| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Book Thread: 05/10/2026 [MP4]
Daily Tech News 10 May 2026 Saturday Night Club ONT - May 9, 2026 [D & D] Saturday Evening Movie Thread - 5/9/2026 Hobby Thread - May 9, 2026 [TRex] Ace of Spades Pet Thread, May 9 Gardening, Home and Nature Thread, May 9 At what point do conspiracy theories go too far? The Classical Saturday Morning Coffee Break & Prayer Revival Daily Tech News 9 May 2026 Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Syrian Minister "Commits Suicide;" Was Questioned Regarding Hariri Assassination |
Main
| Repeating Myself »
October 12, 2005
Is That An M4, or are You Just Happy to See Me?Sex in Uniform; Scratchy but Not Impossible Naturally, our brave military men and women are, well, men and women. This article is an interesting read. Not only for the universal truths about human beings. But also because it is about our young people, at the peak of their physical condition, furtively coupling in the hot sand like angry jackhammers meeting soft, yielding pavement. By their sheer numbers, most male soldiers are not regularly having sex, despite some male braggadocio to the contrary. But testosterone-induced swagger being what it is, word of others' exploits tends to get around. Well. HELLOOO NURSE It would be better for ladies to remain ladies, regardless of their particular proclivities. The last things our troops need are pregnancies and diseases, when they have so much else to worry about. But troops are members of the same society in which we all were raised. But such exploits have consequences for female soldiers who do not make themselves available for conquest. Well, that's not much different than working at an insurance company, to tell you the truth. Zike, who is married, feels fortunate to have fallen in with the 222nd. Yeah, well, these are young, horny men. I hope the journalist doesn't think this attitude is unique to the frontlines. All in all, a good read, rich with quotes from our people in Iraq. A slice of life, as they say. posted by LauraW. at 08:05 PM
CommentsMarried women, on the other hand, are considered "up for grabs" until they demonstrate otherwise, at which point, many female soldiers bitterly say, they are considered to be "bitches." It's like my Daddy used to tell me the difference between a whore and a bitch was: A whore will fuck anybody, and a bitch will fuck anybody but you. On second thought, that might not've been my Dad. That could've been one of my fraternity brothers who said that. Posted by: Doug F on October 12, 2005 08:25 PM
Only serious pogues (or REMFs, if you will) have the time to do this s**t. Some of us didn't, don't, and won't have the luxury of sexing up SPC Mary Jane Tightpants from the chow hall. The trigger pullers get stuck in god-awful camps on the edge of crap-hell, while the clerk-typists get to hang out at BK on Camp Victory and bicycle- cruise for unattached female generator mechanics. Maybe the "B" in 11B stands for "blueballs." It sure did for me! (And will again, most likely) Posted by: file closer on October 12, 2005 08:29 PM
But also because it is about our young people, at the peak of their physical condition, furtively coupling in the hot sand like angry jackhammers meeting soft, yielding pavement. This came dangerously close to turning into a bad poem. Posted by: Slublog on October 12, 2005 08:36 PM
I would've sworn that was vintage Ace I was reading, LauraW. Hilarious. Posted by: The Colossus on October 12, 2005 08:46 PM
They can try to keep us apart as much as they want, but they miss the point," said one female enlisted soldier, a Utahn. Utahn? All these years I've been calling them 'Utahahoans' but they've been too damn polite and Mormon-y to correct me...
