| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Lahaina Noon Cafe
Quick Hits JD Vance, Pete Hegseth Blast Flakey Fetish Weirdo Tom "Pinecone" Massie In Last Push in Primary Election Cultural Enrichment Watch Unite the Kindom Rally Draws Tens of Thousands With Two Republicans Leading the California Gubernatorial Primary, Democrats Plot to Change the Rules Mid-Election So That a Democrat Will Be in the Runoff "Feeding Our Future" Looting Mastermind Aimee Bock: "I Struggle to See How" Ilhan "Omar" Wouldn't Have Known About the Pillaging of the American Taxpayer Arrogant Smug Liberal RINO Bill Cassidy Not Only Loses Primary, But Loses It to Two Different Candidates, Getting Shut Out of the Run-Off THE MORNING RANT: Supreme Court Rules that Freight Brokers Can Be Sued for Hiring Negligent Trucking Companies; Shady Foreign Carriers Hardest Hit? Mid-Morning Art Thread Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Nifty Website |
Main
| Shock: NYT Publishes Op-Ed From Conservative, Attacking Conservatives »
October 27, 2005
No Charges Against Rove, But Libby Likely To Be Indicted
Fitzgerald will ask for an extension to continue investigating Rove. Oh, for God's sake. He's been at this for more than a year. And he still has nothing on Rove? Then end the f'n' investigation. I can't wait to see the ticky-tack charges they got him on. Either some made-up fake charge of "conspiring to misuse classified information" (despite the fact that every specific provision of the laws wasn't broken) or a very thin perjury charge. posted by Ace at 11:00 PM
CommentsHow come the Press hasn't told me how much Fitzgerald's stupid investigation is costing? They always let me know how much Ken Starr's was costing on a minute by minute basis. Posted by: caspera on October 27, 2005 11:09 PM
Winter Discontent We wanted Karl Rove Posted by: Dave in Texas on October 27, 2005 11:28 PM
EVERY CLOUD HAS A SILVER LINING This will be so sweet Posted by: Michael on October 27, 2005 11:34 PM
This is farcical. There should NEVER be a 'special' prosecuter appointed in the future. They seem to feel the need to indict someone on some flimsy non-related issue. Every witness called should just plead a lousy memory to every thing that might be remotely considered problematic. Otherwise you stand the chance of indictment for a 'lousy memory' if all else fails. NEVER. And this was a NYT's article by the way. So the 'credibility' quotient must therefore be factored into the equation. On that basis maybe Libby will receive a special attaboy for co-operation beyond the call of duty. Posted by: dougf on October 27, 2005 11:37 PM
Weasel: I am not a man Posted by: michael on October 27, 2005 11:38 PM
The 'Special Prosecutor' law lapsed already, didn't it? I thought there was already a discussion about how Fitz would be the last one following this set of rules. Posted by: Al on October 27, 2005 11:43 PM
No, the Independent Prosecutor law lapsed, which involves a non-executive branch prosecutor, selected by and answering to a panel of judges. The Pres or AG can always appoint a special prosecutor. I'm not sure if any particular law is needed. In any event, that's not the law that lapsed. The pres or AG could fire Fitzgerald, if they wanted, as Nixon attempted. Posted by: ace on October 27, 2005 11:59 PM
Folks who live in McLean have always maintained that the claims on Plame has been verifiably unmaned. It seriously bothered me that D.C. journos would pretend that a not -serious- about -security woman, who flew a desk at Langley for the past ten years (while going in through the 123 entrance in a bleeding GOLD JAGUAR) was an undercover operative. She might, might have been an undeclared op. She had already been PNG'd. CIA leaks were abundant in the past administration, and it would not be illogical to assume that some came from Plame. Certainly her husband had no qualms about leaking. The point that Mr. Fitz is missing is that anyone in a Georgetown bar knows at least seven "undercover" CIA agents,and (most likely) the wives, or husbands, as well. Truth be told, anyone...repeat Anyone connected to an embassy is tagged as a possible. This is why infiltration and exfiltration (hard guys) operatives do not maintain (or usually get paid for) jobs in the NoVa area. When Joe Wilson started saying Bad Things about Bush, he was hailed as a whistleblowing hero. When it became apparent that he was a liar and a knave, he became a victim. Why he has not been indicted for his leaks is a bit of a mystery to me. So to cap it:Joe is a ugly lying bastard (although I have no support for saying that his parents were unmarried, if he can lie about documents he never saw to the press, I can lie about his parentage), Valerie got picked for a plum position at CIA based on Joe(check the time-line)but was not a model employee. Joe gets wicked fired. Re-hired by his wife for a fact finding mission in which he drinks sweet tea. Returns to the States, delivers his prejorative repot, contradicts said repot in an anonymous fashion. Then-bring down the Government. Joe, as a friend, just go and die. Posted by: pinky on October 28, 2005 12:06 AM
"Valerie got picked for a plum position at CIA based on Joe(check the time-line)but was not a model employee."
