Destroying the Koran and smearing people with FAKE menstrual blood is now objectively evil? Come on Ace, you gotta be making this up, right?

No, it appears not.

Evil must be a broad term for young Mr. Sullivan. Perhaps 9/11 was gob-smackingly evil?

Dead corpses are covered by Geneva?

What all those fuckers we blew to pieces with B-52s?

Sully is right. Give up now and grab your burka. Let's stone all our gays in advance (starting with him).

He must burst into hot, angry tears every time he watches Saving Rrivate Ryan, when Pvt. Mellish taunts the German prisoners that they've been captured by "Juden."

I'm on CENTCOM's email distribution list, and they have officially condemned the actions taken, while also promising to conduct and investigation.

Sullivan-the-fucking-idiot, thinks this is endemic of policy from the top down, and this statement from CENTCOM should quell that.

Here is the CENTCOM release...

Remember in Fight Club when Brad Pitt and Ed Norton where in the bathroom talking about people they wanted to fight? I'd have this conversation:

Pitt: What "infamous/famous" figure would you fight?

Me: I'd fight Andrew Sullivan.

Pitt: Good Answer!

We don't stone our gays to death or make our women wear burkas. So we are offending Muslims everywhere. Shame on us!!!!!

Why is so easy for him for him to get upset with either things that we have condemned (plus, didn't the Koran story turn out to be false?) or torture techniques that work well on getting vital information that may save lives.

I heard on the radio a guy who writes about Islamic terrorism (chris flynn(?) ) and he said at a conference a woman stood up condemning torture on prisoners and he asked her if there had been an opportunity to get information out of one of the hi- jackers from 9-11 with torture and prevent 9-11, would she be for that? And she said..no. The whole room just groaned.

This is what we are dealing with. A mind so seeped in liberal thought that they can't see the good for the bad.

Pardon my French, but I've said it before about Sully, I'll say it again:

What a fucking pussy.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Just spent some time at Sully's place. Found this, and was disturbed by it. Just - ugh.

AMONG THE ASPENS: Arianna recalls hiking with Judy among the aspens of Colorado. The smack-down between these two sex-vixens is among the few redeeming features of the entire affair.

Saw some of the Easy Company fellers the other day pissing standing up and not using a pooper scooper after he did his other business.

Left infidel wee-wee and crap smack dab in the House of Islam (i.e., all of Iraq).

I blame Chimp McBushitler for not teaching these fellers to sit when they whiz and shovel when they shit, per the rules of engagement promulgated by Dag Hummerskold, in the Swedish "Convention on Military Urination and Defecation Whilst in Camel Land."

Just color me bitched, bothered, and gob-smacked in Baghdad.

Sully's cute when he tries to guess at what a heterosexual man might find arousing.

He's not really an expert on heterosexuality, truth be told. Remember, he thought it was plausible that female American soldiers forcibly vaginally raped dirty filthy stinking terrorist scum.

He really did. He figured that was kind of a normal heterosexual female reaction when interrogating a guy with beard so filthy that the ticks and lice called in FEMA for emergency evacuation.

Right before this, Sully links to a story about Muslim's beheading a Buddist, setting fire to a temple with two teenagers inside charring their bodies, and all this during the month of Ramadan. Fuck Fey Andy.

Sullivan is on a mission to singlehandedly demolish the stereotype of gays being unserious and histrionic. So far it's not off to a rollicking start.

As a gay neighbor of mine used to say: "'The Love that Dare Not Speak its Name' now won't shut the f*ck up!"

I don't know why Sullivan invokes the Geneva Convention when our enemies certainly have no intention of abiding by it. Liberals these days seem to want to restrict us to the Marquis of Queensbury rules while our enemies are trying to kick us in the groin.

These idiots don't realize that such behavior will only prolong the war.

How's Sullivan's stock doing in the marketplace of public opinion? I mean, is he still getting writing gigs and stuff, and from whom? I'm not all that plugged in, and I'd love to think he's suffering for his hystrionics.

His blog is still worth a bazillion dollars according to Business Opportunities.

I think their formula puts great store by reported bandwidth costs.

Sweetmeats, I think that shows that Sullivan is at least consistent (now, whatever changes in position he's gone through to get here). He's got plenty of outrage and heart-ache to go around.

We might question his priorities and sense of perspective, but he's hardly in the same category as those who either outright deny or try to minimize and "contextualize" the other side's atrocities.

He's in London's "Sunday Times" every week, and in The New Republic (he was their wunderkind editor back in the late 80s/early 90s) every few weeks.

The blog is probably his primary source of income.

Phew! I thought Knemon was calling me "sweetmeats." I mean, it's flattering and all...

Knemon,

How is he being consistent? What the G.I.'s did in no way equates with the Muslim barbarity. We cremated dead Taliban bodies. Big friggin deal. We didn't burn teenagers alive in a temple. We didn't behead a Buddhist monk. If he didn't want anyone, anywhere to ever be hurt then he would be consistent.

I'm still stuck on the WWII accepted practices for 'non-uniformed combatants'.

We didn't sign many of the subsequent 'Geneva Conventions', so... aren't we following the same set of rules?

That being: Field expedient judgement by an officer + shot dead?

There's a reason 'he was shot while escaping' are so prevalent as a cover - because shooting a _non_uniformed enemy met the relevant legal requirements to avoid flak.

What? We only burned two of these guys? That's it? And they were dead already?

And they called them names! Oh the human rights abuse, soldiers taunting the enemy. The big bad Americans hurt their widdle feewings. Well shit.

I want an investigation into why these soldiers were wasting time taunting these assholes instead of burning them! Do the corpse hump after you frag the guy.

The cremation and psyops didn't even occur at the same time. Once again, Sully has sullied himself over an event misreported by a biased, and yes (Oh surprise!), anti-war media. See here.

Of course, it's barely worth mentioning that we lost a soldier as well as an Afghan in the battle.

We need to be more sensitive after one of our guys gets killed, don't you think?

Yes, Andrew, we should respect all of the beliefs and ceremonies of Islam, just like you respect those of Catholicism.

Damn you, GlaxoSmithKline

I can't believe I used to think this shitbird was smart. Maybe if the guy who plays Will in Will & Grace did one of those public service ads telling poor Andy that wars are an oftentimes nasty little time, he'll stop screeching like my niece when she bangs her head against a table.