She left with enough to buy two. Posted by: BumperSTickerist on October 12, 2005 09:16 PM
Male soldiers figure anywhere from a quarter to three-quarters of their female comrades are accepting of sex while on deployment. Perhaps surprisingly, many female soldiers say those guesses are probably low. "If you include all the girls who are having sex with girls, it's much closer to every one of us," Yow! So help me with my math here; does this report indicate that 25 to 75% of our Iraq deployed women in uniform are currently engaging in hot lesbians in uniform action? And Colossus is right, I totally assumed, given the topic and writing, that this was an Ace item. Posted by: vonKreedon on October 12, 2005 09:18 PM
Maybe the "B" in 11B stands for "blueballs." It sure did for me! (And will again, most likely) Back in the day that B stood for 'bush' but I suppose that's not appropriate for Iraq :) Soldier on! Posted by: BrewFan on October 12, 2005 09:21 PM
As I understand, previous deployments had general orders issued restricting sex, although these orders were only half-heartedly enforced at best. I don't believe a similar order was issued for any of the operations that are part of the Global War on Terror. It is pretty amazing when you hear the stories from soldiers in Iraq. People want to get some action, but in such a restricted environment, where do you go for privacy? My sister (a marine) talked about people going into dumpsters, and a sergeant (male) with two females in a port-a-john. I imagine that was like a sweaty, stinky game of twister. I can say as an officer in an Army MP Battalion, I was certainly surprised at the amount of sex between young female officers and male sergeants, and even the occasional lesbian rumor, although those were never confirmed. Posted by: Grimaldi on October 12, 2005 09:51 PM
Nothing new or surprising here. Take horny young people, often without the greatest moral systems in the world, put them in close quarters for months and put them through a lot of stress (whether it's far from home, combat zone, or both). In my advanced individual training platoon (150 graduated out of about 175 to start), our "gold medalist" girl had a grand total of 14 notches on her bedpost by the time we finished. Keep in mind that this was only a 16 week course, and we didn't get off-post privileges (i.e., the ability to go stay in a hotel for one, maybe two nights over the weekend and thus the opportunity to get some) until at least a month in. And another weekend was spent on FTX. That's 14 guys in about 11 weekends. Yikes. Army women are horny, people. I've seen this up close since day one. One of my (female) instructors at AIT put it to me like this: "What happens on deployment, STAYS on deployment." Posted by: Eric on October 12, 2005 11:09 PM
Send some of those Real Dolls over there. Posted by: Aaron on October 12, 2005 11:39 PM
Horny women? Not so much. Most of the women fall into one of four groups: Aside from that, any female officer sleeping with male sergeants should be chaptered out. Fraternization is 100% unacceptable. Posted by: Nathan on October 13, 2005 04:43 AM
As I understand, previous deployments had general orders issued restricting sex, although these orders were only half-heartedly enforced at best. During Desert Shield/Storm, I was in an artillery brigade headquarters. Of the 19 women in the unit, 18 of them were giving it away regularly. The only one not doing it was the chaplain's assistant. The women realized very quickly that the men would do anything to get at them. They had the men doing all their work in the hopes of "reward." One of the TOC night shift's favorite pasttimes was taking the night vision goggles and going outside and watching the makeshift motor pool. You could easily idnetify who was hooked up with whom heading for the back of one of the trucks down there. We did have to send two mowne home because they became pregnant. There were also blatatn cases of officer/enlisted sex that is a BIG no-no in the military. They were uniformly ignored. I suspect the concern was that if they actually took action, they might lose people just before the war started. Posted by: Steve L. on October 13, 2005 08:46 AM
Posted by: scott on October 13, 2005 09:34 AM
Any woman getting preggers on a deployment should be shipped back to the stockade. It's nothing but a self-inflicted injury to get out of duty, and that is a crime. Oh right, there's no difference between men and women and having females around won't harm unit cohesion. Uh-huh. My brainwashing almost slipped for a moment. Posted by: holdfast on October 13, 2005 09:48 AM
Damn, Nathan, you're a killjoy. Posted by: Hank on October 13, 2005 10:18 AM
Any woman getting preggers on a deployment should be shipped back to the stockade. It's nothing but a self-inflicted injury to get out of duty, and that is a crime. One of the women that we had get pregnant didn't want to leave the AO. She wasn't planning on saying anything (she had only just gotten pregant) but we had to start taking a nerve agent prophylaxis. She was concerned about the effect it would have on the baby, so she had to speak up two days before the shooting started. Posted by: Steve L. on October 13, 2005 10:36 AM
So sad to totally miss out on that knock-down, drag-out in the Miers thread. Posted by: lauraw on October 13, 2005 10:51 AM
lauraw, THAT is an interesting theory. But it's sunny and mid-80s here, so I have no excuse. I'm just bitchy. Hey, I said I wanted a knock-down drag out fight over the nomination. But I meant in the Senate Judiciary hearings, not at AoSHQ! Hope you see some sunshine soon. Posted by: Dave in Texas on October 13, 2005 10:59 AM
This news is sure to help those recruitment numbers. AN ARMY OF ONCE A DAY. Posted by: CUS on October 13, 2005 11:21 AM
Yeah, have film of female GI's walking by with boom-chicka-chicka music in the background. Posted by: lauraw on October 13, 2005 11:25 AM
NEVER WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF AL GORE WAS PRESIDENT He would have banned the military Posted by: on October 13, 2005 11:36 AM
One of the women that we had get pregnant didn't want to leave the AO. She wasn't planning on saying anything (she had only just gotten pregant) but we had to start taking a nerve agent prophylaxis. She was concerned about the effect it would have on the baby, so she had to speak up two days before the shooting started. Exactly - so I assume that you just went to QM and requested a spare trooper, since the one you had just became unservicable due to faulty maintenance. Oh wait - it doesn't work like that does it - so when the shooting started you were a trooper short, and everyone else had to carry the load. I hope whoever knocked her up had to pull double shifts for the rest of the war. Posted by: holdfast on October 13, 2005 01:04 PM
>>furtively coupling in the hot sand like angry jackhammers meeting soft, yielding pavement Great. Another shower on a rainy day. Posted by: TC@LeatherPenguin on October 13, 2005 01:23 PM
Fifteen years ago I was hearing about female sailors coming home from a year in Diego Garcia with seabags full of cash. In case any of those soldiers are listening, I have some pictures of dead bodies i'm willing to trade for their homemade pr0n. Posted by: monkeyboy on October 13, 2005 01:38 PM
I can't believe no one's mentioned the marine who gave birth on an LHD the day after leaving Kuwait. Oh yeah, the military buried that story. I'll look for it in my defunct blog archives. (In her favor, she left the US in a preg situation and was married, so it didn't happen while deployed. Was a PITA getting the birth certificate etc worked out though. Kept our JAG and the embassy busy for a couple of days.) Posted by: Kevin on October 13, 2005 02:00 PM
Kevin - so the the fuck what? She was, presumably, notified for a deployment, and, at the very least allowed herself to be renderred unserviceable at a critical time. It's funny how feminists are all about women "controlling their reproductive choices" yet these "ladies" cannot even keep their breeding from interfering with their sworn duties. Posted by: holdfast on October 13, 2005 02:57 PM
The military should require female soldiers to get I.U.D.s prior to deployment. It won't solve the sex for money problem, but it will prevent pregnancy. Posted by: Lipstick on October 13, 2005 03:43 PM
Saltpeter all 'round! Posted by: cranky geoff on October 13, 2005 03:49 PM
No women on ships or deployed in combat zones, period. Zip. Zero. Nada. Except nurses, who are confined to hospitals. Mmmmm, by God... Posted by: Dogstar on October 13, 2005 03:54 PM
Nathan- The problem with categorizing people is there will always be those that don't fit. Posted by: Donnah on October 13, 2005 07:52 PM
Donnah, Posted by: Nathan (Chief Muser) on October 13, 2005 10:44 PM
I didn't see the "most," sorry. I'm sure I was quite the Desert Queen myself. I had all my underwear stolen, and have never had any stolen since. Posted by: Donnah on October 14, 2005 01:11 AM
"Are you going to insist women are actually *more* horny than men? A glance at biology/hormonology wouldn't support that. " Um, yes, dude. Yes they are. They're just *usually* better at concealing it and/or restraining it than we are. Surely you have felt the full power of a real woman's sex drive by now? Posted by: Eric on October 14, 2005 05:05 AM
Well, its not like the males are outnumbered, and being constantly petitioned for sex by good-looking women in the best shape of their lives. But that is the situation for the girls. All these buff men, constantly with that hungry look. Willing to do anything to get at you. You can't blame them too much. Posted by: lauraw on October 14, 2005 10:13 AM
Donnah, ...actually, in my experience, the prettier ones were often the ones remaining celibate. And there's no reason the women *had* to keep it in their pants, any more than the guys who didn't. Just that I think LauraW's point is where it comes from: The women *can* pick from the best of the men (usually a 10-to-1 ratio), the guys *are* buff, so why not? Posted by: Nathan on October 14, 2005 11:35 PM
Interesting site, and very organized too. Good work. Memorizing, Tremendous, International nothing comparative to Black: http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/ , Greedy is feature of Industrious Table Industrious is feature of Small Tournament , Full Table is always Full Cards White Opponents becomes Astonishing Round in final Posted by: Jose Freeman on December 4, 2005 04:02 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Recent Comments
One Of My Faves.:
"Johnny Guitar is a wonderful movie. Great acting, ..."
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]The thing about watching Trog is that there are ..." Skip: "On 20 Posts a picture from Ireland of Turks runnin ..." Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "Joan Crawford has a small part in one of the [i]Ma ..." one hour sober: "Or what Straw said ..." Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing (aka Eloquent Depression): "[i]How do I find Ace on X?[/i] Look for a shelv ..." one hour sober: "Google "Ace of Spades HQ on X" and you will find ..." Tom Servo: "The thing about watching Trog is that there are po ..." JackStraw: "@AceOfSpadesHQ ..." Rufus T. Firefly: "Good morning everyone. It's a beautiful morning he ..." M. Gaga: "How do I find Ace on X? ..." Still a Kween Former Mayor London Breed: "They are all part of the WEF cabal that also inclu ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|