Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Pravda Health Alert | Main | Most Impressive! »
October 11, 2005

UNICEF Bombs the Smurfs

Well, hell, who hasn't wanted to do that?

It fulfills one of my childhood fantasies.

The makers knew exactly what they are doing, having wisely chosen their emotional blackmail with care:

The advertising agency behind the campaign, Publicis, decided the best way to convey the impact of war on children was to tap into the earliest, happiest memories of Belgian television viewers. They chose the Smurfs, who first appeared in a Belgian comic in 1958.

However, I wonder how far they would have gone if they had been allowed:

"We wanted something that was real war - Smurfs losing arms, or a Smurf losing a head -but they said no."

Saving Private Smurf? Band of Smurfs? Yikes.

I'm actually surprised that they didn't blame the United States for killing the Smurfs.

Loose Shit Update:

Apparently this lone blogger called Ace covered this already. Hmm. I did not know that.

Well, at least it was only a few days old.

I'll have to dock myself a day's blogger pay for napping on the job.

(Anyone who gets the reference has very good taste.)


posted by Harry Callahan at 11:08 PM
Comments



I'm actually surprised that they didn't blame the United States for killing the Smurfs.

Give 'em time, Harry.

And hey, before you know it, we'll be seeing a whole new campaign on how the depleted uranium used in the attack on the Smurf village is giving baby Smurfs cancer years and years later.

Posted by: Sean M. on October 11, 2005 11:17 PM

Ace posted this days ago!

Posted by: Sortelli From Garfield Ridge on October 11, 2005 11:22 PM

Umm, Harry? Do you read Ace of Spades HQ? Because Ace already covered the UN Smurf bombing.

here

Posted by: digitalbrownshirt on October 11, 2005 11:24 PM

Yeah Harry, and Ace, ahem, linked to my site in his post.

I love ya man,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on October 11, 2005 11:59 PM

Sure ace covered this days ago, but Harry's description made me actually check out the link

Posted by: Howard Devore on October 12, 2005 12:01 AM

Remember that movie "Sybil", where the girl's personalities didn't know what each other were up to?


Same thing.

Posted by: harrison on October 12, 2005 12:06 AM

The way your lollygaggin around, you'd think it was a-hunnert and twenty degrees.
Can't be more'n hunnert'n-fourteen.

Posted by: right on October 12, 2005 01:41 AM

Sorry for the obvious mistake with the "your".

Should have been "yer".

Posted by: right on October 12, 2005 01:45 AM

Wire main office. Tell them I said "Ow!" Got it.

Posted by: Chris on October 12, 2005 06:52 AM

I hope they go after Barney next.

Posted by: dough on October 12, 2005 10:19 AM

Are whos down in WHOSVILLE next? is SRAWBERRY SHORTCAKE on the list? they are probibly planing to nuke the hundred acre woods

Posted by: spurwing plover on October 12, 2005 10:20 AM

"Whew, we almost lost ourselves a $400 hand-cart."

Posted by: Gary on October 12, 2005 11:09 AM

Excuse me while I whip this out!

Posted by: Harry Callahan on October 12, 2005 11:51 AM

It's twue! It's twue!

Posted by: doc on October 12, 2005 06:59 PM

Somebody's gonna have to go back and get a s**tload o' dimes!

Posted by: jeff on October 12, 2005 07:54 PM

More of the antwar movments going into crazy mode next thing you know they will want POKEMON delared endangered species

Posted by: spurwing plover on October 15, 2005 09:08 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Scuba_Dude: "SWA, nice story and nice shooting!!!! Keep it up! ..."

Marcus T: ">> Posted by: mindful webworker - missing my mom e ..."

TRex - non-dork dino: "Good evening Horde. Thanks Weasel! ..."

Tuna: "Multifunctional Vegetable Peeler https://youtu.be ..."

Caf: "Howdy all! ..."

Ray's Cyst: "I fired all of my guns at once, but , space didn't ..."

Scuba_Dude: "Back in a minute!! ..."

mindful webworker - more kitchen utinsils. Yaay.: "Multifunctional Vegetable Peeler https://youtu.be ..."

Nova Local: "Poke bowls were great, with enough leftover for my ..."

buddhaha: "As for vodka, yesterday I mentioned Blue Ice, a po ..."

Weasel: "149th! ..."

Stateless - He ain't heavy, he's my dog: "I was always a beer person but if I was having vod ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives