. But at the same time, they are hopelessly welded to socialist welfare schemes that almost no Euro is willing to cut. That means they (France, Germany, etc.) need immigrant armies to sustain what passes for their economies. Enter the Muslems with their very healthy birthrates - enough to overcome the various honor killings, suicide attacks and other self-destructive tendancies. The Euros do not have even the modest "courage" to make cuts to bloated state benefits that would free them from dependency on their latest conqueres. In a world that is often selfish, shortsighted and cynical, the French epitomize these vices. If that were their only problem, I'd still be in favor of trying to help them anyway. But after basically passing to the United States the cost of their defense against murderous aggressors, now and in the Cold War, in order to better fund their "enlightened" Santa-state, they are also actively engaged in policies that run the full - classically French - spectrum from appeasement to collaboration. When they aren't placating our mutual enemies, they are giving them strength. The resurgence of anti-semitism among the French, and the other similarly afflicted Euros, speaks volumes. France holds the tiger by the tail? Fine. And they think they will be able to prosper by ignoring or giving minor help to the tiger as it hunts. Their choice. But France is not a force for good in the world, it does nothing to further the interests of America or freedom, and it have repeatedly chosen to side with the tiger over its would-be rescuers. If the tiger wants them, it can have them. France is not the heart of anything. Not even the tiger. And we will kill this tiger, with or without France in its digestive tract. The short: They have made their own problems. They refuse to fix them because they would rather blame America/the Jooooos while counting on us to save them at our own expense. And what pitiful leverage they have tends to be set against us in the meantime. For all I care, the Wahabbists can Skull.Fuck.France. And may that festering boil of a country prove as useful to them as it has to us. Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 2, 2005 11:18 PM
VRWC, Clearly if you had read my argument, you would see that at no point did I argue for France to be a "force for good." I'm not defending French policies, or them as a people, other than to show that the despicable behavior displayed by the Islamic radicals is the root of this problem. My argument with everyone is to not take our eyes of the ball in gratuitous French bashing. Regardless of how poorly the French have handled themselves, and I've stated in each comment that they've done so poorly, the schmucks that are rioting are still rooted in an ideology that violently wants to get the rest of the world to submit to its will. I don't care about the French response, but I do care about the strength of a logical argument, which I make all the time, is one where the Islamists are doing this because of who we are (not Muslims), versus what we do. We, in this case, does happen to include the French. Posted by: TF6S on November 2, 2005 11:55 PM
the schmucks that are rioting are still rooted in an ideology that violently wants to get the rest of the world to submit to its will. I don't care about the French response, but I do care about the strength of a logical argument Fine. The logical argument is that losing France costs just about nothing. It removes an enemy and does not create a new one. Saving France means expending resources of one kind or another to keep one enemy from devouring another. If Islamofacists want France because they are trying to stick it to us or weaken western values, the joke's on them. As I said before, the fact that they are (nominal) enemies of my enemies does not make them allies. I see one, and only one, in France's favor: they are nuclear. Frankly, though, I don't see missles launching because of some Parisian fatwa in the foreseeable future. Just a lot of internal strife for one of the bad guys. I can live with that. Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 3, 2005 12:49 AM
TF6S I think what we're saying here is that in a fight between the islamo-nutters and the French, everyone's a winner, baby! It's just like the old Iran-Iraq war - we can cheer for both sides - it's all good. Posted by: holdfast on November 3, 2005 02:04 AM
7 days and the French leftist/socialist/statist/liberal crowd hasn't surrendered? That's a record! Posted by: Mr. Satire on November 3, 2005 11:04 AM
CARLOS IS MY BOY! That's right. It's time to start stomping gonads like escargot, baby! Travel Agents to Allah Unite!!! Posted by: Darwin Finch on November 3, 2005 11:35 AM
As much fun as it is to bash the French, they have given a lot of behind the scenes help in the GWOT. That was my impression after reading Shadow Wars. On the other hand, their whole economic system is based upon importing people to pay for their welfare state after their whole workforce retires at the age of 38. The flaw in this "plan" is that most of these imigrants seem to be less than enterprising, relying on the same welfare benefits that every other French fuck is relying upon. Oh, and they also hate everything about the country in which they now live. Like most countries throughout history, they can either adapt or overcome. Charleslemange rose to kick out the moorish invaders, maybe this will happen again. Even the most decadent, understanding people can only take so much. Theo Van Gogh was killed a year ago, leading to Dutch crack downs in crazy Islamists. Maybe that reaction will be a trend. Its like the current debate on coercive interogation. If there were 9/11's happening every month here, it would take 3 weeks before we started the old terrorist head on a spike program. but I digress. Frenchie is either gonna live or die based on how they deal with these 8 million new citizens. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 11:55 AM
I just can't take the "f*ck 'em all" approach that Shtetl G does. The Jewish hard-on for the French goes way back, and from the Shtetl G perspective it really doesn't matter what happens to France.
From his perspective I am sure it makes sense. The French are all goyim anyway (WWII, Dreyfus, etc.) and the ones that aren't goy can be moved to Israel , so at a gut level he figures "what's the loss if France burns up?" And from his perspective, what can you say? He is right. As a Christian, though, I just can't get that enthusiastic about the destruction of France. A big part of my Christian andd Western religion, culture and civilization comes from France. You know? Everything doesn't boil down to Yasser Arafat. I guess that's one big reason why I couldn't really join the Jonah Goldberg wing of the neocon party., even though I loath Islam. But don't get me wrong. A man should be loyal to his people and his race. I do appreciate Shtetl G's commitment to his people, his nation. Its just that his people are just not my people, that's all. Posted by: Big Bill on November 3, 2005 01:55 PM
John said it right at 9:20pm. Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:24 PM
I'm sorry Ace, for the length of this one... • The objects of which Paris folks are fond--literature, art, medicine and adultery." Mark Twain. Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:32 PM
And one final addition to John's comment: Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:43 PM
Big Bill, You deduced all that because Shtetl G is Jewish? Color me awed. I'm Christian. I agree with him/her. PLEASE call me a race traitor or something. I hear I get a free T-shirt for that. (Can I choose the color? I don't want it to clash with my skin.) Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 4, 2005 01:28 AM
A lot of French people are A-holes that hate Americans and all other English speakers, but remember that people of European descent must stick together in solidarity if we plan on defeating Islam. The rich Zionist, dual-National Israelis have promoted multiculturalism and open borders in our lands for several decades. Yet in Israel, non-jews are not permitted to stay for more than a few days, and can never live there or intermarry with a jew. Anyone see any hipocricy in that besides me? Let's get this rising tide of Jihadists out of our territories and throw the Neo-Con Zionists out with them! They can sort out their own problems without our 3 to 5 billion a year in US tax-payers money! Posted by: R. James Ryder on November 4, 2005 07:34 PM
A lot of French people are A-holes that hate Americans and all other English speakers, but remember that people of European descent must stick together in solidarity if we plan on defeating Islam. The rich Zionist, dual-National Israelis have promoted multiculturalism and open borders in our lands for several decades. Yet in Israel, non-jews are not permitted to stay for more than a few days, and can never live there or intermarry with a jew. Anyone see any hipocricy in that besides me? Let's get this rising tide of Jihadists out of our territories and throw the Neo-Con Zionists out with them! They can sort out their own problems without our 3 to 5 billion a year in US tax-payers money! Posted by: R James Ryder on November 4, 2005 07:35 PM
7 days and the French leftist/socialist/statist/liberal crowd hasn't surrendered? That's a record! To be fair, right now it's hard for them to locate someone in charge who can accept their surrender.
Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 4, 2005 10:52 PM
"I hate Internet Nazis." Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 4, 2005 10:55 PM
imigrants atack France this is banal Posted by: natasha on November 8, 2005 05:07 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Baylor Coach Dave Aranda Apologizes for 'Ableism' After Using the Word 'Midget'
Well, he is also disabled...he is a eunuch [CBD] I'm frankly surprised the title is 107 Days. I would have thought it would be:
Soft weak poop from the early 80s Mystery Click
I never liked this song, but it is memorable. In a weak, annoying way. The kid's in shock up and down the block The folks are home playing beat the clock Down at the golden cup They set the young ones up Under the neon light Selling day for night It's alright Nobody rides for free (nobody, nobody) Nobody gets it like they want it to be (nobody, nobody) Nobody hands you any guarantee (nobody, nobody) Nobody
Flashback: UCLA allows terror-supporting thugs to set up and maintain checkpoints to keep Jews out of campus buildings
More video of the anti-Jewish checkpoints A major university allowed this and defended this.
Earthquake off Russian coast sends tsunami waves towards Hawaii:
Nick Sortor Coastal evacuation ordered in Honolulu Warnings for the California coast as well. Impact expected at 12:15
Former CIA operative John Kiriakou talks with Matt Taibbi about the Brennan/Comey Coup
Both guys are old liberals, maybe even of the far-left variety, and both are appalled by the Democrat/Deep State coup against the US. Kiriakou says that CIA officers were legally obligated to report to the Inspector General John Brennan's repeated overruling of actual intelligence to encode his partisan conspiracy theories into US intel product, but of course they didn't.
Jonathan Turley nails it: The rise and fall of John Brennan [Hat Tip: dhmosquito] [CBD]
American Eagle Outfitters has a new ad with Sidney Sweeney, and you are going to like it. [CBD]
Seattle woman takes Navy's Blue Angels to court over social media censorship and 'acoustic torture' of cat
A literal cat lady! [CBD]
OG Blogger Jeff Dunetz passes at age 67
I thought I told everyone to stop dying.
Legendary wrestler and great American Hulk Hogan passes away. Love ya brother. [Weirddave]
![]()
Are your Hot Balls ruining your health? Maybe you need to put those sad droopers on ice.
Most studies about overheated testicles look at semen production and fertility, but it also seems likely that too-hot crotch-knockers result in lowered tesosterone, too.
Ryan Long makes fun of NYC lefties for bragging that they can "handle" living amidst garbage, rats, hobos and murder while p*ssies like you just take the easy way out and move to orderly, pleasant places
At Budokan Mystery Click
Now I had heard the WACs recruited old maids for the war But mommy's neither one of those I've known her all these years Maybe I'll stop linking obscurities and start linking more crowd pleasers. If you can stand the sight of Dan Rather, three members of the band talk about how they got famous in Japan before they ever even played in Japan. Hint: Manga. Recent Comments
Marcus T:
"“ Then he asked them, “If one of you h ..."
Warai-otoko: "See where I’m goin with that? Posted by: Co ..." 18-1 : "Its interesting that by the end of the Cold War th ..." LinusVanPelt : " Yeah but that’s my point. An APB and arrest ..." Jonah: "89. creating open House seats is never good. ..." Jonah: "USA would change for the good, if No Ivy Leaguer's ..." Victor Tango Kilo: "Re: Family Feud promoting degenerates. Can I just ..." Inogame: "Good morning, J.J. Good morning, Horde. ..." redridinghood: "Nancy Mace wants to be the governor of South Carol ..." Yudhishthira's Dice: "This is just lovely: https://tinyurl.com/wtptne ..." rhennigantx: "42.1 percent of white examinees passed the minimum ..." Grumpy and Recalcitrant[/b][/i][/s][/u]: "@53/Stateless: [i]Oh Happy Civic Holiday to the C ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|