Posted by: chicago station on October 28, 2005 02:10 AM
Perhaps so, Michael. Perhaps so. But all we got at this moment is "likely to be..." Posted by: S. Weasel on October 28, 2005 04:56 AM
I would love to expand,hell, even expound on that. Can not. Probably should not have posted in the first place. Just so very angry that a little douche like Wilson can leak and lie, but if Scoot "mis-remembers" a conversation with a journo, who already knew Plame's status, is it grounds for a perjury charge? Sometimes I wish that we had an OSA, but mostly I am glad that we do not. I do have some Joes who say that Scooter is going to take one for the team, but this has been a remarkably silent prosecution. The charge I have yet to see is for Wilson himself. Get that little (self-professed) liar on the stand and see what comes out. Posted by: pinky on October 28, 2005 05:18 AM
Fitzgerald should produce excrement or get offa the f'n porcelain god. His 1st order of business should have been to determine if the "Flame" revelation was a crime. Since it was not - as Plame was no longer covert under the statutory definition - he should have folded his tent and gone home sparing Judith Miller her confinement and saving scads of time and money. If Fitzgerald is exemplary of the best prosecutors, the ordinary ones must be putrid. Posted by: jethro on October 28, 2005 07:24 AM
I can't wait to see the ticky-tack charges they got him on. I'm betting that Fitzgerald goes for "wearing white shoes after Labor Day." Everyone *knows* that's a crime. Posted by: Steve L. on October 28, 2005 08:31 AM
NO! I WANTED A REAL PONY FOR FITZMAS, NOT A MY PRETTY PONY! Posted by: Sue Dohnim on October 28, 2005 08:41 AM
Totally agree: Karl Rove has been under the cloud for two years and TODAY he was either going to be let go or under indictment. MORE investigation? That's a load. The federal judge should cut this off now. No extension. Posted by: Eric Lindholm on October 28, 2005 08:51 AM
I am getting tired of the media speculating and trying to double guess what Fitzgerald is going to do. Says more about their private wet-dreams that about the GJ is thinking. And yes, if a criime has been committed Fitz should know by now, if he hasn't uncovered one by now then the evidence is buried too deep for him to find. Posted by: rabidfox on October 28, 2005 09:10 AM
MERRY FITZMAS, EVERYONE! Hopefully Fitzie-Claus won't make us wait until after the markets close to announce the indictments (if any). Posted by: Monty on October 28, 2005 09:26 AM
The federal judge should cut this off now. No extension. Hasn't it already been extended once? Come ON, it's time to shut this down. Posted by: bbeck on October 28, 2005 09:33 AM
Pinky, enjoyed your screed. Where was Plame PNG'd? When? I thought Ames' internal damge assessment recalled her to the states in the mid-90's. DC/Va culture story: In the early 90's, I flew into National for a job interview and told the cab driver to take me to such in such hotel in VA. After driving for a bit he turned to me and said something like, "is this your first interview with the CIA?". In fact it was my second.
Posted by: Mayday on October 28, 2005 09:52 AM
OH, NO!!! THEY GOT SCOOTER!!! First Gannon, now Scooter. Can the conservative movement take more hits like this? Posted by: Slublog on October 28, 2005 09:58 AM
am I wrong for hoping this will, in fact, reopen the debate over the evidence for the war? Scooter's defense may prove a venue to discredit Wilson and support the Niger evidence, no? Posted by: on October 28, 2005 10:32 AM
First Gannon, now Scooter! WHEN WILL THIS PERSECUTION END?!? Scooter was the best of us, a man of ideals and gentility! I have rent my shirt and anointed my head with ashes; this Fitzmas shall be spent weeping and wailing at the injustice done to the poor innocent Scoot-man. This is a dark Fitzmas indeed. ...or not. Maybe I'll just ignore this like I did the rest of this stupid fucking melodrama. Libby have been indicted, but that's a pretty far cry from being convicted of anything (and I'm betting he'll never stand in front of a judge at all). And if Libby is even indictable, what about Miller and Novak? How is he guilty of anything and not them? This is totally fucked up. How can you commit a crime by talking about some other thing that was not a crime? Bah, and bah again. But at least My Dread Lord Rove has remained untouched for now. And good thing, too: that bastard hasn't mailed my my Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Cabal payment for this month yet, and I've got expenses. Posted by: Monty on October 28, 2005 10:35 AM
Ah, hell. Who are they kidding? Rove was never going to be indicted. All he had to do was wave his hand in front of Fitz's face and say "I'm not the administration official you're looking for." Posted by: Slublog on October 28, 2005 10:40 AM
FREE SCOOTER!
Posted by: Dave in Texas on October 28, 2005 10:48 AM
Slublog - so Rove is a VAMPIRE? That explains everything. And, definitely settles the question from the vampire thread as to whether they can be photographed. Posted by: carin on October 28, 2005 10:52 AM
The lack of an indictment against Rove is a mixed outcome for the administration. It keeps in place the president's top adviser, the architect of his political machine whose fingerprints can be found on virtually every policy that emerges from the White House. fingerprints.....crime......get it? The MSM is crafty! Posted by: The Warden on October 28, 2005 11:14 AM
Scooter who? Posted by: VRWC Agent on October 28, 2005 12:48 PM
MERRY FITZMAS, YOU OLD SAVINGS AND LOAN! I lose. Scooter goes down. Posted by: S. Weasel on October 28, 2005 12:51 PM
Oh, right. What I meant to say was, "OH MY GOD! THEY GOT SCOOTER! YOU BASTARDS!!" Damn typos. Posted by: VRWC Agent on October 28, 2005 12:55 PM
Indicted on 5 counts I hear Posted by: lauraw on October 28, 2005 01:06 PM
What exactly are the five counts? All I can find are general terms. Are any of the five anything to do with the original charge of outing Plame or disclosing classified info? Posted by: Master of None on October 28, 2005 01:08 PM
I grieve for you, Weasel: you will have to suck up to Bean-O now. And as much as I dislike that prick, you're really going to have to be sweet to him -- that'll be your take-home lesson for making rash wagers. Posted by: Monty on October 28, 2005 01:12 PM
Master-All five counts are laid out in the idictment, which is now up at thesmokinggun.com Posted by: See-Dubya on October 28, 2005 01:15 PM
Lamest scandal EVER. Posted by: UGAdawg on October 28, 2005 01:21 PM
Too true, Monty. 'Tis my own petard you see me sadly hoist upon. And yet, somehow, my Fitzmas disappointment is not great. Many who are the winners on this Fitzmas day may feel the loser more. Now, where's tubino? I owe him a big, wet one Posted by: S. Weasel on October 28, 2005 01:28 PM
1. Obstruction of Justice Nothing about outing Plame or disclosing secrets. It's all just about where Libby got the information about Plame working at CIA, and what he told reporters.
Posted by: Master of None on October 28, 2005 01:38 PM
4. Purgery 5. Purgery I didn't know you could get indicted for diarrhea. Poor guy. Oh well, at least he beat a perjury rap. Posted by: Michael on October 28, 2005 01:46 PM
4. Purgery Here are the real charges to be leveled against Libby. Expect Drudge to pick them up any moment now. 1. Conspiracy to poop EXECUTE HIM!! This kind of lawlessness cannot be tolerated! Posted by: Monty on October 28, 2005 02:07 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
After threatening that the "clock is ticking" for renewed strikes on Iran, Trump once again calls them off to give negotiating a chance.
I can't even cover this any more. It's embarrassing. It's like covering the endless negotiations over DHS funding. Trump is going to drag this out through the midterms and then lose them. Note to the president: At some point, allowing the Regime to remain in power without actually forcing them to give up nukes is just a back-door, unacknowledged renewal of the Obama policy. Well, I guess we just have to wait for their economy to collapse and their troops to desert.
Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust. Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?" Recent Comments
Yudhishthira's Dice:
"Whether or not that's Lena, I'd bet the Wicked Wit ..."
runner: "Apparently there was a shooting at a mosque in San ..." Mark1971: "LA County is in a world of hurt since Gage, DeSoto ..." SpeakingOf: "170 I do have a Popeyes close to me and would love ..." Stateless - He ain't heavy, he's my dog: "Plus no concept of time or date. Posted by: Ch ..." Harry Vandenburg : "With corn on the cob and a side of mashed potatoes ..." Common Tater: "Wally Schirra had balls that clanked. NASA nutr ..." Duncanthrax: "Pakistan's military in action: https://www.yout ..." 3 letter guy: "190 Maybe they got two dead guys in a car at San D ..." Diogenes: "I wonder if both of the shooters had been molested ..." Case: "@173. Gage got on my nerves. DeSoto was ok. ..." JQ: "[i]Attempts on Trump: staged Murder of C. Kirk: ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|