This is a preparatory NewsStrike™ for the upcoming midterm elections when leftist moonbats start shooting up and looting republican campaign headquarters in ernest.

They got away with a half dozen or so incidents in the last election. The media is preping for a full court press this time

Anyone think that if the looters had been the Nazis they would have been called "protesters"?

Who cares? They're fucking Nazis.

Yes, I know you were making a theoretical point, but I think choosing to be a Nazi is essentially choosing to have the equivalent of a "kick me" sign on your back forever. If you want to associate yourself with something that vile, you deserve whatever the hell you get. I'm normally against bias in the media, but if they want to be biased against Nazis then I couldn't care less.

"...and then they came for the Nazis, and I didn't speak up. In fact, I laughed my ass off."

If you want to associate yourself with something that vile, you deserve whatever the hell you get.

Before we have another, er, misunderstanding, as we did on the race issue, let me clarify that. I mean if people that are Nazis want to associate themselves with something that vile, Naziism, then they, the Nazis, deserver whatever the the hell they, the Nazis, get.

I do not think Ace or anything here is a Nazi.

And now, to lighten the mood, a joke:

Q: How do German children tie their shoes?

A. In little Nazis (knotsies).

Ha ha. OK, probably better as a spoken joke. OK, probably not that good at all really. Oh well.

Very nice, Craig. You had an argument with yourself and resolved it very nicely by yourself.

Sorry. Don't let me interrupt, please go on.

Who cares? They're fucking Nazis.

I don't think the point was to weep over the plight of Nazis, but rather point out how certain protected classes are not held accountable for their behavior by lefty journalists.

If someone in ohio had a gun there would be afew less looters and a few more for the morgue

Are you for real, spurwing?

Considering what they did to my relatives, I'm not a big fan of the Nazis or any delusional morons who wish to align themselves with that horrid ideology.

All the same, rioting was really damned stupid. Now the Nazi bastards can point their fingers and say, "See? We told you they're subhuman." The riot lent false credence to their idiotic racist blatherings. They got exactly what they wanted.

The better thing to do would have been to ignore the shitheads and go on about daily life. An occasional hand gesture wouldn't have been out of place, though, but deaf ears are the best antidote to assholes preaching hate.

Yoohoo! Irony alert! It's not useful to protest against Nazism by behaving like untermensch.

Holy proving their point for them.

Looters trash a traditionally Polish neighborhood to show their disdain for Nazis. Right.

"Keith White, a black resident, criticized city officials for allowing the march in the first place.

"They let them come here and expect this not to happen?" said White, 29. "

Yes, how stupid of the police for expecting people to control themselves. How can riots be excused, for any reason?

The nazi group as loathsome as they are, have constitutionaly protected right to march on public sidewalks and protest. The black gang members have the right to counter-protest, they do no have the right to burn down and loot their neighborhood. The nazi group was protesting against the black gangs that were harrasing and robbing the homes in white neighborhoods. The nazi group didn't even march, they were asked to cancel their march by the local authorities. The black gang memebers as well as others in the black community simply used this march as a pretext for lawlessness. Proving the nazi's point. Nice going black community of Toledo!

Why do we hamstring police into use wooden pellets for riots?

After a "Please Disperse" and a few cans of tear gas, they should break out the fully automatic weapons.

While the lefties want "A million Mogadishus" I want a million Kent States.

If we prevented Farrakhan from marching under this racist exemption to the 1st amendment these thugs thinks exist, would these same people support the ban, or would they riot against the man yet again?

Yet another reason to vote Republican at every local opportunity.
These areas where pockets of thuggery and crime are coddled and allowed to fester trend overwhelmingly Democrat, sorry but its true.

What Dem would dare suggest that someone spit out the pipe, get a fucking job and become a worthwhile member of society? The very idea that people have the power and responsibility to take care of themselves is anathema to the liberal mindset.

It feeds on victims and pretend-helplessness, not Joe Sixpack who muddles through, regardless of race or weather.

Clearly this episode is just another example of a golden opportunity for thugs to do what they dearly wish, not because they were particulary inflamed.

I mean, they were throwing rocks at AMBULANCES, for crying out loud.

Hopefully, once enough liberals get mugged, they will do what they always do, and vote for a law and order Republican.

Protestor A "forces" Onlooker B to riot. Onlooker B then trashes the property of Innocent Bystander C in retaliation. Makes perfect sense.

But I question the timing.